Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic landslide hazard assessment of central seismic gap region of Himalaya for a Mw 8.5 scenario event

  • Research Article - Solid Earth Sciences
  • Published:
Acta Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, seismic landslide hazard analysis is performed for central seismic gap (CSG) region of Himalaya for a future scenario earthquake of magnitude (Mw) 8.5. Initially, PGA values are estimated by using stochastic finite fault seismological model. Further, the PGA values along with slope displacement prediction equation are used to estimate the Newmark’s sliding displacement. Monte Carlo simulations are performed by considering uncertainties in the material properties. Finally, the hazard map in terms of the probability of slope displacement (DN) value exceeding the threshold values of 5 cm is presented. The probability value varies between 0.1 and 1 and high probability in higher Himalayas highlights the possibility of huge number of co-seismic landslides in this region. The developed seismic landslide hazard map will help local authorities and planners with tools for assessing the seismic landslide risk associated with the use of land and taking necessary measures to minimize the damages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig.2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambraseys NN, Menu JM (1988) Earthquake-induced ground displacements. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 16(7):985–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benito MB, Navarro M, Vidal F, Gaspar-Escribano J, García-Rodríguez MJ, Martínez-Solares JM (2010) A new seismic hazard assessment in the region of Andalusia (Southern Spain). Bull Earthq Eng 8(4):739–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R (2019) Himalayan earthquakes: a review of historical seismicity and early 21st century slip potential. Geol Soc Lond Spec Pub 483(1):423–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Gaur VK (2000) Geodetic contributions to the study of seismotectonic in India. Curr Sci Bangalore 79(9):1259–1269

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Gaur VK, Molnar P (2001) Himalayan seismic hazard. Science 293:1442–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanford WT, Medlicott HB (1879) A manual of the geology of India. Nature 20(504):191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (2009) Comparing stochastic point-source and finite-source ground-motion simulations: SMSIM and EXSIM. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(6):3202–3216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Joyner WB (1997) Site amplifications for generic rock sites. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87(2):327–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray JD, Travasarou T (2007) Simplified procedure for estimating earthquake-induced deviatoric slope displacements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 1334:381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray JD, Augello AJ, Leonards GA, Repetto PC, Byrne RJ (1995) Seismic stability procedures for solid-waste landfills. J Ggeotech Eng 121(2):139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra S, Kumar V, Suthar A, Kumar P (2012) Modeling of strong ground motions for 1991 Uttarkashi, 1999 Chamoli earthquakes, and a hypothetical great earthquake in Garhwal-Kumaun Himalaya. Nat Hazards 64(2):1141–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dèzes P (1999) Tectonic and metamorphic evolution of the central Himalayan domain in southeast Zanskar (Kashmir, India) (Doctoral dissertation, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des sciences)

  • Dhanya J, Raghukanth STG (2020a) A non-stationary random field model for earthquake slip. J Seismol, pp 1–19

  • Dhanya J, Raghukanth STG (2020b) Neural network-based hybrid ground motion prediction equations for Western Himalayas and North-Eastern India. Acta Geophys, pp 1–22

  • Dhanya J, Gade M, Raghukanth STG (2017) Ground motion estimation during 25th April 2015 Nepal earthquake. Acta Geod Geoph 52(1):69–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimri S, Lakhera RC, Sati S (2007) Fuzzy-based method for landslide hazard assessment in active seismic zone of Himalaya. Landslides 4(2):101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du G, Zhang Y, Yang Z, Iqbal J, Tong B, Guo C (2017) Estimation of seismic landslide Hazard in the eastern Himalayan Syntaxis region of Tibetan plateau. Acta Geologica Sinica-English Edition 91(2):658–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn WL (1990) Analysis of post-liquefaction deformations in soil structures, H. Bolton Seed. In: Memorial symposium proceedings. BiTech Publishers, Ltd., Vancouver, vol 2, pp 291–311

  • Gade M, Raghukanth STG (2017) Simulation of strong ground motion for a MW 85 hypothetical earthquake in central seismic gap region, Himalaya. Bull Earthq Eng 15(10):4039–4065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gade M, Nayek PS, Dhanya J (2020) A New Neural Network based Prediction Model for Newmark’s Sliding Displacements. Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01923-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A, Sarkar S, Kanungo DP, Jain SK, Kumar D, Kalura AS, Kumar S (2009) Slope instability and risk assessment of an unstable slope at Agrakhal, Uttarakhand. In: Proceedings of the India geotechnical conference, Guntur, India, pp 783–786

  • Hsieh SY, Lee CT (2011) Empirical estimation of the Newmark displacement from the Arias intensity and critical acceleration. Eng Geol 122(1):34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jibson RW (1993) Predicting earthquake-induced landslide displacements using Newmark’s sliding block analysis. Transp Res Rec 1411:9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Jibson RW (2007) Regression models for estimating coseismic landslide displacement. Eng Geol 91(2–4):209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D, Khattri KN, Teotia SS, Rai SS (1999) Modelling of accelerograms of two Himalayan earthquakes using a novel semi-empirical method and estimation of accelerogram for a hypothetical great earthquake in the Himalaya. Curr Sci, pp 819–830

  • Lee KL (1974) Seismic permanent deformations in earth dams. University of California, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Mechanics and Structures Department, pp 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Legg M, Slosson J, Eguchi R (1982) Seismic hazard for lifelines vulnerability analyses. In: Proceedings of 3rd international conference on microzonation, Seattle, Washington

  • Liu J, Shi J, Wang T, Wu S (2018) Seismic landslide hazard assessment in the Tianshui area, China, based on scenario earthquakes. Bull Eng Geol Env 77(3):1263–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma S, Xu C (2019) Assessment of co-seismic landslide hazard using the Newmark model and statistical analyses: a case study of the 2013 Lushan, China, Mw 66 earthquake. Nat Hazards 96(1):389–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martha TR, Roy P, Mazumdar R, Govindharaj KB, Kumar KV (2017) Spatial characteristics of landslides triggered by the 2015 Mw 7.8 (Gorkha) and Mw 7.3 (Dolakha) earthquakes in Nepal. Landslides 14(2):697–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur LP (1953) Assam earthquake of 15th August 1950–a short note on factual observations. a compilation of papers on the Assam earthquake of August, 15(1950), 56–60

  • Middlemiss CS (1910) The Kangra earthquake of 4th April 1905. Mem. Geol. Surv. India, vol 38

  • Miles SB, Keefer DK, Nyerges TL (2000) A case study in GIS-based environmental model validation using earthquake-induced landslide hazard, paper presented at 4th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Science. Int. Spatial Accuracy Res. Assoc, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Motazedian D, Atkinson GM (2005) Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(3):995–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmark NM (1965) Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Geotechnique 15(2):139–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham RD (1899) Report of the great earthquake of 12th June 1897. Office of the Geological survey

  • Pradhan SP, Vishal V, Singh TN (2018) Finite element modelling of landslide prone slopes around Rudraprayag and Agastyamuni in Uttarakhand Himalayan terrain. Nat Hazards 94(1):181–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghukanth STG, Kavitha B (2014) Ground motion relations for active regions in India. Pure Appl Geophys 171(9):2241–2275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghukanth STG, Kumari KL, Somala SN (2013) Regional level ground motion simulation for a hypothetical great earthquake in the Garwhal Himalaya. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 4(3):202–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refice A, Capolongo D (2002) Probabilistic modeling of uncertainties in earthquake-induced landslide hazard assessment. Comput Geosci 28(6):735–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roback K, Clark MK, West AJ, Zekkos D, Li G, Gallen SF, Godt JW (2018) The size, distribution, and mobility of landslides caused by the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal. Geomorphol 301:121–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Peces MJ, García J, Azanon JM, Jabaloy A (2011) Regional hazard assessment of earthquake-triggered slope instabilities considering site effects and seismic scenarios in Lorca Basin (Spain). Environ Eng Geosci 17(2):183–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Peces MJ, García-Mayordomo J, Azañón JM, Jabaloy A (2014) GIS application for regional assessment of seismically induced slope failures in the Sierra Nevada Range, South Spain, along the Padul Fault. Environ Eearth Sci 72(7):2423–2435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romeo R (2000) Seismically induced landslide displacements: a predictive model. Eng Geol 58(3–4):337–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sah N, Kumar M, Upadhyay R, Dutt S (2018) Hill slope instability of Nainital City, Kumaun Lesser Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. J Rrock Mech Geotech Eng 10(2):280–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satyabala SP (2002) The historical earthquakes of India. In: International geophysics) Academic Press, vol 81

  • Saygili G, Rathje EM (2008) Empirical predictive models for earthquake-induced sliding displacements of slopes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(6):790–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saygili G, Rathje EM (2009) Probabilistically based seismic landslide hazard maps: an application in Southern California. Eng Geol 109(3–4):183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Lee KL, Idriss IM, Makdisi FI (1975) The slides in the San Fernando dams during the earthquake of February 9, 1971. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 101(ASCE# 11449 Proceeding)

  • Sharma M, Sharma S, Kumar M, Singh SK (2019) Analysis of Slope Stability of road cut Slopes of Srinagar, Uttarakhand, India. Int J Appl Eng Res 14(3):609–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddique T, Pradhan SP, Vishal V, Mondal MEA, Singh TN (2017) Stability assessment of Himalayan road cut slopes along National Highway 58, India. Environ Earth Sci 76(22):759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Garcia D, Pacheco JF, Valenzuela R, Bansal BK, Dattatrayam RS (2004) Q of the Indian Shield. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(4):1564–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Umrao RK, Singh TN (2014) Stability evaluation of road-cut slopes in the Lesser Himalaya of Uttarakhand, India: conventional and numerical approaches. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73(3):845–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Srinagesh D, Srinivas D, Arroyo D, Pérez-Campos X, Chadha RK (2017) Strong Ground Motion in the Indo-Gangetic Plains during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal, Earthquake Sequence and Its Prediction during Future Earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 107(3):1293–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K (1950) Mechanism of landslides. Paige, Chairman, Geological Society of America, Application of geology to engineering practice (Berkey volume), p 83

    Google Scholar 

  • Thingbaijam KKS, Martin Mai P, Goda K (2017) New empirical earthquake source-scaling laws. Bull Seismol Soc Am 107(5):2225–2246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umrao RK, Singh R, Ahmad M, Singh TN (2011) Stability analysis of cut slopes using continuous slope mass rating and kinematic analysis in Rudraprayag district, Uttarakhand. Geomaterials, 2011

  • Vose D (1996) Quantitative risk analysis: a guide to Monte Carlo simulation modelling. John Wiley & Sons

  • Wieczorek GF, Wilson RC, Harp EL (1985) Map showing slope stability during earthquakes in San Mateo County, California (No. 1257-E)

  • Wyss M (2006) The Kashmir M7. 6 shock of 8 October 2005 calibrates estimates of losses in future Himalayan earthquakes. In Proceedings of the third international ISCRAM conference

  • Yegian MK, Marciano EA, Ghahraman VG (1991) Earthquake-induced permanent deformations: probabilistic approach. J Geotech Eng 117(1):35–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, 175005, India

    Partha Sarathi Nayek & Maheshreddy Gade

Authors
  1. Partha Sarathi Nayek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maheshreddy Gade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maheshreddy Gade.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Communicated by Ramon Zuñiga, Ph.D. (CO-EDITOR-IN-CHIEF).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nayek, P.S., Gade, M. Seismic landslide hazard assessment of central seismic gap region of Himalaya for a Mw 8.5 scenario event. Acta Geophys. 69, 747–759 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-021-00572-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-021-00572-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation