Skip to main content

What Is Systems Thinking?

Learning, Design, and Technology: An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy

Learning, Design, and Technology

Abstract

This chapter provides a brief overview and understanding of the historical evolution of the field of systems thinking, which has been characterized as occurring in three waves, the last of which recognized a plurality of methods and approaches. In the last decade, a fourth wave has emerged that is based on four simple cognitive tasks or “rules” – making distinctions and recognizing systems, relationships, and perspectives (DSRP). These four rules combine in infinitely complex ways to produce the emergent property of systems thinking. They underlie and serve to integrate the diverse methods and approaches of systems thinking. Applying DSRP is a new skill that extends and enhances popular systems thinking tools and approaches. DSRP provides a common language and analytical method to span the multiple subfields that have often worked in isolation, allowing the tremendous pluralism in systems thinking to exist alongside universality. Importantly, the simplicity of the DSRP rules makes it far easier to teach and learn systems thinking. The fourth wave makes systems thinking more accessible than ever before, as DSRP cognitive skills can be taught to individuals at all levels in all disciplines. The corollary development of systems modeling techniques are accessible ways to capture and measure one’s progress in developing the skills required for systems thinking. The historical overview and description of where the field is headed will provide context for an introduction to the role of systems thinking in human and organizational development and in particular the relevance for educational systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackoff, R. L., Magidson, J., & Addison, H. J. (2006). Idealized design: Creating an organization’s future. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1970). Lecture, “Form, Substance and Difference.” Delivered January 9, 1970. Institute of General Semantics. see: http://faculty.washington.edu/jernel/521/Form.htm

  • Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York, NY: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornhorst, C. (2015). “Thinkified” – How systems thinking can improve student outcomes in youth water education. Albuquerque, New Mexico: Apex Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, A., Geerling, T., Gregory, W., Kagan, C., Midgley, G., Murray, P., & Walsh, M. P. (2007). Systemic evaluation: A participative, multi-method approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 1306–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, M. (2003). Review of systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice by Midgley G. (2000). Journal of Community and Applied Psychology, 13(4), 330–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, D. (2006). Systems thinking (Doctoral dissertation). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, D., & Cabrera, L. (2012). Thinking at every desk: Four simple skills to transform your classroom. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, D., & Cabrera, L. (2015). Systems thinking made simple: New hope for solving wicked problems in a complex world. Ithaca, NY: Odyssean Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, D., & Cabrera, L. (2018). Systems thinking made simple: New hope for solving wicked problems in a complex world (2nd ed.). Ithaca, NY: Odyssean Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, D., Cabrera, L., & Powers, E. (2015). A unifying theory of systems thinking with psychosocial applications. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, D., & Colosi, L. (2008). Distinctions, systems, relationships, and perspectives (DSRP): A theory of thinking and of things. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(3), 311–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, L., & Cabrera, D. (2016). Learning systems thinking at the graduate level: A case study in applying systems thinking to public policy. Special issue consisting of 14 articles dedicated to Systems Thinking/DSRP. Cornell Policy Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, D. (2014). 58th Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences at the School of Business at George Washington University. Learning Across Boundaries: Exploring the Variety of Systemic Theory and Practice. Plenary Address. In Search of Universality in Systems Thinking. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (2002). The hidden connections: Integrating the hidden connections among the biological, cognitive, and social dimensions of life. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1999). Systems thinking. In Systems practice: Includes a 30-year retrospective. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for action: A short definitive account of soft systems methodology, and its use for practitioners, teachers and students. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1968). The systems approach. New York, NY: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1970). Operations research as a profession. Management Science, 17, B37–B53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B., Doskey, S., & Moreland, J. (2017). Modeling the convergence of collaborative systems of systems: A quantitative case study. Systems Engineering, 20(4), 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, W. (2013). The essential Wayne Dyer collection. Carlsbad, CA: Hay House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R., & Jackson, M. (1991a). Creative problem solving: Total systems intervention. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R., & Jackson, M. (1991b). Critical systems thinking: Directed readings. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1971). World dynamics. Cambridge, Mass: Wright-Allen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francois, C. (2004). International Encyclopedia Of Systems And Cybernetics. 2nd edition ed. Munchen: K G Saur North Amer Research; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R. L. (1991). The roots of reductionism: A counter-ontoepistemology for a systems approach. Systems Practice, 4, 419–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W. J. (1996). Discordant pluralism: A new strategy for critical systems thinking? Systems Practice, 9, 605–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. D., & Fagen, R. E. (1956). Definition of system. General Systems, 1, 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1970). Logical investigations. New York, NY: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (2000). Systems approaches to management. New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C., & Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35, 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, D., & Newman, D. (2010). Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 54–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kambiz, E. M., & Robert, Y. C. (2000). Systems Thinking and Modelling: Understanding Change and Complexity. New York. Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosko, B. (1993). Fuzzy thinking: The new science of fuzzy logic. New York, NY: Hyperion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2004). A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latimer, C., & Stevens, C. (1997). Some remarks on wholes, parts and their perception. Psycoloquy, 8. http://www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?8.13. Accessed 7 July 2015.

  • Leleur, S. (2014). The meaning of system: Towards a complexity orientation in systems thinking. International Journal of Systems and Society, 1(1), 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litman, J. A. (2009). Curiosity and metacognition. In C. B. Larson (Ed.), Metacognition: New research developments (pp. 105–116). Retrieved November 2, 2015, from http://drjlitman.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Litman-2009-invited-chapter.pdf

  • Marchal, J. H. (1975). On the concept of a system. Philosophy of Science, 42, 448–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging strategic planning assumptions. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1996). The ideal of unity and the practice of pluralism in systems science. In R. L. Flood & R. NRA (Eds.), Critical systems thinking: Current research and practice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (2003). Systems thinking. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G., & Ochoa-Arias, A. E. (2001). Unfolding a theory of systemic intervention. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 14, 615–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. C. (1992). What are real friends for? A reply to Mike Jackson. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43, 732–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. C. (1993). The system of systems methodologies–a reply to Schecter. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44, 206–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, L., Knox, D., & Schacht, C. (2007). Understanding social problems (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, C. (1998). Perceptual cognition, parts and wholes. Psycoloquy, 9. http://www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?9.1. Accessed 8 July 2015.

  • National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Committee on Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills, Pellegrino, J. W. & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.), Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. A., & Skow-Grant, E. (2003). Memory and learning in figure-ground perception. In Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory: Cognitive vision (Vol. 42, pp. 1–35). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(03)01001-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1994). The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, E. (1996). Streams of systemic thought. Neuchâtel, Switzerland. http://www.slideshare.net/CommunityActionHero/streams-of-systemic-thought. Accessed 8 July 2015.

  • Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (1992). Panoptic reason and the search for totality: A critical assessment of the critical systems perspective. Human Relations, 45, 637–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical heuristics of social planning: A new approach to practical philosophy. Bern, Switzerland: Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1956). General systems theory. General Systems, 1, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. New York. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (2005). On insiders (emic) and outsiders (etic): Views of self, and othering. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 18, 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Z. (2011). After paradigm: Why mixing-methodology theorising fails and how to make it work again. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62, 784–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek Cabrera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Cabrera, D., Cabrera, L. (2019). What Is Systems Thinking?. In: Spector, M., Lockee, B., Childress, M. (eds) Learning, Design, and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_100-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_100-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17727-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17727-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    What Is Systems Thinking?
    Published:
    14 May 2023

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_100-3

  2. What Is Systems Thinking?
    Published:
    14 February 2023

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_100-2

  3. Original

    What Is Systems Thinking?
    Published:
    11 August 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_100-1