Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison on the leaching kinetics of chalcocite and pyrite with or without bacteria

  • Published:
Rare Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The acid leaching, ferric leaching, and bioleaching of chalcocite and pyrite minerals were conducted in two sets of 3L stirred reactors. The dissolution rates of copper and iron were correlated with leaching conditions. In the acid leaching process, the dissolution rate of chalcocite was around 40wt.% while that of pyrite was less than 4%. In the ferric leaching process with high ferric concentration, only 10 wt.% of iron in pyrite was leached out at the same retention time though the copper recovery over 60 wt.% in chalcocite. For the bioleaching process, the chalcocite leaching rate was highly increased, nearly 90 wt.% of copper was leached out, and the iron dissolution of pyrite exceeded 70 wt.%. For the two minerals, the bioleaching shows the highest leaching rate compared with the acid leaching or ferric leaching. In uncontrolled bioleaching process, pyrite could be dissolved effectively. The experimental data were fitted to the shrinking core and particle model. The results show that in all the leaching tests, the chalcocite leaching was mainly controlled by diffusion, while for the pyrite leaching, chemical reaction is the main rate-determining step.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schippers A. and Sand W., Bacterial leaching of metal sulfide proceeds by two indirect mechanisms via thiosulfate or via polysulfides and sulfur, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1999, 65, 319.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Braun R.L., Lewis A.E., and Wadsworth M.E., In-place leaching of primary sulfide ores: laboratory leaching data and kinetics model, Metall. Trans., 1974, 5, 1717.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Silva G.D., Relative importance of diffusion and reaction control during the bacterial and ferric sulphate leaching of zinc sulphide. Hydrometallurgy, 2004, 73: 313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu X., Wu B., Chen B., Wen J., Ruan R., Yao G., and Wang D., Bioleaching of chalcocite started at different pH: Response of the microbial community to environmental stress and leaching kinetics, Hydrometallurgy, 2010, 103: 1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boon M., Luyben K.C.A.M., and Heijen J.J. The use of on-line off-gas analyses and stoichiometry in the bio-oxidation kinetics of sulfide minerals, Hydrometallurgy, 1998, 48(1): 1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boon M. and Heijnen J.J., Chemical oxidation kinetics of pyrite in bioleaching processes, Hydrometallurgy, 1998, 48(1): 27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruan R., Wen J., and Chen J., Bacterial heap-leaching: practice in Zijinshan Copper Mine, Hydrometallurgy, 2006, 83, 77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. May N., Ralph D.E., and Hansord G.S., Dynamc redox potential measurement for determining the ferric leach kinetics of pyrite, Miner. Eng., 1997, 10(11): 1279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yunker S.B. and Radovich J.M., Enhancement of growth and ferrous iron oxidation rates of thiobacillus ferrooxidans by electrochemical reduction of ferric iron, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 1986, 28(12): 1867.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Konishi Y., Nishimura H., and Asai S., Bioleaching of sphalerite by the acidophilic thermophile Acidianus brierleyi, Hydrometallurgy, 1998, 47(2–3): 339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Herrera M.N., Wiertz J.V., Ruiz P., Neuberg H.J., and Badilla-ohlbaum R., A phenomenological model of the bioleaching of complex sulfide ores, Hydrometallurgy, 1989, 22(1–2): 193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Asai S., Konishi Y., and Yoshida K., Kinetics model for batch bacterial dissolution of pyrite particles by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Chem. Eng. Sci., 1992, 47(1): 133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Olanipekun E., A kinetic study of the leaching of a nigerian ilmenite ore by hydrochloric acid, Hydrometallurgy, 1999, 53(1): 1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rohwerder T., Schippers A., and Sand W., Determination of reaction energy valus for biological pyrite oxidation by calorimetry, Thermochim. Acta, 1998, 309(1): 79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Samuel A.B., Kinetics of Leaching of Chalcocite in Acid Ferric Sulfate Media: Chemical and Bacterial Leaching [Dissertation], University of British Columbia, Canada, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sand W., Gehrke T., Jozsa P.G., and Schippers A., (Bio)chemistry of bacterial leaching—direct vs. indirect bioleaching, Hydrometallurgy, 2001, 59: 159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renman Ruan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruan, R., Zhou, E., Liu, X. et al. Comparison on the leaching kinetics of chalcocite and pyrite with or without bacteria. Rare Metals 29, 552–556 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-010-0167-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-010-0167-3

Keywords

Navigation