Abstract
Tat interacting protein 60 (TIP60) is a histone acetyltransferase involved in chromatin remodeling and the DNA damage response. However, the role of TIP60 in maintaining genome stability is poorly understood. Here, we show that TIP60 can directly interact with suppressor of variegation 3–9 homologue 1 (SUV39H1), a methyltransferase that is responsible for histone H3 tri-methylation on Lys9 (H3K9me3). When we knocked down TIP60 or treated cells with hydrogen peroxide, a typical reactive oxygen species (ROS) generator that induces genome instability, SUV39H1 dissociated from chromatin but its acetylation levels remained unchanged. Consequently, H3K9me3 levels in the heterochromatin decreased, leading to a significant increase in the expression of satellite 2 (Sat2) and α-satellite (α-Sat), indicators of heterochromatin relaxation. Micrococcal nuclease sensitivity and colony formation assays further demonstrated that TIP60 knockdown or hydrogen peroxide treatment resulted in a relaxing of the heterochromatin and genome instability. Exogenous TIP60 could rescue the assembly of SUV39H1 on chromatin and ensure genome stability in response to hydrogen peroxide. This study is the first to describe a role for TIP60 in maintaining heterochromatin structure and genome stability by recruiting SUV39H1 to the chromatin upon oxidative stress, presenting TIP60 as a promising target to sensitize cancer cells to ROS-promoting therapies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
20 November 2020
The original version of this article, published on November 6, 2020, contained a mistake.
References
Ayrapetov, M. K., Gursoyyuzugullu, O., Xu, C., Xu, Ye., & Price, B. D. (2014). DNA double-strand breaks promote methylation of histone H3 on lysine 9 and transient formation of repressive chromatin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 9169–9174. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1403565111
Bao, Y., Tong, L., Song, B., Liu, Ge., Zhu, Q., Lu, X., et al. (2020). UNG2 deacetylation confers cancer cell resistance to hydrogen peroxide-induced cytotoxicity. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.06.010
Bosch-Presegue, L., Raurellvila, H., Marazueladuque, A., Kanegoldsmith, N., Valle, A., Oliver, J., et al. (2011). Stabilization of Suv39H1 by SirT1 is part of oxidative stress response and ensures genome protection. Molecular Cell, 42, 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.02.034
Cao, L.-L., Shen, C., & Zhu, W.-G. (2016). Histone modifications in DNA damage response. Science China Life Sciences, 59, 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-016-5011-z
Chiba, T., Saito, T., Yuki, K., Zen, Y., Koide, S., Kanogawa, N., et al. (2015). Histone lysine methyltransferase SUV39H1 is a potent target for epigenetic therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. International Journal of Cancer, 136, 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28985
Choi, J. E., Heo, S.-H., Kim, M. J., & Chung, W.-H. (2018). Lack of superoxide dismutase in a rad51 mutant exacerbates genomic instability and oxidative stress-mediated cytotoxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 129, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.09.015
Chuang, J. Y., Chang, W. C., & Hung, J. J. (2011). Hydrogen peroxide induces Sp1 methylation and thereby suppresses cyclin B1 via recruitment of Suv39H1 and HDAC1 in cancer cells. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 51, 2309–2318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.10.001
Cottini, F., Hideshima, T., Suzuki, R., Tai, Y.-T., Bianchini, G., Richardson, P. G., et al. (2015). Synthetic lethal approaches exploiting DNA damage in aggressive myeloma. Cancer Discovery, 5, 972. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0943
Forrester, S. J., Kikuchi, D. S., Hernandes, M. S., Xu, Q., & Griendling, K. K. (2018). Reactive oxygen species in metabolic and inflammatory signaling. Circulation Research, 122, 877–902. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311401
Fritsch, L., Robin, P., Mathieu, J., Souidi, M., Hinaux, H., Rougeulle, C., et al. (2010). A subset of the histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferases Suv39h1, G9a, GLP, and SETDB1 participate in a multimeric complex. Molecular Cell, 37, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.017
Ghobashi, A. H., & Kamel, M. A. (2018). Tip60: updates. Journal of Applied Genetics, 59, 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-018-0432-y
Grezy, A., Chevillardbriet, M., Trouche, D., & Escaffit, F. (2016). Control of genetic stability by a new heterochromatin compaction pathway involving the Tip60 histone acetyltransferase. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 27, 599–607. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E15-05-0316
Hong, I. S., & Greenberg, M. M. (2005). DNA interstrand cross-link formation initiated by reaction between singlet oxygen and a modified nucleotide. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 127, 10510–10511. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja053493m
Hornbeck, P. V., Zhang, B., Murray, B., Kornhauser, J. M., Latham, V., & Skrzypek, E. (2015). PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations. Nucleic Acids Research, 43, D512–D520. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1267
Hou, T., Cao, Z., Zhang, J., Tang, M., Tian, Y., Li, Y., et al. (2020). SIRT6 coordinates with CHD4 to promote chromatin relaxation and DNA repair. Nucleic Acids Research, 48, 2982–3000. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa006
Huang, B. K., Langford, T. F., & Sikes, H. D. (2016). Using sensors and generators of H2O2 to elucidate the toxicity mechanism of piperlongumine and phenethyl isothiocyanate. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 24, 924–938.
Hyun, K., Jeon, J., Park, K., & Kim, J. (2017). Writing, erasing and reading histone lysine methylations. Experimental Molecular Medicine, 49, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/emm.2017.11
Ikura, T., Ogryzko, V., Grigoriev, M., Groisman, R., Wang, J., Horikoshi, M., et al. (2000). Involvement of the TIP60 histone acetylase complex in DNA repair and apoptosis. Cell, 102, 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00051-9
Jehanno, C., Flouriot, G., Le Goff, P., & Michel, D. (2017). A model of dynamic stability of H3K9me3 heterochromatin to explain the resistance to reprogramming of differentiated cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA): Gene Regulatory Mechanisms, 1860, 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.11.006
Kamine, J., Elangovan, B., Subramanian, T., Coleman, D., & Chinnadurai, G. (1996). Identification of a cellular protein that specifically interacts with the essential cysteine region of the HIV-1 tat transactivator. Virology, 216, 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1996.0071
Kaniskan, H. U., Konze, K. D., & Jin, J. (2015). Selective inhibitors of protein methyltransferases. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 58, 1596–1629. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm501234a
Kim, J. J., Lee, S. Y., & Miller, K. M. (2019). Preserving genome integrity and function: the DNA damage response and histone modifications. Molecular Biology, 54, 208–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409238.2019.1620676
Li, Q., Lin, S., Wang, X., Lian, G., Lu, Z., Guo, H., et al. (2009). Axin determines cell fate by controlling the p53 activation threshold after DNA damage. Nature Cell Biology, 11, 1128–1134. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1927
Li, G., Ma, D., & Chen, Y. (2016). Cellular functions of programmed cell death 5. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA): Molecular Cell Research, 1863, 572–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.12.021
Li, Y., Li, Z., Dong, L., Tang, M., Zhang, P., Zhang, C., et al. (2018). Histone H1 acetylation at lysine 85 regulates chromatin condensation and genome stability upon DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Research, 46, 7716–7730. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky568
Li, Z., Chen, Y., Tang, M., Li, Y., & Zhu, W.-G. (2020). Regulation of DNA damage-induced ATM activation by histone modifications. Genome Instability & Disease, 1, 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42764-019-00004-8
Liu, Y., Tavana, O., & Gu, W. (2019). p53 modifications: exquisite decorations of the powerful guardian. Journal of Molecular Cell Biology, 11, 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjz060
Lu, X., Tang, M., Zhu, Q., Yang, Q., Li, Z., Bao, Y., et al. (2019). GLP-catalyzed H4K16me1 promotes 53BP1 recruitment to permit DNA damage repair and cell survival. Nucleic Acids Research, 47, 10977–10993. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz897
Luijsterburg, M. S., Dinant, C., Lans, H., Stap, J., Wiernasz, E., Lagerwerf, S., et al. (2009). Heterochromatin protein 1 is recruited to various types of DNA damage. Journal of Cell Biology, 185, 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200810035
Mo, F., Zhuang, X., Liu, X., Yao, P. Y., Qin, Bo., Su, Z., et al. (2016). Acetylation of Aurora B by TIP60 ensures accurate chromosomal segregation. Nature Chemical Biology, 12, 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.2017
Mungamuri, S. K., Qiao, R. F., Yao, S., Manfredi, J. J., Gu, W., & Aaronson, S. A. (2016). USP7 enforces heterochromatinization of p53 target promoters by protecting SUV39H1 from MDM2-mediated degradation. Cell Reports, 14, 2528–2537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.02.049
Nair, N., Shoaib, M., & Sorensen, C. S. (2017). Chromatin dynamics in genome stability: Roles in suppressing endogenous DNA damage and facilitating DNA repair. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18, 1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071486
Nicolas, E., Roumillac, C., & Trouche, D. (2003). Balance between acetylation and methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 on the E2F-responsive dihydrofolate reductase promoter. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 23, 1614–1622. https://doi.org/10.1128/Mcb.23.5.1614-1622.2003
Niida, H., Katsuno, Y., Sengoku, M., Shimada, M., Yukawa, M., Ikura, M., et al. (2010). Essential role of Tip60-dependent recruitment of ribonucleotide reductase at DNA damage sites in DNA repair during G1 phase. Genes & Development, 24, 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1863810
Pietrzak, J., Spickett, C. M., Ploszaj, T., Virag, L., & Robaszkiewicz, A. (2018). PARP1 promoter links cell cycle progression with adaptation to oxidative environment. Redox biology, 18, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2018.05.017
Qin, Bo., Yu, J., Nowsheen, S., Wang, M., Tu, X., Liu, T., et al. (2019). UFL1 promotes histone H4 ufmylation and ATM activation. Nature Communications, 10, 1242. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09175-0
Shafirovich, V., & Geacintov, N. E. (2017). Removal of oxidatively generated DNA damage by overlapping repair pathways. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 107, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.10.507
Shirai, A., Kawaguchi, T., Shimojo, H., Muramatsu, D., Ishidayonetani, M., Nishimura, Y., et al. (2017). Impact of nucleic acid and methylated H3K9 binding activities of Suv39h1 on its heterochromatin assembly. eLife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25317
Strahl, B. D., & Allis, C. D. (2000). The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature, 403, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1038/47412
Sun, Y., Jiang, X., Chen, S., Fernandes, N., & Price, B. D. (2005). A role for the Tip60 histone acetyltransferase in the acetylation and activation of ATM. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 13182–13187. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504211102
Sun, Y., Jiang, X., Xu, Ye., Ayrapetov, M. K., Moreau, L. A., Whetstine, J. R., & Price, B. D. (2009). Histone H3 methylation links DNA damage detection to activation of the tumour suppressor Tip60. Nature Cell Biology, 11, 1376–1382. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1982
Tang, Y., Luo, J., Zhang, W., & Gu, W. (2006). Tip60-dependent acetylation of p53 modulates the decision between cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Molecular Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.021
Tang, J., Cho, N. W., Cui, G., Manion, E. M., Shanbhag, N. M., Botuyan, M. V., et al. (2013). Acetylation limits 53BP1 association with damaged chromatin to promote homologous recombination. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 20, 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2499
Vaquero, A., Scher, M., Erdjumentbromage, H., Tempst, P., Serrano, L., & Reinberg, D. (2007). SIRT1 regulates the histone methyl-transferase SUV39H1 during heterochromatin formation. Nature, 450, 440–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06268
Vargaweisz, P. (2001). ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors: Nucleosome shufflers with many missions. Oncogene, 20, 3076–3085. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1204332
Wang, D., Zhou, J., Liu, X., Lu, D., Shen, C., Du, Y., et al. (2013). Methylation of SUV39H1 by SET7/9 results in heterochromatin relaxation and genome instability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 5516–5521. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216596110
Wang, C., Zhu, B., & Xiong, J. (2018). Recruitment and reinforcement: maintaining epigenetic silencing. Science China Life Sciences, 61, 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-018-9276-7
Wang, K., Liu, X., Liu, Q., Ho, I., Wei, X., Yin, T., et al. (2020). Hederagenin potentiated cisplatin- and paclitaxel-mediated cytotoxicity by impairing autophagy in lung cancer cells. Cell Death & Disease, 11, 611. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-02880-5
Wang, S., Wu, X.-M., Liu, C.-H., Shang, J.-Y., Gao, F., & Guo, H.-S. (2020). Verticillium dahliae chromatin remodeling facilitates the DNA damage repair in response to plant ROS stress. PLoS Pathogens, 16, e1008481. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008481
Whongsiri, P., Pimratana, C., Wijitsettakul, U., Sanpavat, A., Jindatip, D., Hoffmann, M. J., et al. (2019). Oxidative stress and LINE-1 reactivation in bladder cancer are epigenetically linked through active chromatin formation. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 134, 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.01.031
Wienken, M., Moll, U., & Dobbelstein, M. (2017). Mdm2 as a chromatin modifier. Journal of Molecular Cell Biology, 9, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjw046
Wu, Y., Zhou, H., Wu, Ke., Lee, S., Li, R., & Liu, X. (2014). PTEN phosphorylation and nuclear export mediate free fatty acid-induced oxidative stress. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 20, 1382–1395. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2013.5498
Yamamoto, T., & Horikoshi, M. (1997). Novel substrate specificity of the histone acetyltransferase activity of HIV-1-tat interactive protein Tip60. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272, 30595–30598. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.49.30595
Yang, N., Sun, T., & Shen, P. (2020). Deciphering p53 dynamics and cell fate in DNA damage response using mathematical modeling. Genome Instability & Disease. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42764-020-00019-6
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Professor Lin Shengcai for gifting the FLAG-TIP60 HAT-deficient mutant expression vector and HepG2 cells. We also thank Dr. Jessica Tamanini of ETediting, Shenzhen University for language editing. The authors would like to recognize that there are many other valuable papers that could have been included in this study, but space limitations prevented them all from being cited.
Funding
This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0503900]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [81720108027, 81530074]; Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province in China [2017B030301016]; Shenzhen Municipal Commission of Science and Technology Innovation [JCYJ20170818092450901]; Discipline Construction Funding of Shenzhen [(2016)1452]; Shenzhen Bay Laboratory [SZBL2019062801011].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Experiments and data analysis were carried out by BT and YB; The study was conceived by W-GZ with intellectual contributions from QZ, XL, HW, TH, YZ and PZ; All authors contributed to writing and editing of the manuscript and have approved the final submission.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors have approved the final submission and consented to publication.
Additional information
The original online version of this article was revised: The original version of this article, published on November 6, 2020, contained a mistake. The list of corresponding authors was incorrect.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tu, B., Bao, Y., Tang, M. et al. TIP60 recruits SUV39H1 to chromatin to maintain heterochromatin genome stability and resist hydrogen peroxide-induced cytotoxicity. GENOME INSTAB. DIS. 1, 339–355 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42764-020-00025-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42764-020-00025-8