Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of RAPD, ISSR and DAMD markers in assessment of genetic variability and population structure of wild Musa acuminata colla

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

North east India is considered as one of the major biodiversity hotspots worldwide and centre of origin of several plant species including Musa. Musa acuminata Colla is known to be one of the wild progenitors of cultivated bananas and plantains. Three single primer based DNA marker techniques viz., random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and directed amplification of minisatellites DNA (DAMD) were used for diversity diagnostics among 25 genotypes of wild M. acuminata collected from Meghalaya province of north east India. A total of 58 primers (26-RAPD, 21-ISSR, and11-DAMD) yielded 451 DNA fragments, of which 395 (87.58 %) were found to be polymorphic in nature. The polymorphic information content (PIC) values were almost identical for each marker system. The resolving power of the marker system was found to be highest in RAPD (3.96) whereas ISSR resolved highest marker index (16.39) in the study. Selected amplicon data obtained through single primer amplification reactions were utilized for determination of diversity within and among the populations of M. acuminata. Nei’s genetic differentiation (Gst) value (0.451) indicated higher proportion of the genetic variation within the populations which is supported by the AMOVA analysis (88 %). The study provides insight into the efficacy of RAPD, ISSR and DAMD to analyse the genetic variation existing in the wild Musa germplasm, which can further be exploited for quality trait improvement and domestication of such important horticultural crops. The genetic diversity based population structure may shed light on the genetic basis of speciation and evolution of various species within the genus Musa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnaud-Haond S, Teixeira S, Massa S, Billot C, Saenger P, Coupland G, Duarte CM, Serrão EA (2006) Genetic structure at range edge: low diversity and high inbreeding in Southeast Asian mangrove (Avicennia marina) populations. Mol Ecol 15:3515–3525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat KV, Bhat SR, Chandel KPS (1992) Survey of isozyme polymorphism for clonal identification in Musa. I. Esterase, acid phosphatase and catalase. J Hort Sci 67:501–507

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya E, Dandin SB, Ranade SA (2005) Single primer amplification methods reveal exotic and indigenous mulberry varieties are similarly diverse. J Biosci 30:669–677

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byars SG, Parsons Y, Hoffmann AA (2009) Effect of altitude on the genetic structure of an Alpine grass, Poa hiemata. Ann Bot 103:885–899

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Creste S, Tulmann-Neto A, Silva SO, Figueira A (2003) Genetic characterization of banana cultivars (Musa spp.) from Brazil using microsatellite markers. Euphytica 132:259–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Creste S, Tulmann-Neto A, Vencovsky R, Silva SO, Figueira A (2004) Genetic diversity of Musa diploid and triploid accessions from the Brazilian banana breeding program estimated by Microsatellite markers. Genet Res Crop Evol 51:723–733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniells JW, Jenny C, Karamura DA, Tomekpe K, Arnaud E, Sharrock S (2001) Musalogue: A catalogue of Musa germplasm diversity in the genus Musa. INIBAP, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson A (2000). Recommended intakes of vitamins and essential minerals. In: CRN (Council for responsible Nutrition). The benefits of Nutritional Supplements

  • Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frison EA, Escalant JV, Sharrock S (2004) The global Musa genomic consortium: A boost for banana improvement. In: Jain SM, Swennen R (eds) Banana improvement: Cellular, molecular biology, and induced mutations. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 341–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawel NJ, Jarret RL (1991) A modified CTAB DNA extraction procedure for Musa and Ipomoea. Plant Mol Biol Rep 9:262–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ge XJ, Liu MH, Wang WK, Schaal BA, Chiang TY (2005) Population structure of wild bananas, Musa balbisiana, in China determined by SSR fingerprinting and cpDNA-RFLP. Mol Ecol 14:933–944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick JL, Godt MJW (1996) Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 351:1291–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath DD, Iwana GK, Delvin RH (1993) PCR primed with VNTR core sequences yields species specific patterns and hypervariable probes. Nucleic Acids Res 21:5782–5785

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogbin PM, Peakall R (1999) Evaluation of the contribution of genetic research to the management of the endangered plant Zieria prostrata. Conserv Biol 13:514–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INIBAP/CIRAD (1996) Descriptors for Banana (Musa spp.) INIBAB Montpellier. France. http://www.Musalit.org/pdf/IN100330_en.pdf.

  • Jarret RL, Gawel NJ, Wittermore A (1992) RFLP-based phylogeny of Musa species in Papua New Guinea. Theor Appl Genet 84:579–584

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jarret RL, Vulysteke D, Gawel NJ, Pimentel R, Dunbar L (1993) Detecting genetic diversity in diploid bananas using PCR and primers from a highly repetitive DNA sequence. Euphytica 68:69–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Javed MA, Chai M, Othman RY (2004) Study of resistance of Musa acuminata to Fusarium oxysporum using RAPD markers. Biol Plant 48:93–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M, Crow J (1964) The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49:725–738

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Kumaria S, Sharma SK, Rao SR, Tandon P (2011) Genetic diversity assessment of Jatropha curcas L. germplasm from Northeast India. Biomass Bioenerg 35:3063–3070

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Kumaria S, Tandon P (2013) SPAR methods coupled with seed-oil content revealed intra-specific natural variation in Jatropha curcas L. from Northeast India. Biomass Bioenerg 54:100–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Mishra P, Singh SC, Sundaresan V (2014) Efficiency of ISSR and RAPD markers in genetic divergence analysis and conservation management of Justicia adhatoda L., a medicinal plant. Plant Syst Evol 300:1409–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagoda PJL, Noyer JL, Dambier D, Baurens FC, Grapin A, Lanaud C (1998) Sequence tagged microsatellite site (STMS) markers in the Musaceae. Mol Ecol 7:657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1972) The apportionment of human diversity. Evol Biol 6:381–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YF, Xing M, Zhao W, Fan RJ, Luo S, Chen X (2012) Genetic diversity analysis of Rhododendron aureum Georgi (Ericaceae) located on Changbai Mountain using ISSR and RAPD markers. Plant Syst Evol 298:921–930

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Milligan BG (1994) Analysis of population structure with RAPD markers. Mol Ecol 3:91–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott JM, McDonald BA (1993) Gene flow in plant pathosystems. Ann Rev Phytopathol 31:353–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer W, Mitchell TG, Freedman EZ, Vilgays R (1993) Hybridization probes for conventional DNA fingerprinting used as single primers in the polymerase chain reaction to distinguish strains of Cryptococcus neoformans. J Clin Microbiol 31:2274–2280

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller MP (1998) AMOVA-PREP1.01. A Program for the Preparation of AMOVA Input Files From Dominant-Marker Raw Data. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona. USA.

  • Mukunthakumar S, Padmesh P, Vineesh PS, Skaria R, Kumar KH, Krishnan PN (2013) Genetic diversity and differentiation analysis among wild antecedents of banana (Musa acuminata Colla) using RAPD markers. Indian J Biotechnol 12:493–498

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 70:3321–3323

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohsawa T, Ide Y (2008) Global patterns of genetic variation in plant species along vertical and horizontal gradients on mountains. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:152–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onguso JM, Kahangi EM, Ndiritu DW, Mizutani F (2004) Genetic characterization of cultivated bananas and plantains in Kenya by RAPD markers. Sci Hort 99:9–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Padmesh P, Mukunthakumar S, Vineesh PS, Skaria R, Kumar KH, Krishnan PN (2012) Exploring wild genetic resources of Musa acuminata Colla distributed in the humid forests of southern Western Ghats of peninsular India using ISSR markers. Plant Cell Rep 31:1591–1601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prevost A, Wilkinson MJ (1999) A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theor App Genet 98:107–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranade SA, Rana TS, Narzary D (2009) SPAR profile and genetic diversity amongst pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 15:61–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scariot V, de Keyser E, Handa T, de Riek J (2007) Comparative study of the discriminating capacity and effectiveness of AFLP, STMS and EST markers in assessing genetic relationships among evergreen azaleas. Plant Breed 126(2):207–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal D, Rajpal VR, Raina SN, Sasanuma T, Sasakuma T (2009) Assaying polymorphism at DNA level for genetic diversity diagnostics of the safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) world germplasm resources. Genetica 135:457–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SK, Rawat D, Kumar S, Kumar A, Kumaria S, Rao SR (2010) Single primer amplification reaction (SPAR) reveals intra-specific natural variation in Prosopis cineraria (L.) Druce. Trees Struct Funct 24:855–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SK, Kumaria S, Tandon P, Rao SR (2011) Single primer amplification reaction (SPAR) reveals inter-and intra-specific natural genetic variation in five species of Cymbidium (Orchidaceae). Gene 483:54–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW (1962) Evolution of the bananas. Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW, Shepherd K (1955) The taxonomy and origins of cultivated bananas. Bot J Linn Soc 55:302–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JSC, Chin ECL, Shu H, Smith OS, Wall SJ, Senior ML, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S, Ziegle J (1997) An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor Appl Genet 95:163–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification

  • Uma S, Siva SA, Saraswathi MS, Manickavasagam M, Durai P, Selvarajan R, Sathiamoorthy (2006) Variation and intraspecific relationships in Indian wild Musa balbisiana (BB) population as evidenced by random amplified polymorphic DNA. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:349–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varshney RK, Chabane K, Hendre PS, Aggarwal RK, Graner A (2007) Comparative assessment of EST-SSR, EST-SNP and AFLP markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation of genetic resources using wild, cultivated and elite barleys. Plant Sci 173(6):638–649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new concept for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 21:4407–4414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong C, Kiew R, Argent G, Set O, Lee SK, Gan YY (2002) Assessment of the validity of the sections in Musa (Musaceae) using AFLP. Ann Bot 90:231–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh FC, Young RC, Boyle T (1999) Popgene version 1.31: microsoft window-based freeware for population genetic analysis

  • Zawko G, Krauss SL, Dixon KW, Sivasithamparam K (2001) Conservation genetics of the rare and endangered Leucopogon obtectus (Ericaceae). Mol Ecol 10:2389–2396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A, Labuda D (1994) Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)—anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20(2):176–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Head, Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, NEHU, Shillong for providing the facilities and support to carry out this research. Sincere thanks are also accorded to Dr. C.S. Rao (St. Anthony’s College, Shillong, Meghalaya), Dr. Santosh K. Sharma, Dr. Shrawan Kumar and all members of the Plant Biotechnology Laboratory for their constant encouragement and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satyawada Rama Rao.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Fig S1

(PPTX 960 kb)

Supplementary Fig S2

(PPTX 293 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lamare, A., Rao, S.R. Efficacy of RAPD, ISSR and DAMD markers in assessment of genetic variability and population structure of wild Musa acuminata colla. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 21, 349–358 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-015-0295-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-015-0295-1

Keywords

Navigation