Abstract
A new thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) was prepared from polylactide-b-poly(ethylene glycol)-b-polylactide (soft segment) and 2,4-toluene diisocyanate (hard segment). Then, TPU in various proportions (i.e., 50, 70, and 90 wt%) was blended with poly(ethylene-alt-maleic anhydride) (PEMA) to form samples coded as TPU/PEMA50, TPU/PEMA70, and TPU/PEMA90. The TPU and PEMA blend at ratio of 50:50 was reinforced by various graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) contents. Three novel strategies were opted in this research, including design of novel thermoplastic polyurethane, blend of TPU with poly(ethylene-alt-maleic anhydride), and fabrication of graphene nanoplatelet-based nanocomposites. Hydrogen bonding between blend component and GNPs directed the formation of regular nanostructure. Consequently, unique self-assembled flower-shaped morphology was observed in blends as well as hybrid materials using the scanning electron microscopy technique. Physical interlinking between blend components and nanofiller was also responsible for rise in tensile modulus (39.3 MPa) and Young’s modulus (4.04 GPa) of the TPU/PEMA/GNP 5 hybrid compared with the neat blend. The crystallization property was studied by the X-ray diffraction analysis and differential scanning calorimetry. The melting temperature of about 70 °C was preferred for the shape recovery studies. The results from heat-induced shape recovery were compared with those of electroactive shape memory effects. Electrical conductivity was increased to 0.18 S cm−1 using 5 wt% GNP nanofiller, which was dependent on the applied temperature, as well. The original shape of TPU/PEMA/GNP 5 sample was almost 95 % recovered using heat-induced shape memory effect, while 98 % recovery was observed in an electric field of 40 V. Electroactive shape memory results were found to be better than those induced by heat stimulation effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Piszczyk Ł, Hejna A, Formela K, Danowska M, Strankowski M (2015) Effect of ground tire rubber on structural, mechanical and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foams. Iran Polym J 24:75–84
Momtaz M, Barikani M, Razavi-Nouri M (2015) Effect of ionic group content on thermal and structural properties of polycaprolactone-based shape memory polyurethane ionomers. Iran Polym J 24:1–9
Şerban DA, Linul E, Voiconi T, Marşavina L, Modler N (2015) Numerical evaluation of two-dimensional micromechanical structures of anisotropic cellular materials: case study for polyurethane rigid foams. Iran Polym J 24:515–529
Lizundia E, Gómez-Galván F, Pérez-Álvarez L, León LM, Vilas JL (2016) Poly (l-lactide)/branched β-cyclodextrin blends: thermal, morphological and mechanical properties. Carbohyd Polym 144:25–32
Jahani Y, Valavi A, Ziaee F (2015) Reactive melt modification of polyethylene by ethyl acrylate/acrylic acid copolymers: rheology, morphology and thermal behavior. Iran Polym J 24:449–458
Lakatos C, Czifrák K, Papp R, Karger-Kocsis J, Zsuga M, Kéki S (2016) Segmented linear shape memory polyurethanes with thermoreversible Diels–Alder coupling: effects of polycaprolactone molecular weight and diisocyanate type. Express Polym Lett 10:324–336
Wan LY, Han RM, Wan ZH (2016) The molecular mechanism of the thermo-responsive shape memory effect of self-assembled poly-{2, 5-bis [(4-butoxyphenyl) oxycarbonyl] styrene} fiber. Iran Polym J 25:79–88
Zhao Q, Behl M, Lendlein A (2013) Shape-memory polymers with multiple transitions: complex actively moving polymers. Soft Matter 9:1744–1755
Li G, Ajisafe O, Meng H (2013) Effect of strain hardening of shape memory polymer fibers on healing efficiency of thermosetting polymer composites. Polymer 54:920–928
Wang K, Zhu G, Wang Y, Ren F (2015) Thermal and shape memory properties of cyanate/polybutadiene epoxy/polysebacic polyanhydride copolymer. J Appl Polym Sci 132:23. doi:10.1002/app.42045
Collins DA, Yakacki CM, Lightbody D, Patel RR, Frick CP (2016) Shape-memory behavior of high-strength amorphous thermoplastic poly (para-phenylene). J Appl Polym Sci 133:3. doi:10.1002/app.42903
Taguet A, Cassagnau P, Lopez-Cuesta JM (2014) Structuration, selective dispersion and compatibilizing effect of (nano) fillers in polymer blends. Prog Polym Sci 39:1526–1563
Hui CM, Dang A, Chen B, Yan J, Konkolewicz D, He H, Ferebee R, Bockstaller MR, Matyjaszewski K (2014) Effect of thermal self-initiation on the synthesis, composition, and properties of particle brush materials. Macromolecules 47:5501–5508
Schnepp Z (2013) Biopolymers as a flexible resource for nanochemistry. Angew Chem Int Edit 52:1096–1108
Dash R, Foston M, Ragauskas AJ (2013) Improving the mechanical and thermal properties of gelatin hydrogels cross-linked by cellulose nanowhiskers. Carbohyd Polym 91:638–645
Ojer P, Neutsch L, Gabor F, Irache JM, de Cerain AL (2013) Cytotoxicity and cell interaction studies of bioadhesive poly (anhydride) nanoparticles for oral antigen/drug delivery. J Biomed Nanotechnol 9:1891–1903
Liu Y, Lim J, Teoh SH (2013) Review: development of clinically relevant scaffolds for vascularised bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol Adv 31:688–705
Liu Y, Du H, Liu L, Leng J (2014) Shape memory polymers and their composites in aerospace applications: a review. Smart Mater Struct 23:023001. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/23/2/023001
Cai D, Song M (2010) Recent advance in functionalized graphene/polymer nanocomposites. J Mater Chem 20:7906–7915
Nasir A, Kausar A, Younus A (2015) A review on preparation, properties and applications of polymeric nanoparticle-based materials. Polym-Plast Technol 54:325–341
Li W, Dichiara A, Bai J (2013) Carbon nanotube–graphene nanoplatelet hybrids as high-performance multifunctional reinforcements in epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 74:221–227
Wen J, Somorjai G, Lim F, Ward R (1997) XPS study of surface composition of a segmented polyurethane block copolymer modified by PDMS end groups and its blends with phenoxy. Macromolecules 30:7206–7213
Sattar R, Kausar A, Siddiq M (2015) Thermal, mechanical and electrical studies of novel shape memory polyurethane/polyaniline blends. Chin J Polym Sci 33:1313–1324
Zhu C, Guo S, Fang Y, Dong S (2010) Reducing sugar: new functional molecules for the green synthesis of graphene nanosheets. ACS Nano 4:2429–2437
Yadav SK, Cho JW (2013) Functionalized graphene nanoplatelets for enhanced mechanical and thermal properties of polyurethane nanocomposites. Appl Surf Sci 266:360–367
Ariga K, Yamauchi Y, Rydzek G, Ji Q, Yonamine Y, Wu KC, Hill JP (2014) Layer-by-layer nanoarchitectonics: invention, innovation, and evolution. Chem Lett 43:36–68
Akhtar MN, Sulong AB, Karim SA, Azhari CH, Raza MR (2015) Evaluation of thermal, morphological and mechanical properties of PMMA/NaCl/DMF electrospun nanofibers: an investigation through surface methodology approach. Iran Polym J 24:1025–1038
Borreguero AM, Rodríguez JF, Valverde JL, Peijs T, Carmona M (2013) Characterization of rigid polyurethane foams containing microencapsulted phase change materials: microcapsules type effect. J Appl Polym Sci 128:582–590
Tang Q, Zhou Z, Chen Z (2013) Graphene-related nanomaterials: tuning properties by functionalization. Nanoscale 5:4541–4583
Meng H, Li G (2013) A review of stimuli-responsive shape memory polymer composites. Polymer 54:2199–2221
Bai Y, Chen Y, Wang Q, Wang T (2014) Poly(vinyl butyral) based polymer networks with dual-responsive shape memory and self-healing properties. J Mater Chem A 2:9169–9177
Wu Y, Hu J, Zhang C, Han J, Wang Y, Kumar B (2015) A facile approach to fabricate a UV/heat dual-responsive triple shape memory polymer. J Mater Chem A 3:97–100
Sun R, Xue C, Ma X, Gao M, Tian H, Li Q (2013) Light-driven linear helical supramolecular polymer formed by molecular-recognition-directed self-assembly of bis (p-sulfonatocalix [4] arene) and pseudorotaxane. J Am Chem Soc 135:5990–5993
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kausar, A. Physical properties and shape memory behavior of thermoplastic polyurethane/poly(ethylene-alt-maleic anhydride) blends and graphene nanoplatelet composite. Iran Polym J 25, 945–955 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-016-0481-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-016-0481-1