Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Youths’ and Adults’ Identity in STEM: a Systematic Literature Review

  • Research Review
  • Published:
Journal for STEM Education Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents a synthesis of the empirical research on identity across science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) published between 2000-2018. The research canvassed in this study encompasses a range of contexts and ages. A total of 202 articles were examined in order to determine how identity was emphasized and operationalized within each field and by grade/age bands, as well as the multitude of factors shaping individual’s identity within STEM. Results confirmed the complex nature of identity and the internal (e.g., confidence) and external factors (e.g., institutional norms) positively and/or negatively shaping youths’ and adults’ identity within STEM. These factors are distinguishing and perpetuating the in-group, or those who identify as a member of a STEM field, from the outgroup, or those who do not identify as a member of a STEM field. Additionally, the findings of this study highlighted identity in the field of technology, and with adult participants, as among the least investigated fields and grade/age bands respectively. Conversely, we have a more holistic picture of science and mathematics identities across age/grade bands. Other findings demonstrated an overemphasis on representational identities in comparison to identities as narratives and identities as ways of acting. The findings generated from this review serve in providing research directions concerning identity studies within the STEM field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • *Adams, J. D., & Gupta, P. (2013). “I learn more here than I do in school. Honestly, I wouldn’t lie about that”: Creating a space for agency and identity around science. The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 4(2), 87–104.

  • *Adjapong, E. S., Levy, I. P., & Emdin, C. (2016). Empowering girls of color through authentic science internships. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 12, 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Ahlqvist, S., London, B., & Rosenthal, L. (2013). Unstable identity compatibility: How gender rejection sensitivity undermines the success of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1644–1652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613476048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Alston, G. D., Guy, B. S., & Campbell, C. D. (2017). Ready for the professoriate? The influence of mentoring career development for Black male graduate students in STEM. Journal of African American Males in Education, 8(1), 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Andersen, H. M., Krogh, L. B., & Lykkegaard, E. (2014). Identity matching to scientists: Differences that make a difference? Research in Science Education, 44(3), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9391-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Anderson, K. T., & Zuiker, S. J. (2010). Performative identity as a resource for classroom participation: Scientific Shane vs. Jimmy neutron. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 9(5), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2010.517708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Anthony, A. K., Walters, L., & McGrady, P. (2017). Creating connections between authentic research and the development of science identities in undergraduate marine biology experiences. Florida Scientist, 80(2/3), 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren's constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). “Balancing acts”: Elementary school girls' negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science. Science Education, 96(6), 967–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). ‘Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous’: Primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(1), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.748676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Avraamidou, L. (2016). Stories of self and science: Preservice elementary teachers’ identity work through time and across contexts. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 11(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2015.1047837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), The dialogic imagination. Trans. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGe, trans.; C. Emerson and M. Holquist, Eds.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

  • *Bartholomew, H., Darragh, L., Ell, F., & Saunders, J. (2011). ‘I’m a natural and I do it for love!’: exploring students’ accounts of studying mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 915-9924. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.608863.

  • *Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin'! Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Beavis, C., & Charles, C. (2007). Would the ‘real’ girl gamer please stand up? Gender, LAN cafés and the reformulation of the ‘girl’ gamer. Gender and Education, 19(6), 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250701650615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Beier, M. E., Miller, L. M., & Wang, S. (2012). Science games and the development of scientific possible selves. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(4), 963–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9408-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. L., & Russo, N. F. (2008). Explaining too few women in academic science and engineering careers: A psychosocial perspective. Series on thepsychology of women at work: Challenges and solutions for our female workforce, 2, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Bishop, J. P. (2012). “She’s always been the smart one. I’ve always been the dumb one”: Identities in the mathematics classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), 34–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Black, L., & Hernandez-Martinez, P. (2016). Re-thinking science capital: The role of ‘capital’ and ‘identity’ in mediating students’ engagement with mathematically demanding programmes at university. Mathematics and Its Applications: International Journal of the IMA, 35(3), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrw016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Black, L., & Williams, J. (2013). Contradiction and conflict between ‘leading identities’: Becoming an engineer versus becoming a ‘good Muslim’ woman. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9481-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromme, R., & Goldman, S. R. (2014). The public's bounded understanding of science. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.921572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Brooks, C. F. (2017). Student identity and aversions to science: A study of translation in higher education. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36(1), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X16663259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Bucholtz, M., Skapoulli, E., Barnwell, B., & LEE, J. E. J. (2011). Entextualized humor in the formation of scientist identities among US undergraduates. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 42(3), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1492.2011.01126.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Bucholtz, M., Barnwell, B., Skapoulli, E., & Lee, J. E. J. (2012). Itineraries of identity in undergraduate science. A nthropology & Education Quarterly, 43(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1492.2012.01167.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Capobianco, B. M., Yu, J. H., & French, B. F. (2015). Effects of engineering design-based science on elementary school science students’ engineering identity development across gender and grade. Research in Science Education, 45, 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9422-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlone, H. B., Scott, C. M., & & Lowder, C. (2014). Becoming (less) scientific: A longitudinal study of students’ identity work from elementary to middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 836–869. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21150.

  • *Carlone, H. B., Webb, A. W., Archer, L., & Taylor, M. (2015). What kind of boy does science? A critical perspective on the science trajectories of four scientifically talented boys. Science Education, 99, 438–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrim, N. M. H., & Nkomo, S. M. (2016). Wedding intersectionality theory and identity work in organizations: South African Indian women negotiating managerial identity. Gender, Work and Organization, 23(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Chang, M. J., Eagan, M. K., Lin, M. H., & Hurtado, S. (2011). Considering the impact of racial stigmas and science identity: Persistence among biomedical and behavioral science aspirants. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(5), 564–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Chemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 469–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Childers, G., & Jones, M. G. (2017). Learning from a distance: High school students’ perceptions of virtual presence, motivation, and science identity during a remote microscopy investigation. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1278483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Chronaki, A. (2005). Learning about ‘learning identities’ in the school arithmetic practice: The experience of two young minority gypsy girls in the Greek context of education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(1), 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Cribbs, J. D., Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. M. (2015). Establishing an explanatory model for mathematics identity. Child Development, 86(4), 1048–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, K. H. (2018). Confronting color-blind STEM talent development: toward a contextual model for black student STEM identity. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18757958.

  • Conlin, L.D., Richards, J., Gupta, A., & Elby, A. (2015). “Bring it on”: Explaining persistence in science at the intersection of identity and epistemology. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net

  • *Crocker, J., Karpinski, A., Quinn, D. M., & Chase, S. K. (2003). When grades determine self-worth: Consequences of contingent self-worth for male and female engineering and psychology majors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.507.

  • *Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, E., & Lo, L. (2013). Do gender–science stereotypes predict science identification and science career aspirations among undergraduate science majors? Social Psychology of Education, 16(4), 541–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9232-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Danielak, B. A., Gupta, A., & Elby, A. (2014). Marginalized identities of sense-makers: Reframing engineering student retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 8–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Darragh, L. (2013). Constructing confidence and identities of belonging in mathematics at the transition to secondary school. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(3), 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darragh, L. (2015). Recognising ‘good at mathematics’: Using a performative lens for identity. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0120-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darragh, L. (2016). Identity research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9696-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *D'Mello, M. (2006). Gendered selves and identities of information technology professionals in global software organizations in India. Information Technology for Development, 12(2), 131–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Farland-Smith, D. (2012). Personal and social interactions between young girls and scientists: Examining critical aspects for identity construction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9259-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Foyn, T., Solomon, Y., & Braathe, H. J. (2018). Clever girls’ stories: The girl they call a nerd. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9801-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Gamez, R., & Parker, C. A. (2018). Becoming science learners: A study of newcomers’ identity work in elementary school science. Science Education, 102(2), 377–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 46(8), 781–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Gill, J., Mills, J., Franzway, S., & Sharp, R. (2008). ‘Oh you must be very clever! ‘High-achieving women, professional power and the ongoing negotiation of workplace identity. Gender and Education, 20(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250801968990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, J. L., Sassler, S., Levitte, Y., & Michelmore, K. M. (2013). What's so special about STEM? A comparison of women's retention in STEM and professional occupations. Social Forces, 92(2), 723–756. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Godwin, A., & Potvin, G. (2017). Pushing and pulling Sara: A case study of the contrasting influences of high school and university experiences on engineering agency, identity, and participation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(4), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., & Lock, R. (2016). Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 312–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Goldstein, D. S. (2018). Mathematics identities of competence in a middle-grades d/deaf and hard-of-hearing classroom. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 10(3), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2018.1467081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Gonzales, A. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2008). Identity shift in computer-mediated environments. Media Psychology, 11(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260802023433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Goralnik, L., Thorp, L., & Rickborn, A. (2018). Food system field experience: STEM identity and change agency for undergraduate sustainability learners. The Journal of Experimental Education, 41(3), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825918774810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 3(1), 5–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2016). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating a blueprint for your “house”. Administrative Issues Journal, 4(2), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.5929/2014.4.2.9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Hall, J., Towers, J., & & Martin, L. C. (2018). Using I poems to illuminate the complexity of students’ mathematical identities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9839-y.

  • *Hatmaker, D. M. (2013). Engineering identity: Gender and professional identity negotiation among women engineers. Gender, Work and Organization, 20(4), 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00589.x.

  • *Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M. C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Hazari, Z., Sadler, P. M., & Sonnert, G. (2013). The science identity of college students: Exploring the intersection of gender, race, and ethnicity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Hernandez, P. R., Bloodhart, B., Barnes, R. T., Adams, A. S., Clinton, S. M., Pollack, I., et al. (2017). Promoting professional identity, motivation, and persistence: Benefits of an informal mentoring program for female undergraduate students. PLoS One, 12(11), e0187531. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2013). The co-construction of learning difficulties in mathematics—Teacher–student interactions and their role in the development of a disabled mathematical identity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(3), 341–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9457-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Hill, P. W., McQuillan, J., Spiegel, A. N., & Diamond, J. (2018). Discovery orientation, cognitive schemas, and disparities in science identity in early adolescence. Sociological Perspectives, 61(1), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121417724774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social identity theory. In S. Mckeown, R. Haji, & N. Ferguson (Eds.), Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory: Contemporary global perspectives (pp. 5–17). Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Holmegaard, H. T., Madsen, L. M., & Ulriksen, L. (2014). A journey of negotiation and belonging: Understanding students’ transitions to science and engineering in higher education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9, 755–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9542-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, I. S. (2008). Turnaround students in high school mathematics: Constructing identities of competence through mathematical worlds. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 201–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802216177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Hossain, S., Mendick, H., & Adler, J. (2013). Troubling “understanding mathematics in-depth”: Its role in the identity work of student-teachers in England. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9474-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Hughes, R. M., Nzekwe, B., & Molyneaux, K. J. (2013). The single sex debate for girls in science: A comparison between two informal science programs on middle school students’ STEM identity formation. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1979–2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9345-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. (2016). Why do women leave science and engineering? ILR Review, 69(1), 199–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.

  • *Ideland, M., & Malmberg, C. (2012). Body talk: Students’ identity construction while discussing a socioscientific issue. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(2), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9381-7.

  • *Irving, P. W., & Sayre, E. C. (2013). Physics identity development: A snapshot of the stages of development of upper-level physics students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(4), 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Jackson, P. A., & Seiler, G. (2018). I am smart enough to study postsecondary science: A critical discourse analysis of latecomers’ identity construction in an online forum. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(3), 761–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9818-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Jamaludin, A., & Hung, D. (2017). Problem-solving for STEM learning: Navigating games as narrativized problem spaces for 21st century competencies. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0038-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Jones, S. (2003). Identities of race, class, and gender inside and outside the math classroom: A girls' math club as a hybrid possibility. Feminist Teacher, 14(3), 220–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Jones, B. D., Ruff, C., & Paretti, M. C. (2013). The impact of engineering identification and stereotypes on undergraduate women’s achievement and persistence in engineering. Social Psychology of Education, 16(3), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9222-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Jones, B. D., Sahbaz, S., Schram, A. B., & Chittum, J. R. (2017). Using psychological constructs from the MUSIC model of motivation to predict students’ science identification and career goals: Results from the US and Iceland. International Journal of Science Education, 39(8), 1089–1108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1319093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, D. M. (2017). Misconceptions, misinformation, and the logic of identity-protective cognition (working paper no. 164). SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2973067.

  • *Katz, P. (2011). A case study of the use of internet photobook technology to enhance early childhood “scientist” identity. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 525–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9301-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2011). How Brianna became bossy and Kofi came out smart: Understanding the trajectories of identity and engagement for two group leaders in a project-based mathematics classroom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2011.595881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. D. (2002). More than ability: Gender and personal relationships influence science and technology involvement. Sociology of Education, 349–373.

  • *Lesko, A. C., & Corpus, J. H. (2006). Discounting the difficult: How high math-identified women respond to stereotype threat. Sex Roles, 54(1–2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-8873-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Leyva, L. A. (2016). An intersectional analysis of Latin@ college women’s counter-stories in mathematics. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 9(2), 81–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Li, S. L., & Loverude, M. E. (2013). Identity and belonging: Are you a physicist (chemist)?. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1513, no. 1, pp. 246–249). AIP.

  • Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(11). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6.

  • *London, B., Rosenthal, L., & Gonzalez, A. (2011). Assessing the role of gender rejection sensitivity, identity, and support on the academic engagement of women in nontraditional fields using experience sampling methods. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 510–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Major, J. C., & Kirn, A. (2017). Engineering identity and project-based learning: How does active learning develop student engineering identity? Proceedings from the American Society for Engineering Education. Columbus, Ohio: ASEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Mark, S. L. (2018). A bit of both science and economics: A non-traditional STEM identity narrative. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(4), 983–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9832-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Mendick, H. (2005). A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing 'good at maths'. Gender and Education, 17(2), 203–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Merolla, D. M., & Serpe, R. T. (2013). STEM enrichment programs and graduate school matriculation: The role of science identity salience. Social Psychology of Education, 16(4), 575–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9233-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Merolla, D. M., Serpe, R. T., Stryker, S., & Schultz, P. W. (2012). Structural precursors to identity processes: The role of proximate social structures. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75(2), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272511436352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Middleton, M., Dupuis, J., & Tang, J. (2013). Classrooms and culture: The role of context in shaping motivation and identity for science learning in indigenous adolescents. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 111–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Morton, T. R., & Parsons, E. C. (2018). # BlackGirlMagic: The identity conceptualization of Black women in undergraduate STEM education. Science Education, 102(6), 1363–1393. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8(3), 211–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Nadelson, L. S., McGuire, S. P., Davis, K. A., Farid, A., Hardy, K. K., Hsu, Y. C., et al. (2017). Am I a STEM professional? Documenting STEM student professional identity development. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 701–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1070819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Nasir, N. I. S., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning, and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 143–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400801986108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2019). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. NSF https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd.

  • *Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math= male, me= female, therefore math≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *O'Connor, B., & MacKeogh, C. (2007). New media communities: Performing identity in an online women's magazine. Irish Journal of Sociology, 16(2), 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Oemig, P. A., & Baptiste, H. P. (2018). Investigating the development of science-literate identities through a multicultural perspective. Multicultural Perspectives, 20(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2018.1447070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Onyekwelu, C. (2018). Why do underrepresented minorities leave science and engineering ? (senior theses). Retrieved from Claremont Colleges Scholarship Database.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Oppland-Cordell, S. B. (2014). Urban Latina/o undergraduate students' negotiations of identities and participation in an emerging scholars calculus I workshop. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 7(1), 19–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Owens, K. (2014). The impact of a teacher education culture-based project on identity as a mathematically thinking teacher. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.892568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Park, J. J., Chuang, Y. C., & Hald, E. S. (2018a). Identifying key influencers of professional identity development of Asian international STEM graduate students in the United States. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0373-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Park, L. E., Kondrak, C. L., Ward, D. E., & Streamer, L. (2018b). Positive feedback from male authority figures boosts women’s math outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(3), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217741312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Pattison, S. A., Gontan, I., Ramos-Montañez, S., & Moreno, L. (2018). Identity negotiation within peer groups during an informal engineering education program: The central role of leadership-oriented youth. Science Education, 102(5), 978–1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Perez, T., Cromley, J. G., & & Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034027.

  • Petticrew, M., Egan, M., Thomson, H., Hamilton, V., Kunkler, R., & Roberts, H. (2008). Publication bias in qualitative research: What becomes of qualitative research presented at conferences? Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 62(6), 552–554. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.059394.

  • *Pietri, E. S., Johnson, I. R., Ozgumus, E., & Young, A. I. (2018). Maybe she is relatable: Increasing women’s awareness of gender bias encourages their identification with women scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(2), 192–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317752643.

  • Radovic, D., Black, L., Williams, J., & Salas, C. E. (2018). Towards conceptual coherence in the research on mathematics learner identity: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99, 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/10649-018-9819-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Rahm, J., Lachaîne, A., & Mathura, A. (2014). Youth voice and positive identity-building practices: The case of science girls. Canadian Journal of Education, 37(1), 209–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Ramsey, L. R., Betz, D. E., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2013). The effects of an academic environment intervention on science identification among women in STEM. Social Psychology of Education, 16(3), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9218-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reveles, J. M., & Brown, B. A. (2008). Contextual shifting: Teachers emphasizing students' academic identity to promote scientific literacy. Science Education, 92(6), 1015–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Riedinger, K., & Taylor, A. (2016). I could see myself as a scientist. Afterschool Matters, 23, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Robinson, K. A., Perez, T., Nuttall, A. K., Roseth, C. J., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2018). From science student to scientist: Predictors and outcomes of heterogeneous science identity trajectories in college. Developmental Psychology, 54(10), 1977–1992. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Rodriguez, S. L., Lu, C., & Bartlett, M. (2018). Engineering identity development: A review of the higher education literature. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 6(3), 254–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Rosa, M., & Lerman, S. (2011). Researching online mathematics education: Opening a space for virtual learner identities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9310-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Rosenthal, L., London, B., Levy, S. R., & Lobel, M. (2011). The roles of perceived identity compatibility and social support for women in a single-sex STEM program at a co-educational university. Sex Roles, 65(9–10), 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9945-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Ryu, M. (2013). “But at school… I became a bit shy”: Korean immigrant adolescents’ discursive participation in science classrooms. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(3), 649–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9406-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Saavedra, L., Araújo, A. M., Taveira, M. D. C., & Vieira, C. C. (2014). Dilemmas of girls and women in engineering: A study in Portugal. Educational Review, 66(3), 330–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.780006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2014). Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Schnittka, C. G., Brandt, C. B., Jones, B. D., & Evans, M. A. (2012). Informal engineering education after school: Employing the studio model for motivation and identification in STEM domains. Advances in Engineering Education, 3(2), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Shanahan, M. C., & Nieswandt, M. (2009). Creative activities and their influence on identification in science: Three case studies. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(3), 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Shields, T. J. (2013). Identity and learning of mathematics for adult first nations students. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v2i1.213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, A. (2018). Making the invisible visible: Affordances and hindrances of using tangible objects in identity research. The Qualitative Report, 23(12), 293–298. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol23/iss12/6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, A., Morales-Collazo, J., Zilvinskis, J., & Maltese, A. (2020). Professionals’ identification within and across science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. Journal of Career Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845320913112.

  • Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D., & Hofer, B. K. (2014). Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: Epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.916216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Smith, J. L., Brown, E. R., Thoman, D. B., & Deemer, E. D. (2015). Losing its expected communal value: How stereotype threat undermines women’s identity as research scientists. Social Psychology of Education, 18(3), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9296-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Solomon, Y. (2007). Not belonging? What makes a functional learner identity in undergraduate mathematics? Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070601099473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Solomon, Y. (2012). Finding a voice? Narrating the female self in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9384-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Solomon, Y., Lawson, D., & Croft, T. (2011). Dealing with ‘fragile identities’: Resistance and refiguring in women mathematics students. Gender and Education, 23(5), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2010.512270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Solomon, Y., Radovic, D., & Black, L. (2016). “I can actually be very feminine here”: Contraction and hybridity in becoming a female mathematician. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91, 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9649-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Starr, C. R. (2018). “I’m not a science nerd!” STEM stereotypes, identity, and motivation among undergraduate women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(4), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318793848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Stets, J. E., Brenner, P. S., Burke, P. J., & Serpe, R. T. (2017). The science identity and entering a science occupation. Social Science Research, 64, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Stevens, R., O'connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D. M. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1972). Social categorization. English manuscript of “La catégorisation sociale”. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction à la psychologie sociale (Vol. 1, pp. 272–302). Paris: Lorousse.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Takeuchi, M. A. (2018). Power and identity in immigrant parents’ involvement in early years mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9781-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Tan, E., & Barton, A. C. (2008a). From peripheral to central, the story of Melanie's metamorphosis in an urban middle school science class. Science Education, 92(4), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Tan, E., & Barton, A. C. (2008b). Unpacking science for all through the lens of identities-in-practice: The stories of Amelia and Ginny. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-007-9076-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Tate, E. D., & Linn, M. C. (2005). How does identity shape the experiences of women of color engineering students? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(5–6), 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-0223-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2010). Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. In A. M. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 1–41). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Tucker-Raymond, E., Varelas, M., Pappas, C. C., Korzh, A., & Wentland, A. (2007). “They probably aren’t named Rachel”: Young children’s scientist identities as emergent multimodal narratives. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(3), 559–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9017-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Tugurian, L. P., & Carrier, S. J. (2017). Children's environmental identity and the elementary science classroom. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(3), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2016.1191415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Ulriksen, L., Holmegaard, H. T., & Madsen, L. M. (2017). Making sense of curriculum—The transition into science and engineering university programmes. Higher Education, 73(3), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0099-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Vedder-Weiss, D. (2018). “Won't you give up your snack for the sake of science?” emerging science identities in family everyday interaction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(8), 1211–1235. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. (2010). The field of identity studies. In M. Wetherell & C. Mohanty (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of identities (pp. 3–26). London: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winberg, C. (2008). Teaching engineering/engineering teaching: Interdisciplinary collaboration and the construction of academic identities. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(3), 353–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Yatchmeneff, M., & Calhoun, M. (2017). Exploring engineering identity in a common introduction to engineering course to improve retention. Paper presented at the annual American Society of Engineering Education conference. OH: Columbus.

  • *Yerrick, R. K., & Gilbert, A. (2011). Constraining the discourse community: How science discourse perpetuates marginalization of underrepresented students. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 6(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2010.510909.

  • *Yoon, S. Y., Dyehouse, M., Lucietto, A. M., Diefes-Dux, H. A., & Capobianco, B. M. (2014). The effects of integrated science, technology, and engineering education on elementary students' knowledge and identity development. School Science and Mathematics, 114(8), 380–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Yu, F. Y. (2012). Any effects of different levels of online user identity revelation? Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 64–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Zavala, M. D. R. (2014). Latina/o youth's perspectives on race, language, and learning mathematics. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 7(1), 55–87.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Teaching, Learning & Educational Leadership, Binghamton University SUNY, P.O. Box 6000, Binghamton, 13902-6000, NY, USA

    Amber Simpson & Yahya Bouhafa

Authors
  1. Amber Simpson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yahya Bouhafa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amber Simpson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 106 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 66.1 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simpson, A., Bouhafa, Y. Youths’ and Adults’ Identity in STEM: a Systematic Literature Review. Journal for STEM Educ Res 3, 167–194 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00034-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00034-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation