Abstract
Babia Góra massif is the only site of occurrence of the Cerastium alpinum L. in Poland, an arctic-alpine perennial plant with a wide distribution in North America, northwestern Asia, and Europe. To determine whether the isolated Polish populations are genetically distinct, we have performed an evaluation of C. alpinum from Babia Góra with the use of iPBS markers. A total number of 133 individuals of C. alpinum from seven populations representing four localizations of the species were analyzed, i.e., from Babia Góra (Poland), Alps (Switzerland), Nuolja massif (Sweden), and Kaffiøyra (Svalbard, Norway). Genetic analysis of all C. alpinum samples using eight PBS primers identified 262 bands, 79.4% of which were polymorphic. iPBS markers revealed low genetic diversity (average He = 0.085) and high population differentiation (FST = 0.617). AMOVA results confirmed that the majority of the genetic variation (62%) was recorded among populations. The grouping revealed by PCoA showed that C. alpinum from Svalbard is the most diverged population, C. alpinum from Switzerland and Sweden form a pair of similar populations, whereas C. alpinum from the Babia Góra form a heterogeneous group of four populations. Results of isolation by distance analysis suggested that the spatial distance is the most probable cause of the observed differentiation among populations. Although significant traces of a bottleneck effect were noted for all populations of C. alpinum from Babia Góra, the populations still maintain a low but significant level of genetic polymorphism. These results are of great importance for developing conservation strategies for this species in Poland.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The genus Cerastium (Caryophyllaceae) consists of over 200 species (Plants of the World Online, http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org), the majority of which are spread in the Northern Hemisphere in the temperate climate zone, but only a few of them are cosmopolitan species. Cerastium alpinum is a perennial that grows in rocky, sandy, or gravely substrates and is characterized by its matted growth form, hairy basal leaves, flowering stems, white, five-petalled flowers about 20 mm in diameter, and a branched root system (Porsild and Cody 1980; Clapham et al. 1987; Rønning 1999). Flowering is initiated relatively late, from June to August. The species is generally cross-pollinated by insects, although self-pollination occurs (Totland and Schulte-Herbrüggen 2003; Parusel 2008). Seeds are dispersed by gravity—they are sown mainly within a close vicinity of the source plant (Parusel 2008). In Poland, its only natural sites are located in the Babia Góra massif (Żywiec Beskids, Western Carpathians) within the area of the Babia Góra National Park (Parusel 2001). C. alpinum can be found on high mountain grasslands where it forms one-species aggregations on rock shelves, in rock crevices, and on stony debris (Parusel 2014). Most of these sites were recorded in the subalpine zone, from 1480 to 1680 m.a.s.l. (Parusel 2001). Due to the limited area of occurrence and spatial isolation of its sites (the closest populations are in the Alps and the Eastern Carpathians; Parusel 2001), C. alpinum was included in the Polish Red Data Book of Plants and received the status of a critically endangered species in Poland (Parusel 1993, 2014; Mirek and Piękoś-Mirkowa 2008). This makes it a critical component of Polish flora that requires special attention, i.e., increased interdisciplinary activity to develop effective strategies for species conservation and restoration.
The subject of conservation genetic studies is to understand the dynamics of genes in populations threatened by extinction, to apply the techniques and concepts of genetics, and to use them to address problems in conservation biology (Hedrick and Miller 1992). To plan an effective conservation strategy, it is necessary to know the current genetic condition of the population. Genetic diversity is influenced by population size, gene flow, the mating system, and other facultative factors like genetic drift, founder effects or bottleneck, and subsequent inbreeding (Ellstrand and Elam 1993). Inbreeding depression, consequently, can lead to the accumulation of deleterious mutations, a reduction in plant fitness, and a further reduction in population size (Ellstrand and Elam 1993; Lynch et al. 1995; Young et al. 1996). Another factor leading to genetic degradation is spatial isolation, which may restrict or prevent gene flow. Due to being rare and in a remote area, C. alpinum from Babia Góra may be exposed to the above problems, which could make the risk of local extinction higher.
In recent decades, various PCR-based techniques such as randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD; Williams et al. 1990), inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR; Zietkiewicz et al. 1994), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP; Vos et al. 1995), or simple sequence repeats (SSR; Tautz 1989) have been widely used for assessment of the genetic diversity of many plants (e.g., Arif et al. 2010; Amiteye 2021) and animal (e.g., Arif and Khan 2009; Yang et al. 2013) species. Knowledge of the level of genetic polymorphism maintained in a particular population and information about the relatedness between individuals is essential for establishing efficient conservation management programs.
Unfortunately, the knowledge of the genetic diversity of C. alpinum and the whole genus Cerastium is minimal. The genetic studies for the genus Cerastium include the RAPD and SCAR markers for C. arcticum (Hagen et al. 2001) or AFLP technique for C. dinaricum (Kutnjak et al. 2014), C. decalvans (Niketić et al. 2022), C. sylvaticum, C. subtriflorum (Skubic et al. 2018), C. hekuravense (Caković et al. 2018) and C. grandiflorum, C. decalvans and C. dinaricum (Đurović et al. 2021). Most molecular studies of C. alpinum involved populations found in Svalbard, Greenland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and Finland and relied on analyses of isoenzymatic polymorphism (Nyberg Berglund et al. 2006). Nonetheless, they concentrated on the issue of hybridization and introgression between C. alpinum and other closely related species (i.e., C. arcticum, C. nigrescens) (Brysting and Borgen 2000; Hagen et al. 2002), as well as the identification and comparison of various isoenzymatic phenotypes from different populations to describe their geographic distribution and infer about the species’ history (colonization routes) in Fennoscandia. Scheen et al. (2004) also wrote about the phylogenetic relationships and biogeography of the genus Cerastium. Brysting (2000) and Brysting et al. (2011) researched how the number of chromosomes might vary in some Cerastium species.
The iPBS (inter primer binding sites) method described by Kalendar et al. (2010) is based on the virtually universal presence of a tRNA complement as a reverse transcriptase primer binding site (PBS) in long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons. It does not require prior knowledge of the sequence, making it suitable for many objects, including “orphan crops” with underdeveloped marker systems. This marker system has been successfully used for the molecular characterization of different plant species, such as chickpea (Andeden et al. 2013), pea (Baloch et al. 2015), quinoa (Hossein-Pour et al. 2019), grapevine (Milovanov et al. 2019), lianas from genus Gnetum (Doungous et al. 2020), onion (Khapilina et al. 2021a, 2021b), or pathogenic fungi, e.g., representatives of genus Alternaria (Turzhanova et al. 2020) and Rhizoctonia (Erper et al. 2021). This method has also found application in phylogenetic research of saffron (Bayat et al. 2018) and emmer wheat (Arystanbekkyzy et al. 2019). Our previous studies demonstrated the usefulness of iPBS markers for genetic diversity studies in non-model plants, such as Colobanthus quitensis (Koc et al. 2018), Poa annua (Androsiuk et al. 2019), and Deschampsia antarctica (Androsiuk et al. 2020), for which knowledge on their genome sequence and organization is limited. The retrotransposon-based DNA marker system used in these studies effectively assessed DNA polymorphism between individuals and among populations.
The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to test the suitability of iPBS to detect genetic polymorphism within and among C. alpinum populations; (2) to estimate genetic differentiation and relationships among studied C. alpinum populations from different geographic regions; and (3) to evaluate the genetic condition of C. alpinum from the Babia Góra massif to provide information essential for the development of effective conservation strategies for the genetic resources of C. alpinum in Babia Góra.
Materials and methods
Material
The research material consisted of 133 individuals of Cerastium alpinum representing seven sampling sites (from now on referred to as populations) from Poland, Switzerland, Sweden, and Svalbard (Norway) (Table 1). Plants from Switzerland and Sweden were obtained in a dried form. In the case of C. alpinum from Svalbard, the original material consisted of seeds collected during the Arctic expedition to Nicolaus Copernicus University Polar Station in Spitsbergen in 2012. Polish C. alpinum populations were collected in Babia Góra National Park after obtaining the permission of the Polish Ministry of Environment. All Polish sampling sites are scattered on the Babia Góra massif. To avoid damaging the C. alpinum individuals from these unique and valuable sampling sites, we collected only bags with mature seeds from 14 to 28 individuals from each localization; the sampled plants were ca. 10–20 m apart from each other to avoid collecting material representing the clonal genets as it is reported that C. alpinum can reproduce vegetatively (Rune 1957; Parusel 2008). Plants grown from seeds were maintained in the greenhouse of the Department of Plant Physiology, Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology at the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland. In the case of C. alpinum from Babia Góra massif, one seedling obtained from three to five germinated seeds originating from one seed bag, representing each sampled specimen, was selected for DNA extraction.
The molecular analysis was performed using 133 C. alpinum individuals representing seven populations, ranging from 14 to 28 individuals per population. The size of a given population limited the number of sampled individuals.
DNA extraction and iPBS genotyping
Genomic DNA from each individual was extracted with Genomic Mini AX Plant Spin kit (A&A Biotechnology). The amount and purity of isolated DNAs were estimated spectrophotometrically (NanoDrop). Additionally, the quality of DNA was verified on 1.5% (w/v) agarose staining with 0.5 µg/ml ethidium bromide.
Initially, 34 PBS primers (2074, 2076, 2079, 2080, 2085, 2217, 2220, 2221, 2224, 2228, 2229, 2231, 2232, 2237, 2238, 2240, 2241, 2242, 2249, 2251, 2253, 2272, 2277, 2373, 2374, 2376, 2378, 2381, 2389, 2391, 2393, 2395, 2399, 2415) were screened for C. alpinum (Kalendar et al. 2010), with the annealing temperature set at 56 °C for all primers. During this step, the quality of the band pattern was the factor that decided whether the particular PBS primer could be selected for further studies or not. To evaluate the quality of the band pattern for each tested PBS primer, we applied the scale of PCR efficiency described in the original paper by Kalendar et al. (2010). According to that scale, we could distinguish five types of iPBS band profiles: 0, no bands; 1, few and weak bands; 2, a few strong bands; 3, ≈10 strong bands; 4, many bands (good primer); 5, many strong and equally amplifying bands. Based on our observations for further steps of our study, we selected eight PBS primers with the highest score (Table S1). In the next step, we experimentally determined the optimal annealing temperature for selected primers, by performing PCR with the gradient of annealing temperature (50–60 °C). When the optimal annealing temperature for each selected PBS primer was determined (Table 2), the reproducibility of band profiles for each of selected PBS primer was verified. This verification was based on a comparison of the electrophoretic profiles for eleven individuals representing population 1 from Babia Góra, Poland. Data were generated and compared in two replicates. Gels were then checked to identify iPBS amplicons (bands) in one or both replicates.
Eight PBS primers that gave clearly identifiable and repeatable amplification products (bands) were selected for subsequent genetic diversity studies (Table 2). The iPBS amplification was performed according to the procedure described by Kalendar et al. (2010) with modifications (Androsiuk et al. 2015). Amplification products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis in 1.5% (w/v) agarose with 1 × TBE electrophoresis buffer at 100 V for 2 h and visualized with 0.5 μg/ml ethidium bromide.
Data analysis
The amplified bands were scored as either 1 (present) or 0 (absent) across genotypes. Based on the obtained binary matrix of amplification products, the following genetic parameters were estimated with the use of GenAlEx 6.5 software (Peakall and Smouse 2006; 2012): the total number of bands per population (NB), percentage of polymorphic bands (P), Shannon’s information index (I), and expected heterozygosity (He).
The genetic structure of the studied populations was inferred based on the Bayesian model-based clustering method implemented in Structure ver. 2.3.4 (Pritchard et al. 2000). The model probabilistically assigns individual multilocus genotypes to a user-defined number of clusters (K), achieving linkage equilibrium within clusters (Pritchard et al. 2000). We ran ten replicates with a burn-in of 100,000 iterations and with 500,000 iterations for Markov chain Monte Carlo for K ranging from 1 to 10 possible clusters. The analysis, with the implemented admixture model, was conducted without prior information on the original population of each sampled individual. The optimal number of clusters and ad hoc statistics ΔK (Evanno et al. 2005) was evaluated in Structure Harvester ver.0.6.94 (Earl and vonHoldt 2012). The genetic subdivision patterns of the analyzed C. alpinum populations were also investigated by principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on the matrix of Euclidean distances between individuals from all analyzed populations. This analysis was performed in PAST software (Hammer et al. 2001).
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was performed on Arlequin 3.5 software (Excoffier et al. 2005). For that analysis, the iPBS dataset was treated as haplotypic, consisting of a combination of alleles at one or several loci (Excoffier et al. 2005). The significance of the fixation indices was tested using a nonparametric permutation approach (Excoffier et al. 1992). The significance test was based on 1023 permutations.
The possible effect of increased spatial distance on the genetic structure of the studied populations of C. alpinum was also investigated. The spatial genetic structure was estimated by testing the significance of isolation by distance (IBD) using a Mantel test with 9999 permutations of the relationship between the matrix of pairwise FST/(1 − FST) and that of the logarithm of geographical distance between populations (Rousset 1997), using GenAlEx 6.5. The pairwise FST values were estimated in Arlequin 3.5 software, and their significance was also tested based on 110 permutations.
Tajima’s D, Fu’s FS neutrality test, mismatch distribution, and demographic processes affecting populations were also performed using Arlequin 3.5 software (Excoffier et al. 2005).
Bottleneck ver. 1.2.02 (Cornuet and Luikart 1996) software was used to investigate the recent reduction of effective population size based on allele data frequencies for each C. alpinum population (Cornuet and Luikart 1996; Piry et al. 1999). This effect was studied using dominant markers in the infinite allele model (IAM) to test the mutation-drift hypothesis against the bottleneck hypothesis (Tero et al. 2003). The significance of potential bottleneck was estimated in the SIGN test, the standardized differences test, and the one-tailed Wilcoxon sign-rank test for heterozygosity excess with 10,000 simulations.
Results
Efficiency of applied PCR primers
Our analysis of Cerastium alpinum populations, using eight PBS primers, yielded 262 distinguished amplification products (bands) (Table 2, Table S2, File S1). The highest number of bands (38) was revealed by primer 2228, and the lowest number of bands (26) was obtained for primer 2229. On average, 32.75 bands were obtained per primer. Of the identified loci, 208 (79.39%) were polymorphic (Table 2).
Of a total of 262 scored bands, 20 (7.63%) were represented as private bands that were found only within one population and absent in the others (Table 3). The highest number of private bands (4) was revealed by primer 2228. The Svalbard population (6) appeared as the most abundant in private bands—six of them were scored in individuals representing that population, while for population 2, no private bands were found.
Genetic diversity and differentiation
The iPBS markers revealed the presence of genetic polymorphism between individuals within a population and genetic variation among populations (Table 4). The number of iPBS amplification products ranged from 172 for population 5 to 236 for population 3. The highest number of polymorphic bands was scored for population 3 (45.80%) and the lowest for population 5 (13.36%). On average (over loci and populations), 25.35% of iPBS loci were polymorphic. The genetic variation was assessed with two parameters: Shannon’s information index (I) and expected heterozygosity (He). Population 3 had the highest values for both parameters, while population 5 had the lowest values.
PCoA indicates that 51.56% of the variation was explained by the first three components (21.6, 18.83, and 11.13%, respectively). The projection of the analyzed populations on the first two axes is shown in Fig. 1. The grouping revealed by PCoA pointed to the high degree of similarity between populations 5 and 7. The Babia Góra populations (1–4) can be put together into one group, but population 6 is very different from the others along coordinates 1 and 2.
The Bayesian clustering analysis performed in Structure and Structure Harvester software revealed that ΔK has a maximum at K = 7, but a marked secondary peak at K = 5 was also found (Fig. 2a). Both populations’ structure bar plots generated by Structure software for K = 5 (Fig. 2b) and K = 7 (Fig. 2c) reveal a clear separation between populations 5, 6, and 7, which also appeared to be genetically homogenous. In the case of populations 1–4, a combination of diverse genotypes shared by all these populations can be observed, indicating admixture between these localizations. However, even then (for K = 7), in the case of populations 1 and 4, the predicted values of the proportion of membership of these populations to separate, individual clusters were > 0.7. The highest admixture was observed for populations 2 and 3, for which the predicted proportion of membership in the certain cluster was ≤ 0.499. For K = 5, an analogous pattern of population subdivision is observed. Pairwise FST analysis was also performed. The highest FST value (0.839) was observed between populations 5 and 6, whereas the lowest (0.268) was between population 1 and population 3 (Table 5). All the pairwise FST values appeared to be significant (p < 0.05).
The results of AMOVA showed that most of the identified genetic variation occurred among populations (61.69%), whereas the remaining 38.31% was attributed to variation within populations (Table 6).
The IBD analysis revealed a significant correlation between genetic divergence and the logarithm of the geographic distance between populations (R2 = 0.5073, p = 0.02), which means that the genetic distance between populations, expressed as pairwise FST/(1 − FST) values, increases with the spatial distance between them (Fig. 3, Table 5).
Neutrality tests and demography
Tajima’s D did not show any deviation from zero except for population 6, which was negative and significant. Fu’s FS was negative for all populations (except population 6), but only for populations 5 and 7 did it significantly deviate from zero (Table 7). The FS statistic interpretation was performed according to Fu (1997), who indicated that it should be considered significant at the 5% level if its p value is below 0.02 but not below 0.05. In the mismatch analysis for population growth and geographic expansion, SSD values were not statistically significant, and all samples had a low raggedness index (Table 8).
Three tests (SIGN, standardized differences, and Wilcoxon sign-rank) were used to analyze the bottleneck effect in studied populations (Table 9). In each case, the values were statistically significant, except for population 6 (SIGN test), population 4 (standardized differences test), and populations 4 and 6 (one-tailed Wilcoxon test for heterozygosity excess). Also, the results of all three tests showed that there were significant signs of bottleneck effects in populations 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7.
Discussion
Genetic diversity and differentiation of Cerastium alpinum
Cerastium alpinum occurs mainly in the Northern Hemisphere, North America (Canada and Greenland), Europe, and Western Siberia (Hultén 1956). Our research focused on the only natural Polish stand of C. alpinum (in the Babia Góra National Park) and populations of the species from Switzerland (Piz Val Gronda, Alps), Sweden (Nuolja massif, Abisko National Park), and Norway (Svalbard, Kaffiøyra).
Cerastium alpinum is a common perennial in Fennoscandia. In alpine regions, it has a continuous distribution on alpine heat and serpentine soils, while in boreal forests, it has a scattered distribution on ultramafic soils and steep slopes (Nyberg Berglund et al. 2001; Nyberg Berglund and Westerbergh 2001). Ultramafic soils (often called serpentine) are characterized by low concentrations of plant nutrients and high, potentially toxic, concentrations of Mg and Ni (Proctor 1999). Although Mg is one of the vital nutrients associated with chlorophyll health, the increased concentration of Mg creates conflict with other ions, like Ca, and may decrease their uptake (Nyberg Berglund et al. 2003). In the case of Ni, increased concentrations of these ions were reported to be responsible for the inhibition of cell division at root meristems (Robertson 1985). Moreover, nickel’s negative effect on photosynthesis and transpiration regulation was observed (Carlson et al. 1975). Research on C. alpinum showed that individuals growing in serpentine soils produce a lower number of seeds, display a more dwarfed structure, and show a higher tolerance to Ni and Mg stress (Grundt et al. 1999; Nyberg Berglund et al. 2003). In the Alps, the species has a scattered distribution and can be found on stony grasslands and ridges of the alpine and subalpine zones (The National Data and Information Center on the Swiss Flora, http://www.infoflora.ch). In Poland, C. alpinum occurs only in one place, on the Babia Góra massif in the Babia Góra National Park. This species is critically endangered in Poland due to its small range and geographical isolation (Parusel 2001).
Environmental and geographic isolation can strongly influence a population’s genetic structure and diversity (Wang and Bradburd 2014). This isolation can lead to decreased genetic variation and increased inter-population genetic differences due to reduced gene flow. That could be especially observed in alpine landscapes, which, due to their heterogeneous topography, may create numerous geographically and ecologically isolated habitats for alpine plants (Körner 2003). The terrain relief with steep valleys and high mountain ridges may limit gene flow and lead to more genetic differentiation between isolated plant populations compared to plants from less isolated habitats or lower altitudes (Till-Bottraud and Gaudeul 2002). Many factors, such as population size and the mating system, can affect genetic variation. Genetic diversity in small populations may also be limited by genetic drift and/or bottleneck during colonization by a small number of colonists and subsequent inbreeding (Ellstrand and Elam 1993; Lowe et al. 2004; Stöcklin et al. 2009). As a result, the lower ability of a population to respond to environmental changes might be observed, associated with the accumulation of deleterious recessive alleles and increased mortality of seeds and seedlings, which increases the probability of population extinction (Young et al. 1996; Lowe et al. 2005). High-mountain areas are also characterized by many stress factors, such as extreme temperatures, shorter vegetative periods, strong winds, heavy rainfall, and increased UV radiation, which affect plant growth and development (Körner 2003). Adaptive evolution driven by these factors favors individuals (genotypes) with traits that enhance survival and reproduction and consequently shapes the genetic diversity of populations (Bertel et al. 2018). The reproductive system also influences the genetic diversity of a plant population. Outcrossing species usually have higher within-population diversity and lower differentiation among populations than selfing species (Loveless and Hamrick 1984).
All the factors mentioned above also exist for C. alpinum on the Babia Góra massif. However, the unique character of C. alpinum from that location has not received adequate attention, which is reflected in a deficient number of published studies. The earliest scientific report describing the occurrence of C. alpinum on Babia Góra was released in 1906 by Zapałowicz (1906). Later reports included more detailed descriptions of the species’ morphology, occurrence, and abundance (Parusel 1993, 2001, 2008, 2014; Borysiak and Stachnowicz 2004, 2018). So far, no genetic studies have been performed on C. alpinum from Babia Góra, so we lack knowledge of its historical and current genetic composition. Genetic evaluation of these valuable genetic resources is essential not only to complement our state of knowledge but also for developing and managing effective conservation strategies for the species in Poland. Therefore, genetic characteristics of the C. alpinum from the Babia Góra massif seem to be a very urgent task, especially in light of the present and possible future threats, for example, intensive and increasing tourism in this area and the consequences of global climate change. The mountain environment is an ideal model for studying physiological and adaptive responses to global climate change (Körner 2003). In the next 50–80 years, the amount of rain and snow in Europe’s alpine areas is expected to go down, while the temperature is expected to go up (Engler et al. 2011). In high-elevation areas, the growing season could even get 60 days longer (Raible et al. 2006).
Due to progressive climate warming, plants found at high altitudes are particularly vulnerable to increasing competition due to the upward migration of species previously located at lower altitudes (Lenoir et al. 2008; Chen et al. 2011; Rumpf et al. 2018). Unfortunately, no such research has been carried out so far for the Babia Góra massif and its vicinity. However, the increased temperature and changes in precipitation appeared as the most likely drivers of changes in plant species composition observed within the last 90 years in the Tatra Mountains (Czortek et al. 2018), the mountain range located about 50 km southeast of the Babia Góra massif. Czortek et al. (2018) found that species composition changed the most in snowbeds, mylonite grasslands, and hygrophilous tall herb communities.
To the best of our knowledge, no investigations using iPBS markers for C. alpinum or any other member of the genus Cerastium have been carried out. Results of our study proved the suitability of this technique for evaluation of genetic diversity of the species. Two hundred and eight (79.39%) of the detected amplification products in our study on the genetic diversity of C. alpinum using the iPBS method were polymorphic, and the average polymorphism was found to be at 25.35% (across loci and populations). From 13.36% in population 5 to 45.80% in population 3, this parameter’s value was found. There were even higher levels of polymorphism in earlier studies using iPBS markers, such as 82.35% for Nicotiana tabacum (Yaldiz et al. 2018), 85.7% for Psidium guajava (Mehmood et al. 2013), 86.3% for Vitis varieties (Guo et al. 2014), 97.4% for Myrica rubra (Fang-Yong and Ji-Hong 2014), and 98.7% for Peruvian rosewood (Baloch et al. 2022). For Antarctic plants, however, a substantially lower level of polymorphism was noted, such as an average of 12.5% for Deschampsia antarctica (Androsiuk et al. 2020) and 9.57% for Colobanthus quitensis (Koc et al. 2018). Even lower variability between clones of the apricot cultivar was found by Baránek et al. (2012) at 4.88%. Twenty of the total 208 polymorphic bands were found to be private bands, meaning they only appeared in one population and were not present in the others. Populations 3 and 6 had the most private alleles (5 and 6, respectively), but population 1 only had one such amplification result. The only population for which none of these factors was scored was population 2. Unfortunately, these unique amplification products cannot be treated as diagnostic markers as they were not observed in all individuals representing particular populations.
Our study revealed low genetic diversity within populations of C. alpinum (mean He = 0.085). The highest value of that parameter was observed for population 3 (He = 0.162) and the lowest for population 5 (He = 0.051). Several authors found similarly low levels of heterozygosity in other isolated plant populations. The arctic-alpine species Dryas octopetala forms isolated populations in mountainous regions on northern Greece’s southernmost edge of the species’ distribution range. Studies by Varsamis et al. (2021) aimed at evaluating genetic variation within three selected populations of the species and analyzing its overall genetic structure. The results indicated relatively low intrapopulation genetic diversity (mean value of He = 0.156). In Pilosella alpicola subsp. ullepitschii, an endemic plant in the Carpathians, in the Western Carpathians (Slovakia and Poland), this species occurs at many sites, but only four sites are known in the Eastern and Southern Carpathians (Romania). Studies by Šingliarová et al. (2008) with the use of allozyme markers indicated a significant loss of genetic diversity (He = 0.134) in isolated populations of the Eastern and Southern Carpathians in comparison to populations from the Western part (He = 0.235). The results suggested that this population experienced a robust genetic bottleneck, probably due to a founder effect. On the other hand, studies of the influence of alpine habitat isolation on the genetic diversity of the rare and isolated population of Campanula thyrsoides showed a large genetic variation (He = 0.762; Ægisdóttir et al. 2009; He = 0.714; Frei et al. 2012) within the populations and a relatively low inbreeding coefficient. This rare monocarpic perennial’s high genetic diversity within its own population is best explained by the fact that its long-lived individuals do not breed with each other and that its generations overlap.
Significant traces of a recent reduction in effective population size were noted for all C. alpinum populations in this study. However, negative and significant Fu’s FS statistics were observed only for populations 5 and 7, whereas negative and significant Tajima’s D was only for population 6, confirming a demographic expansion of the populations mentioned above. It might suggest that the studied C. alpinum populations might experience different demographic histories or extinction-recolonization events.
The results of our study revealed that despite a low level of polymorphism revealed by iPBS markers (on average, 25.35% of iPBS bands revealed differences between individuals from the particular population) and low genetic diversity (average He = 0.085), the analyzed populations of C. alpinum were characterized by very high genetic differentiation (FST = 0.6169, results of Structure software which assigned individuals into seven probable clusters, and high population dispersal revealed by PCoA). The significant pairwise FST values between all pairs of studied populations and the significant results of IBD analysis suggest that this population differentiation could be attributed to limited gene flow between them. This is, however, a surprising observation in the case of C. alpinum populations from the Babia Góra massif, which are not separated by high geographical distances (the pairwise distance between populations from this site ranges from 0.14 to 0.55 km). Therefore, the most likely explanation is the seed dispersal method (gravity) and the fact that the C. alpinum seeds are not morphologically adapted to wind dispersal.
Isoenzymatic analysis of C. alpinum from 31 populations from Fennoscandia also revealed their high genetic differentiation (FST = 0.526) (Nyberg Berglund et al. 2006). The authors also observed that some populations were fixed for some alleles and/or were characterized by inbreeding. The isolation of these populations was pointed out as the most likely explanation for the observed pattern of genetic variation (Nyberg Berglund et al. 2006).
Implication for conservation
Genetic diversity is a fundamental source of biodiversity and can be defined as any measure that quantifies the magnitude of genetic variability within a population (Hughes et al. 2008). Therefore, evaluating genetic diversity and population differentiation is vital for species conservation (Carvalho et al. 2019). There are two complementary conservation strategies for plant species: in situ (on-site) conservation that protects species in their native habitat, while ex situ (off-site) protects endangered species outside their natural habitat in artificial environments, e.g., botanical gardens, arboreta, or as a germplasm collection in gene banks (Maunder et al. 2001; Schoen and Brown 2001; Heywood and Iriondo 2003; Guerrant et al. 2004; Havens et al. 2006; Hardwick et al. 2011; Miller et al. 2016). The general concept of in situ conservation is the conservation of living resources in the surroundings where they have developed and to maintain certain species in a dynamic relationship with the natural habitat (Edwards and Kelbessa 1999). This strategy enables the conservation of a large amount of natural genetic diversity. However, it requires adequate human and financial resources to ensure the effectiveness of protected areas in maintaining biodiversity (Zegeye 2017). However, because of climate change, possible pressure from invasive species, or habitat degradation, we cannot always completely prevent the extinction of a species in its natural environment. In that case, ex situ conservation seems to be the only alternative.
The popularity of seed banking is due to the ease of storage and immediate access for scientists, as well as resistance to habitat destruction, diseases, and predators (Roberts 1991; Schoen and Brown 2001). In addition, the deposited material can be used for species reintroduction to their natural habitat or as a genetic rescue, i.e., to increase the diversity of genetically depleted populations (Schoen and Brown 2001). However, despite the many advantages of ex situ conservation, it is not indifferent to the protected resources—it limits genetic variability and eliminates natural processes (e.g., evolutionary and ecological processes) that act on the particular species and are responsible for the adaptation of the species to changing environmental conditions. One example of ex situ conservation efforts that did not meet expectations is associated with Cochlearia polonica (Brassicaceae). It is an endemic plant species that is extinct in the wild in Poland and is known only from one transplanted population (by the Centuria River, right bank tributary of the Biała Przemsza river, in Southern Poland) with similar habitat conditions to its native site. Some individuals were transplanted to the Botanical Garden of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Warsaw to protect the species from complete extinction. After 18 years of ex situ conservation, Rucińska and Puchalski (2011) studied genetic diversity within the garden and source population. They observed a decrease in genetic diversity within the botanical garden population (Nei’s gene diversity = 0.1007) compared with the source population (0.1558). Similar results were observed for Silene otites (Lauterbach et al. 2012) and Metasequoia glyptostroboides (Li et al. 2005). So, in situ and ex situ conservation strategies should not be seen as alternatives, but rather as ways to protect endangered species that work well together. Both have their pros and cons, but both have been shown to be important and effective ways to do so.
Populations with more genetic diversity are more likely to be able to adapt to changing environmental conditions because they have more genetic variation (Willi et al., 2006). This makes them better candidates for conservation efforts. But there are also examples of both plant (e.g., Arabidopsis lyrata; Huber et al. 2014, Takou et al. 2021) and animal (e.g., Oncorhynchus mykiss; Willoughby et al. 2018, Salvelinus fontinalis; Yates et al. 2019) species that show that even populations with very little genetic diversity (e.g., because of a bottleneck) can have distinct signatures of local adaptation. Therefore, the low genetic diversity of C. alpinum populations from Babia Góra should not be treated as a direct threat to the population’s survival. What is more, C. alpinum from Babia Góra is characterized by higher genetic diversity than other studied populations of the species from Sweden, Switzerland, or Norway (Svalbard). Even lower values of He were observed with the application of the same DNA markers (iPBS) for populations of C. quitensis (He = 0.036; Koc et al. 2018), D. antarctica (He = 0.021; Androsiuk et al. 2020), and Poa annua (He = 0.063; Androsiuk et al. 2019). In all the above-mentioned cases, the populations’ adaptation to harsh climatic conditions of the Maritime Antarctic was indicated as the most probable explanation of observed patterns of genetic variation. This may also be true for C. alpinum populations whose genetic pools have been subjected to strong selection from climatic and edaphic factors found in mountainous habitats.
Considering the low genetic diversity and high population differentiation revealed in this study, we suggest that all C. alpinum populations from the Babia Góra massif should be treated the same during the development of its conservation strategy, as only then most of the genetic variability can be preserved. Furthermore, the results of botanical inventory studies of the Babia Góra massif clearly show that the area of occurrence of C. alpinum is shrinking (Perzanowska 2012), so there is an urgent need to develop an efficient strategy for species protection. Fortunately, all Polish C. alpinum sites are located within the protected area of Babia Góra National Park, which will help to maximize the effects of activities associated with species conservation. Nevertheless, due to the constant threat from tourism (trampling, unauthorized plant collection), regular monitoring of the species abundance and population condition should be continued.
Conclusions
Currently, we observe the increasing recognition of the value of genetic data to support the decisions associated with developing and managing species conservation strategies. In this paper, the retrotransposon-based DNA markers (iPBS) proved helpful in revealing the genetic variation of Cerastium alpinum populations. The results showed a relatively low level of genetic diversity and high population differentiation. Furthermore, the genetic structure analyses reveal that the C. alpinum population from Babia Góra forms a distinct and heterogeneous group with greater genetic diversity than populations from other regions. Although C. alpinum populations from Babia Góra revealed significant traces of a recent bottleneck, like all other studied populations of the species, they still represent valuable genetic resources deserving protection. This has become especially important in light of the recent observations pointing to the shrinking area of its occurrence. Therefore, immediate action is required to develop an efficient conservation strategy to protect this species’s only Polish location.
References
Ægisdóttir HH, Kuss P, Stöcklin J (2009) Isolated populations of a rare alpine plant show high genetic diversity and considerable population differentiation. Ann Bot 104:1313–1322. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp242
Amiteye S (2021) Basic concepts and methodologies of DNA marker systems in plant molecular breeding. Heliyon 7:e080932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08093
Andeden EE, Baloch FS, Derya M, Kilian B, Ozkan H (2013) iPBS-retrotransposons-based genetic diversity and relationship among wild annual Cicer species. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 22:453–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-012-0175-5
Androsiuk P, Chwedorzewska K, Szandar K, Giełwanowska I (2015) Genetic variability of Colobanthus quitensis from King George Island (Antarctica). Pol Polar Res 36:281–295. https://doi.org/10.1515/popore-2015-0017
Androsiuk P, Koc J, Chwedorzewska KJ, Górecki R, Giełwanowska I (2019) Retrotransposon-based genetic variation of Poa annua populations from contrasting climate conditions. PeerJ 7:e6888. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6888
Androsiuk P, Chwedorzewska KJ, Dulska J, Milarska S, Giełwanowska I (2020) Retrotransposon-based genetic diversity of Deschampsia antarctica Desv. from King George Island (Maritime Antarctic). Ecol Evol 11:648–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7095
Arif IA, Khan HA (2009) Molecular markers for biodiversity analysis of wildlife animals: a brief review. Anim Biodivers Conserv 32(1):9–17. https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2009.32.0009
Arif IA, Bakir MA, Khan HA, Al Farhan AH, Al Homaidan AA, Bahkali AH, Sadoon MA, Shobrak M (2010) A brief review of molecular techniques to assess plant diversity. Int J Mol Sci 11:2079–2096. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms11052079
Arystanbekkyzy M, Nadeem MA, Aktaş H, Yeken MZ, Zencirci N, Nawaz MA, Ali F, Haider MS, Tunc K, Chung G, Baloch FS (2019) Phylogenetic and taxonomic relationship of Turkish wild and cultivated emmer (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides) revealed by iPBS-retrotransposons markers. Int J Agri Biol 21:155–163. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.0876
Baloch FS, Alsaleh A, Sáenz de Miera LE, Hatipoğlu R, Çiftçi V, Karaköy T, Yıldız M, Özkan H (2015) DNA based iPBS-retrotransposon markers for investigating the population structure of pea (Pisum sativum) germplasm from Turkey. Biochem Syst Ecol 61:244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2015.06.017
Baloch FS, Guizado SJV, Altaf MT, Yüce I, Çilesiz Y, Bedir M, Nadeem MA, Hatipoglu R, Gómez JCC (2022) Applicability of inter-primer binding site iPBS-retrotransposon marker system for the assessment of genetic diversity and population structure of Peruvian rosewood (Aniba rosaeodora Ducke) germplasm. Mol Biol Rep 49:2553–2564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-07056-8
Baránek M, Meszáros M, Sochorová J, Čechová J, Raddová J (2012) Utility of retrotransposon-derived marker systems for differentiation of presumed clones of the apricot cultivar Velkopavlovická. Sci Hortic 143:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.05.022
Bayat M, Amirnia R, Özkan H, Gedik A, Ates D, Tanyulac B, Rahimi M (2018) Diversity and phylogeny of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) accessions based on iPBS markers. Genetika 50:33–44. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1801033B
Bertel C, Rešetnik I, Frajman B, Erschbamer B, Hülber K, Schönswetter P (2018) Natural selection drives parallel divergence in the mountain plant Heliosperma pusillum s.l. Oikos 127:1355–1367. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.05364
Borysiak J, Stachnowicz W (2018) Flora roślin naczyniowych Babiogórskiego Parku Narodowego (Karpaty Zachodnie, Polska). The vascular flora of the Babia Góra National Park (The Western Carpathian, Poland) In: Holeksa J, Szwagrzyk J (ed) Rośliny Babiej Góry. Grafpol Agnieszka Blicharz-Krupińska, Wrocław-Zawoja, pp 63–102
Borysiak J, Stachnowicz W (2004) Zarys flory roślin naczyniowych Babiogórskiego Parku Narodowego. Babiogórski Park Narodowy. Monografia Przyrodnicza, Outline of the vascular flora of the Babiogórski National Park (Poland)
Brysting AK (2000) Chromosome number variation in the polyploid Cerastium alpinum-C. arcticum complex (Caryophyllaceae). Nord J Bot 20:149–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.2000.tb01558.x
Brysting AK, Borgen L (2000) Isozyme analysis of the Cerastium alpinum-C. arcticum complex (Caryophyllaceae) supports a splitting of C. arcticum Lange. Plant Syst Evol 220:199–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985046
Brysting AK, Mathiesen C, Marcussen T (2011) Challenges in polyploid phylogenetic reconstruction: a case story from the arctic-alpine Cerastium alpinum complex. Taxon 60:333–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.602004
Caković D, Stešević D, Schönswetter P, Frajman B (2018) Long neglected diversity in the Accursed Mountains of northern Albania: Cerastium hekuravense is genetically and morphologically divergent from C. dinaricum. Plant Syst Evol 304:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-017-1448-1
Carlson RW, Bazzazet FA, Rolfe GL (1975) The effect of heavy metals on plants. II. Net photosynthesis and transpiration of whole corn and sunflower plants treated with Pb, Cd. Ni and Tl Environ Res 10:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-9351(75)90077-8
Carvalho YGS, Vitorino LC, de Souza UJB, Bessa LA (2019) Recent trends in research on the genetic diversity of plants: implications for conservation. Divers 11:62. https://doi.org/10.3390/d11040062
Chen IC, Hill JK, Ohlemüller R, Roy DB, Thomas CD (2011) Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Sci 333:1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206432
Clapham AR, Tutin TG, Moore DM (1987) Flora of the British Isles, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/144.4.2001
Czortek P, Kapfer J, Delimat A, Eycott AE, Grytnes JA, Orczewska A, Ratyńska H, Zięba A, Jaroszewicz B (2018) Plant species composition shifts in the Tatra Mts as a response to environmental change: a resurvey study after 90 years. Folia Geobot 53:333–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-018-9312-9
Doungous O, Kalendar R, Filippova N, Ngane BK (2020) Utility of iPBS retrotransposons markers for molecular characterization of African Gnetum species. Plant Biosyst 154:587–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2019.1651782
Đurović SZ, Temunović M, Niketić M, Tomović G, Schönswetter P, Frajman B (2021) Impact of Quaternary climatic oscillations on phylogeographic patterns of three habitat-segregated Cerastium taxa endemic to the Dinaric Alps. J Biogeogr 48:2022–2036. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.14133
Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7
Edwards S, Kelbessa E (1999) Indicators to determine the level of threat to tree species. In: Edwards S, Demissie A, Bekele T, Haase G (ed) Forest genetic resources conservation: principles, strategies and actions. Proceedings of the national forest genetic resources conservation strategy workshop, 21-22 June 1999, Addis Abeba, Ethiopia. Institute of Biodiversity Concervation and Research, Addis Abeba, pp 101–133
Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 24:217–242. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.001245
Engler R, Randin CF, Thuiller W et al (2011) 21st century climate change threatens mountain flora unequally across Europe. Glob Chang Biol 17:2330–2341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02393.x
Erper I, Ozer G, Kalendar R, Avci S, Yildirim E, Alkan M, Turkkan M (2021) Genetic diversity and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia spp isolates associated with red cabbage in Samsun (Turkey). J Fungi 7:234. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030234
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
Excoffier L, Smouse P, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction sites. Genetics 131:479–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/131.2.479
Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform 1:47–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/117693430500100003
Fang-Yong C, Ji-Hong L (2014) Germplasm genetic diversity of Myrica rubra in Zhejiang Province studied using inter-primer binding site and start codon-targeted polymorphism markers. Sci Hortic 170:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.03.010
Frei ES, Scheepens JF, Stöcklin J (2012) High genetic differentiation in populations of the rare alpine plant species Campanula thyrsoides on a small mountain. Alp Bot 122:23–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-012-0103-2
Fu YX (1997) Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics 147:915–925. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/147.2.915
Grundt HH, Borgen L, Elven R (1999) Aspects of reproduction in Cerastium alpinum on calcic and ultramafic soils in Central Norway. Nord J Bot 19:447–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1999.tb01228.x
Guerrant EO Jr, Havens K, Maunder M (2004) Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Island, Washington, DC
Guo DL, Guo MX, Hou XG, Zhang GH (2014) Molecular diversity analysis of grape varieties based on iPBS markers. Biochem Syst Ecol 52:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2013.10.008
Hagen AR, Giese H, Brochmann C (2001) Trans-Atlantic dispersal and phylogeography of Cerastium arcticum (Caryophyllaceae) inferred from RAPD and SCAR markers. Am J Bot 88:103–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657131
Hagen AR, Sæther T, Borgen L, Elven R, Stabbetorp OE, Brochmann C (2002) The arctic-alpine polyploids Cerastium alpinum and C. nigrescens (Caryophyllaceae) in a sympatric situation: breakdown of species integrity? Plant Syst Evol 230:203–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s006060200005
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:1–9
Hardwick KA, Fiedler P, Lee LC et al (2011) The role of botanic gardens in the science and practice of ecological restoration. Conserv Biol 25:265–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01632.x
Havens K, Vitt P, Maunder M, Guerrant EOJ, Dixon K (2006) Ex situ plant conservation and beyond. Biosci 56:525–531. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[525:ESPCAB]2.0.CO;2
Hedrick PW, Miller PS (1992) Conservation genetics: techniques and fundamentals. Ecol Appl 2:30–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941887
Heywood VH, Iriondo JM (2003) Plant conservation: old problems, new perspectives. Biol Conserv 113:321–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00121-6
Hossein-Pour A, Haliloglu K, Özkan G, Tan M (2019) Genetic diversity and population structure of quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Willd.) using iPBS-retrotransposons markers. Appl Ecol Environ Res 17:1899–1911. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1702_18991911
Huber CD, Nordborg M, Hermisson J, Hellmann I (2014) Keeping it local: evidence for positive selection in Swedish Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biol Evol 31:3026–3039. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu247
Hughes AR, Inouye BD, Johnson MTJ, Underwood N, Vellend M (2008) Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecol Lett 11:609–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01179.x
Hultén E (1956) The Cerastium alpinum complex. A case of introgressive hybridization. Sven Bot Tidskr 50:411–495
Kalendar R, Antonius K, Smýkal P, Schulman AH (2010) iPBS: a universal method for DNA fingerprinting and retrotransposon isolation. Theor Appl Genet 121:1419–1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1398-2
Khapilina O, Raiser O, Danilova A, Shevtsov V, Turzhanova A, Kalendar R (2021) DNA profiling and assessment of genetic diversity of relict species Allium altaicum Pall on the territory of Altai. PeerJ 9:e10674. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10674
Khapilina O, Turzhanova A, Danilova A, Tumenbayeva A, Shevtsov V, Kotukhov Y, Kalendar R (2021b) Primer Binding Site (PBS) profiling of genetic diversity of natural populations of endemic species Allium ledebourianum Schult. Biotech 10:23. https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech10040023
Koc J, Androsiuk P, Chwedorzewska KJ, Cuba-Díaz M, Górecki R, Giełwanowska I (2018) Range-wide pattern of genetic variation in Colobanthus quitensis. Polar Biol 41:2467–2479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2383-5
Körner C (2003) Alpine plant life: functional plant ecology of high mountain ecosystems. Springer, Berlin
Kutnjak D, Kuttner M, Niketić M, Dullinger S, Schönswetter P, Frajman B (2014) Escaping to the summits: phylogeography and predicted range dynamics of Cerastium dinaricum, an endangered high mountain plant endemic to the western Balkan Peninsula. Mol Phylogenet Evol 78:365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.05.015
Lauterbach D, Burkart M, Gemeinholzer B (2012) Rapid genetic differentiation between ex situ and their in situ source populations: an example of the endangered Silene otites (Caryophyllaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 168:64–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01185.x
Lenoir J, Gégout JC, Marquet PA, de Ruffray P, Brisse H (2008) A significant upward shift in plant species optimum elevation during the 20th century. Sci 320:1768–1771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156831
Li YY, Chen XY, Zhang X, Wu TY, Lu HP, Cai YW (2005) Genetic differences between wild and artificial populations of Metasequoia glyptostroboides: implications for species recovery. Conserv Biol 19:224–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00025.x
Loveless MD, Hamrick JL (1984) Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 15:65–95. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.000433
Lowe A, Harris S, Ashton P (2004) Ecological genetics: design, analysis, and application. Blackwell publishing, Oxford
Lowe AJ, Boshier D, Ward M, Bacles CFE, Navarro C (2005) Genetic resource impacts of habitat loss and degradation; reconciling empirical evidence and predicted theory for neotropical trees. Heredity 95:255–273. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800725
Lynch M, Conery J, Bürger R (1995) Mutational meltdown in sexual populations. Evol 49:1067–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb04434.x
Maunder M, Higgens S, Culham A (2001) The effectiveness of botanic garden collections in supporting plant conservation: a European case study. Biodivers Conserv 10:383–401. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016666526878
Mehmood A, Jaskani MJ, Ahmad S, Ahmad R (2013) Evaluation of genetic diversity in open pollinated guava by iPBS primers. Pak J Agric Sci 50:591–597
Miller JS, Lowry PP, Aronson J, Blackmore S, Havens K, Maschinski J (2016) Conserving biodiversity through ecological restoration: the potential contributions of botanical gardens and arboreta. Candollea 71:91–98. https://doi.org/10.15553/c2016v711a11
Milovanov A, Zvyagin A, Daniyarov A, Kalendar R, Troshin L (2019) Genetic analysis of the grapevine genotypes of the Russian Vitis ampelographic collection using iPBS markers. Genetica 147:91–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-019-00055-5
Mirek Z, Piękoś-Mirkowa H (2008). Czerwona Księga Karpat Polskich - Rośliny Naczyniowe. Instytut Botaniki im. W. Szafera PAN, Kraków, pp 114–119
Niketić M, Đurović SZ, Tomović G, Schönswetter P, Frajman B (2022) Diversification within ploidy-variable Balkan endemic Cerastium decalvans (Caryophyllaceae) reconstructed based on genetic, morphological and ecological evidence. Bot J Linn Soc 199:578–608. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boab037
Nyberg Berglund AB, Saura A, Westerbergh A (2001) Genetic differentiation of a polyploid plant on ultramafic soils in Fennoscandia. S Afr J Sci 97:533–535
Nyberg Berglund AB, Westerbergh A (2001) Two postglacial immigration lineages of the polyploid Cerastium alpinum (Caryophyllaceae). Hereditas 134:171–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.2001.00171.x
Nyberg Berglund AB, Dahlgren S, Westerbergh A (2003) Evidence of parallel evolution and site-specific selection of serpentine tolerance in Cerastium alpinum during the colonization of Scandinavia. New Phytol 161:199–209. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00934.x
Nyberg Berglund AB, Saura A, Westerbergh A (2006) Electrophoretic evidence for disomic inheritance and allopolyploid origin of the octoploid Cerastium alpinum (Caryophyllaceae). J Hered 97:296–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esj029
Parusel J (1993) Czerwona lista roślin Babiogórskiego Parku Narodowego (2) Rogownica alpejska Cerastium alpinum. Parki Narodowe i Rezerwaty Przyrody 12:53
Parusel J (2014) Cerastium alpinum Rogownica alpejska. In: Kaźmierczakowa R, Zarzycki K, Mirek Z (eds) Polska Czerwona Księga Roślin. Paprotniki i rośliny kwiatowe, Instytut Ochrony Przyrody PAN, Kraków, pp 121–123
Parusel J (2001) Cerastium alpinum L. s.s. Rogownica alpejska. In: Kaźmierczakowa R, Zarzycki K (ed) Polska Czerwona Księga Roślin. Instytut Botaniki im. W. Szafera PAN, Instytut Ochrony Przyrody PAN, Kraków, pp 97–99
Parusel J (2008) Rogownica alpejska Cerastium alpinum L. In: Mirek Z, Piękoś–Mirkowa H (ed) Czerwona księga Karpat polskich. Instytut Botaniki im. W. Szafera PAN, Kraków, pp 118–120
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinforma 28:2537–2539. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460
Perzanowska J (2012) Rogownica alpejska Cerastium alpinum L. In: Perzanowska J (ed) Monitoring gatunków roślin. Przewodnik metodyczny. Część III, GIOŚ, Warszawa, pp 192–202
Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet JM (1999) BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J Hered 90:502–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/90.4.502
Porsild AE, Cody WJ (1980) Vascular of the continental North-west Territories. Canada, National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/155.2.945
Proctor J (1999) Toxins, nutrient shortage and droughts: the serpentine challenge. Trends Ecol Evol 14:334–335
Raible CC, Casty C, Luterbacher J, Pauling A, Esper J, Frank DC, Büntgen U, Roesch AC, Tschuck P, Wild M, Vidale PL, Schär C, Wanner H (2006) Climate variability - observations reconstructions and model simulations for the Atlantic-European and Alpine region from 1500–2100 AD In: Wanner H Grosjean M Röthlisberger R Xoplaki E (eds.) Climate variability, predictability and climate risks. Springer, Dordrecht. 9–29 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5714-4_2
Roberts EH (1991) 3. Genetic conservation in seed banks. Biol J Linn Soc 43:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00580.x
Robertson AI (1985) The poisoning of roots of Zea mays by nickel ions, and the protection afforded by magnesium and calcium. New Phytol 100:173–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1985.tb02769.x
Rønning OI (1999) The flora of Svalbard. Norsk Polarinstitutt, Oslo, pp 33–34
Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145:1219–1228. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/145.4.1219
Rucińska A, Puchalski J (2011) Comparative molecular studies on the genetic diversity of an ex situ garden collection and its source population of the critically endangered polish endemic plant Cochlearia polonica E. Fröhlich Biodivers Conserv 20:401–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9965-z
Rumpf SB, Hulber K, Klonner G, Moser D, Schutz M, Wessely J, Dullinger S (2018) Range dynamics of mountain plants decrease with elevation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:1848–1853. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713936115
Rune O (1957) De serpentinicola elementen i Fennoscandiens flora. Sven Bot Tidskr 51:43–105
Scheen AC, Brochmann C, Brysting AK, Elven R, Morris A, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Albert VA (2004) Northern hemisphere biogeography of Cerastium (Caryophyllaceae): insight from phylogenetic analysis of noncoding plastid nucleotide sequences. Am J Bot 91:943–952. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.6.943
Schoen DJ, Brown ADH (2001) The conservation of wild plant species in seed banks: attention to both taxonomic coverage and population biology will improve the role of seed banks as conservation tools. Biosci 51:960–966. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0960:TCOWPS]2.0.CO;2
Šingliarová B, Chrtek J, Mráz P (2008) Loss of genetic diversity in isolated populations of an alpine endemic Pilosella alpicola subsp. ullepitschii: effect of long-term vicariance or long-distance dispersal? Plant Syst Evol 275:181–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-008-0058-3
Skubic M, Schönswetter P, Frajman B (2018) Diversification of Cerastium sylvaticum and C. subtriflorum on the margin of the south-eastern Alps. Plant Syst Evol 304:1101–1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-018-1535-y
Stöcklin J, Kuss P, Pluess AR (2009) Genetic diversity, phenotypic variation and local adaptation in the alpine landscape: case studies with alpine plant species. Bot Helv 119:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-009-0065-1
Takou M, Hämälä T, Koch EM (2021) Maintenance of adaptive dynamics and no detectable load in a range-edge outcrossing plant population. Mol Biol Evol 38:1820–1836. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa322
Tautz D (1989) Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Res 17:6463–6471. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/17.16.6463
Tero N, Aspi J, Siikamäki P, Jäkäläniemi A, Tuomi J (2003) Genetic structure and gene flow in a metapopulation of an endangered plant species, Silene tatarica. Mol Ecol 12:2073–2085. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01898.x
Till-Bottraud I, Gaudeul M (2002) Intraspecific genetic diversity in alpine plants. In: Körner C, Spehn EM (eds) Mountain biodiversity: a global assessment. Parthenon Publishing, New York, NY, pp 23–34
Totland Ø, Schulte-Herbrüggen B (2003) Breeding system, insect flower visitation, and floral traits of two Alpine Cerastium species in Norway. Arct Antarct Alp Res 35:242–247. https://doi.org/10.1657/1523-0430(2003)035[0242:BSIFVA]2.0.CO;2
Turzhanova A, Khapilina O, Tumenbayeva A, Shevtsov V, Raiser O, Kalendar R (2020) Genetic diversity of Alternaria species associated with black point in wheat grains. PeerJ 8:e9097. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9097
Varsamis G, Merou T, Karapatzak E, Papageorgiou AC, Fotiadis G, Tsiftsis S (2021) Genetic diversity of alpine Dryas octopetala populations at their southern distribution limit in Europe. Nord J Bot 39:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.03150
Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Lee T, Hornes M, Friters A, Pot J, Paleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/23.21.4407
Wang IJ, Bradburd GS (2014) Isolation by environment. Mol Ecol 23:5649–5662. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12938
Willi Y, van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA (2006) Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Sys 37:433–458. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110145
Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/18.22.6531
Willoughby JR, Harder AM, Tennessen JA, Scribner KT, Christie MR (2018) Rapid genetic adaptation to a novel environment despite a genome-wide reduction in genetic diversity. Mol Ecol 27:4041–4051. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14726
Yaldiz G, Çamlica M, Nadeem MA, Nawaz MA, Baloch FS (2018) Genetic diversity assessment in Nicotiana tabacum L. with iPBS-retrotransposons. Turk J Agric For 42. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1708-32
Yang W, Kang X, Yang Q, Lin Y, Fang M (2013) Review on the development of genotyping methods for assessing farm animal diversity. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 4:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-4-2
Yates MC, Bowles E, Fraser DJ (2019) Small population size and low genomic diversity have no effect on fitness in experimental translocations of a wild fish. Proc Royal Soc B 286:20191989. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1989
Young AG, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11:413–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(96)10045-8
Zapałowicz H (1906) Krytyczny przegląd roślinności Galicyi. PAU, Kraków
Zegeye H (2017) In situ and ex situ conservation: complementary approaches for maintaining biodiversity. Int J Res Env Std 4:1–12. https://doi.org/10.33500/ijres.2017.4.001
Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A, Labuda D (1994) Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20:176–183. https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.1994.1151
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to Prof. Peter Schönswetter from University of Innsbruck (Austria), Prof. Xiao-Ru Wang from Umeå University (Sweden), Prof. Michał Węgrzyn from Jagiellonian University in Kraków (Poland) for their help in obtaining the research material, and employees of the Babia Góra National Park for their great help in our field work. Preliminary report on this study was presented in the form of poster at the 59th Congress of the Centenary of the Polish Botanical Society Warsaw, June 26–July 3, 2022 (Milarska S., Androsiuk P., Giełwanowska I. “Genetic variation of critically endangered Cerastium alpinum L. (Caryophyllaceae) population from Babia Góra National Park, Poland”). Abstracts of lectures and posters presented during the Congress are available at https://pbsociety.org.pl/repository/bitstream/handle/20.500.12333/320/2022.0003.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: P.A. and I.G.; supervision: P.A.; methodology: P.A.; resources: P.A., K.L., and I.G.; investigation: S.E.M.; data analysis and interpretation: S.E.M., P.A., and P.T.B.; data curation: P.A.; writing—original draft preparation: S.E.M. and P.A.; visualization: S.E.M. and P.A.; writing—review and editing: P.T.B., K.L., and I.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The experiments in this study comply with the current laws of Poland, Switzerland, Sweden, and Norway.
Consent for publication
The corresponding author declares, on behalf of all co-authors, that the work described is original, previously unpublished research, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Izabela Pawłowicz
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Milarska, S.E., Androsiuk, P., Bednarek, P.T. et al. Genetic variation of Cerastium alpinum L. from Babia Góra, a critically endangered species in Poland. J Appl Genetics 64, 37–53 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-022-00731-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-022-00731-x