Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physical properties and shape memory behavior of thermoplastic polyurethane/poly(ethylene-alt-maleic anhydride) blends and graphene nanoplatelet composite

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Polymer Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) was prepared from polylactide-b-poly(ethylene glycol)-b-polylactide (soft segment) and 2,4-toluene diisocyanate (hard segment). Then, TPU in various proportions (i.e., 50, 70, and 90 wt%) was blended with poly(ethylene-alt-maleic anhydride) (PEMA) to form samples coded as TPU/PEMA50, TPU/PEMA70, and TPU/PEMA90. The TPU and PEMA blend at ratio of 50:50 was reinforced by various graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) contents. Three novel strategies were opted in this research, including design of novel thermoplastic polyurethane, blend of TPU with poly(ethylene-alt-maleic anhydride), and fabrication of graphene nanoplatelet-based nanocomposites. Hydrogen bonding between blend component and GNPs directed the formation of regular nanostructure. Consequently, unique self-assembled flower-shaped morphology was observed in blends as well as hybrid materials using the scanning electron microscopy technique. Physical interlinking between blend components and nanofiller was also responsible for rise in tensile modulus (39.3 MPa) and Young’s modulus (4.04 GPa) of the TPU/PEMA/GNP 5 hybrid compared with the neat blend. The crystallization property was studied by the X-ray diffraction analysis and differential scanning calorimetry. The melting temperature of about 70 °C was preferred for the shape recovery studies. The results from heat-induced shape recovery were compared with those of electroactive shape memory effects. Electrical conductivity was increased to 0.18 S cm−1 using 5 wt% GNP nanofiller, which was dependent on the applied temperature, as well. The original shape of TPU/PEMA/GNP 5 sample was almost 95 % recovered using heat-induced shape memory effect, while 98 % recovery was observed in an electric field of 40 V. Electroactive shape memory results were found to be better than those induced by heat stimulation effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1
Scheme 2
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Piszczyk Ł, Hejna A, Formela K, Danowska M, Strankowski M (2015) Effect of ground tire rubber on structural, mechanical and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foams. Iran Polym J 24:75–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Momtaz M, Barikani M, Razavi-Nouri M (2015) Effect of ionic group content on thermal and structural properties of polycaprolactone-based shape memory polyurethane ionomers. Iran Polym J 24:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Şerban DA, Linul E, Voiconi T, Marşavina L, Modler N (2015) Numerical evaluation of two-dimensional micromechanical structures of anisotropic cellular materials: case study for polyurethane rigid foams. Iran Polym J 24:515–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lizundia E, Gómez-Galván F, Pérez-Álvarez L, León LM, Vilas JL (2016) Poly (l-lactide)/branched β-cyclodextrin blends: thermal, morphological and mechanical properties. Carbohyd Polym 144:25–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jahani Y, Valavi A, Ziaee F (2015) Reactive melt modification of polyethylene by ethyl acrylate/acrylic acid copolymers: rheology, morphology and thermal behavior. Iran Polym J 24:449–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lakatos C, Czifrák K, Papp R, Karger-Kocsis J, Zsuga M, Kéki S (2016) Segmented linear shape memory polyurethanes with thermoreversible Diels–Alder coupling: effects of polycaprolactone molecular weight and diisocyanate type. Express Polym Lett 10:324–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wan LY, Han RM, Wan ZH (2016) The molecular mechanism of the thermo-responsive shape memory effect of self-assembled poly-{2, 5-bis [(4-butoxyphenyl) oxycarbonyl] styrene} fiber. Iran Polym J 25:79–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao Q, Behl M, Lendlein A (2013) Shape-memory polymers with multiple transitions: complex actively moving polymers. Soft Matter 9:1744–1755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li G, Ajisafe O, Meng H (2013) Effect of strain hardening of shape memory polymer fibers on healing efficiency of thermosetting polymer composites. Polymer 54:920–928

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang K, Zhu G, Wang Y, Ren F (2015) Thermal and shape memory properties of cyanate/polybutadiene epoxy/polysebacic polyanhydride copolymer. J Appl Polym Sci 132:23. doi:10.1002/app.42045

    Google Scholar 

  11. Collins DA, Yakacki CM, Lightbody D, Patel RR, Frick CP (2016) Shape-memory behavior of high-strength amorphous thermoplastic poly (para-phenylene). J Appl Polym Sci 133:3. doi:10.1002/app.42903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Taguet A, Cassagnau P, Lopez-Cuesta JM (2014) Structuration, selective dispersion and compatibilizing effect of (nano) fillers in polymer blends. Prog Polym Sci 39:1526–1563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hui CM, Dang A, Chen B, Yan J, Konkolewicz D, He H, Ferebee R, Bockstaller MR, Matyjaszewski K (2014) Effect of thermal self-initiation on the synthesis, composition, and properties of particle brush materials. Macromolecules 47:5501–5508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schnepp Z (2013) Biopolymers as a flexible resource for nanochemistry. Angew Chem Int Edit 52:1096–1108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dash R, Foston M, Ragauskas AJ (2013) Improving the mechanical and thermal properties of gelatin hydrogels cross-linked by cellulose nanowhiskers. Carbohyd Polym 91:638–645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ojer P, Neutsch L, Gabor F, Irache JM, de Cerain AL (2013) Cytotoxicity and cell interaction studies of bioadhesive poly (anhydride) nanoparticles for oral antigen/drug delivery. J Biomed Nanotechnol 9:1891–1903

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu Y, Lim J, Teoh SH (2013) Review: development of clinically relevant scaffolds for vascularised bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol Adv 31:688–705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Y, Du H, Liu L, Leng J (2014) Shape memory polymers and their composites in aerospace applications: a review. Smart Mater Struct 23:023001. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/23/2/023001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cai D, Song M (2010) Recent advance in functionalized graphene/polymer nanocomposites. J Mater Chem 20:7906–7915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nasir A, Kausar A, Younus A (2015) A review on preparation, properties and applications of polymeric nanoparticle-based materials. Polym-Plast Technol 54:325–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Li W, Dichiara A, Bai J (2013) Carbon nanotube–graphene nanoplatelet hybrids as high-performance multifunctional reinforcements in epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 74:221–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wen J, Somorjai G, Lim F, Ward R (1997) XPS study of surface composition of a segmented polyurethane block copolymer modified by PDMS end groups and its blends with phenoxy. Macromolecules 30:7206–7213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sattar R, Kausar A, Siddiq M (2015) Thermal, mechanical and electrical studies of novel shape memory polyurethane/polyaniline blends. Chin J Polym Sci 33:1313–1324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu C, Guo S, Fang Y, Dong S (2010) Reducing sugar: new functional molecules for the green synthesis of graphene nanosheets. ACS Nano 4:2429–2437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yadav SK, Cho JW (2013) Functionalized graphene nanoplatelets for enhanced mechanical and thermal properties of polyurethane nanocomposites. Appl Surf Sci 266:360–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ariga K, Yamauchi Y, Rydzek G, Ji Q, Yonamine Y, Wu KC, Hill JP (2014) Layer-by-layer nanoarchitectonics: invention, innovation, and evolution. Chem Lett 43:36–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Akhtar MN, Sulong AB, Karim SA, Azhari CH, Raza MR (2015) Evaluation of thermal, morphological and mechanical properties of PMMA/NaCl/DMF electrospun nanofibers: an investigation through surface methodology approach. Iran Polym J 24:1025–1038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Borreguero AM, Rodríguez JF, Valverde JL, Peijs T, Carmona M (2013) Characterization of rigid polyurethane foams containing microencapsulted phase change materials: microcapsules type effect. J Appl Polym Sci 128:582–590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tang Q, Zhou Z, Chen Z (2013) Graphene-related nanomaterials: tuning properties by functionalization. Nanoscale 5:4541–4583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Meng H, Li G (2013) A review of stimuli-responsive shape memory polymer composites. Polymer 54:2199–2221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bai Y, Chen Y, Wang Q, Wang T (2014) Poly(vinyl butyral) based polymer networks with dual-responsive shape memory and self-healing properties. J Mater Chem A 2:9169–9177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu Y, Hu J, Zhang C, Han J, Wang Y, Kumar B (2015) A facile approach to fabricate a UV/heat dual-responsive triple shape memory polymer. J Mater Chem A 3:97–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sun R, Xue C, Ma X, Gao M, Tian H, Li Q (2013) Light-driven linear helical supramolecular polymer formed by molecular-recognition-directed self-assembly of bis (p-sulfonatocalix [4] arene) and pseudorotaxane. J Am Chem Soc 135:5990–5993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayesha Kausar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kausar, A. Physical properties and shape memory behavior of thermoplastic polyurethane/poly(ethylene-alt-maleic anhydride) blends and graphene nanoplatelet composite. Iran Polym J 25, 945–955 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-016-0481-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-016-0481-1

Keywords

Navigation