Abstract
Although research on biochar has received increasing attention for environmental and agricultural applications, the significance of nanobiochar for environmental pollutant remediation is poorly understood. In contrast to bulk biochar, nanobiochar has superior physicochemical properties such as high catalytic activity, unique nanostructure, large specific surface area and high mobility in the soil environment. These unique characteristics make nanobiochar an ideal candidate for pollution remediation. Thus far, the research on nanobiochar is still in its infancy and most of the previous studies have only been conducted for exploring its properties and environmental functions. The lack of in-depth summary of nanobiochar’s research direction makes it a challenge for scientists and researchers globally. Hence in this review, we established some key fabrication methods for nanobiochar with a focus on its performance for the removal of pollutants from the environment. We also provided up-to-date information on nanobiochar’s role in environmental remediation and insights into different mechanisms involved in the pollutant removal. Although, nanobiochar application is increasing, the associated drawbacks to the soil ecosystem have not received enough research attention. Therefore, further research is warranted to evaluate the potential environmental risks of nanobiochar before large scale application.
Graphical Abstract
![](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42773-022-00201-x/MediaObjects/42773_2022_201_Figa_HTML.png)
Highlights
-
Key synthesis technologies and properties of nanobiochars were discussed.
-
The interactions pathways of nanobiochar with pollutants were elucidated.
-
Role of environmental factors on pollutants remediation and life cycle was delineated.
-
Important research outlooks on nanobiochar’s potential in pollutant remediation were elaborated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Environmental pollution threatens the soil and water resources and needs immediate global attention (Hou et al. 2020; Pure Earth/Green Cross 2015; WHO 2019; Zhang et al. 2016). The pollutants may enter the environment through natural processes and anthropogenic activities such as industrial emissions, domestic sewage discharge and agricultural activities (Jaishankar et al. 2014; Liu et al. 2022; Young et al. 2004). Generally, pollutants are classified as biodegradable and non-biodegradable (Gong et al. 2022; Samadi et al. 2021). Heavy metals are non-biodegradable, which makes it difficult to eliminate them from the soil and water environments, resulting in their accumulation by living organisms (Kirpichtchikova et al. 2006). Globally, over 20 million hectares of land have been polluted with heavy metals (Liu et al. 2018b). Prolonged exposure to heavy metals negatively impacts human health and may cause various cancers, hallucinations, insomnia, and other diseases (Zhang et al. 2022b). Although organic pollutants are biodegradable, some persistent organic pollutants are often toxic and cancerogenic to human and animals even in small amounts (Liu et al. 2020b; Singh et al. 2022). For example, Khan et al. (2021) found that traces of pharmaceutical compound residues in the aquatic environment may pose a threat to the public health and they have even been detected in trace amounts in surface water. Numerous studies have reported that unprecedented amounts of pollutants have accumulated both in aquatic and soil systems (Hou et al. 2020; Gong et al. 2022; Pure Earth/Green Cross 2015). Therefore, it is of great importance to conduct soil and water remediation activities.
In recent years, biochars have been widely used as effective amendments to remediate polluted soil and water (Azadi and Raiesi 2021; Chen et al. 2022; Luo et al. 2022; Wang et al. 2021). Studies have shown that biochar can effectively remove pollutants from wastewater (Li et al. 2020; Lian et al. 2020; Ren et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2019a) and reduce pollutant bioavailability in soils (Sun et al. 2022). Biochar is pyrolyzed from biomass raw materials under low to high temperatures (300–700 °C) in oxygen limited conditions (Lehmann 2007; Li et al. 2022). Since the raw material sources of producing biochar are usually agricultural and forestry wastes, it is economical and environmentally friendly and may also become an effective additive for carbon sequestration (Lyu et al. 2020; Tripathi et al. 2011). Biochar with particle sizes in the range of 1–100 nm is considered as nanobiochar (Naghdi et al. 2017a; Sulaiman et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2022b). Generally, nanobiochar can be obtained by two main ways. One is artificially manufactured and, the other is physical disintegration of biochar by aging process in the environment (Huang et al. 2021; Ramanayaka et al. 2020b). Compared to bulk biochar, nanobiochar a much larger specific surface area (SSA), smaller hydrodynamic radius, more negative zeta potential, and more oxygen-containing functional groups (Lyu et al. 2018a; Naghdi et al. 2017a; Pratap et al. 2022; Ramanayaka et al. 2020b).
Nanobiochar has been studied and applied to different fields including biosensors, soil amendments, photocatalytic materials, and as pollutant adsorbents (Fig. 1a, also see Dong et al. 2018; Xiao et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2022b). The scientmetric analysis through Web of Science displayed that the number of articles on the term “nanobiochar and nano-biochar” has increased in recent years from 2017 to 2021, and it now appears that research in 2022 will also likely exceed that in 2021 (Fig. 1b). Furthermore, the use of nanobiochar to remediate polluted soils and water was the most studied areas (account for 51%, see Fig. 1c). Nanobiochar can be an effective additive for pollutant removal from polluted water (Lyu et al. 2018a; Xiao et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2021) and can also be used for stabilization of pollutants in polluted soils (Sun et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2022a). Despite this, the total number of papers searched in Web of Science in the past 5 years was less than 70, which further suggests that this is a new field, and a lot of research needs to be carried out.
As a new research direction in the field of biochar, the research on nanobiochar has not yet been done systematically at present. In addition, long-term research on the environmental functions of nanobiochar is lacking. Although there have been some articles reviewing related research on nanobiochar, these reviews either focus on the properties of nanobiochar or aim at broad overviews of its application for many fields. To our knowledge, there is currently no detailed review that summarizes the use of nanobiochar in environmental pollution remediation. Therefore, this review aimed to summarize the results from studies (1) concerning the effects of nanobiochar on the remediation of water and soil pollution, (2) on the preparation process of nanobiochar, (3) concerning affecting nanobiochar performance in environmental pollutant remediation and the associated mechanisms. This will provide a theoretical basis and practical guidance for the safe and effective use of nanobiochar for environmental pollution remediation.
2 Preparation of nanobiochar
Generally, the raw material of nanobiochar will affect its physiochemical properties. It has been reported that biomass with high hemicellulose usually derives nanobiochar with low carbon content and high oxygen content (Weber and Quicker 2018), while materials with high lignin usually produce nanobiochar with strong aggregation ability (Föhr et al. 2017). Oleszczuk et al. (2016) observed that wicker and wheat straw nanobiochars had relatively open-structured primary small particles while miscanthus nanobiochar possessed large spherical particles and exhibited weaker aggregation effects than the first two nanobiochars. Moreover, the ash content of nanobiochar produced from agricultural waste was directly proportional to the bulk biochar, however, this was not observed in nanobiochar produced from municipal waste (Song et al. 2019). Usually, nanobiochar is produced in the same manner as bulk biochar with a few additional steps (Chausali et al. 2021), which will be discussed in detail below (see Fig. 2).
2.1 Milling method
Ball milling has been a commonly used approach for producing nanobiochar, which can mechanically break the biochar and reduce particles to nanometer size (Anupama and Khare 2021; Chausali et al. 2021; Lyu et al. 2017; Soares et al. 2015). In the milling process, smaller pores with flat pieces are formed from squeezing of longitudinal pores and canals, which leads to the increase of SSA (Ramezanzadeh et al. 2021). This method includes dry milling mode and wet milling mode, which is based on whether the biochar is mixed with water or not during the grinding process. Yuan et al. (2020) showed that wet ball milling for 12 h was more effective in obtaining smaller particle size and more evenly distributed biochar than dry ball milling, and both ball milling methods can obtain larger SSA of biochar than hand grinding.
The ball milling method has been demonstrated to be a green approach with low cost and reproducibility (Kumar et al. 2020; Naghdi et al. 2017b; Wang et al. 2018), however, it is not the only milling method used for nanobiochar production. For example, the double-disc milling method has been used to produce polygonal platelet-shaped particles with the diameter of 50–150 nm (Ramanayaka et al. 2020a). In addition, other studies have found that vibrating disc milling can produce more uniformly shaped nanobiochar and has a greater yield than ball milling (Bayram and Öner 2007; Huang et al. 2022). The selection of a suitable milling method for nanobiochar production usually depends on the purpose of the experiment and raw materials.
2.2 Ultrasonication method
Ultrasonication is another effective method for producing nanobiochar. During the sonication process, a probe tip is immobilized below the surface of the suspension where biochar particles are disintegrated and biochar’s graphite-like structure is exfoliated by shockwaves (Li et al. 2013; Oleszczuk et al. 2016). The main mechanism involves the use of ultrasound-induced microjets and shockwaves to create new pores, open blocked pores, and change the biochar structure, which ultimately leads to an increase of microporosity (Sajjadi et al. 2020). Liu et al. (2018a) showed that the fine fragments adhering to the surface or embedded in the pores of the parent biochar are separated by ultrasonic waves and longer sonication time may produce more nanobiochar. Dong et al. (2019) found that the ultrasonically treated regular biochar successfully produced nanobiochar with a particle size of 42 ± 6 nm. Song et al. (2019) carried out ultrasonic work on bulk biochars derived from different raw materials for 30 min and nanobiochar was obtained with a particle size less than 100 nm.
In addition to the above methods, other approaches have also been applied to prepare nanobiochar, for example, microwave pyrolysis reactors have been used to directly produce nanobiochar (Wallace et al. 2019). This method is cost-effective and efficient because only one step is required (Li et al. 2016). Centrifugation technology is another direct method or a step to produce nanobiochar and the resulting biochar nanoparticles are ordered (Lian et al. 2020; Xu and Cölfen 2021). The digestion of the bulk biochar by concentrated nitric and sulfuric acids can also be used to produce nanobiochar (Guo et al. 2020).
2.3 Modified nanobiochar
More recently, many methods have been employed for the modification of bulk biochar and nanobiochar in order to improve their properties (Ndirangu et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2021), which mainly include metal modification (Jenie et al. 2020; Nath et al. 2019; Qiao et al. 2019), ultrasonic modification (Li et al. 2017b), acid-base modification (Mahmoud et al. 2020a), and thiol modification (Lyu et al. 2020) (see Fig. 3). For example, Lyu et al. (2020) modified wood chip nanobiochar with 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (3-MPTS) and found that the SSA of the modified nanobiochar was much larger than that of the pristine biochar, the zeta potential was more negative, and it had more surface functional groups. Xu et al. (2019) compared the properties of pristine biochar, ball-milled biochar, and ball-milled N-doped biochar and found that the SSA and pore volume of ball-milled biochar significantly increased after adding ammonium hydroxide. This suggests that ammonium hydroxide may act as an activator to further generate pores on the biochar during ball milling process. The N-doped nanobiochar, however, was easier to agglomerate due to hydrophilic groups present on the biochar particles. Nath et al. (2019) modified rice husk nanobiochar with iron oxides to increase the nanobiochar C–O and Fe–O functional groups and optimize its adsorption capacity. Many studies have shown that the modified nanobiochars has a stronger ability to remove pollutants than the non-modified nanobiochar (Vishnu et al. 2022; Wang and Wang 2018).
3 Adsorption of environmental pollutants by nanobiochar
3.1 Heavy metals
As shown in Table 1, nanobiochar has been demonstrated to be an effective tool for heavy metal immobilization in the environment. For instance, previous studies have shown that nanobiochar could strongly absorb Cd, Pb or Cu in aqueous system, and the heavy metal removal rate increases gradually as the concentration of nanobiochar increases. This increase in heavy metal removal rate may be due to the adsorbent exchangeable sites and the larger SSA of nanobiochar (Li et al. 2017b; Yue et al. 2019a; Vishnu et al. 2022). However, high nanobiochar concentrations may lead to the occurrence of agglomeration effect especially under acidic conditions. The agglomeration of nanobiochar significantly reduces SSA and nanobiochar ability to immobilize pollutants (Mahmoud et al. 2019; Rasaki et al. 2019). As reported by Lyu et al. (2018a), Nickel (Ni) adsorption rate increased when soils were amended with low rate of nanobiochar but decreased with high rate of nanobiochar applied. In addition, hetero aggregation between nanobiochar and soil minerals may also frequently occur in soil system. This mainly occurs because that the positive charged soil minerals form electrostatic interactions with the negatively charged nanobiochar surfaces, thereby increasing the heteroaggregation (Zhang et al. 2022b). Therefore, there is an urgent need to understand and develop ways to reduce nanobiochar agglomeration and heteroaggregation in the environment to improve its ability to adsorb pollutants.
As mentioned above, studies have used modified nanobiochar to remediate some specific environmental pollutants. It has been reported that pristine nanobiochar had lower adsorption capacity for Chromium [Cr(VI)] than modified biochar (Wang et al. 2020a). Heavy metals tend to be positively charged, hence nanobiochars with surface functional groups that are not easily protonated or nanobiochars with negative charges introduced on the surface may have better adsorption capability (Yi et al. 2015). Lyu et al. (2020) introduced thiol groups to the surface of nanobiochar using the ball milling method, which increased the surface negative charge and consequently the adsorption capacity of positively charged mercury (Hg) reached 320.1 mg g−1. An iron oxide permeated mesoporous rice husk modified nanobiochar was demonstrated to remove up to 95% of Arsenic (As) in the environment (Nath et al. 2019). However, when the modified nanobiochar was applied in the environment, the modified materials (e.g. metals) may leach from its surface and cause harm to the environment. Therefore, the environmental risk of modified nanobiochar needs to be further studied.
3.2 Organic pollutants
Unlike heavy metals, organic pollutants can be degraded, and the application of nanobiochar can reduce the migration and bioavailable fraction of organic pollutants in both aquatic and soil systems through a series of mechanisms such as adsorption and catalytic degradation (see Table 2). Due to its special properties, nanobiochar offers excellent sorption capacity for many organic pollutants, such as herbicides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (Anupama and Khare 2021; Kumar et al. 2018). It has been reported that nanobiochar has a maximum adsorption capacity of 103.4 mg g−1 for acetone, which is 16-fold higher than the pristine biochar (Xiang et al. 2020). The development of nanobiochar composites and its modification methods also prove a way to enhance its adsorption capacity for pollutants. The adsorption capacity of the composites with 25% ball-milled nanobiochar (1210 mg g−1) and 75% calcium-alginate for methylene blue was much greater than that of pure ball-milled nanobiochar (184 mg g−1) (Wang et al. 2019). Xu et al. (2019) found that the adsorption capacity of N-doped nanobiochar on reactive red was 18.8 times higher than that of the bulk biochar and over 2 times higher than that of the common nanobiochar. This is due to the increase of the zeta potential and zero-point charge (PZC) of the biochar by N doping, which promotes the adsorption of anionic reactive red (Pereira et al. 2003). The basic N groups on N-doped nanobiochar can be protonated and positively charged, enabling the biochar to adsorb Congo red (a type of dye) through electrostatic adsorption (Tian et al. 2018).
Due to the low surface-active site density and low activation energy of adsorption bonds, nanobiochar can also be coupled with photocatalyst zinc oxide (ZnO) to degrade phenol indirectly (Chen et al. 2016). The addition of nanobiochar may improve the photoresponse and photocatalytic performance of the catalyst during the degradation process and the nanobiochar itself also adsorbs some phenol molecules. Zhang et al. (2021) showed that the degradation efficiency of the composite material to phenol within 90 min was 99.8% higher than that of pure ZnO. Other modification methods (see Sect. 2.2.3) will also strongly affect the properties of nanobiochar, thereby affecting its ability to remove organic pollutants. However, thus far, only few studies on the use of nanobiochar or modified nanobiochar to remove organic pollutants have been done, and therefore further studies are needed to improve our understanding of the role of nanobiochar in this field.
3.3 Emerging pollutants
Emerging pollutants include a range of organic compounds including pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs), detergents, pesticides, and industrial chemicals (Daughton and Ternes 1999; Matei et al. 2022; Norvill et al. 2016). They are highly polar, hydrophilic and resistant to biodegradation. Many emerging pollutants can enter the biosphere through groundwater and surface water (Gondi et al. 2022; Wanda et al. 2017). Some emerging pollutants may interfere with human enzymatic activities, hormones, or be mutagenic (Basheer 2018). In recent years, due to rapid industrialization, the global emission of emerging pollutants has increased to 10,000 tons per year (Gondi et al. 2022).
Table 3 summaries recent representative studies of nanobiochar application for the removal of emerging pollutants. Due to the abundant surface functional groups and rich pores, nanobiochar’s high-efficiency removal ability for mainstream antibiotics in the environment has been demonstrated. Previous studies have shown that the removal rate of tetracycline (TC) in TC contaminated soil amended with ball milled nanobiochar was 96.36%, which was significantly higher than that amended with the bulk biochar (Sun et al. 2022). This result was attributed to the enhanced activity of soil microorganisms through the adsorption and degradation of TC by nanobiochar (Yue et al. 2019a). Moreover, active carbon and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) were considered as super adsorbents for pollutants in wastewater, however, they are unable to completely remove persistent organic pollutants from wastewater (Hernández-Leal et al. 2011; Westerhoff et al. 2005). However, nanobiochar has exhibited a considerable adsorption capacity (609–2098 mg kg−1 for galaxolide) for persistent organic pollutants, which was much higher than active carbon (Zhang et al. 2019b). All these studies further indicated that nanobiochar can be used as a useful amendment for removal of antibiotics in the environment.
Increasing antibiotic exposure in the environment promotes the relative abundance of antibiotic resistance genes (ARG) (Pruden et al. 2006). Lian et al. (2020) found that nanobiochar could adsorb the extracellular DNA (eDNA) of ARGs and the adsorption capacity reached 296 mg g−1. It is worth noting that the adsorbed eDNA is cleaved into short fragments or loses structural integrity over time. At the same time, the comparison found that the binding ability of nanobiochar to ARGs was 50–100 times higher than that of the bulk biochar. They also found that the nanobiochar not only adsorbed and damaged ARGs, but also inhibited their replication (Lian et al. 2020). In contrast, the bulk biochar–ARGs interaction only involves adsorption without the damaging and inhibition effects.
Ma et al. (2019) reported that the maximum adsorption capacity of diethyl phthalate by nanobiochar under pH 9 was much greater than that of micro-size biochar, while the adsorption capacity of nanobiochar and micron-scale biochar was insignificant at pH 3, which indicates that the corn stover nanobiochar has high activity under alkaline conditions. Studies have shown that biochar can prevent leaching and increase the dissipation of these biopesticides thereby reducing their potential environmental risk (Anupama and Khare 2021; Gámiz et al. 2016). In terms of pollutant adsorption and degradation, biochar and nanobiochar share similar mechanisms which are discussed in detail below. Shen et al. (2020) found that nanobiochar can weaken the Imperata cylindrica allelopathic effect on rice seedlings. Together these studies demonstrated that nanobiochar is an effective absorbent for controlling the release of allelopathic compounds.
According to the above discussion, nanobiochar can significantly stabilize or remove toxic substances from soil, which may offer a healthy environment for plant growth. In addition, nanobiochar combines the pristine biochar and nanomaterial properties to promote plant growth (Garg et al. 2022; Rajput et al. 2022; Shen et al. 2020). Therefore, during phytoremediation process, nanobiochar application to contaminated soil will also further improve the phytoremediation effectiveness.
4 Adsorption mechanism of pollutants using nanobiochar
As a powerful pollutant adsorbent, the adsorption mechanism of nanobiochar is complex and diverse, including ion exchange, complexation, precipitation, electrostatic interaction, and physical adsorption (Zhang et al. 2022b). In the adsorption process, the above reactions or their combined reactions may be involved (Mahmoud et al. 2021). The adsorption mechanisms, however, varied with the properties of nanobiochar, environmental conditions, and the type of adsorbed pollutants (Antonangelo et al. 2019). For example, studies showed that the adsorption of Ni on carbonaceous materials mainly involves electrostatic forces, cationic-π interactions, and surface complexed, while the adsorption mechanism of glyphosate on nanobiochar may not include chemisorption (Meena et al. 2005; Ramanayaka et al. 2020a; Sato et al. 2007). The increase of acidic functional groups will reduce the surface potential and PZC of nanobiochar, thereby enhancing the electrostatic effect of adsorption (Lyu et al. 2018a). Moreover, high temperature pyrolysis may result in the increase of the SSA and void structure richness of biochar and a decrease in polar surface functional groups, consequently the dominant adsorption mechanism tends to be physical adsorption. On the contrary, the SSA of low-temperature nanobiochar is relatively low and the polar surface functional groups are relatively more, and the dominant adsorption mechanism is biased towards chemical adsorption (Zhuang et al. 2021). Therefore, to explore the nanobiochar with good removal ability for heavy metals and organic pollutants, it is necessary to study the mechanisms that mainly control the adsorption.
Fan et al. (2020) concluded that the main mechanism for the adsorption of heavy metals by nanobiochar was attributed to the interaction between the negatively charge surface carrying oxygen-containing functional groups as electron donors and positively charged metals. Wang et al. (2020b) showed that the complexation of the positively charged –OH groups of nanobiochar with the negatively charged Cr(VI) in aqueous systems was the dominant mechanism involved in the adsorption process. Ramanayaka et al. (2020a) pointed out that no physical adsorption was found in the adsorption of Cr(VI) by nanobiochar, and the surface –OH, –COOH, –C=O and other oxygen-containing functional groups provide electrons for the reduction of Cr(VI), which was confirmed by Zhang et al. (2013a, b). Cations (Ca2+ and Mg2+) were observed to be released from biochar into solution during adsorption process, which suggests that cation exchange is another important adsorption mechanism during Cr(III)-biochar reaction (Chen et al. 2015). For anions, nanobiochar showed different adsorption mechanisms. Niazi et al. (2018a) reported that the functional groups were involved in As sequestration by biochar. After As loading, the shift peaks of functional groups consistent with hydroxy, carboxyl, and C–O ester of alcohols were observed in Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra (Samsuri et al. 2013), suggesting the complexation of As with functional groups. In addition to complexation, electrostatic interaction may be another mechanism which largely controls the As adsorption (Li et al. 2017a). This is evidenced by Wang et al. (2016b) who found the surface functional groups with higher degree of protonation at low pH attract As oxyanion through electrostatic interaction. Lyu et al. (2018a) found ball milling increased the internal and external surface area and exposed the graphene structure on the surface of nanobiochar, which enhanced Ni adsorption via strong cation-π interactions. Furthermore, electrostatic interaction and surface complexation were also observed to be the main mechanisms of Ni-nanobiochar reaction.
Different from heavy metals, the removal of organic pollutants by nanobiochar also includes promoting the pollutant degradation (Khan et al. 2022). Xiao et al. (2020) showed that the ball-milled nanobiochar exposed to visible light produced more oxygen-containing functional groups and exhibited a high degradation rate to enrofloxacin. Sun et al. (2022) showed that the adsorption of TC in soil by ball-milled nanobiochar is mainly based on surface adsorption, π–π interactions, hydrophobic interactions, and hydrogen bonding. Tetracycline adsorbed on nanobiochar surface was degraded by microorganisms whose activity were enhanced by nanobiochar (Yue et al. 2019b). It is likely that the removal process was adsorption at initial period and followed by degradation. Another study also reported that the adsorption mechanism of TC in wastewater on magnetic ball-milled nanobiochar was mainly based on the combined effect of electrostatic interaction, hydrogen bonding and Cπ–Cπ interaction (Li et al. 2020). Hydrogen bonding may be the key mechanism for TC adsorption because of the TC aromaticity, whose molecular structure contains several components that can act as H+ acceptors (e.g. –N(CH3)2 and –C=O) or both as H+ acceptors or donors (e.g. –OH, –CONH2, and –NH2). These components can form hydrogen bonds with the surface components of biochar (Jing et al. 2014; Yang et al. 2011). Electrostatic interactions are the most common adsorption mechanism during the binding of nanobiochar to organic pollutants (Abbas et al. 2018; Zheng et al. 2013). The solution pH largely determines the strength of the electrostatic force and whether it is attractive or repulsive (see Sect. 5.3). With the pH value ranging from 1.8 to 9.8, the adsorption capacity of nanobiochar for methyl blue ranged from 216 to 351 mg g−1, which indicates that the electrostatic interaction mechanism plays an important role in the adsorption process (Lyu et al. 2018b). Compared to bulk biochar, nanobiochar has more graphene structure and larger pore volume and pore size. Therefore, pore filling and π–π interactions should occur more frequently during the reaction. Zhang et al. (2019b) found that pore filling and π–π interactions enhanced the adsorption of galaxolide by high-temperature ball-milled nanobiochar. The adsorption mechanism of nanobiochar on pollutants is ultimately determined by its properties, which is discussed in detail below.
5 Factors affecting performance of nanobiochar for environmental remediation
The biogeochemical behavior of nanobiochar during the removal or stabilization of pollutants is affected by various factors, such as the physical and chemical properties of nanobiochar, characteristics of pollutants and environmental conditions. These factors also have different degrees of influence on nanobiochar’s biogeochemical behavior in soil and water environments. For example, when environmental factors (e.g. acid rain) attempt to alter the soil and water pH, the soil pH was more affected than water system due to due to the strong buffering capacity of the soil. In addition, the types of microorganisms in soil and water also vary, which may lead to greater variability in nanobiochar biogeochemical behavior in both systems.
5.1 Properties of nanobiochar
It has been widely accepted that the pyrolysis temperature can significantly affect nanobiochar properties. During pyrolysis, the release of volatile gases leads to an increase in porosity and therefore increases the SSA of biochar/nanobiochar (Niazi et al. 2018b; Swaren et al. 2022; Weber and Quicker 2018). Most nanobiochars have large SSA ranging from 5.58 to 1736 m2 g−1 (Table 4) due to the small particle size. Studies have shown that the SSA of nanobiochar could increase with the pyrolysis temperature (see Table 4 and references therein). However, there are also conflicting opinions which suggest that the increase of pyrolysis temperature had no effect or negatively effect on nanobiochar SSA (Table 4). The reason for these differences may be due to the difference in the raw parent materials of the nanobiochar.
Chen et al. (2011) reported that nanobiochar made from high hemicellulose biomass had a larger surface area than that from high lignin content material. This may be due to the high recalcitrance of lignin pyrolysis below 1000 °C (Neeli and Ramsurn 2018). Under the same preparation conditions, the carbon content of barley grass nanobiochar was only 5.02%, however, the pig manure nanobiochar reached 44.9% (Song et al. 2019). As for the ash content, corn straw nanobiochar had a much lower ash content than that of rice straw nanobiochar, which was mainly due to the rice straw containing more silicon (Si) than corn straw (Ma et al. 2019).
In addition to the raw material, the ash content was usually related to the pyrolysis temperature (Anupama et al. 2021; Nath et al. 2019). As the pyrolysis temperature increases, the base cation and carbonate content of the biochar increases thus leading to an increase in total ash content (Ramanayaka et al. 2020a). For instance, the ash content of 800 °C sugarcane bagasse biochar was 2–3 times higher than low temperature biochar (Hass and Lima 2018). In addition, the ash content of ultrasonic nanobiochar was significantly lower than that of pristine biochar by about 50% because of the separation or dissolution of minerals by the ultrasonic process (Liu et al. 2018a). Similar to the ash content, the carbon content also showed a strong correlation with temperature and raw material (Zhang et al. 2022c). Under high temperature pyrolysis conditions, the C–H and C–O bonds are broken leading to the release of hydrogen and oxygen and an increase in carbon content (Jindo et al. 2014; Mahinpey et al. 2009; Xu et al. 2020). At low temperatures (< 300 °C), the raw material is difficult to be carbonized and thus retains its original properties, and the carbon content of the biochar is lower (Keiluweit et al. 2010). The effect of raw materials on the carbon content of nanobiochar has been summarized in Table 4. At the molecular scale, the main component of nanobiochar carbon was mainly the aromatic structure (Ma et al. 2019). At higher pyrolysis temperatures (800–900 °C), smaller aromatic rings form larger and more stable aromatic ring structures that were more difficult to depolymerize (Feng et al. 2017). The aromatic clusters were distributed on different graphene-like aggregates (Xiao et al. 2017). Graphene-like multilayer structures have been observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Ma et al. 2019; Oleszczuk et al. 2016), where these nanosheets are randomly arranged in the turbo-layered state (Xiao et al. 2016). In addition, amorphous carbon was present on the surface of the nanobiochar (Zhao et al. 2022), where intrinsic minerals (mainly the alkali and alkaline earth metals) can act as catalysts (He et al. 2021). The composition and structure of nanobiochar have a great impact on its ability to adsorb pollutants. For example, nanobiochar with higher concentration of cations may enhance the ion exchange ability with heavy metals, thereby stabilizing more metal ions. A more aromatic structure nanobiochar may lead to more π–π interactions between nanobiochar and pollutants (mainly for organic pollutants). Therefore, when nanobiochar is used as an amendment for environmental remediation, its composition and structure should also be taken into consideration.
The aggregation ability, colloidal stability and the electro kinetic properties of nanobiochar may affect the adsorption capacity of nanobiochar on pollutants, which can be assessed by measuring the zeta potential (Filipinas et al. 2021; Safari et al. 2019). Generally, the zeta potential of nanobiochar is lower than that of microbiochar, which is due to the smaller particle size, lower carbon content and higher ash content of nanobiochar (Song et al. 2019). The zeta potential may vary due to differences in chemical composition of the parent material (such as –COOH) (Qian et al. 2016). Song et al. (2019) observed that nanobiochar produced from wood, forage and agricultural waste had a much higher zeta potential than that produced from manure and activated sludge. Surface functional groups of nanobiochar also vary with pyrolysis temperature and parent material. As the temperature increases, the volatile organic compounds in the material are devolatilize, resulting in a surface functional group reduction (Alam et al. 2018). Hence, low-temperature pyrolysis nanobiochar was reported to have an abundance of surface functional groups, high absolute zeta potential and strong suspension stability (Xu et al. 2020).
5.2 Characteristics of pollutants affecting sorption by nanobiochar
The adsorption behaviour of nanobiochar for different pollutants may varies greatly due to the large differences in the properties of the pollutants. As for heavy metals, the valence, hydration radius, electronegativity and hydrolysis constant are the main factors that govern the remediation process of nanobiochar (Fig. 4). Zhang et al. (2022a) found that under the same conditions, the adsorption capacity of nanobiochar for Pb was much greater than that for Cd. This could be attributed to the property difference of metals and their affinity for adsorption sites. The hydration radius of Cd (4.26 Å) is larger than that of Pb (4.01 Å) and the pKH (negative log of hydrolysis constant) of Cd (10.1) is larger than that of Pb (7.71). These metallic properties indicate that Pb can be better adsorbed through internal surface complexation or adsorption reactions than Cd. In addition, the electronegativity of Pb (2.33) is greater than that of Cd (1.69), which leads to a better binding tendency of Pb to hard Lewis base surface functional groups (Ni et al. 2019).
The characteristics of organic pollutants such as polarity, hydrophobicity, aromaticity, and molecular size are important factors affecting their interaction with nanobiochar (Fig. 4). Since acetone polarity was higher than that of toluene, the adsorption capacity of nanobiochar for acetone was greatly improved compared to that of toluene (Zhuang et al. 2021). Generally, the adsorption rate of strongly hydrophobic organics by carbonaceous adsorbents is slow (Choi et al. 2013, 2014). Kang et al. (2018) showed that reducing biochar particle size can significantly improve the adsorption rate of hydrophobic organics by biochar. Galaxolide is a hydrophobic organic pollutant and thus can be better adsorbed by ball milled nanobiochar (Zhang et al. 2019b). In addition, the hydrophobic interaction between the polar groups of TC and the nanobiochar enhanced its adsorption (Sun et al. 2022). Aromatic organic compounds can form π–π interactions with biochar and be tightly adsorbed (Teixidó et al. 2011; Zhu et al. 2005). Zeng et al. (2019) reported that TC was adsorbed through the π–π stacking interactions between the four aromatic rings in its molecular structure and the aromatic carbon matrix of nanobiochar. Pollutants with different molecular sizes have different effective contact and interception effects on biochar/nanobiochar, subsequently the adsorption mechanism and adsorption effect are also different (Nguyen et al. 2007). Larger compound molecules are hardly absorbed by biochar due to the size exclusion effect and pore filling mechanism, which lead to organic molecules being largely restricted from entering pores smaller than their size (Han et al. 2014; Zhu et al. 2022). This effect is likely to be amplified on nanobiochar due to its generally small pore diameter.
5.3 Environmental conditions
Environmental factors that strongly affect the performance of nanobiochar in environmental remediation mainly include pH, coexisting ions, dissolved organic matter (DOM), organisms and root exudates (soil system) (see details in Fig. 5). Environment pH strongly governs the biogeochemical behavior of nanobiochar for environmental remediation (Gaya et al. 2015). Under low pH conditions, the functional groups of nanobiochar are easily protonated to form H+, which will cause H+ and cation pollutant species to compete with each other for cation adsorption sites thus reducing the adsorption capacity of nanobiochar (Mahmoud et al. 2020b; Park et al. 2019). In addition, positively charged surfaces may hinder the adsorption of pollutants due to electrostatic repulsion (Lyu et al. 2018a). Studies have found that the adsorption capacity of Cd by nanobiochar increased with the pH value (ranging from 1 to 7) (Mahmoud et al. 2021; Ramanayaka et al. 2020a). This may be due to the protonation of the nanobiochar surface during the acidic adsorption process, which enables Cd to outcompete H+ for adsorption sites. However, the negatively charged nanobiochar surface also showed lower affinity for negatively charged or neutral pollutants due to electrostatic repulsion at high pH (Zeng et al. 2019). Previous studies have also shown similar results where the adsorption capacity of nanobiochar increased as pH increased from 2 to 8 and decreased slowly when the pH was greater than 8 (Li et al. 2020; Sun et al. 2022). In summary, it is essential to study pH changes in the environment when using nanobiochar for environmental remediation.
Determination of the PZC is important to accurately investigate how pH affects the adsorption capacity of nanobiochar (Mahmoud et al. 2021). PZC usually occurs when the nanobiochar surface is neutral, and under pH < pHPZC conditions, the nanobiochar surface shows a positive charge, otherwise it is negatively charged (Choudhary et al. 2020). Changes in the adsorbate solution pH can affect not only the surface chemistry of the adsorbent, but also changes in the adsorbate species (Li et al. 2010). For example, Ni2+ is the dominant form when the solution pH range is < 9, while the dominant form is Ni (OH)2 (aq) when the pH ranges from 9 to 11, and Ni (OH)3 for pH 12–14 (Lyu et al. 2018a). As for the metal modified nanobiochar, a change in environment pH may affect the properties of nanobiochar itself, thereby affecting its pollutants adsorption abilities. Wang et al. (2020a, b, c) showed that the surface of Fe0-nanobiochar contained soluble iron oxides at pH lower than PZC under acidic conditions, thus providing more opportunities for electron transfer. Li et al. (2022) found that the low pH condition resulted in structural instability and partial dissolution of the MgAl-layered double hydroxide (LDH) phase of the biochar supported layered double hydroxide composites, which weakened the adsorption capacity of phosphate by the layered double hydroxides.
Previous studies have shown that coexist of multiple ions may affect nanobiochar’s behavior for pollutant removal (Yadav et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2020). Independent adsorption, cooperative adsorption and competitive adsorption are three adsorption relationships which are suitable for substances that coexist in the water environment (Wang et al. 2016a). Wang et al. (2017) showed that the addition of Pb could promote the adsorption of p-nitrophenol on biochar. Likewise, the presence of As3+ in the aqueous solution increased the adsorption of Cd on the magnetized biochar from 3% to 16% (Wu et al. 2018). The cations and anions in water system may have a much stronger effect on nanobiochar properties than in soil system, which occurs because they can migrate faster in water and are easier to contact nanobiochar. There are large number of organisms in the environment which may produce secretions or excretions, like extracellular polymers by Escherichia coli cells and metabolites by algae, and this may block the pores of the adsorbent surface and reduce adsorption sites especially for nanobiochar due to its small pore and particle size (Kenney and Rosenzweig 2018; Zhang et al. 2020).
DOM is abundant in the environment and plays a critical role in the removal and migration of pollutants (Fig. 5, also see details in Ling et al. 2015). As an important fraction, the presence of humic acid will reduce the adsorption of sulfamethazine by biochar (Jia et al. 2018). Yang et al. (2020a) found that DOM would suppress the Bisphenol S adsorption capacity on biochar (should be the same effect on nanobiochar). More importantly, DOM itself can bind with metals or combine with organic pollutants, thereby reducing their bioavailability. It is essential to investigate how different fractions of DOM affect nanobiochar adsorption capacity for pollutants.
In soil systems, specifically, the nanobiochar pores can promote bacteria and fungi coexistence and offer protection from pollutants (Quilliam et al. 2013). The nutrient components of nanobiochar can be absorbed by soil microorganisms or used as carbon sources, thereby enhancing the activity of soil microorganisms, and promoting pollutant degradation (Ameloot et al. 2015). Nanobiochar can affect soil properties such as reducing soil bulk density, increasing soil effective water content and carbon sequestration capacity, which consequently affect microbial community structure (Rajput el al. 2022; Yu et al. 2015). It is important to note that that effect of nanobiochar on soil microorganisms is not unidirectional. Since many microorganisms in the rhizosphere soil produce secondary metabolites such as nonribosomal peptides and terpenes (Tyc et al. 2017) that can easily agglomerate or heterogeneously aggregate nanobiochars, leading to a decrease in SSA. This in turn significantly reduces nanobiochar’s pollutant adsorption rate. For soil fauna, earthworms are the most studied organisms in the interaction between soil animals and biochar (Lehmann et al. 2011). The glandular cells of earthworms are present in the posterior epithelium and release mucus to moisten the epithelium (Wang et al. 2011). Nanobiochar contacting with mucus is likely to lose its adsorption sites due to pore plugging . However, the research on the effects of other soil fauna behavioral processes on the environmental function of nanobiochar is lacked.
In soil systems, plant roots are ubiquitous and release root exudates such as organic acids, amino acids and other simple sugars during plant growth (Ling et al. 2009; Toyama et al. 2011). Root exudates can promote the biodegradation of organic pollutants and control redox sensitive pollutant bioavailability (Martin et al. 2014; Sun et al. 2013). The root exudate components can affect nanobiochar physicochemical properties, which may further influence its adsorption capacity of pollutants. Li et al. (2019) reported that oxalic acid would undergo acid oxidation with biochar to promote biochar polarity and reduce its aromaticity, which directly led to the enhanced adsorption of phenanthrene and the weakened pyrene adsorption by biochar. Interestingly, the high oxalic acid concentration dissolved the ash content and increased the number of micropores in biochar to increase its SSA, and consequently promoted phenanthrene adsorption (Zhang et al. 2013a, b). In addition, root exudates may also diffuse into the pores of nanobiochar to destroy the pore structure, resulting in the release of pollutants adsorbed into the environment (Joseph et al. 2010).
Usually, natural aging process may also strongly affect the adsorption capacity of biochar when using for pollutant removal. This process can partially crack bulk biochar into nanobiochar. Wang et al. (2020c) reported that aging will lead to nanobiochar erosion, oxidation, and disagglomeration. Some studies showed that biochar aging in soil environment will generate more oxygen-containing surface functional groups, which is due to the chemical aging by soil minerals (Chang et al. 2019; Ren et al. 2018). This enhances biochar/nanobiochar ability to immobilize heavy metals. However, Zhang et al. (2016) found that aging process reduced the adsorption capacity of biochar to pollutants due to dissolved organic matter blocking the pores of biochar. Therefore, how aging process affects the performance of nanobiochar on the removal/stabilize pollutants in the environment still need to be further studied.
6 Conclusions and outlooks
Although numerous studies have focused on how to use biochar in environmental remediation, there are relatively few studies on nanobiochar. By summarizing the literatures in this review, we found that nanobiochar has much greater potential for remediation of environmental pollution than biochar, which can be attributed to its special physical and chemical properties and higher mobility in the environment as nanoparticles. However, it is not clear whether nanobiochar will produce nanotoxicity or display negative effects when it enters the environment. Therefore, future studies should be conducted to fill the knowledge gaps which are list as below:
-
As discussed in Sect. 2, although various methods can be used for nanobiochar preparation, their yields were still relatively low and this greatly limits the development of related research on nanobiochar. Therefore, further studies are needed to optimize nanobiochar production methods to improve its yield.
-
In the remediation process, the biogeochemical behavior of nanobiochar is still unclear, especially the environmental risks. Therefore, studying the biogeochemical behavior of nanobiochar and its environmental risks will provide a guarantee for the safe use of nanobiochar in environmental remediation.
-
When nanobiochar is added to the environment, it can stabilize a large amount of pollutants. This will greatly reduce pollutant transport and bioavailability and consequently diminishing their threat to ecosystems and human health. However, it is unknown whether the immobilized pollutants will be re-released into the environment. The issue of how to recover the biochar used for environmental remediation from the environment has not been solved. As nano-level particles, nanobiochar is even more difficult to recycle. Therefore, nanobiochar recovery technology and its environmental risks after adsorption of pollutants need to be further studied.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abbas Z, Ali S, Rizwan M, Zaheer IE, Malik A, Riaz MA, Shahid MR, Rehman MZU, Al-Wabel MI (2018) A critical review of mechanisms involved in the adsorption of organic and inorganic contaminants through biochar. Arab J Geosci 11:448
Alagha O, Manzar MS, Zubair M, Anil I, MuazuQureshi NDA (2020) Comparative adsorptive removal of phosphate and nitrate from wastewater using biochar-MgAl LDH nanocomposites: Coexisting anions effect and mechanistic studies. Nanomater 10:336
Alam MS, Gorman-Lewis D, Chen N, Flynn SL, Ok YS, Konhauser KO, Alessi DS (2018) Thermodynamic analysis of nickel(II) and zinc(II) adsorption to biochar. Environ Sci Technol 52:6246–6255
Ameloot N, Sleutel S, Das KC, Kanagaratnam J, de Neve S (2015) Biochar amendment to soils with contrasting organic matter level: Effects on N mineralization and biological soil properties. GCB Bioenergy 7:135–144
Antonangelo JA, Zhang H, Sun X, Kumar A (2019) Physicochemical properties and morphology of biochars as affected by feedstock sources and pyrolysis temperatures. Biochar 1:325–336
AnupamaKhare IP (2021) A comprehensive evaluation of inherent properties and applications of nano-biochar prepared from different methods and feedstocks. J Clean Prod 320:128759
Arabyarmohammadi H, Darban AK, Abdollahy M, Yong R, Ayati B, Zirakjou A, van der Zee SEATM (2018) Utilization of a novel chitosan/clay/biochar nanobiocomposite for immobilization of heavy metals in acid soil environment. J Polym Environ 26:2107–2119
Azadi N, Raiesi F (2021) Biochar alleviates metal toxicity and improves microbial community functions in a soil co-contaminated with cadmium and lead. Biochar 3:485–498
Basheer A (2018) New generation nano-adsorbents for the removal of emerging contaminants in water. J Mol Liq 261:583–593
Bayram M, Öner MD (2007) Bulgur milling using roller, double disc and vertical disc mills. J Food Eng 79:181–187
Chang R, Sohi SP, Jing F, Liu Y, Chen JA (2019) Comparative study on biochar properties and Cd adsorption behavior under effects of ageing processes of leaching, acidification and oxidation. Environ Pollut 254:113123
Chausali N, Saxena J, Prasad R (2021) Nanobiochar and biochar based nanocomposites: Advances and applications. J Agric Food Chem 5:100191
Chen WH, Hsu HC, Lu KM, Lee WJ, Lin TC (2011) Thermal pretreatment of wood (Lauan) block by torrefaction and its influence on the properties of the biomass. Energy 36:3012–3021
Chen T, Zhou ZY, Xu S, Wang HT, Lu WJ (2015) Adsorption behavior comparison of trivalent and hexavalent chromium on biochar derived from municipal sludge. Bioresour Technol 190:388–394
Chen D, Zhu H, Yang S, Li N, Xu Q, Li H, He J, Lu J (2016) Micro-nanocomposites in environmental management. Adv Mater 28:10443–10458
Chen H, Gao Y, Li J, Sun C, Sarkar B, Bhatnagar A, Bolan N, Yang X, Meng J, Liu Z, Hou H, Wong JWC, Hou D, Chen W, Wang H (2022) Insights into simultaneous adsorption and oxidation of antimonite [Sb(III)] by crawfish shell-derived biochar: Spectroscopic investigation and theoretical calculations. Biochar 4:37
Choi YJ, Cho YM, Gala WR, Luthy RG (2013) Measurement and modeling of activated carbon performance for the sequestration of parent- and alkylated-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in petroleum-impacted sediments. Environ Sci Technol 47:1024–1032
Choi YJ, Cho YM, Luthy RG (2014) In situ sequestration of hydrophobic organic contaminants in sediments under stagnant contact with activated carbon. 1. Column Studies Environ Sci Technol 48:1835–1842
Choudhary M, Kumar R, Neogi S (2020) Activated biochar derived from opuntia ficus-indica for the efficient adsorption of malachite green dye, Cu+2 and Ni+2 from water. J Haz Mat 392:122441
Daughton CG, Ternes TA (1999) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: Agents of subtle change? Environ Health Persp 107:907–938
Dong X, He L, Liu Y, Piao Y (2018) Preparation of highly conductive biochar nanoparticles for rapid and sensitive detection of 17beta-estradiol in water. Electrochim Acta 292:55–62
Dong CD, Lung SCC, Chen CW, Lee JS, Chen YC, Wang WCV, Chen CJ, Hung CM, Lin CH (2019) Assessment of the pulmonary toxic potential of nano-tobacco stem-pyrolyzed biochars. Environ Sci Nano 6:1527–1535
Fan Z, Zhang Q, Li M, Sang W, Qiu Y, Wei X, Hao H (2020) Removal behavior and mechanisms of Cd(II) by a novel MnS loaded functional biochar: Influence of oxygenation. J Clean Prod 256:120672
Feng DD, Zhao YJ, Zhang Y, Zhang ZB, Zhang LY, Gao JM, Sun SZ (2017) Synergetic effects of biochar structure and AAEM species on reactivity of H2O-activated biochar from cyclone air gasification. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:16045–16053
Filipinas JQ, Rivera KKP, Ong DC, Pingul-Ong SMB, Abarca RRM, de Luna MDG (2021) Removal of sodium diclofenac from aqueous solutions by rice hull biochar. Biochar 3:189–200
Föhr J, Ranta T, Suikki J, Soininen H (2017) Manufacturing of torrefied pellets without a binder from different raw wood materials in the pilot plant. Wood Res 62:481–494
Gámiz B, Pignatello JJ, Cox L, Hermosín MC, Celis R (2016) Environmental fate of the fungicide metalaxyl in soil amended with composted olive-mill waste and its biochar: An enantioselective study. Sci Total Environ 541:776–783
Garg R, Rani P, Garg R, Khan MA, Khan NA, Khan AH, Américo-Pinheiro JHP (2022) Biomedical and catalytic applications of agri-based biosynthesized silver nanoparticles. Environ Pollut 310:119830
Gaya UI, Otene E, Abdullah AH (2015) Adsorption of aqueous Cd(II) and Pb(II) on activated carbon nanopores prepared by chemical activation of doum palm shell. Springerplus 4:458
Gondi R, Kavitha S, Yukesh RY, Karthikeyan OP, Kumar G, Tyagi VK, Banu JR (2022) Algal-based system for removal of emerging pollutants from wastewater: A review. Bioresour Technol 344:126245
Gong Y, Wang Y, Lin N, Wang R, Wang M, Zhang X (2022) Iron-based materials for simultaneous removal of heavy metal(loid)s and emerging organic contaminants from the aquatic environment: Recent advances and perspectives. Environ Pollut 299:118871
Goswami L, Pakshirajan K, Pugazhenthi G (2020) Biological treatment of biomass gasification wastewater using hydrocarbonoclastic bacterium Rhodococcus opacus in an up-flow packed bed bioreactor with a novel waste-derived nano-biochar based bio-support material. J Clean Prod 256:120253
Guo F, Bao L, Wang H, Larson SL, Ballard JH, Knotek-Smith HM, Zhang Q, Su Y, Wang X, Han F (2020) A simple method for the synthesis of biochar nanodots using hydrothermal reactor. Methodsx 7:101022
Han L, Sun K, Jin J, Wei X, Xia X, Wu F, Gao B, Xing B (2014) Role of structure and microporosity in phenanthrene sorption by natural and engineered organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 48:11227–11234
Hass A, Lima IM (2018) Effect of feed source and pyrolysis conditions on properties and metal sorption by sugarcane biochar. Environ Technol Innovation 10:16–26
He Q, Raheem A, Ding L, Xu JL, Cheng C, Yu GS (2021) Combining wet torrefaction and pyrolysis for woody biochar upgradation and structural modification. Energ Convers Manage 243:114383
Hernández-Leal L, Temmink H, Zeeman G, Buisman CJN (2011) Removal of micropollutants from aerobically treated grey water via ozone and activated carbon. Water Res 45:2887–2896
Hou D, O’Connor D, Igalavithana AD, Alessi DS, Luo J, Tsang DCW, Sparks DL, Yamauchi Y, Rinklebe J, Ok YS (2020) Metal contamination and bioremediation of agricultural soils for food safety and sustainability. Nat Rev Earth Environ 1:366–381
Huang X, Zhu S, Zhang H, Huang Y, Wang X, Wang Y, Chen D (2021) Biochar nanoparticles induced distinct biological effects on freshwater algae via oxidative stress, membrane damage, and nutrient depletion. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:10761–10770
Huang Z, Yi Y, Zhang N, Tsang PE, Fang Z (2022) Removal of fluconazole from aqueous solution by magnetic biochar treated by ball milling: Adsorption performance and mechanism. Environ Sci Pollut R 29:33335–33344
Jaishankar M, Tseten T, Anbalagan N, Mathew BB, Beeregowda KN (2014) Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip Toxicol 7:60–72
Jenie SNA, Kristiani A, Sudiyarmanto KDS, Takeishi K (2020) Sulfonated magnetic nanobiochar as heterogeneous acid catalyst for esterification reaction. J Environ Chem Eng 8:103912
Jia M, Wang F, Bian Y, Stedtfeld RD, Liu G, Yu J, Jiang X (2018) Sorption of sulfamethazine to biochars as affected by dissolved organic matters of different origin. Bioresour Technol 248:36–43
Jiang C, Bo J, Xiao X, Zhang S, Wang Z, Yan G, Wu Y, Wong C, He H (2020) Converting waste lignin into nano-biochar as a renewable substitute of carbon black for reinforcing styrene-butadiene rubber. Waste Manage 102:732–742
Jindo K, Mizumoto H, Sawada Y, Sanchez-Monedero MA, Sonoki T (2014) Physical and chemical characterization of biochars derived from different agricultural residues. Biogeosciences 11:6613–6621
Jing XR, Wang YY, Liu WJ, Wang YK, Jiang H (2014) Enhanced adsorption performance of tetracycline in aqueous solutions by methanol-modified biochar. Chem Eng J 248:168–174
Joseph SD, Camps-Arbestain M, Lin Y, Munroe P, Chia CH, Hook J, van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Cowie A, Singh BP, Lehmann J, Foidl N, Smernik RJ, Amonette JE (2010) An investigation into the reactions of biochar in soil. Soil Res 48:501–515
Kang S, Jung J, Choe JK, Ok YS, Choi Y (2018) Effect of biochar particle size on hydrophobic organic compound sorption kinetics: Applicability of using representative size. Sci Total Environ 619:410–418
Keiluweit M, Nico PS, Johnson MG, Kleber M (2010) Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44:1247–1253
Kenney GE, Rosenzweig AC (2018) Chalkophores. Annu Rev Biochem 87:645–676
Khan AH, Aziz HA, Khan NA, Hasan MA, Ahmed S, Farooqi IH, Dhingra A, Vambol V, Changani F, Yousefi M, Islam S, Mozaffari N, Mahtab MS (2021) Impact, disease outbreak and the eco-hazards associated with pharmaceutical residues: A critical review. Int J Environ Sci Te 19:677–688
Khan AH, Khan NA, Zubair M, Shaida MA, Manzar MS, Abutaleb A, Naushad M, Iqbal J (2022) Sustainable green nanoadsorbents for remediation of pharmaceuticals from water and wastewater: A critical review. Environ Res 204:112243
Kirpichtchikova TA, Manceau A, Spadini L, Panfili F, Marcus MA, Jacquet T (2006) Speciation and solubility of heavy metals in contaminated soil using X-ray microfluorescence, EXAFS spectroscopy, chemical extraction, and thermodynamic modeling. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70:2163–2190
Kumar A, Kumar A, Sharma G, Al-Muhtaseb AH, Naushad M, Ghfar AA, Guo CS, Stadler FJ (2018) Biochar-templated g-C3N4/Bi2O2CO3/CoFe2O4 nano-assembly for visible and solar assisted photo-degradation of paraquat, nitrophenol reduction and CO2 conversion. Chem Eng J 339:393–410
Kumar M, Xiong X, Wan Z, Sun Y, Tsang DCW, Gupta J, Gao B, Cao X, Tang J, Ok YS (2020) Ball milling as a mechanochemical technology for fabrication of novel biochar nanomaterials. Bioresour Technol 312:123613
Lehmann J (2007) A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143–144
Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota – a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836
Li Z, Schulz L, Ackley C, Fenske N (2010) Adsorption of tetracycline on kaolinite with pH-dependent surface charges. J Colloid Interface Sci 351:254–260
Li W, Zhu X, He Y, Xing B, Xu J, Brookes PC (2013) Enhancement of water solubility and mobility of phenanthrene by natural soil nanoparticles. Environ Pollut 176:228–233
Li J, Dai J, Liu G, Zhang H, Gao Z, Fu J, He Y, Huang Y (2016) Biochar from microwave pyrolysis of biomass: A review. Biomass Bioenergy 94:228–244
Li HB, Dong XL, da Silva EB, de Oliveira LM, Chen YS, Ma LNQ (2017a) Mechanisms of metal sorption by biochars: Biochar characteristics and modifications. Chemosphere 178:466–478
Li L, Zhang K, Chen L, Huang Z, Liu G, Li M, Wen Y (2017b) Mass preparation of micro/nano-powders of biochar with water-dispersibility and their potential application. New J Chem 41:9649–9657
Li X, Song Y, Bian Y, Wang F, Gu C, Yang X, Jiang X (2019) Effects of root exudates on the sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons onto biochar. Env Pollut Bioavail 31:156–165
Li R, Zhang Y, Deng H, Zhang Z, Wang JJ, Shaheen SM, Xiao R, Rinklebe J, Xi B, He X, Du J (2020) Removing tetracycline and Hg(II) with ball-milled magnetic nanobiochar and its potential on polluted irrigation water reclamation. J Hazard Mater 384:121095
Li DP, Ma J, Xu HC, Xu XY, Qiu H, Cao XD, Zhao L (2022) Recycling waste nickel-laden biochar to pseudo-capacitive material by hydrothermal treatment: Roles of nickel-carbon interaction. Carbon Res 1:16
Lian F, Yu W, Zhou Q, Gu S, Wang Z, Xing B (2020) Size matters: Nano-biochar triggers decomposition and transformation inhibition of antibiotic resistance genes in aqueous environments. Environ Sci Technol 54:8821–8829
Ling W, Ren L, Gao Y, Zhu X, Sun B (2009) Impact of low-molecular-weight organic acids on the availability of phenanthrene and pyrene in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 41:2187–2195
Ling W, Sun R, Gao X, Xu R, Li H (2015) Low-molecular-weight organic acids enhance desorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil. Eur J Soil Sci 66:339–347
Liu G, Zheng H, Jiang Z, Zhao J, Wang Z, Pan B, Xing B (2018a) Formation and physicochemical characteristics of nano biochar: Insight into chemical and colloidal stability. Environ Sci Technol 52:10369–10379
Liu L, Li W, Song W, Guo M (2018b) Remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: Principles and applicability. Sci Total Environ 633:206–219
Liu X, Tang J, Wang L, Liu Q, Liu R (2019) A comparative analysis of ball-milled biochar, graphene oxide, and multi-walled carbon nanotubes with respect to toxicity induction in Streptomyces. J Environ Manage 243:308–317
Liu W, Li Y, Feng Y, Qiao J, Zhao H, Xie J, Fang Y, Shen S, Liang S (2020a) The effectiveness of nanobiochar for reducing phytotoxicity and improving soil remediation in cadmium-contaminated soil. Sci Rep 10:858
Liu Y, Luo X, Zeng Y, Wang Q, Tu W, Yang C, Mai B (2020b) Trophic magnification of Short- and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in terrestrial food webs and their bioamplification in insects and amphibians during metamorphosis. Environ Sci Technol 54:11282–11291
Liu X, Liu L, Leng P, Hu Z (2022) Syringa reticulata subsp. amurensis growth influencing the microbial diversity and heavy metal contents in mixed substrate of municipal sludge and construction waste. Env Pollut Bioavail 34:127–135
Luo Y, Wang Y, Zhu Y, Xue M, Zheng A, Han Y, Yin Z, Hong Z, Xie C, Li X, Lei S, Gao B (2022) Ball-milled bismuth oxychloride/biochar nanocomposites with rich oxygen vacancies for reactive red-120 adsorption in aqueous solution. Biochar 4:21
Lyu H, Gao B, He F, Ding C, Tang J, Crittenden JC (2017) Ball-milled carbon nanomaterials for energy and environmental applications. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:9568–9585
Lyu H, Gao B, He F, Zimmerman AR, Ding C, Huang H, Tang J (2018a) Effects of ball milling on the physicochemical and sorptive properties of biochar: Experimental observations and governing mechanisms. Environ Pollut 233:54–63
Lyu H, Gao B, He F, Zimmerman AR, Ding C, Tang J, Crittenden JC (2018b) Experimental and modeling investigations of ball-milled biochar for the removal of aqueous methylene blue. Chem Eng J 335:110–119
Lyu H, Xia S, Tang J, Zhang Y, Gao B, Shen B (2020) Thiol-modified biochar synthesized by a facile ball-milling method for enhanced sorption of inorganic Hg2+ and organic CH3Hg+. J Hazard Mater 384:121357
Ma S, Jing F, Sohi SP, Chen J (2019) New insights into contrasting mechanisms for PAE adsorption on millimeter, micron- and nano-scale biochar. Environ Sci Pollut R 26:18636–18650
Mahinpey N, Murugan P, Mani T, Raina R (2009) Analysis of bio-oil, biogas, and biochar from pressurized pyrolysis of wheat straw using a tubular reactor. Energy Fuels 23:2736–2742
Mahmoud ME, Nabil GM, Zaki MM, Saleh MM (2019) Starch functionalization of iron oxide by-product from steel industry as a sustainable low cost nanocomposite for removal of divalent toxic metal ions from water. Int J Biol Macromol 137:455–468
Mahmoud ME, El-Ghanam AM, Saad SR, Mohamed RHA (2020a) Promoted removal of metformin hydrochloride anti-diabetic drug from water by fabricated and modified nanobiochar from artichoke leaves. Sustain Chem Pharm 18:100336
Mahmoud ME, Fekry NA, Abdelfattah AM (2020b) A novel nanobiosorbent of functionalized graphene quantum dots from rice husk with barium hydroxide for microwave enhanced removal of lead (II) and lanthanum (III). Bioresour Technol 298:122514
Mahmoud ME, Abou-Ali SAA, Elweshahy SMT (2021) Efficient and ultrafast removal of Cd(II) and Sm(III) from water by leaves of Cynara scolymus derived biochar. Mater Res Bull 141:111334
Makshut NA, Ngaini Z, Wahi R, Hussain H, Mahmut NI, Bahrin NQ (2020) Nano-sized adsorbent from pyrolysed sago activated sludge for removal of Pb (II) from aqueous solution. Pertanika J Sci Technol 28:893–916
Martin BC, George SJ, Price CA, Ryan MH, Tibbett M (2014) The role of root exuded low molecular weight organic anions in facilitating petroleum hydrocarbon degradation: Current knowledge and future directions. Sci Total Environ 472:642–653
Matei E, Covaliu-Mierla CI, Ţurcanu AA, Râpă M, Predescu AM, Predescu C (2022) Multifunctional membranes-A versatile approach for emerging pollutants removal. Membranes 12:67
Meena AK, Mishra GK, Rai PK, Rajagopal C, Nagar PN (2005) Removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions using carbon aerogel as an adsorbent. J Hazard Mater 122:161–170
Naghdi M, Taheran M, Brar SK, Kermanshahi-pour A, Verma M, Surampalli RY (2017a) Immobilized laccase on oxygen functionalized nanobiochars through mineral acids treatment for removal of carbamazepine. Sci Total Environ 584:393–401
Naghdi M, Taheran M, Brar SK, Rouissi T, Verma M, Surampalli RY, Valero JR (2017b) A green method for production of nanobiochar by ball milling-optimization and characterization. J Clean Prod 164:1394–1405
Nath BK, Chaliha C, Kalita E (2019) Iron oxide permeated mesoporous rice-husk nanobiochar (IPMN) mediated removal of dissolved arsenic (As): Chemometric modelling and adsorption dynamics. J Environ Manage 246:397–409
Ndirangu SM, Liu Y, Xu K, Song S (2019) Risk evaluation of pyrolyzed biochar from multiple wastes. J Chem-NY 2019:4506314
Neeli ST, Ramsurn H (2018) Synthesis and formation mechanism of iron nanoparticles in graphitized carbon matrices using biochar from biomass model compounds as a support. Carbon 134:480–490
Nguyen TH, Cho HH, Poster DL, Ball WP (2007) Evidence for a pore-filling mechanism in the adsorption of aromatic hydrocarbons to a natural wood char. Environ Sci Technol 41:1212–1217
Ni BJ, Huan QS, Wang C, Ni TY, Sun J, Wei W (2019) Competitive adsorption of heavy metals in aqueous solution onto biochar derived from anaerobically digested sludge. Chemosphere 219:351–357
Niazi NK, Bibi I, Shahid M, Ok YS, Burton ED, Wang H, Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J, Lüttge A (2018a) Arsenic removal by perilla leaf biochar in aqueous solutions and groundwater: An integrated spectroscopic and microscopic examination. Enviro Pollut 232:31–41
Niazi NK, Bibi I, Shahid M, Ok YS, Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J, Wang H, Murtaza B, Islam E, Nawaz MF, Lüttge A (2018b) Arsenic removal by Japanese oak wood biochar in aqueous solutions and well water: Investigating arsenic fate using integrated spectroscopic and microscopic techniques. Sci Total Environ 621:1642–1651
Norvill ZN, Shilton A, Guieysse B (2016) Emerging contaminant degradation and removal in algal wastewater treatment ponds: Identifying the research gaps. J Hazard Mater 313:291–309
Oleszczuk P, Ćwikła-Bundyra W, Bogusz A, Skwarek E, Ok YS (2016) Characterization of nanoparticles of biochars from different biomass. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 121:165–172
Park JH, Wang JJ, Zhou B, Mikhael JER, DeLaune RD (2019) Removing mercury from aqueous solution using sulfurized biochar and associated mechanisms. Environ Pollut 244:627–635
Pereira MFR, Soares SF, Órfão JJM, Figueiredo JL (2003) Adsorption of dyes on activated carbons: Influence of surface chemical groups. Carbon 41:811–821
Pratap T, Chaubey AK, Patel M, Mlsna TE, Pittman CU Jr, Mohan D (2022) Nanobiochar for aqueous contaminant removal. In: Mohan D, Pittman CU, Mlsna TE (eds) Sustainable biochar for water and wastewater treatment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 667–704
Pruden A, Pei R, Storteboom H, Carlson KH (2006) Antibiotic resistance genes as emerging contaminants: studies in Northern Colorado. Environ Sci Technol 40:7445–7450
Qian L, Zhang W, Yan J, Han L, Gao W, Liu R, Chen M (2016) Effective removal of heavy metal by biochar colloids under different pyrolysis temperatures. Bioresour Technol 206:217–224
Qiao J, Yu H, Wang X, Li F, Wang Q, Yuan Y, Liu C (2019) The applicability of biochar and zero-valent iron for the mitigation of arsenic and cadmium contamination in an alkaline paddy soil. Biochar 1:203–212
Quilliam RS, Glanville HC, Wade SC, Jones DL (2013) Life in the ‘charosphere’ – Does biochar in agricultural soil provide a significant habitat for microorganisms? Soil Biol Biochem 65:287–293
Rajput VD, Minkina T, Ahmed B, Singh B, Singh VK, Mandzhieva S, Sushkova S, Bauer T, Verma KK, Shan SD, van Hullebusch ED, Wang B (2022) Nano-biochar: A novel solution for sustainable agriculture and environmental remediation. Environ Res 210:112891
Ramanayaka S, Tsang DCW, Hou D, Ok YS, Vithanage M (2020a) Green synthesis of graphitic nanobiochar for the removal of emerging contaminants in aqueous media. Sci Total Environ 706:135725
Ramanayaka S, Vithanage M, Alessi DS, Liu WJ, Jayasundera ACA, Ok YS (2020b) Nanobiochar: Production, properties, and multifunctional applications. Environ Sci Nano 7:3279–3302
Ramezanzadeh H, Reyhanitabar A, Oustan S, Mohammadi MH, van der Zee S (2021) Enhanced sorption of cadmium by using biochar nanoparticles from ball milling in a sandy soil. Eurasian Soil Sci 54:201–211
Rasaki SA, Thomas T, Yang M (2019) Co-precipitation strategy for engineering pH-tolerant and durable ZnO@MgO nanospheres for efficient, room-temperature, chemisorptive removal of Pb(II) from water. J Environ Chem Eng 7:103019
Ren X, Wang F, Zhang P, Guo J, Sun H (2018) Aging effect of minerals on biochar properties and sorption capacities for atrazine and phenanthrene. Chemosphere 206:51–58
Ren SY, Xu X, Hu KS, Tian WJ, Duan XG, Yi JB, Wang SB (2022) Structure-oriented conversions of plastics to carbon nanomaterials. Carbon Res 1:15
Richard S, Rajadurai JS, Manikandan V (2016) Influence of particle size and particle loading on mechanical and dielectric properties of biochar particulate-reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Int J Polym Anal Charact 21:462–477
Safari S, von Gunten K, Alam MS, Hubmann M, Blewett TA, Chi Z, Alessi DS (2019) Biochar colloids and their use in contaminants removal. Biochar 1:151–162
Sajjadi B, Chen WY, Mattern DL, Hammer N, Dorris A (2020) Low-temperature acoustic-based activation of biochar for enhanced removal of heavy metals. J Water Process Eng 34:101166
Samadi A, Xie M, Li J, Shon H, Zheng C, Zhao S (2021) Polyaniline-based adsorbents for aqueous pollutants removal: A review. Chem Eng J 418:129425
Samsuri AW, Sadegh-Zadeh F, Seh-Barden BJ (2013) Adsorption of As(III) and As(V) by Fe coated biochars and biochars produced from empty fruit bunch and rice husk. J Environ Chem Eng 1:981–988
Sato S, Yoshihara K, Moriyama K, Machida M, Tatsumoto H (2007) Influence of activated carbon surface acidity on adsorption of heavy metal ions and aromatics from aqueous solution. Appl Surf Sci 253:8554–8559
Shen Y, Zhang N (2019) Facile synthesis of porous carbons from silica-rich rice husk char for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) sorption. Bioresour Technol 282:294–300
Shen Y, Tang H, Wu W, Shang H, Zhang D, Zhan X, Xing B (2020) Role of nano-biochar in attenuating the allelopathic effect from Imperata cylindrica on rice seedlings. Environ Sci Nano 7:116–126
Singh M, Ahsan M, Pandey V, Singh A, Mishra D, Tiwari N, Singh P, Karak T, Khare P (2022) Comparative assessment for removal of anionic dye from water by different waste-derived biochar vis a vis reusability of generated sludge. Biochar 4:13
Soares OSGP, Rocha RP, Gonçalves AG, Figueiredo JL, Órfão JJM, Pereira MFR (2015) Easy method to prepare N-doped carbon nanotubes by ball milling. Carbon 91:114–121
Song B, Chen M, Zhao L, Qiu H, Cao X (2019) Physicochemical property and colloidal stability of micron- and nano-particle biochar derived from a variety of feedstock sources. Sci Total Environ 661:685–695
Sulaiman GM, Mohammed WH, Marzoog TR, Al-Amiery AAA, Kadhum AAH, Mohamad AB (2013) Green synthesis, antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of silver nanoparticles using Eucalyptus chapmaniana leaves extract. Asian Pac J Trop Bio 3:58–63
Sun B, Ling W, Wang Y (2013) Can root exudate components influence the availability of pyrene in soil ? J Soils Sediments 13:1161–1169
Sun Y, Lyu H, Cheng Z, Wang Y, Tang J (2022) Insight into the mechanisms of ball-milled biochar addition on soil tetracycline degradation enhancement: Physicochemical properties and microbial community structure. Chemosphere 291:132691
Swaren L, Safari S, Konhauser KO, Alessi DS (2022) Pyrolyzed biomass-derived nanoparticles: A review of surface chemistry, contaminant mobility, and future research avenues to fill the gaps. Biochar 4:33
Teixidó M, Pignatello JJ, Beltrán JL, Granados M, Peccia J (2011) Speciation of the ionizable antibiotic sulfamethazine on black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 45:10020–10027
Tian C, Feng C, Wei M, Wu Y (2018) Enhanced adsorption of anionic toxic contaminant Congo red by activated carbon with electropositive amine modification. Chemosphere 208:476–483
Toyama T, Furukawa T, Maeda N, Inoue D, Sei K, Mori K, Kikuchi S, Ike M (2011) Accelerated biodegradation of pyrene and benzo[a]pyrene in the Phragmites australis rhizosphere by bacteria–root exudate interactions. Water Res 45:1629–1638
Tripathi S, Sonkar SK, Sarkar S (2011) Growth stimulation of gram (Cicer arietinum) plant by water soluble carbon nanotubes. Nanoscale 3:1176–1181
Tyc O, Song C, Dickschat JS, Vos M, Garbeva P (2017) The ecological role of volatile and soluble secondary metabolites produced by soil bacteria. Trends Microbiol 25:280–292
Vishnu D, Dhandapani B, Vaishnavi G, Preethi V (2022) Synthesis of tri-metallic surface engineered nanobiochar from cynodon dactylon residues in a single step-batch and column studies for the removal of copper and lead ions. Chemosphere 286:131572
Wallace CA, Afzal MT, Saha GC (2019) Effect of feedstock and microwave pyrolysis temperature on physio-chemical and nano-scale mechanical properties of biochar. Bioresour Bioprocess 6:33
Wanda EMM, Nyoni H, Mamba BB, Msagati TAM (2017) Occurrence of emerging micropollutants in water systems in Gauteng, Mpumalanga, and North West Provinces, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:79
Wang C, Wang H (2018) Pb(II) sorption from aqueous solution by novel biochar loaded with nano-particles. Chemosphere 192:1–4
Wang C, Sun Z, Zheng D, Liu X (2011) Function of mucilaginous secretions in the antibacterial immunity system of Eisenia fetida. Pedobiologia 54:S57–S62
Wang D, Zhang W, Hao X, Zhou D (2013) Transport of biochar particles in saturated granular media: Effects of pyrolysis temperature and particle size. Environ Sci Technol 47:821–828
Wang C, Gu L, Liu X, Zhang X, Cao L, Hu X (2016a) Sorption behavior of Cr(VI) on pineapple-peel-derived biochar and the influence of coexisting pyrene. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 111:78–84
Wang SS, Gao B, Li YC (2016b) Enhanced arsenic removal by biochar modified with nickel (Ni) and manganese (Mn) oxyhydroxides. J Ind Eng Chem 37:361–365
Wang H, Feng M, Zhou F, Huang X, Tsang DCW, Zhang W (2017) Effects of atmospheric ageing under different temperatures on surface properties of sludge-derived biochar and metal/metalloid stabilization. Chemosphere 184:176–184
Wang T, Rodriguez A, Misra M, Mohanty A (2018) Sustainable carbonaceous biofiller from miscanthus: Size reduction, characterization, and potential bio-composites applications. BioResources 13:3720–3739
Wang B, Gao B, Wan Y (2019) Comparative study of calcium alginate, ball-milled biochar, and their composites on aqueous methylene blue adsorption. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:11535–11541
Wang B, Li F, Wang L (2020a) Enhanced hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) removal from aqueous solution by Fe-Mn oxide-modified cattail biochar: Adsorption characteristics and mechanism. Chem Ecol 36:138–154
Wang K, Sun Y, Tang J, He J, Sun H (2020b) Aqueous Cr(VI) removal by a novel ball milled Fe0-biochar composite: Role of biochar electron transfer capacity under high pyrolysis temperature. Chemosphere 241:125044
Wang L, O’Connor D, Rinklebe J, Ok YS, Tsang DCW, Shen Z, Hou D (2020c) Biochar aging: Mechanisms, physicochemical changes, assessment, and implications for field applications. Environ Sci Technol 54:14797–14814
Wang Y, Wang L, Li Z, Yang D, Xu J, Liu X (2021) MgO-laden biochar enhances the immobilization of Cd/Pb in aqueous solution and contaminated soil. Biochar 3:175–188
Weber K, Quicker P (2018) Properties of biochar. Fuel 217:240–261
Westerhoff P, Yoon Y, Snyder S, Wert E (2005) Fate of endocrine-disruptor, pharmaceutical, and personal care product chemicals during simulated drinking water treatment processes. Environ Sci Technol 39:6649–6663
WHO (2019) Lead poisoning and health. World Health Organization, Geneva
Pure Earth; Green Cross Switzerland (2015) World’s worst pollution problems. The new top six toxic threats: A priority list for remediation; Pure Earth: New York; Green Cross Switzerland: Zurich, Switzerland
Wu J, Huang D, Liu X, Meng J, Tang C, Xu J (2018) Remediation of As(III) and Cd(II) co-contamination and its mechanism in aqueous systems by a novel calcium-based magnetic biochar. J Hazard Mater 348:10–19
Xiang W, Zhang X, Chen K, Fang J, He F, Hu X, Tsang D, Ok Y, Gao B (2020) Enhanced adsorption performance and governing mechanisms of ball-milled biochar for the removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Chem Eng J 358:123842
Xiao X, Chen BL (2017) A direct observation of the fine aromatic clusters and molecular structures of biochars. Environ Sci Technol 51:5473–5482
Xiao X, Chen Z, Chen B (2016) H/C atomic ratio as a smart linkage between pyrolytic temperatures, aromatic clusters and sorption properties of biochars derived from diverse precursory materials. Sci Rep 6:22644
Xiao Y, Lyu H, Tang J, Wang K, Sun H (2020) Effects of ball milling on the photochemistry of biochar: Enrofloxacin degradation and possible mechanisms. Chem Eng J 384:123311
Xu X, Cölfen H (2021) Ultracentrifugation techniques for the ordering of nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 11:2
Xu X, Zheng Y, Gao B, Cao X (2019) N-doped biochar synthesized by a facile ball-milling method for enhanced sorption of CO2 and reactive red. Chem Eng J 368:564–572
Xu CY, Li QR, Geng ZC, Hu FN, Zhao SW (2020) Surface properties and suspension stability of low-temperature pyrolyzed biochar nanoparticles: Effects of solution chemistry and feedstock sources. Chemosphere 259:127510
Yadav N, Dubey A, Shukla S, Saini CP, Gupta G, Priyadarshini R, Lochab B (2017) Graphene oxide-coated surface: Inhibition of bacterial biofilm formation due to specific surface–interface interactions. ACS Omega 2:3070–3082
Yang WB, Zheng FF, Lu YP, Xue XX, Li N (2011) Adsorption interaction of tetracyclines with porous synthetic resins. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:13892–13898
Yang X, Zhang S, Liu L, Ju M (2020a) Study on the long-term effects of DOM on the adsorption of BPS by biochar. Chemosphere 242:125165
Yang Y, Beibei Z, Hu Z, Lin H (2020b) The effects of nano-biochar on maize growth in Northern Shaanxi province on the loess plateau. Appl Ecol Environ Res 18:2863–2877
Yao L, He L, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Liang L, Piao Y (2021) Nanobiochar paper based electrochemical immunosensor for fast and ultrasensitive detection of microcystin-LR. Sci Total Environ 750:141692
Yi P, Pignatello JJ, Uchimiya M, White JC (2015) Heteroaggregation of cerium oxide nanoparticles and nanoparticles of pyrolyzed biomass. Environ Sci Technol 49:13294–13303
Yin P, Brauer M, Cohen AJ, Wang H, Li J, Burnett RT, Stanaway JD, Causey K, Larson S, Godwin W, Frostad J, Marks A, Wang L, Zhou M, Murray CJL (2020) The effect of air pollution on deaths, disease burden, and life expectancy across China and its provinces, 1990–2017: An analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Planet Health 4:e386–e398
Young S, Balluz L, Malilay J (2004) Natural and technologic hazardous material releases during and after natural disasters: A review. Sci Total Environ 322:3–20
Yu L, Yuan Y, Tang J, Wang Y, Zhou S (2015) Biochar as an electron shuttle for reductive dechlorination of pentachlorophenol by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Sci Rep 5:16221
Yuan Y, Zhang N, Hu X (2020) Effects of wet and dry ball milling on the physicochemical properties of sawdust derived-biochar. Instrum Sci Technol 48:287–300
Yue L, Lian F, Han Y, Bao Q, Wang Z, Xing B (2019a) The effect of biochar nanoparticles on rice plant growth and the uptake of heavy metals: Implications for agronomic benefits and potential risk. Sci Total Environ 656:9–18
Yue Y, Shen C, Ge Y (2019b) Biochar accelerates the removal of tetracyclines and their intermediates by altering soil properties. J Hazard Mater 380:120821
Zand AD (2017) Leaching characteristics of phenanthrene and pyrene in biochar-amended contaminated soil. J Appl Biotechnol Rep 4:573–591
Zeng Z, Ye S, Wu H, Xiao R, Zeng G, Liang J, Zhang C, Yu J, Fang Y, Song B (2019) Research on the sustainable efficacy of g-MoS2 decorated biochar nanocomposites for removing tetracycline hydrochloride from antibiotic-polluted aqueous solution. Sci Total Environ 648:206–217
Zhang P, Sun H, Yu L, Sun T (2013a) Adsorption and catalytic hydrolysis of carbaryl and atrazine on pig manure-derived biochars: Impact of structural properties of biochars. J Hazard Mater 244:217–224
Zhang XH, Mao SY, Chen H, Huang L, Qiu RL (2013b) Pb(II) and Cr(VI) sorption by biochars pyrolyzed from the municipal wastewater sludge under different heating conditions. Bioresour Technol 147:545–552
Zhang X, Sarmah AK, Bolan NS, He L, Lin X, Che L, Tang C, Wang H (2016) Effect of aging process on adsorption of diethyl phthalate in soils amended with bamboo biochar. Chemosphere 142:28–34
Zhang J, Hu X, Zhang K, Xue Y (2019a) Desorption of calcium-rich crayfish shell biochar for the removal of lead from aqueous solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 554:417–423
Zhang Q, Wang J, Lyu H, Zhao Q, Jiang L, Liu L (2019b) Ball-milled biochar for galaxolide removal: Sorption performance and governing mechanisms. Sci Total Environ 659:1537–1545
Zhang X, Li B, Deng J, Qin B, Wells M, Tefsen B (2020) Quantitative high-throughput approach to chalkophore screening in freshwaters. Sci Total Environ 735:139476
Zhang Y, Zhao G, Xuan Y, Gan L, Pan M (2021) Enhanced photocatalytic performance for phenol degradation using ZnO modified with nano-biochar derived from cellulose nanocrystals. Cellulose 28:991–1009
Zhang P, Xue B, Jiao L, Meng X, Zhang L, Li B, Sun H (2022a) Preparation of ball-milled phosphorus-loaded biochar and its highly effective remediation for Cd- and Pb-contaminated alkaline soil. Sci Total Environ 813:152648
Zhang X, Wells M, Niazi N, Bolan N, Shaheeng S, Hou D, Gao B, Wang H, Rinklebe J, Wang Z (2022b) Nanobiochar-rhizosphere interactions: Implications for the remediation of heavy-metal contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 299:118810
Zhang XX, Yang XQ, Yuan XR, Tian SC, Wang XL, Zhang HH, Han LJ (2022c) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on composition, carbon fraction and abiotic stability of straw biochars: Correlation and quantitative analysis. Carbon Resesrch 1:17
Zhao L, Zhang Y, Wang L, Lyu H, Xia S, Tang J (2022) Effective removal of Hg(II) and MeHg from aqueous environment by ball milling aided thiol-modification of biochars: Effect of different pyrolysis temperatures. Chemosphere 294:133820
Zheng H, Wang ZY, Zhao J, Herbert S, Xing BS (2013) Sorption of antibiotic sulfamethoxazole varies with biochars produced at different temperatures. Environ Pollut 181:60–67
Zhu D, Kwon S, Pignatello JJ (2005) Adsorption of single-ring organic compounds to wood charcoals prepared under different thermochemical conditions. Environ Sci Technol 39:3990–3998
Zhu HX, Liu XY, Jiang Y, Lin HD, Yang K (2022) Sorption kinetics of 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene to biochars produced at various temperatures. Biochar 4:32
Zhuang Z, Wang L, Tang J (2021) Efficient removal of volatile organic compound by ball-milled biochars from different preparing conditions. J Hazard Mater 406:124676
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Yi Zhu and Dr. Cheng Zhang for their comments on the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42107245) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M701455).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MJ: conceptualization, data curation, investigation, visualization, writing—original draft. LH: writing—review and editing. NKN: writing—review and editing. HW: writing—review and editing. WG: writing—review and editing. MV: writing—review and editing. KG: writing—review and editing. HS: writing—review and editing. XZ: conceptualization, supervision, writing—review and editing. ZW: writing—review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose, financial or otherwise.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, M., He, L., Niazi, N.K. et al. Nanobiochar for the remediation of contaminated soil and water: challenges and opportunities. Biochar 5, 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-022-00201-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-022-00201-x