Skip to main content
Log in

Quantification of beef, pork, chicken and turkey proportions in sausages: use of matrix-adapted standards and comparison of single versus multiplex PCR in an interlaboratory trial

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantitative PCR methods for the determination of beef, pork, chicken and turkey proportions in sausage were tested in an interlaboratory trial. Twelve different laboratories analysed six meat products each made of different compositions of beef, pork, chicken and turkey. Two kinds of calibrators were used: sausages of known proportions of meat and DNA from muscle tissue. Results generated using calibration sausages were more accurate than those resulting from the use of muscle tissue DNA. Regardless of the method used (either multiplex or single PCR), when using calibration sausages, it was always possible to quantify the proportions of meats in the unknown samples (in the range of 0.5–80%) with high precision and accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verordnung über Lebensmittel tierischer Herkunft 23. November 2005 Art. 8 Abs. 5

  2. Meyer R, Candrian U, Lüthy J (1994) Detection of pork in heated meat products by the polymerase chain reaction. J AOAC Int 77(3):617–622

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Matsunaga T, Chikuni K, Tanabe R, Muroya S, Shibata K, Yamada J, Shimura Y (1999) A quick and simple method for the identification of meat species and meat products by PCR assays. Meat Sci 51:143–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Laube I, Butschke A, Zagon J, Spiegelberg A, Schauzu M, Bögl K-W, Kroh LW, Broll H (2001) Nachweisverfahren für Rindfleisch in Lebensmitteln unter Anwendung der TaqManTM-Technologie. Bundesgesundheitsbl 44:326–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Calvo JH, Osta R, Zaragoza P (2002) Quantitative PCR detection of pork in raw and heated ground beef and pâté. J Agric Food Chem 50:5265–5267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Laube I, Spiegelberg A, Butschke A, Zagon J, Schauzu M, Kroh L, Broll H (2003) Methods for the detection of beef and pork in foods using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Int J Food Sci Technol 38:111–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sawyer J, Wood C, Shanahan D, Gout S, McDowell D (2003) Real-time PCR for quantitative meat species testing. Food Control 14:579–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brodmann P, Moor D (2003) Sensitive and semi-quantitative TaqMan™ real-time polymerase chain reaction systems for the detection of beef (Bos taurus) and the detection of the family Mammalia in food and feed. Meat Sci 65:599–607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodriguez MA, Garcia T, Gonzales I, Asensio L, Pablo E, Hernandez PE, Rosario Martin R (2004) Quantitation of mule duck in goose foie gras using TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Agric Food Chem 52:1478–1483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Binke R, Spiegel K, Schwägele F (2005) Vergleichende Untersuchung von mitochondrialen und nukleären Gensequenzen zur Identifizierung von tierischen Bestandteilen in Fleischerzeugnissen mittels PCR. Mitteilungsblatt der Fleischforschung Kulmbach 44(169):201–210

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lopez-Andreo M, Lugo L, Garrido-Pertierra A, Prieto I, Puyet A (2005) Identification and quantitation of species in complex DNA mixtures by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Anal Biochem 339:73–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hird H, James Chisholm J, Brown J (2005) The detection of commercial duck species in food using a single probe-multiple species-specific primer real time PCR assay. Eur Food Res Technol 221:559–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lopez-Andreo M, Lugo L, Garrido-Pertierra A, Prieto I, Puyet A (2005) Identification and quantitation of species in complex DNA mixtures by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Anal Biochem 339:73–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Laube I, Zagon J, Broll H (2007) Quantitative determination of commercially relevant species in foods by real-time PCR. Int J Food Sci Technol 42:336–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Eugster A, Ruf J, Rentsch J, Hübner P, Köppel R (2008) Quantification of beef and pork fraction in sausages by real-time PCR analysis: results of an interlaboratory trial. Eur Food Res Technol Eur Food Res Technol 227:17–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Köppel R, Ruf J, Zimmerli F, Breitenmoser A (2008) Multiplex real-time PCR for the detection and quantification of DNA from beef, pork, chicken and turkey. Eur Food Res Technol 227:1199–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jonker KM, Tilburg JHC, Hägele GH, De Boer E (2008) Species identification in meat products using real-time PCR. Food Addit Contam 25(5):527–533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the participating laboratories: Swiss Cantonal Laboratories of Aargau, Bern, Basel-Stadt, Neuenburg, Thurgau and Zürich, the Central Laboratory of Coop, Swiss Quality Testing Services (SQTS), LGL Bayern, LHL Hessen, LAVES Niedersachsen, CVUA Freiburg, CVUA Sigmaringen and TLLV Thüringen. Special thanks to the SQTS for the production and quality control of reference and sample sausages.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to René Köppel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eugster, A., Ruf, J., Rentsch, J. et al. Quantification of beef, pork, chicken and turkey proportions in sausages: use of matrix-adapted standards and comparison of single versus multiplex PCR in an interlaboratory trial. Eur Food Res Technol 230, 55–61 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-009-1138-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-009-1138-5

Keywords

Navigation