Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

STEM enrichment programs and graduate school matriculation: the role of science identity salience

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improving the state of science education in the United States has become a national priority. One response to this problem has been the implementation of STEM enrichment programs designed to increase the number of students that enter graduate programs in science. Current research indicates enrichment programs have positive effects for student performance, degree completion, interest in science and graduate enrollment. Moreover, research suggests that beyond improving performance in STEM, and providing access to research experience and faculty mentoring, enrichment programs may also increase the degree to which students identify as scientists. However, researchers investigating the role of science identity on student outcomes have focused primarily on subjective outcomes, leaving a critical question of whether science identity also influences objective outcomes such as whether students attend graduate school. Using identity theory, this study addresses this issue by investigating science identity as a mechanism linking enrichment program participation to matriculation into graduate science programs. Quantitative results from a panel study of 694 students indicate that science identity salience, along with research experience and college GPA, mediate the effect of enrichment program participation on graduate school matriculation. Further, results indicate that although the social psychological process by which science identity salience develops operates independently from student GPA, science identity amplifies the effect of achievement on graduate school matriculation. These results indicate that policies seeking to increase the efficacy of enrichment programs and increase representation in STEM graduate programs should be sensitive to the social and academic aspects of STEM education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited. Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfred, L., Atkins, C., Lopez, M., Chavez, T., Avila, V., & Paolini, P. (2005). A Science pipeline pathway for trainings underrepresented students in the biomedical Sciences. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 11(1), 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, A., & Villarejo, M. (2004). Making a difference for minorities: Evaluation of an educational enrichment program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 861–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M. A., & Fischer, M. J. (2012). Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors. Social Psychology of Education, 15(4), 427–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. L., & Kee, H. J. (2009). Birth order matters: The effect of family size and birth order on educational attainment. Journal of Population Economics, 22(2), 367–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, N. W., & Potter, J. T. (2001). Young women’s scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 965–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (2012). Occupational outlook handbook. Retrieved September 15, 2012 from http://www.bls.gov/ooh/.

  • Blake, J. (1989). Family size and achievement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonous-Hammarth, M. (2000). Pathways to success: Affirming opportunities of science mathematics and engineering majors. Journal of Negro Education, 69, 92–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P., & Stets, J. (2009). Identity theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, F., Mandell, M., & Maton, K. (2009). The influence of on-campus, academic year undergraduate research on stem PhD outcomes: Evidence from the Meyerhoff Scholarship Program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 441–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chemers, M. M., Zurbiggen, E., Barbara Goza, M. S., & Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 469–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darke, K., Clewell, B. C., & Sevo, R. (2002). Meeting the challenge: The impact of the national science foundation’s program for women and girls. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(3/4), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, D. (1995). When bigger is not better: Family size, parental resources and children’s educational performance. American Sociological Review, 60(3), 746–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, M. K., Hurtado, S., Garibay, J., Herrera, F. (2012). Accentuating advantage: Developing Science identity during college. In: Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Conference.

  • Espinosa, L. L. (2011). Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate stem majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review, 82(2), 209–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadigan, K. A., & Hammrich, P. L. (2004). A longitudinal study of the educational and career trajectories of female participants of an urban informal science education program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 835–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, K. (1999). No services needed?: The case of mentoring high achieving African American students. Peabody Journal of Education, 74(2), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamoran, A. (1987). The stratification of high school learning opportunities. Sociology of Education, 60(3), 135–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office (2012). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics education: Strategic planning needed to better manage overlapping programs across multiple agencies. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

  • Goyette, K., & Mullen, A. (2006). Who studies the arts and sciences? Social background and the choice and consequences of undergraduate field of study. Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 497–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandy, J. (1998). Persistence in science of high-ability minority students: results of a longitudinal study. Journal of Higher Education, 69(6), 589–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, T. (1998). Soft assessment of undergraduate research: Reactions and student perspectives. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 18, 189–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S. L. (1996). Lost talent. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

  • Hazari, Z., Sommert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations physics identity and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernán, M., Hernandez-Diaz, S., & Robins, J. M. (2004). A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology, 15(5), 615–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A Be, Laursen, S., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A. (2006). The quiet crisis: Falling short in producing American scientific and technical talent. Washington DC: Building Engineering and Science Talent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 505–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A., Brown, J., Carlone, H., & Cuervas, A. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 339–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M., Barlow, A., & Villarejo, M. (2010). Importance of undergraduate research for minority persistence and achievement in biology. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 82–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardash, C. M. (2000). Evaluation of an undergraduate research experience: Perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty mentors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, P., Ugweke, O., Mawasha, R., & Srivatsan, T. (2003). An assessment of the McNair Program at the University of Akron. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9(1), 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S. (1999). The Holmes scholars network: A network mentoring program of the Holmes Partnership. Peabody Journal of Education, 74(2), 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. T. (1998). Which kids can ‘become’ scientists? Effects of gender, self-concepts, and perceptions of scientists. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(3), 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. T. (2002). More than ability: Gender and personal relationships influence science and technology involvement. Sociology of Education, 75(4), 349–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 491–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. (1999). Striving toward effective retention: The effect of race on mentoring African American students. Peabody Journal of Education, 74(2), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maple, S., & Stage, F. (1991). Influences on the choice of math/science major by gender and ethnicity. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 37–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K., Hrabowski, F. A., & Schmitt, C. (2000). African American college students excelling in the science: College and post-college outcomes in the Meyerhoff scholars program. Journal of Research in Science and Teaching, 37(7), 629–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K., & Hrabowski, F. (2004). Increasing the number of African American PhDs in science and engineering: A strengths-based approach. American Psychologist, 59(6), 547–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, D., & Dwyer, J. (1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17(2), 144–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merolla, D. M., Serpe, R. T., Stryker, S., & Schulz, P. W. (2012). Structural precursors to identity processes: The role of proximate social structures. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75(2), 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (NSF) (2012). Doctorate Recipients from US universities. Washington DC: National Science Foundation.

  • National Institutes of Health (2006). Assessment of NIH minority research and training programs: Phase 3. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

  • National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and the National Academy of Mathematics (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

  • Ong, M. (2005). Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race and science. Social Problems, 52(4), 593–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M., & St. John, E. P. (2002). Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 73(2), 189–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., & McCullough, J. (2007). Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science, 316, 548–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, P., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96(3), 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W., Hernandez, P. R., Woodcock, A., Estrada, M., Chance, R., Aguilar, M., et al. (2011). Patching the pipeline: Reducing educational disparities in the sciences through minority training programs. Journal of Educational Policy Analysis, 33(1), 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serpe, R. T. (1987). Stability and change in the self: A structural symbolic interaction perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(1), 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (1987). The construction of self and the reconstruction of social relationships. In E. Lawler & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 4, pp. 41–82). Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (1993). Prior social ties and movement into new social relationships. In E. Lawler, B. Markovsky, & J. O’Brien (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 10, pp. 283–304). Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (2011). The symbolic interactionist perspective and identity theory. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 225–248). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, E., Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S., & De Antoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three year study. Science Education, 88(4), 493–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirin, S. (2005). Socio-economic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, T. D., & Dillow, S. A. (2012). Digest of educational statistics: 2011. Washington DC: National Center for Educational Statistics Institute of Education Sciences US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural view. Menlo Park CA: Benjamin/Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1982). Commitment, identity salience, and role behavior: Theory and research example. In W. Ickes & E. S. Knowles (Eds.), Personality, roles, and social behavior (pp. 199–218). New York: Springer.

  • Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1994). Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent, overlapping, or complementary concepts? Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 16–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., Serpe, R., & Hunt, M. (2005). Making good on a promise: The impact of larger social structures on commitment. Advances in Group Processes, 22, 93–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syed, M., Azmitia, M., & Cooper, C. R. (2011). Identity and academic success among underrepresented ethnic minorities: An interdisciplinary review and integration. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 442–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, L. (2007). Effective strategies to increase diversity in STEM fields: A review of the research literature. The Journal of Negro Education, 76(4), 666–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau (2012). Percent of the projected population by race and Hispanic origin for the united states: 2015 to 2060. United States Census Bureau report #np2012-t6.

  • Vartanian, T., Karen, D., Buck, P., & Cadge, W. (2007). Early factors leading to college graduation for Asians and non-Asians in the United States. The Sociological Quarterly, 48(2), 165–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villarejo, M., Barlow, A., Kogan, D., Veazey, B., & Sweeney, J. (2008). Encouraging minority undergraduates to choose science careers: Career path survey results. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7, 394–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Wayne State University, 656 W. Kirby, 2253 FAB, Detroit, MI, USA

    David M. Merolla

  2. Department of Sociology, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA

    Richard T. Serpe

Authors
  1. David M. Merolla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard T. Serpe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Merolla.

Additional information

Funding for this research was provided by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Science (R01-GM074316).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merolla, D.M., Serpe, R.T. STEM enrichment programs and graduate school matriculation: the role of science identity salience. Soc Psychol Educ 16, 575–597 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9233-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9233-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation