Abstract
Livestock production in the tropics contributes significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions, so better understanding the role of silvopastoral systems (SPS) in mitigating such emissions is necessary. The aim of this study was to evaluate the amounts of carbon stored in the biomass and soil organic carbon (SOC) components of a Leucaena leucocephala cum Panicum maximum silvopasture system (SPS) compared to a deciduous tropical forest (DTF), and a grass monoculture (GM) in Michoacán, Mexico. The above- and below-ground biomass were measured by destructive sampling in the SPS and GM, while previously reported allometric equations were used to quantify biomass stocks in the DTF. The SOC concentration up to 30 cm was determined by dry combustion method. The SPS and DTF contained more aboveground biomass (41.8 ± 3.30 and 36.7 ± 5.72 Mg DM ha−1) compared to GM (8.0 ± 0.76 Mg DM ha−1). However, the SPS exhibited greater belowground biomass (16.4 ± 1.95 Mg DM ha−1) than the other systems. The DTF had the highest SOC fraction in all depth classes with values ranging from 3.1 ± 0.07% to 3.7 ± 0.06%, respectively, compared to the other systems. The total carbon stocks in SPS was similar to DTF (120.7 ± 10.97 vs. 120.9 ± 6.38 Mg C ha−1) but was significantly higher than GM (78.2 ± 8.41 Mg C ha−1). In dry tropical conditions, SPS displays enormous potential for increasing biomass and soil carbon stocks compared to the GM and can thus be used as a greenhouse gas mitigation strategy in livestock production systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amézquita MC, Murgueitio E, Ibrahim M, Ramírez B (2010) Carbon sequestration in pasture and silvopastoral systems compared with native forests in ecosystems of tropical America. Grassland carbon sequestration: management, policy and economics. In: Abberton M, Conant R, Batello C (eds) Proceedings of the workshop on the role of grassland carbon sequestration in the mitigation of climate change, Roma, pp 153–155. http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1880e/i1880e06.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2014
Andrade HJ, Brook R, Ibrahim M (2008) Growth, production and carbon sequestration of silvopastoral systems with native timber species in the dry lowlands of Costa Rica. Plant Soil 308:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9600-x
Aryal DR, De Jong BHJ, Ochoa-Gaona S, Esparza-Olguin L, Mendoza-Vega J (2014) Carbon stocks and changes in tropical secondary forests of southern Mexico. Agr Ecosyst Environ 195:220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.06.005
Aryal DR, De Jong BHJ, Ochoa-Gaona S, Mendoza-Vega J, Esparza-Olguin L (2015) Successional and seasonal variation of litterfall and associated nutrient transfer in semi-evergreen tropical secondary forests of SE Mexico. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 103(1):45–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9719-0
Bacab PHM, Solorio SFJ (2011) Forage offer and intake and milk production in dual purpose cattle managed under silvopastoral systems in Tepalcatepec, Michoacan. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst 13(3):271–278. www.revista.ccba.uady.mx/ojs/index.php/TSA/article/view/1367
Bambrick AD, Whalen JK, Bradley RL, Cogliastro A, Gordon AM, Olivier A, Thevathasan NV (2010) Spatial heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in tree-based intercropping systems in Quebec and Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 79:343–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9305-z
Broom DM, Galindo FA, Murgueitio E (2013) Sustainable, efficient livestock production with high biodiversity and good welfare for animals. Proc R Soc B 280:2013–2025. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2025
Brown S (2002) Measuring carbon in forests: current status and future challenges. Environ Pollut 116:363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00212-3
Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, Baumgarder GA (1997) Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests. Oecologia 111:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050201
Carter MR (2002) Soil quality for sustainable land management: organic matter and aggregation interactions that maintain soil functions. Agron J 94:38–47. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.3800
Casals P, Romero J, Rusch GM, Ibrahim M (2014) Soil organic C and nutrient contents under trees with different functional characteristics in seasonally dry tropical silvopastures. Plant Soil 374:643–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1884-9
Casanova-Lugo F, Caamal-Maldonado J, Petit-Aldana J, Solorio-Sánchez F, Castillo-Caamal J (2010) Carbon storage in biomass of Leucaena leucocephala and Guazuma ulmifolia both in intercropping and monoculture systems. Revista Forestal Venezolana 54(1):45–50. http://www.saber.ula.ve/bitstream/123456789/31644/1/articulo4.pdf
Casanova-Lugo F, Petit-Aldana J, Solorio-Sánchez F, Parsons D, Ramírez-Avilés L (2014) Forage yield and quality of Leucaena leucocephala and Guazuma ulmifolia in mixed and pure fodder banks systems in Yucatan, Mexico. Agrofor Syst 88:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9652-7
Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, Fölster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure JP, Nelson BW, Ogawa H, Puig H, Riéra B, Yamakura T (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x
Coulibaly JY, Chiputwa B, Nakelse T, Kundhlande G (2017) Adoption of agroforestry and the impact on household food security among farmers in Malawi. Agric Syst 155:52–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.03.017
Cubillos AM, Vallejo VE, Arbeli Z, Terán W, Dick RP, Molina CH, Molina E, Roldan F (2016) Effect of the conversion of conventional pasture to intensive silvopastoral systems on edaphic bacterial and ammonia oxidizer communities in Colombia. Eur J Soil Biol 72:42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2015.12.003
Djomo AN, Knohl A, Gravenhorst G (2011) Estimations of total ecosystem carbon pools distribution and carbon biomass current annual increment of a moist tropical forest. For Ecol Manag 261:1448–1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.01.031
Elevitch CR (2006) Traditional trees of Pacific Islands: their culture, environment, and use. Permanent agriculture resources (PAR), Holualoa, United States of America. http://agroforestry.org/projects/traditional-tree-initiative. Accessed 24 June 2014
Feliciano D, Slee B, Hunter C, Smith P (2013) Estimating the contribution of rural land uses to greenhouse gas emissions: a case study of North East Scotland. Environ Sci Policy 25:36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.007
Feliciano D, Ledoa A, Hillier J, Nayaka DR (2018) Which agroforestry options give the greatest soil and above ground carbon benefits in different world regions? Agr Ecosyst Environ 254:117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.11.032
Haile SG, Nair VD, Nair PKR (2010) Contribution of trees to carbon storage in soils of silvopastoral systems in Florida, USA. Glob Change Biol 16:427–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01981.x
Harvey CA, Chacon M, Donatti CI, Garen E, Hannah L, Andrade A, Bede L, Brown D, Calle A, Chara J, Clement C, Gray E, Hoang MH, Minang P, Rodriguez AM, Seeberg-Elverfeldt C, Semroc B, Shames S, Smukler S, Somarriba E, Torquebiau E, van Etten J, Wollenberg E (2014) Climate-smart landscapes: opportunities and challenges for integrating adaptation and mitigation in tropical agriculture. Conserv Lett 7:77–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12066
Hoosbeek MR, Remme RP, Rusch GM (2016) Trees enhance soil carbon sequestration and nutrient cycling in a silvopastoral system in south-western Nicaragua. Agroforest Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-0049-2
Ibrahim M, Chacón M, Cuartas C, Naranjo J, Ponce G, Vega P, Casasola F, Rojas J (2007) Carbon storage in soil and tree biomass in different land use systems in cattle-dominated landscapes in Colombia, Costa Rica and Nicaragua. Agroforestería en las Américas 45:27–36. http://www.cipav.org.co/pdf/red%20de%20agroforesteria/Articulos/almacenamiento%20de%20carbono%20en%20el%20suelo%20y%20la%20biomasa%20arborea.pdf
INEGI (2005) Conjunto de datos vectoriales de la carta de uso del suelo y vegetación: escala 1:250,000. Serie III (continuo nacional). Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, Michoacán. http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/recnat/usosuelo/Default.aspx. Accessed 10 May 2014
IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC WG1 AR4 Final Report. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4_wg1_full_report.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2015
IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107415324. Accessed 19 Apr 2014
Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7
Jose S (2012) Agroforestry for conserving and enhancing biodiversity. Agrofor Syst 85(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9517-5
Leblanc HA, McGraw RL, Nygren P (2007) Dinitrogen-fixation by three neotropical agroforestry tree species under semi-controlled field conditions. Plant Soil 291(1–2):199–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9186-0
Lorenz K, Lal R (2014) Soil organic carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 34:443-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0212-y
Luedeling E, Kindt R, Huth NI, Koenig K (2014) Agroforestry systems in a changing climate—challenges in projecting future performance. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.013
Manning AD, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2006) Scattered trees are keystone structures—implications for conservation. Biol Cons 132:311–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.023
Matamala R, González-Meler MA, Jastrow JD, Norby RJ, Schlesinger WH (2003) Impacts of fine root turnover on forest NPP and soil C sequestration potential. Science 302:1385–1387. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089543
Matos ES, Freese D, Mendonca ES, Slazak A, Reinhard FH (2012) Carbon, nitrogen and organic C fractions in topsoil affected by conversion from silvopastoral to different land use systems. Agrofor Syst 81:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9314-y
Mattsson E, Ostwald M, Nissanka SP, Pushpakumara DKNG (2015) Quantification of carbon stock and tree diversity of homegardens in a dry zone area of Moneragala district, Sri Lanka. Agrofor Syst 3:435–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9780-8
Mbow C, Smith P, Skole D, Duguma L, Bustamante M (2014) Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.09.002
McGroddy ME, Lerner AM, Burbano DV, Schneider LC, Rudel TK (2015) Carbon stocks in silvopastoral systems: a study from four communities in southeastern Ecuador. Biotropica 47(4):407–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12225
Miranda T, Machado R, Machado H, Brunet J, Duquesne P (2008) Economic valuation of environmental goods and services in two ecosystems of cattle use. Zootec Trop 26(3):187–189. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/64190
Montagnini F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 61–62(1–3):281–295. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:agfo.0000029005.92691.79
Mun HT, Whitford WG (1997) Changes in mass and chemistry of plant roots during long-term decomposition on a Chihuahuan Desert watershed. Biol Fertil Soils 26(1):16–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050336
Munroe JW, Isaac ME (2014) N2-fixing trees and the transfer of fixed-N for sustainable agroforestry: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34(2):417–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0190-5
Nair PKR (2012) Carbon sequestration studies in agroforestry systems: a realitycheck. Agrofor Syst 86:243–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9434-z
Nakakaawa C, Aune J, Vedeld P (2009) Changes in carbon stocks and tree diversity in agro-ecosystems in south western Uganda: What role for carbon sequestration payments? New Forest 40(1):19–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-009-9180-5
Partey ST (2011) Effect of pruning frequency and pruning height on the biomass production of Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl) A. Gray. Agrofor Syst 83(2):181–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9367-y
Reyes G, Brown S, Chapman J, Lugo AE (1992) Wood densities of tropical tree species. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Southern Forest Experimental Station, NewOrleans, Louisiana. General Technical Report SO-88. https://doi.org/10.2737/so-gtr-88
SAS Institute Inc (2004) SAS/STAT ® 9.1 User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
Schmitt-Harsh M, Evans TP, Castellanos E, Randolph JC (2012) Carbon stocks in coffee agroforests and mixed dry tropical forests in the western highlands of Guatemala. Agrofor Syst 86(2):141–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9549-x
Soto-Pinto L, Anzueto M, Mendoza J, Jimenez-Ferrer G, De Jong B (2010) Carbon sequestration through agroforestry in indigenous communities of Chiapas, Mexico. Agrofor Syst 78:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9247-5
Tapia-Coral SC, Luiza FJ, Wandelli E, Fernandes ECM (2005) Carbon and nutrient stocks in the litter layer of agroforestry systems in central Amazonia, Brazil. Agrofor Syst 65:33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-004-5152-0
Trumbmore SE, Davidson EA, Barbosa de Camargo P, Nepstad DD, Martinelli LA (1995) Belowground ciclin of carbon in forest and pastures of eastern Amazonia. Global Biogeochem Cycles 9:515–528. https://doi.org/10.1029/95gb02148
Villanueva-López G, Martínez-Zurimendi P, Ramírez-Avilés L, Casanova-Lugo F, Jarquín-Sánchez A (2014) Influence of livestock systems with live fences of Gliricidia sepium on several soil properties in Tabasco, Mexico. Cien Inv Agr 2:175–186. http://www.scielo.cl/pdf/ciagr/v41n2/art04.pdf
Villanueva-López G, Martínez-Zurimendi P, Casanova-Lugo F, Ramírez-Avilés L, Montañez-Escalante PI (2015) Carbon storage in livestock systems with and without live fences of Gliricidia sepium in the humid tropics of Mexico. Agrofor Syst 6:1083–1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9836-4
Villanueva-López G, Casanova-Lugo F, Martínez-Zurimendi P, Parsons D, Aguilar-Solis L (2016) Effect of live fences of Gliricidia sepium on CO2 fluxes in tropical livestock systems. Soil Use Manag 32:553–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12311
Waldron A, Garrity D, Malhi Y, Girardin C, Miller DC, Seddon N (2017) Agroforestry can enhance food security while meeting other sustainable development goals. Trop Conserv Sci 10:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082917720667
WRB (2007) The world reference base for soil resources. First update 2007. Reports on Global Soil Resources No. 103. FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/nr/images/resources/pdf_documents/wrb2007_red.pdf. Accessed 27 Sept 2014
Xu X, Liu W, Zhang C, Kiely G (2011) Estimation of soil organic carbon stock and its spatial distribution in the Republic of Ireland. Soil Use Manag 27(2):156–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00342.x
Acknowledgements
We thank the Fundación Produce Michoacán A.C. for financially supporting this project, and we are also grateful to the National Council of Science and Technology for the support provided under infrastructure Project Number 270666. We thank Juan Carlos Gómez and Sergio Piñón, who contributed their experience and support, thereby facilitating the field work, and comments and suggestions from Fabien Charbonnier significantly improved the study. We acknowledge the comments from two anonymous reviewers on an earlier version of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
López-Santiago, J.G., Casanova-Lugo, F., Villanueva-López, G. et al. Carbon storage in a silvopastoral system compared to that in a deciduous dry forest in Michoacán, Mexico. Agroforest Syst 93, 199–211 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0259-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0259-x