Skip to main content
Log in

The roots of reductionism: A counter-ontoepistemology for a systems approach

  • Papers
  • Published:
Systems practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Systems thinking is presented as the antithesis of “reductionism.” This article—the first in a trilogy which intends to present an ontoepistemological foundation for interpretive systemology—is concerned with understanding the ontoepistemological roots of reductionism. The immediate purpose of such an understanding is to provide an interpretive contrasting context (a counter-ontoepistemology) against which an ontoepistemology for systems thinking can dialectically be drawn (the second and third papers in the trilogy published in this issue ofSystems Practice). The inquiry into the ontoepistemological roots of reductionism leads to the principle of noncontradiction. Such a principle is shown to be the source of the merging together the most fundamental ontological and epistemological principles ruling Western thought. As such, they are shown to have brought about reductionism in modern science. Finally, the “form of essential recursiveness” is put forward as a logical antithetical form with regard to the principle of noncontradiction and which will serve as a logical instrument for developing an ontoepistemology for the systems approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff, R. (1974).Redesigning the Future. A Systems Approach to Societal Problems, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1928).The Works of Aristotle, Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1952). Metaphysics. In W. D. Ross (ed., trans.),The Works of Aristotle, Encyclopedia Britannica, Chicago, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L. V. (1968).General System Theory, Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981).Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1979).The Systems Approach and Its Enemies, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1637). Discourse on the method. InPhilosophical Writings, The Open University Press, Middlesex, 1954, pp. 3–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1642). Meditations on first philosophy. InPhilosophical Writings, The Open University Press, Middlesex, 1954, pp. 59–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1644). Principles of philosophy. InPhilosophical Writings, The Open University Press, Middlesex, 1954, pp. 181–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1701). Rules for the direction of the mind. InPhilosophical Writings, The Open University Press, Middlesex, 1954, pp. 151–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R. (1985).The Ontology and Epistemology of a Systems Approach, Ph.D. thesis, University of Lancaster, Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R. (1990). Systems thinking and critique. I. What is critique?Syst. Pract. 3, 525–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R. (1991a). The self-referential structure of an everyday-living situation: A phenomenological ontology for interpretive systemology.Syst. Pract. 4, 449–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R. (1991b). Truth and openness: An epistemology for interpretive systemology.Syst. Pract. 4, 473–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R., and López-Garay, H. (1991). The scene for interpretive systemology.Syst. Pract. 4, 401–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (1981).Obras Completas, Alianza Editorial, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. (1984).Lógica, Ediciones Orbis, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962).Being and Time, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1967). Modern science metaphysics and mathematics. InBasic Writings, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 244–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1969).The Essence of Reasons, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1975).Early Greek Thinking, Harper & Row, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1787).Critique of Pure Reason, Macmillan, London, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Garay, H. (1986).A Holistic Interpretive Concept of Systems Design, Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcovich, M. (1967).Heraclitus: Greek Text with a Short Commentary, Los Andes University Press, Mérida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E., and Newman, J. (1970).El Teorema de Gödel, Editorial Tecnos, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega y Gasset, J. (1941).Historia como sistema, Revista de Occidente, Madrid (7th ed., 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega y Gasset, J. (1974).Pasado y parvenir para el hombre actual, Revista de Occidente, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmenideset al. (1975).Fragmentos, Ediciones Orbis, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1959).The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J. P. (1958).Being and Nothingness, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer Brown, G. (1969).Laws of Form, George Allen and Undwing, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. (1979).Principles of Biological Autonomy, North Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, G. (1970).Freedom in a Rocking Boat, Penguin Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A., and Russell, B. (1910).Principia Mathematica, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuenmayor, R. The roots of reductionism: A counter-ontoepistemology for a systems approach. Systems Practice 4, 419–448 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01104460

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01104460

Key words

Navigation