Skip to main content
Log in

Comprehensive performance assessment of landslide susceptibility mapping with MLP and random forest: a case study after Elazig earthquake (24 Jan 2020, Mw 6.8), Turkey

  • Thematic Issue
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality assessment (QA) for landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) is essential to increase their usability. A QA approach based on the landslide activity after a triggering event can be useful for the performance evaluation of the methods used for LSM production. Landslides triggered by earthquakes can be employed for this purpose as they occur frequently throughout the active seismic regions of the world. After an earthquake occurred in Elazig, Turkey on 24 Jan 2020 (Mw 6.8), several landslides were activated in the mountainous parts. Here, the performances of two state-of-the-art machine learning methods, i.e., the random forest (RF) and the multi-layer perceptron (MLP), were investigated using the activated landslides. The landslide inventory was derived in a previous study by using pre- and post-event aerial photogrammetric datasets and classified according to their activity types and temporal observations. The classes observed in the pre-event photogrammetric datasets were inactive (L1) and active mass movements (L2). The ones observed in the post-event photogrammetric datasets were new active zones inside the existing landslide (L3) and new activity (L4). Here, only the L1 and L2 type landslides observed in a part of the study area were used for the model training and the LSMs were produced for the whole area to investigate the model transferability. The L3 and L4 type landslides were used for validation. In addition, the area under curve (AUC) values obtained from the methods and the volumetric change maps obtained from the pre- and post-event digital elevation models were also used for the performance assessment. The results demonstrated that RF exhibited higher classification accuracy (AUC = 0.93) than MLP (AUC = 0.87); and accurate LSMs could be produced by using a sub-part of the basin for training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data subject to third-party restrictions. The aerial photogrammetric datasets were provided by the General Directorate of Mapping, Turkey, for research purposes and without the sharing permission publicly.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is part of the Ph.D. thesis research of Gizem Karakas. The authors thank General Directorate of Mapping, Turkey for the provision of aerial photogrammetric datasets; and Dr. Orhan Firat and Recep Can for their continuous support. In addition, the authors thank to 4DiXplorer AG, Switzerland for providing the LS3D Software.

Funding

No external funding was received for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sultan Kocaman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of a Topical Collection in Environmental Earth Sciences on ‘‘Landslides in a Changing Environment’’, guest edited by Mihai Ciprian Mărgărint, Marta Jurchescu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karakas, G., Kocaman, S. & Gokceoglu, C. Comprehensive performance assessment of landslide susceptibility mapping with MLP and random forest: a case study after Elazig earthquake (24 Jan 2020, Mw 6.8), Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 81, 144 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10225-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10225-y

Keywords

Navigation