Abstract
A review of the literature shows that the model for the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) has received only limited validation in educational contexts. This limitation led to this study to determine the applicability of the UTAUT model with an educational perspective and to statistically explain the factors affecting student teachers’ intentions to use interactive whiteboards. The research project comprised a cohort of 159 student teachers who undertook a questionnaire designed to measure their responses to performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating condition and behavioural intention. Structural equation modelling was used as the main technique for data analysis. According to the result of the goodness-of-fit test, the findings led to the conclusion that the model was endorsed by the data. Overall, the model accounted for 59.6 % of the variance in intention of student teachers to use interactive whiteboards in their teaching. The findings also demonstrated the important distinction of performance expectancy, effort expectancy and user’s experiences in interactive whiteboard adoption amongst student teachers. The theoretical and practical implications of the model are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behaviour. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). New York: Springer.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Betcher, C., & Lee, M. (2009). Interactive whiteboard revolution: teaching with IWBs. Camberwell, VIC: ACER Press.
Campbell, C. (2010). Using interactive whiteboards in pre-service teacher education: Examples from two Australian universities. Australia Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 447–463.
Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., Hu, P. J., & Tam, K. Y. (2010). Modeling citizen satisfaction with mandatory adoption of an e-government technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(10), 519–549.
Cheng, B., Wang, M., Stephen, J. H. Y., Kinshuk, & Peng, J. (2011). Acceptance of competency-based workplace e-learning systems: Effects of individual and peer learning support. Computer & Education, 57(1), 1317–1333.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 318–339.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Garland, R. (1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it Desirable? Marketing Bulleting, 2, 66–70.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person-Hall International.
Harlow, A., Cowie, B., & Heazlewood, M. (2010). Keeping in touch with learning: The use of an interactive whiteboard in the junior school. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 2(19), 237–243.
Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning, Media and Technology, 3(32), 283–301.
Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 3(32), 213–235.
Im, I., Kim, Y., & Han, H.-J. (2008). The effects of perceived risk and technology type on users’ acceptance of technology. Information & Management, 45(1), 1–9.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Loo, W. H., Paul, Y. H. P., & Chong, S. C. (2009). User acceptance of Malaysian government multipurpose smartcard applications. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 358–367.
Marchewka, K., Liu, C., & Kostiwa, K. (2007). An application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions using course management software. Communications of the IIMA, 7(2), 93–104.
Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? Effects of testing time and scale properties. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(6), 506–509.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, R. H. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82.
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222.
Murica, K., & Sheffield, R. (2010). Talking about science in interactive whiteboard classrooms. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 417–431.
Rhodes, S. R. (1983). Age-related differences in work attitudes and behavior: A review and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 93(2), 328–367.
Runyon, P., & Harber, A. (1991). Fundamentals of behavioral statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schaik, P. (2009). Unified theory of acceptance and use for websites used by students in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(2), 229–257.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 561–570.
Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008.
Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2011). An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modelling approach. Computer & Technology, 57(2), 1645–1653.
Teo, T., & van Schaik, P. (2009). Understanding technology acceptance in pre-service teachers: A structural-equation modelling approach. The Asia-Pacific Education Research, 18(1), 47–66.
Teo, T., Wong, S. L., & Chai, C. S. (2008). A cross-cultural examination of the intention to use technology between Singaporean and Malaysia pre-service teachers: An application of the TAM. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 265–280.
Terzis, V., & Economides, A. A. (2011). The acceptance and use of computer based assessment. Computer & Education, 56(4), 1032–1044.
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 124–143.
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1994). Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(1), 167–187.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating perceived behavioural control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model. Information System Research, 11(4), 342–365.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Venkatesh, V., & Zhang, X. (2010). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: U.S. vs. China. Journal of Global information Technology Management, 13(1), 5–24.
Vincent, J. (2007). The interactive whiteboard in an early years classroom: A case study in the impact of a new technology on pedagogy. Australian Educational Computing, 22(1), 20–25.
Wang, Y., & Shih, Y. (2009). Why do people use information kiosks? A validation of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 158–165.
Worcester, R. M., & Burns, T. R. (1975). A statistical examination of the relative precision of verbal scales. Journal of Market Research Society, 17(3), 181–197.
Yang, K. (2010). Determinants of US consumer mobile shopping services adoption: Implications for designing mobile shopping services. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(3), 262–270.
Zhou, T., Lu, Y., & Wang, B. (2010). Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 760–767.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 8.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wong, KT., Teo, T. & Russo, S. Interactive Whiteboard Acceptance: Applicability of the UTAUT Model to Student Teachers. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 22, 1–10 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0001-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0001-9