Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A nuclear DNA-based species determination and DNA quantification assay for common poultry species

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Food Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

DNA testing for food authentication and quality control requires sensitive species-specific quantification of nuclear DNA from complex and unknown biological sources. We have developed a multiplex assay based on TaqMan® real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) for species-specific detection and quantification of chicken (Gallus gallus), duck (Anas platyrhynchos), and turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) nuclear DNA. The multiplex assay is able to accurately detect very low quantities of species-specific DNA from single or multispecies sample mixtures; its minimum effective quantification range is 5 to 50 pg of starting DNA material. In addition to its use in food fraudulence cases, we have validated the assay using simulated forensic sample conditions to demonstrate its utility in forensic investigations. Despite treatment with potent inhibitors such as hematin and humic acid, and degradation of template DNA by DNase, the assay was still able to robustly detect and quantify DNA from each of the three poultry species in mixed samples. The efficient species determination and accurate DNA quantification will help reduce fraudulent food labeling and facilitate downstream DNA analysis for genetic identification and traceability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso A, Martin P, Albarran C, Garcia P, Garcia O, de Simon LF, Garcia-Hirschfeld J, Sancho M, de La Rua C, Fernandez-Piqueras J (2004) Real-time PCR designs to estimate nuclear and mitochondrial DNA copy number in forensic and ancient DNA studies. Forensic Science International 139(2–3):141–149. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.10.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ballin NZ (2010) Authentication of meat and meat products. Meat Science 86(3):577–587. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.06.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark-Langone K, Sangli C, Krishnakumar J, Watson D (2010) Translating tumor biology into personalized treatment planning: analytical performance characteristics of the Oncotype DX(R) Colon Cancer Assay. BMC Cancer 10(1):691. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-10-691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva Coelho I, de Queiroz MV, Costa MD, Kasuya MC, de Araujo EF (2010) Identification of differentially expressed genes of the fungus Hydnangium sp. during the pre-symbiotic phase of the ectomycorrhizal association with Eucalyptus grandis. Mycorrhiza 20(8):531–540. doi:10.1007/s00572-010-0301-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalmasso A, Fontanella E, Piatti P, Civera T, Rosati S, Bottero MT (2004) A multiplex PCR assay for the identification of animal species in feedstuffs. Molecular and Cellular Probes 18(2):81–87. doi:10.1016/j.mcp.2003.09.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley JJ, Paine KE, Garrett SD, Brown HM (2004) Detection of meat species using TaqMan real-time PCR assays. Meat Science 68(3):431–438. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.04.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doosti A, Ghasemi Dehkordi P, Rahimi E (2011) Molecular assay to fraud identification of meat products. Journal of Food Science and Technology. doi:10.1007/s13197-011-0456-3

  • Eugster A, Ruf J, Rentsch J, Köppel R (2009) Quantification of beef, pork, chicken and turkey proportions in sausages: use of matrix-adapted standards and comparison of single versus multiplex PCR in an interlaboratory trial. Eur Food Res Technol 230(1):55–61. doi:10.1007/s00217-009-1138-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans JJ, Wictum EJ, Penedo MC, Kanthaswamy S (2007) Real-time polymerase chain reaction quantification of canine DNA. Journal of Forensic Science 52(1):93–96. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00305.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fajardo V, González I, Rojas M, García T, Martín R (2010) A review of current PCR-based methodologies for the authentication of meats from game animal species. Trends Food Sci Technol 21(8):408–421. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2010.06.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fumiere O, Dubois M, Baeten V, von Holst C, Berben G (2006) Effective PCR detection of animal species in highly processed animal byproducts and compound feeds. Anal Bioanal Chem 385(6):1045–1054. doi:10.1007/s00216-006-0533-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghovvati S, Nassiri MR, Mirhoseini SZ, Moussavi AH, Javadmanesh A (2009) Fraud identification in industrial meat products by multiplex PCR assay. Food Control 20(8):696–699. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.09.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Girish P, Haunshi S, Vaithiyanathan S, Rajitha R, Ramakrishna C (2011) A rapid method for authentication of Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) meat by Alkaline Lysis method of DNA extraction and species specific polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Food Science and Technology:1–6. doi:10.1007/s13197-011-0230-6

  • Girish PS, Anjaneyulu AS, Viswas KN, Santhosh FH, Bhilegaonkar KN, Agarwal RK, Kondaiah N, Nagappa K (2007) Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism of mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene: a simple method for identification of poultry meat species. Vet Res Commun 31(4):447–455. doi:10.1007/s11259-006-3390-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hajibabaei M, Singer GA, Hebert PD, Hickey DA (2007) DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. Trends in Genetics 23(4):167–172. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haunshi S, Basumatary R, Girish PS, Doley S, Bardoloi RK, Kumar A (2009) Identification of chicken, duck, pigeon and pig meat by species-specific markers of mitochondrial origin. Meat Science 83:454–459. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.06.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herman BL (2001) Determination of the animal origin of raw food by species-specific PCR. The Journal of Dairy Research 68(3):429–436. doi:10.1017/S0022029901004940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herman L (2004) Species identification of poultry egg products. Poult Sci 83(12):2083–2085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hird H, Chisholm J, Brown J (2005) The detection of commercial duck species in food using a single probe-multiple species-specific primer real-time PCR assay. Eur Food Res Technol 221(3):559–563. doi:10.1007/s00217-005-1197-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horváth MB, Martínez-Cruz B, Negro JJ, Kalmár L, Godoy JA (2005) An overlooked DNA source for non-invasive genetic analysis in birds. J Avian Biol 36(1):84–88. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2005.03370.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanthaswamy S, Premasuthan A, Ng J, Satkoski J, Goyal V (2012) Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assay for human-dog-cat species identification and nuclear DNA quantification. Forensic Science International Genetics 6(2):290–295. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.06.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Paabo S, Villablanca FX, Wilson AC (1989) Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86(16):6196–6200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Köppel R, Zimmerli F, Breitenmoser A (2009) Heptaplex real-time PCR for the identification and quantification of DNA from beef, pork, chicken, turkey, horse meat, sheep (mutton) and goat. Eur Food Res Technol 230(1):125–133. doi:10.1007/s00217-009-1154-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist CD, Evans JJ, Wictum EJ (2011) Developmental validation of feline, bovine, equine, and cervid quantitative PCR assays. Journal of Forensic Science 56(Suppl 1):S29–S35. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01605.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lockley AK, Bardsley RG (2000) DNA-based methods for food authentication. Trends Food Sci Technol 11(2):67–77. doi:10.1016/s0924-2244(00)00049-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ng J, Satkoski J, Premasuthan A, Kanthaswamy S (2012) A TaqMan® multiplex assay for hoofed livestock species identification and nuclear DNA quantification. International Food Research Journal 19(3):1279–1285

    Google Scholar 

  • Primrose S, Woolfe M, Rollinson S (2010) Food forensics: methods for determining the authenticity of foodstuffs. Trends Food Sci Technol 21(12):582–590. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2010.09.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez MA, Garcia T, Gonzalez I, Asensio L, Mayoral B, Lopez-Calleja I, Hernandez PE, Martin R (2003) Identification of goose, mule duck, chicken, turkey, and swine in foie gras by species-specific polymerase chain reaction. J Agric Food Chem 51(6):1524–1529. doi:10.1021/jf025784+

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soares S, Amaral JS, Mafra I, Oliveira MB (2010) Quantitative detection of poultry meat adulteration with pork by a duplex PCR assay. Meat Science 85(3):531–536. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamoulis P, Stamatis C, Sarafidou T, Mamuris Z (2010) Development and application of molecular markers for poultry meat identification in food chain. Food Control 21(7):1061–1065. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.12.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanabe S, Hase M, Yano T, Sato M, Fujimura T, Akiyama H (2007) A real-time quantitative PCR detection method for pork, chicken, beef, mutton, and horseflesh in foods. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 71(12):3131–3135. doi:10.1271/bbb.70683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Timken MD, Swango KL, Orrego C, Chong MD, Buoncristiani MR (2005) Quantitation of DNA for forensic DNA typing by qPCR (quantitative PCR): singleplex and multiple modes for nuclear and mitochondrial genomes, and the Y chromosome. National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJ publication number 210302)

  • Walker JA, Hughes DA, Hedges DJ, Anders BA, Laborde ME, Shewale J, Sinha SK, Batzer MA (2004) Quantitative PCR for DNA identification based on genome-specific interspersed repetitive elements. Genomics 83(3):518–527. doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2003.09.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woolfe M, Primrose S (2004) Food forensics: using DNA technology to combat misdescription and fraud. Trends Biotechnol 22(5):222–226. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.03.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zha D, Xing X, Yang F (2010) A multiplex PCR assay for fraud identification of deer products. Food Control 21(10):1402–1407. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.04.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a National Institute of Justice grant 2008-DN-BX-K288 to SK. We wish to thank Eric Johnston (Scidera, Davis, CA), John Metzer (Metzer Farms, Gonzales, CA), Cheryl Schellhous, and various human and non-human donors for their samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Kanthaswamy.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 1728 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ng, J., Satkoski, J., Premasuthan, A. et al. A nuclear DNA-based species determination and DNA quantification assay for common poultry species. J Food Sci Technol 51, 4060–4065 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0893-7

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0893-7

Keywords

Navigation