Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in tree-based intercropping systems in Quebec and Ontario, Canada

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land use affects the carbon sequestration potential of soils across landscapes. Tree-based intercropping (TBI) systems where annual crops are grown between established tree rows are expected to exhibit spatial heterogeneity in the soil organic carbon (SOC) content due to differences in carbon input and decomposition rates of litter from trees and herbaceous plants. This study aimed to quantify variability in the SOC of TBI systems, compare the SOC content of TBI and nearby conventional agroecosystems, and determine if SOC was related to soil fertility. The TBI research sites were established 4 years (St. Paulin and St. Edouard, Quebec, Canada), 8 years (St. Remi, Quebec, Canada) and 21 years (Guelph, Ontario, Canada) before soil samples were collected for this study. The SOC content was greater within 0.75 m of the tree row than in the intercropped space at the St. Edouard and St. Remi sites. At the Guelph site, the SOC was spatially heterogeneous in plots with Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) but not hybrid poplar (Populus deltoides × P. nigra clone DN-177), probably due to litterfall distribution. Formerly a tree plantation, the TBI system at St. Remi contained 77% more SOC than a nearby conventional agroecosystem, while there was 12% more SOC in the TBI system than the conventional agroecosystem at Guelph. There was no difference in the SOC content of 4-year old TBI sites and nearby conventional agroecosystems. However, an increase in SOC at all TBI sites was positively related to the plant-available N concentrations, indicating the benefit of temperate TBI systems for soil fertility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Don A, Schumacher J, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Scholten T, Schulze ED (2007) Spatial and vertical variation of soil carbon at two grassland sites—implications for measuring soil carbon stocks. Geoderma 141:272–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellert BH, Bettany JR (1995) Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes. Can J Soil Sci 75:529–538

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2008a) Canada’s 2006 greenhouse gas inventory. http://www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/ghg/inventory_report/2006/som-sum_eng.pdf Accessed 11 Dec 2008

  • Environment Canada (2008b) The national climate data and information archive. Canadian climate normals or averages 1971–2000. http://climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climate_normals/index_e.html Accessed 15 Dec 2008

  • Garten CTJ (2002) Soil carbon storage beneath recently established tree plantations in Tennessee and South Carolina, USA. Biomass Bioenergy 23:93–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gouvernement du Quebec (2008) Quebec climate change action plan. http://www.mddep.gouv.qc.ca/changements/plan_action/bilan2-en.pdf Accessed 10 Nov 2008

  • Hamilton JG, DeLucia EH, George K, Naidu SL, Finzi AC, Schlesinger WH (2002) Forest carbon balance under elevated CO2. Oecologia 131:250–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher L (1994) A step-by-step aproach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Havlin JL, Beaton JD, Tisdale SL, Nelson WL (2005) Soil fertility and fertilizers: an introduction to nutrient management, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendershot WH, Lalande H, Duquette M (2008) Soil reaction and exchangeable acidity. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp 173–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf Accessed 9 Nov 2008

  • Janzen HH (2005) Soil carbon: a measure of ecosystem response in a changing world? Can J Soil Sci 85:467–480

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen HH, Campbell CA, Gregorich EG, Ellert BH (1997) Soil carbon dynamics in Canadian agroecosystems. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Follett RF, Stewart BA (eds) Soil processes and the carbon cycle. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 57–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacombe S, Bradley RL, Hamel C, Beaulieu C (2009) Do tree-based intercropping systems increase the diversity and stability of soil microbial communities? Agric Ecosyst Environ 131:25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2006) Enhancing crop yields in the developing countries through restoration of the soil organic carbon pool in agricultural lands. Land Degrad Dev 17:197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard DG, Kalra YP, Crumbaugh JA (2008) Nitrate and exchangeable ammonium nitrogen. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp 71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagnini F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agroforest Syst 61:281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montreal Climate Exchange (2009) Montreal climate exchange. http://www.mcex.ca/index_en. Accessed 11 Jan 2009

  • Oelbermann M, Voroney R (2007) Carbon and nitrogen in a temperate agroforestry system: using stable isotopes as a tool to understand soil dynamics. Ecol Eng 29:342–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oelbermann M, Voroney R, Gordon A (2004) Carbon sequestration in tropical and temperate agroforestry systems: a review with examples from Costa Rica and southern Canada. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:359–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oelbermann M, Voroney R, Thevathasan N, Gordon A, Kass D, Schlonvoigt A (2006) Soil carbon dynamics and residue stabilization in a Costa Rican and southern Canadian alley cropping system. Agroforest Syst 68:27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papiernik SK, Lindstrom MJ, Schumacher JA, Farenhorst A, Stephens KD, Schumacher TE, Lobb DA (2005) Variation in soil properties and crop yield across an eroded prairie landscape. J Soil Water Conserv 60:388–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Peichl M, Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM, Huss J, Abohassan RA (2006) Carbon sequestration potentials in temperate tree-based intercropping systems in southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforest Syst 66:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivest D, Cogliastro A, Vanasse A, Olivier A (2009) Production of soybean associated with different hybrid poplar clones in a tree-based intercropping system in southwestern Quebec, Canada. Agric Ecosyst Environ 131:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer TJ, Cambardella CA, Brandle JR (2007) Soil carbon and tree litter dynamics in a red cedar-scotch pine shelterbelt. Agroforest Syst 71:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeneberger MM (2009) Agroforestry: working trees for sequestering carbon on agricultural lands. Agroforest Syst 75:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker RE, Lomax RG (2004) A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow SH, Ismail S (2004) Carbon and nitrogen storage in agroforests, tree plantations, and pastures in western Oregon, USA. Agroforest Syst 60:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P (2008) Land use change and soil organic carbon dynamics. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 81:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Classification Working Group (1998) The Canadian system of soil classification, 3rd edn. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Publication 1646, 187 pp

  • Tans P (2009) Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide – Mauna Loa. NOAA/ESRL http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/. Accessed 30 Dec 2009

  • Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM (2004) Ecology of tree intercropping systems in the north temperate region: Experiences from southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforest Syst 61:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM, Simpson JA, Reynolds PE, Price GW, Zhang P (2004) Biophysical and ecological interactions in a temperate tree-based intercropping system. J Crop Improve 12:339–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VandenBygaart AJ (2006) Monitoring soil organic carbon stock changes in agricultural landscapes: issues and a proposed approach. Can J Soil Sci 86:451–463

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziadi N, Sen Tran T (2008) Mehlich 3—extractable elements. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp 81–88

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support came from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, through a postgraduate scholarship to A.D.B. and through a Strategic Project grant to the research team. Funding from the Biocap Foundation of Canada, the Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies and support from landowners in Quebec who hosted the research sites is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joann K. Whalen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bambrick, A.D., Whalen, J.K., Bradley, R.L. et al. Spatial heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in tree-based intercropping systems in Quebec and Ontario, Canada. Agroforest Syst 79, 343–353 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9305-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9305-z

Keywords

Navigation