Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Computer Navigation for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduces Dislocation Rates

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Computer navigation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) offers potential for more accurate placement of acetabular components, avoiding impingement, edge loading, and dislocation, all of which can necessitate revision THA (rTHA). Therefore, the use of computer navigation may be particularly beneficial in patients undergoing rTHA. The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of computer-assisted hip navigation reduces the rate of dislocation in patients undergoing rTHA.

Methods

A retrospective review of 72 patients undergoing computer-navigated rTHA between February 2016 and May 2017 was performed. Demographics, indications for revision, type of procedure performed, and incidence of postoperative dislocation were collected for all patients. Clinical follow-up was recorded at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years.

Results

All 72 patients (48% female; 52% male) were included for analysis. The mean age was 70.4 ± 11.2 years and mean BMI was 26.4 ± 5.2 kg/m2. 22 of 72 patients (31%) required a rTHA procedure due to instability resulting in dislocation. At 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years, there were no dislocations (0%). There was a significant reduction in dislocation rate after computer-navigated rTHA (0%) relative to that following primary THA in the same patient cohort (31%; p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates a significant reduction in dislocation rate following rTHA with computer navigation. Although the cause of postoperative dislocation is often multifactorial, the use of computer navigation may help to curtail femoral and acetabular malalignment in rTHA.

Level of Evidence

Level III: retrospective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, A.K.S., upon reasonable request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Callanan, M. C., Jarrett, B., Bragdon, C. R., et al. (2011). The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 469, 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1487-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kennedy, J. G., Rogers, W. B., Soffe, K. E., et al. (1998). Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 13, 530–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90052-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewinnek, G. E., Lewis, J. L., Tarr, R., et al. (1978). Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 60, 217–220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Najarian, B. C., Kilgore, J. E., & Markel, D. C. (2009). Evaluation of component positioning in primary total hip arthroplasty using an imageless navigation device compared with traditional methods. Journal of Arthroplasty, 24, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.01.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Williamson, J.A., & Reckling, F.W. (1978). Limb length discrepancy and related problems following total hip joint replacement. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 135–138. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/729230/

  6. DiGioia, A. M., Jaramaz, B., Blackwell, M., et al. (1998). The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199810000-00003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Digioia, A. M., Jaramaz, B., Plakseychuk, A. Y., et al. (2002). Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 17, 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.30411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Honl, M., Dierk, O., Gauck, C., et al. (2003). Comparison of robotic-assisted and manual implantation of a primary total hip replacement. A prospective study. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 85, 1470–1478. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200308000-00007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Noble, P. C., Sugano, N., Johnston, J. D., et al. (2003). Computer simulation: how can it help the surgeon optimize implant position? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000096829.67494.dc

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu, K., Li, Y., Zhang, H., et al. (2014). Computer navigation in total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Surgery, 12, 528–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.02.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bohl, D. D., Nolte, M. T., Ong, K., et al. (2019). Computer-assisted navigation is associated with reductions in the rates of dislocation and acetabular component revision following primary total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 101, 250–256. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.00108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jolles, B. M., Genoud, P., & Hoffmeyer, P. (2004). Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000141903.08075.83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lass, R., Kubista, B., Olischar, B., et al. (2014). Total hip arthroplasty using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation: a prospective randomized study. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 29, 786–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McLawhorn, A. S., Sculco, P. K., Weeks, K. D., et al. (2015). Targeting a new safe zone: a step in the development of patient-specific component positioning for total hip arthroplasty. American Journal of Orthopedics, 44, 270–276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nogler, M., Kessler, O., Prassl, A., et al. (2004). Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000141902.30946.6d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wixson, R. L., & MacDonald, M. A. (2005). Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 20, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bozic, K. J., Kurtz, S. M., Lau, E., et al. (2009). The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 91, 128–133. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurtz, S., Ong, K., Lau, E., et al. (2007). Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 89, 780–785. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paprosky, W. G., & Muir, J. M. (2016). Intellijoint HIP®: a 3D mini-optical navigation tool for improving intraoperative accuracy during total hip arthroplasty. Med Devices (Auckl), 9, 401–408. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S119161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bozic, K. J., Kamath, A. F., Ong, K., et al. (2015). Comparative epidemiology of revision arthroplasty: failed THA poses greater clinical and economic burdens than failed TKA. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 473, 2131–2138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-4078-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gwam, C. U., Mistry, J. B., Mohamed, N. S., et al. (2017). Current epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States: national inpatient sample 2009 to 2013. Journal of Arthroplasty, 32, 2088–2092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Khatod, M., Cafri, G., Inacio, M. C. S., et al. (2015). Revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 97, 359–366. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Langston, J., Pierrepont, J., Gu, Y., & Shimmin, A. (2018). Risk factors for increased sagittal pelvic motion causing unfavourable orientation of the acetabular component in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. The Bone & Joint Journal, 100-B, 845–852. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1599.R1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hua, X., Li, J., Jin, Z., & Fisher, J. (2016). The contact mechanics and occurrence of edge loading in modular metal-on-polyethylene total hip replacement during daily activities. Medical Engineering & Physics, 38, 518–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wasterlain, A. S., Buza, J. A., Thakkar, S. C., et al. (2017). Navigation and robotics in total hip arthroplasty. JBJS reviews. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.16.00046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dargel, J., Oppermann, J., Brüggemann, G.-P., & Eysel, P. (2014). Dislocation following total hip replacement. Deutsches Arzteblatt International, 111, 884–890. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2014.0884

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Alberton, G. M., High, W. A., & Morrey, B. F. (2002). Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty : an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 84, 1788–1792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Berend, K. R., Sporer, S. M., Sierra, R. J., et al. (2010). Achieving stability and lower-limb length in total hip arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 92, 2737–2752.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wetters, N. G., Murray, T. G., Moric, M., et al. (2013). Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 471, 410–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2561-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors have no acknowledgements to make for this study.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AKS: data curation, formal analysis, writing-original draft preparation, manuscript revision; ZC: formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation; KMC: data curation, writing—reviewing and editing; SAJ: data curation, writing—reviewing and editing; WGP: data curation, writing-reviewing and editing; PKS: data curation, writing—reviewing and editing; AGDV: data curation, writing—reviewing and editing; RS: data curation, writing-reviewing and editing; DJM: data curation, writing—reviewing and editing; JMV: conceptualization, data curation, writing—reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhinav K. Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Abhinav K. Sharma declares that he has no conflict of interest. Zlatan Cizmic, M.D., declares that he has no conflict of interest. Kaitlin M. Carroll reports having stock ownership in Orthalign. Seth Jerabek, M.D., reports having stock ownership in Stryker and Imagen and receiving IP royalties, personal fees, and research funding from Stryker. Wayne Paprosky, M.D., reports having stock ownership in Intellijoint Surgical and receiving fees from Intellijoint Surgical, Zimmer Biomet, Microport, and Ceramtec. Peter Sculco, M.D., reports receiving fees from EOS Imaging, Intellijoint Surgical, and Lima Corp. Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle, M.D., reports receiving IP royalties and fees from OrthoDevelopment, IP royalties, fees, and research support from OrthoSensor, and fees from Johnson & Johnson and Link Orthopaedics. Ran Schwarzkopf, M.D., reports having stock ownership in PSI and receiving fees and grants from Smith & Nephew and Intellijoint Surgical. David Mayman, M.D., reports having stock ownership in Imagen, Insight, Wishbone, and Orthalign, receiving IP royalties, fees, and research funding from Smith & Nephew, and receiving IP royalties from Orthalign. Jonathan M. Vigdorchik, M.D., reports stock ownership in Intellijoint Surgical and Motion Insights, fees and research funding from Corin Group, and fees from Intellijoint Surgical, Medacta, and Zimmer.

Ethics approval

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was waived from all patients included in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable; no patient images, identifiers or identifiable individual data were used in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, A.K., Cizmic, Z., Carroll, K.M. et al. Computer Navigation for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduces Dislocation Rates. JOIO 56, 1061–1065 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-022-00606-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-022-00606-7

Keywords

Navigation