Skip to main content
Log in

The co-construction of learning difficulties in mathematics—teacher–student interactions and their role in the development of a disabled mathematical identity

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leaning on a communicational framework for studying social, affective, and cognitive aspects of learning, the present study offers a new look at the construction of an identity of failure in mathematics as it occurs through teaching–learning interactions. Using the case of Dana, an extremely low-achieving student in 7th grade mathematics, I attempt to unearth the mechanisms of interaction between Dana and myself, her teacher, that instead of advancing Dana, perpetuated her failure. Through examining the interactional routines followed by Dana and me, I show how Dana’s deviations from normative routines resulted in my identification of Dana as “clueless” in mathematics. This identification, shared both by Dana and by me, was accompanied by adherence to ritual rule following that did not enable Dana’s advancement in mathematical discourse. This case points to the need to re-examine permanent difficulties in mathematics in light of the reciprocal nature of such difficulties’ (re)construction in teaching-and-learning interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Heb: “Tavniot mispar”; “Number formula” is the Hebrew term that refers to algebraic expressions. I chose here to use the literary form because the students refer specifically to the word “formula”.

  2. All the students articulated the English pronunciation of the capitalized letters

  3. “The eights” was a popular Israeli T.V. series in that year.

  4. Heb: “Keta”, Lit: a section. The word “Keta” is very common in Hebrew slang for denoting some piece of information. The closest translation would be something between “a thing” and “stuff”.

  5. For technical reasons, I did not get straight access to Dana’s psychological diagnosis.

  6. Heb: “Az pakhot ekhad” Lit: so subtract one. “Pakhot” is the word for the subtraction sign, and is not used in this context as “minus” which might signify the number (−1).

  7. Legend: ^high pitch^; .hhh: audible inhale; >accelerated talk<

  8. Heb: “Dai”, Lit: enough, stop it

  9. Heb: “Tedamyenu lachem, Da-mu lachem”; Dana is changing slightly the verb of “imagine” to be in the correct form, which is only used in literary Hebrew, thus exaggerating a “high” form of speech.

  10. Heb: “Damu-na”—a literary form of saying “imagine please”, hardly ever used in today’s spoken Hebrew.

References

  • Anderson, K. T. (2009). Applying positioning theory to the analysis of classroom interactions: Mediating micro-identities, macro-kinds, and ideologies of knowing. Linguistics and Education, 20(4), 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, A. (2011). Engagement in education: Identity narratives and agency in the contexts of mathematics education. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Aalborg University: Aalborg.

  • Ben-Yehuda, M. (2003). Using discourse analysis to investigate arithmetical thinking processes of students with learning difficulties. (Unpublished doctoral thesis) (Hebrew). University of Haifa: Haifa.

  • Ben-Yehuda, M., Lavy, I., Linchevski, L., & Sfard, A. (2005). Doing wrong with words, what bars students’ access to arithmetical discourses. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(3), 176–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. P. (2012). She’s always been the smart one. I’ve always been the dumb one: Identities in the mathematics classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), 34–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, L. (2004a). Differential participation in whole-class discussions and the construction of marginalised identities. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(1), 34–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, L. (2004b). Teacher–pupil talk in whole-class discussions and processes of social positioning within the primary school classroom. Language and Education, 18(5), 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (1997). Reclaiming school mathematics: The girls fight back. Gender and Education, 9(3), 286–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics education (pp. 171–200). Westport: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. E. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(5), 631–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond “identity”. Theory and Society, 29(1), 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. (2005). Developmental dyscalculia. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 455–468). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Gresalfi, M., & Hodge, L. L. (2009). An interpretive scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 40–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992). Interaction and learning in mathematics classroom situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 99–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1980). Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. American Psychologist, 35(10), 100–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann, T., & Even, R. (2011). Enacted types of algebraic activity in different classes taught by the same teacher. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 867–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J., Morgan, C., & Tsatsaroni, A. (2006). Discursive positioning and emotion in school mathematics practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J. D., & Hamlett, C. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 493–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C., & Hoard, M. K. (2005). Learning disabilities in arithmetic and mathematics. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 253–267). New York and Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2000–2001). Identity as an analytical lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(99–125).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. P. (1997). Mathematics learning disabilities: A view from developmental psychology. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(1), 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1967/2005). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior/Erving Goffman; with a new introduction by Joel Best. Transaction Publishers: New Brunswick.

  • González, J. E. J., & Espínel, G. A. I. (1999). Is IQ-achievement discrepancy relevant in the definition of arithmetic learning disabilities? Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(4), 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graven, M. (2011). Creating new mathematical stories: Exploring potential opportunities within maths clubs. In H. Venkat & A. Assien (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Congress of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa (pp. 161–170). Johannesburg: AMESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, T., & Bluck, S. (2000). Getting a life: The emergence of the life story in adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 748–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Gillette, G. (1994). The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (1999). Positioning theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyd-Metzuyanim (2012). Emotional aspects of learning mathematics – How the interaction between identifying and mathematizing influences the effectiveness of learning. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Haifa: Haifa.

  • Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., & Sfard, A. (2012). Identity struggles in the mathematics classroom—learning mathematics as interplay between mathematizing and identifying. International Journal of Educational Research, 51–52, 128–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, N. (2011). Affect and identity: The mathematical journeys of adolescents. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Otago: Dunedin.

  • Jones, E. D., Wilson, R., & Bhojwani, S. (1997). Mathematics instruction for secondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2), 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jussim, L. (1989). Teacher expectations: Self-fulfilling prophecies, perceptual biases, and accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 469–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosc, L. (1974). Developmental dyscalculia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7(3), 164–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, T. (2009). Difficulties, meaning and marginalisation in mathematics learning as seen through children’s eyes. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Aalborg University: Aalborg.

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leander, K. M. (2002). Locating Latanya: The situated production of identity artifacts in classroom interaction. Research in the Teaching of English, 37(2), 198–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leder, G. C., & Forgasz, H. J. (2006). Affect and mathematics education. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 403–427). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefstein, A. (2008). Changing teacher practice through the National Literacy Strategy: A micro-Interactional perspective. American Journal of Education Research, 45(3), 701–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linchevski, L., & Kutscher, B. (1998). Tell me with whom you’re learning, and I’ll tell you how much you’ve learned: Mixed-ability versus same-ability grouping in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(5), 533–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X. (1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 520–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzocco, M. M. (2005). Challenges in identifying target skills for math disability screening and intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 318–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzocco, M. M., & Myers, G. (2003). Complexities in identifying and defining mathematics learning disability in the primary school-age years. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 218–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5(2), 100–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1966). Identities and interactions. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. P. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice (pp. 269–305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575–596). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, M. (2007). Self-regulation and mathematics instruction. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22(1), 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, N. S. (2002). Identity, goals, and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2), 213–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 124–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Kranzler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(4), 426–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. M., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural-historical perspective on mathematics teaching and learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 338–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: Making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 565–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A., & Lavie, I. (2005). Why cannot children see as the same what grown-ups cannot see as different?—early numerical thinking revisited. Cognition and Instruction, 23(3), 237–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalev, R. S., Manor, O., Kerem, B., Ayali, M., Badichi, N., Friedlander, Y., et al. (2001). Developmental dyscalculia is a familial learning disability. (Statistical data included). Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(1), 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Y. (2007). Experiencing mathematics classes: Ability grouping, gender and the selective development of participative identities. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(1–2), 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steedly, K., Dragoo, K., Arefeh, S., Luke, S. D. (2008). Effective mathematics instruction, evidence for education. 3(1). Downloaded on October, 12, 2012 from http://nichcy.org/wp-content/uploads/docs/eemath.pdf.

  • Voigt, J. (1994). Negotiation of mathematical meaning and learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 275–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (trans: Anscombe, G.E.M.). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Witzel, B. S., Smith, S. W., & Brownell, M. T. (2001). How can I help students with learning disabilities in algebra? Intervention in School and Clinic, 37(2), 101–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. B. (2008). Mathematizing, identifying, and autonomous learning: Fourth grade students engage mathematics. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University: East Lansing, MI.

  • Wood, M. B., & Kalinec, C. A. (2012). “What? A Black brother can’t talk?” Possibilities for learning mathematics in small group interactions. International Journal of Educational Research, 51–52, 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Prof. Anna Sfard, my advisor for the present study. In addition, I wish to express my thanks to the Mandel Scholars program for PhD students and the Golda-Meir foundation of the Hebrew University for having provided financial support for the writing process. Finally, I wish to thank Dr. Adam Lefstein and the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on the first drafts of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Einat Heyd-Metzuyanim.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Dana’s first assessment—10/2/08
Table 5 Dana’s final assessment—24/6/08

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. The co-construction of learning difficulties in mathematics—teacher–student interactions and their role in the development of a disabled mathematical identity. Educ Stud Math 83, 341–368 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9457-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9457-z

Keywords

Navigation