Skip to main content
Log in

Pelvic fixation for neuromuscular scoliosis deformity correction

  • Pediatrics (M Glotzbecker, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pelvic fixation is most frequently indicated in the pediatric population for the treatment of neuromuscular scoliosis with significant pelvic obliquity. Neuromuscular scoliosis surgery is associated with a high risk of complications, and this is further increased by extension of fusion to the sacrum. Numerous techniques have been described for pelvic fixation associated with a long spine fusion each with its own set of specific benefits and risks. This article reviews the contemporary surgical techniques of pelvic fixation used to extend a spine fusion to the sacrum and pelvis focusing on the management of neuromuscular scoliosis, including their biomechanical rationale, results, and complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Lenke LG, Kuklo TR. Sacropelvic fixation techniques in the treatment of pediatric spinal deformity. Semin Spine Surg. 2004;16(2):114–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hosalkar HS, Luedtke LM, Drummond DS. New technique in congenital scoliosis involving fixation to the pelvis after hemivertebra excision. Spine. 2004;29(22):2581–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hresko MT, Hirschfeld R, Buerk AA, Zurakowski D. The effect of reduction and instrumentation of spondylolisthesis on spinopelvic sagittal alignment. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29(2):157–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakamura H, Matsuda H, Konishi S, Yamano Y. Single-stage excision of hemivertebrae via the posterior approach alone for congenital spine deformity: follow-up period longer than ten years. Spine. 2002;27(1):110–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shufflebarger HL, Geck MJ. High-grade isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis: monosegmental surgical treatment. Spine. 2005;30(6 Suppl):S42–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith JT. Bilateral rib-to-pelvis technique for managing early-onset scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(5):1349–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sponseller PD, Yang JS, Thompson GH, et al. Pelvic fixation of growing rods: comparison of constructs. Spine. 2009;34(16):1706–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Drummond D, Breed AL, Narechania R. Relationship of spine deformity and pelvic obliquity on sitting pressure distributions and decubitus ulceration. J Pediatr Orthop. 1985;5(4):396–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Larsson EL, Aaro S, Normelli H, Oberg B. Weight distribution in the sitting position in patients with paralytic scoliosis: pre- and postoperative evaluation. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(2):94–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Murans G, Gutierrez-Farewik EM, Saraste H. Kinematic and kinetic analysis of static sitting of patients with neuropathic spine deformity. Gait Posture. 2011;34(4):533–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel J, Walker JL, Talwalkar VR, et al. Correlation of spine deformity, lung function, and seat pressure in spina bifida. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(5):1302–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith RM, Emans JB. Sitting balance in spinal deformity. Spine. 1992;17(9):1103–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dubousset J. Pelvic obliquity: a review. Orthopedics. 1991;14(4):479–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Winter RB, Pinto WC. Pelvic obliquity. Its causes and its treatment. Spine. 1986;11(3):225–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. • Ko PS, Jameson 2nd PG, Chang TL, Sponseller PD. Transverse-plane pelvic asymmetry in patients with cerebral palsy and scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(3):277–83. This case–control study using computed tomography compared iliac angle differences (right and left) in patients with scoliosis and severe cerebral palsy to those of age-matched controls. The results indicated that case subjects had significantly more iliac angle asymetry. This intrapelvic deformity should be taken into account by spine surgeons because it could challenge pelvic fixation and explain some residual postoperative deformity.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brenn BR, Theroux MC, Dabney KW, Miller F. Clotting parameters and thromboelastography in children with neuromuscular and idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion. Spine. 2004;29(15):E310–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lipton GE, Miller F, Dabney KW, et al. Factors predicting postoperative complications following spinal fusions in children with cerebral palsy. J Spinal Disord. 1999;12(3):197–205.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lonstein JE, Akbarnia A. Operative treatment of spinal deformities in patients with cerebral palsy or mental retardation. An analysis of one hundred and seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65(1):43–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lonstein JE, Koop SE, Novachek TF, Perra JH. Results and complications following spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis in cerebral palsy and static encephalopathy using luque galveston instrumentation: experience in 93 patients. Spine. 2012, In press.

  20. Master DL, Connie PK, Jochen SH, et al. Wound infections after surgery for neuromuscular scoliosis: risk factors and treatment outcomes. Spine. 2011;36(3):E179–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Modi HN, Suh SW, Yang JH, et al. Surgical complications in neuromuscular scoliosis operated with posterior- only approach using pedicle screw fixation. Scoliosis. 2009;4:11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mohamad F, Parent S, Pawelek J, et al. Perioperative complications after surgical correction in neuromuscular scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27(4):392–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. • Reames DL, Smith JS, Fu KM, et al. Complications in the surgical treatment of 19,360 cases of pediatric scoliosis: a review of the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality database. Spine. 2011;36(18):1484–91. This multicenter retrospective review showed that the surgical treatment of neuromuscular scoliosis had a significantly higher rate of complications (17.9 %) when compared to congenital (10.6 %) and idiopathic (6.3 %) scoliosis..

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sponseller PD, Shah SA, Abel MF, et al. Infection rate after spine surgery in cerebral palsy is high and impairs results: multicenter analysis of risk factors and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(3):711–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McCall RE, Hayes B. Long-term outcome in neuromuscular scoliosis fused only to lumbar 5. Spine. 2005;30(18):2056–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta MC, Wijesekera S, Sossan A, et al. Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine. 2007;32(6):691–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Osebold WR, Mayfield JK, Winter RB, Moe JH. Surgical treatment of paralytic scoliosis associated with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(6):841–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Allen Jr BL, Ferguson RL. The Galveston technique of pelvic fixation with L-rod instrumentation of the spine. Spine. 1984;9(4):388–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Maloney WJ, Rinsky LA, Gamble JG. Simultaneous correction of pelvic obliquity, frontal plane, and sagittal plane deformities in neuromuscular scoliosis using a unit rod with segmental sublaminar wires: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop. 1990;10(6):742–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lubicky JP, McCarthy RE. Sacral pelvic fixation in neuromuscular deformities. Semin Spine Surg. 2004;16(2):126–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Broom MJ, Banta JV, Renshaw TS. Spinal fusion augmented by luque-rod segmental instrumentation for neuromuscular scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(1):32–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mehta SS, Modi HN, Srinivasalu S. Pedicle screw-only constructs with lumbar or pelvic fixation for spinal stabilization in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22(6):428–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Modi HN, Suh SW, Hong JY, et al. Treatment and complications in flaccid neuromuscular scoliosis (Duchenne muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy) with posterior-only pedicle screw instrumentation. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(3):384–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Modi HN, Hong JY, Mehta SS, et al. Surgical correction and fusion using posterior-only pedicle screw construct for neuropathic scoliosis in patients with cerebral palsy: a three-year follow-up study. Spine. 2009;34(11):1167–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Whitaker C, Burton DC, Asher M. Treatment of selected neuromuscular patients with posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis ending with lumbar pedicle screw anchorage. Spine. 2000;25(18):2312–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. • Modi HN, Woo Suh S, Song HR, et al. Evaluation of pelvic fixation in neuromuscular scoliosis: a retrospective study in 55 patients. Int Orthop. 2010;34(1):89–96. This retrospective study demonstrated that patients treated for neuromuscular scoliosis with horizontal pelvic obliquity >15° without pelvic fixation showed a significant loss of correction of pelvic obliquity over a minimum follow-up of two years when compared to patients with >15 % of pelvic obliquity and treated with pelvic fixation and a third group of patient with pelvic obliquity <15 % and treated without pelvic fixation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Banta JV, Drummond DS, Ferguson RL. The treatment of neuromuscular scoliosis. AAOS Instruct Course Lectures. 1999;48:551–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. McCarthy RE. Management of neuromuscular scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30(3):435–49. viii.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Askin GN, Hallett R, Hare N, Webb JK. The outcome of scoliosis surgery in the severely physically handicapped child. An objective and subjective assessment. Spine. 1997;22(1):44–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Tsirikos AI, Lipton G, Chang WN, et al. Surgical correction of scoliosis in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy using the unit rod instrumentation. Spine. 2008;33(10):1133–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mazur J, Menelaus MB, Dickens DR, Doig WG. Efficacy of surgical management for scoliosis in myelomeningocele: correction of deformity and alteration of functional status. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986;6(5):568–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Müller EB, Nordwall A, von Wendt L. Influence of surgical treatment of scoliosis in children with spina bifida on ambulation and motoric skills. Acta Paediatr. 1992;81(2):173–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schoenmakers MA, Gulmans VA, Gooskens RH, et al. Spinal fusion in children with spina bifida: influence on ambulation level and functional abilities. Eur Spine J. 2005;14(4):415–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Findley TW, Agre JC, Habek RV, et al. Ambulation in the adolescent with myelomeningocele. I: Early childhood predictors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:518–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. O’Brien MF, Kuklo TR, Lenke LG. Sacropelvic instrumentation: anatomic and biomechanical zones of fixation. Semin Spine Surg. 2004;16(2):76–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kornblatt MD, Casey MP, Jacobs RR. Internal fixation in lumbosacral spine fusion. A biomechanical and clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;203:141–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Leong JC, Lu WW, Zheng Y, et al. Comparison of the strengths of lumbosacral fixation achieved with techniques using one and two triangulated sacral screws. Spine. 1998;23(21):2289–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. McCord DH, Cunningham BW, Shono Y, et al. Biomechanical analysis of lumbosacral fixation. Spine. 1992;17(8 Suppl):S235–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Schwab FJ, Nazarian DG, Mahmud F, Michelsen CB. Effects of spinal instrumentation on fusion of the lumbosacral spine. Spine. 1995;20(18):2023–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Shirado O, Zdeblick TA, McAfee PC, Warden KE. Biomechanical evaluation of methods of posterior stabilization of the spine and posterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis for lumbosacral isthmic spondylolisthesis. A calf-spine model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(4):518–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Stovall Jr DO, Goodrich JA, Lundy D, et al. Sacral fixation technique in lumbosacral fusion. Spine. 1997;22(1):32–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Camp JF, Caudle R, Ashmun RD, Roach J. Immediate complications of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation to the sacro-pelvis. A clinical and biomechanical study. Spine. 1990;15(9):932–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Luque ER. Segmental spinal instrumentation for correction of scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;163:192–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Allen Jr BL, Ferguson RL. A 1988 perspective on the Galveston technique of pelvic fixation. Orthop Clin North Am. 1988;19(2):409–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Benson ER, Thomson JD, Smith BG, Banta JV. Results and morbidity in a consecutive series of patients undergoing spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine. 1998;23(21):2308–17. discussion 2318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Boachie-Adjei O, Lonstein JE, Winter RB, et al. Management of neuromuscular spinal deformities with Luque segmental instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(4):548–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Ferguson RL, Allen Jr BL. Staged correction of neuromuscular scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1983;3(5):555–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Gau YL, Lonstein JE, Winter RB, et al. Luque-Galveston procedure for correction and stabilization of neuromuscular scoliosis and pelvic obliquity: a review of 68 patients. J Spinal Disord. 1991;4(4):399–410.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Lascombes P, Fabre B, Fresler F, et al. Surgical treatment of spinal deformity due to cerebral motor disorders using a Luque type appliance. Chir Pediatr. 1989;30(6):271–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Sink EL, Newton PO, Mubarak SJ, Wenger DR. Maintenance of sagittal plane alignment after surgical correction of spinal deformity in patients with cerebral palsy. Spine. 2003;28(13):1396–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bell DF, Moseley CF, Koreska J. Unit rod segmental spinal instrumentation in the management of patients with progressive neuromuscular spinal deformity. Spine. 1989;14(12):1301–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Marchesi D, Arlet V, Stricker U, Aebi M. Modification of the original Luque technique in the treatment of Duchenne’s neuromuscular scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17(6):743–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Brook PD, Kennedy JD, Stern LM, et al. Spinal fusion in Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy. J Pediatr Orthop. 1996;16(3):324–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Dias RC, Miller F, Dabney K, et al. Surgical correction of spinal deformity using a unit rod in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 1996;16(6):734–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Nectoux E, Giacomelli MC, Karger C, et al. Complications of the Luque-Galveston scoliosis correction technique in paediatric cerebral palsy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96(4):354–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Rinsky LA. Surgery of spinal deformity in cerebral palsy. Twelve years in the evolution of scoliosis management. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;253:100–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Gitelman A, Joseph Jr SA, Carrion W, Stephen M. Results and morbidity in a consecutive series of patients undergoing spinal fusion with iliac screws for neuromuscular scoliosis. Orthopedics. 2008;31(12).

  68. Tsirikos AI, Mains E. Surgical Correction of spinal deformity in patients with cerebral palsy using pedicle screw instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012.

  69. Berry JL, Stahurski T, Asher MA. Morphometry of the supra sciatic notch intrailiac implant anchor passage. Spine. 2001;26(7):E143–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Schwend RM, Sluyters R, Najdzionek J. The pylon concept of pelvic anchorage for spinal instrumentation in the human cadaver. Spine. 2003;28(6):542–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Phillips JH, Gutheil JP, Knapp Jr DR. Iliac screw fixation in neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine. 2007;32(14):1566–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Hahn F, Hauser D, Espinosa N, et al. Scoliosis correction with pedicle screws in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(2):255–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Zahi R, Thévenin-Lemoine C, Rogier A, et al. The “T-construct” for spinopelvic fixation in neuromuscular spinal deformities. Preliminary results of a prospective series of 15 patients. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011;27(11):1931–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M. New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;227:10–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Bonnett C, Brown JC, Perry J, et al. Evolution of treatment of paralytic scoliosis at Rancho Los Amigos Hospital. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57(2):206–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. McMaster MJ. Anterior and posterior instrumentation and fusion of thoracolumbar scoliosis due to myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69(1):20–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Miladi LT, Ghanem IB, Draoui MM, et al. Iliosacral screw fixation for pelvic obliquity in neuromuscular scoliosis. A long-term follow-up study. Spine. 1997;22(15):1722–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Widell EH, et al. A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;203:99–112.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Teli MG, Cinnella P, Vincitorio F, et al. Spinal fusion with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for neuropathic scoliosis in patients with cerebral palsy. Spine. 2006;31(14):E441–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Zahi R, Vialle R, Abelin K, et al. Spinopelvic fixation with iliosacral screws in neuromuscular spinal deformities: results in a prospective cohort of 62 patients. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010;26(1):81–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Neustadt JB, Shufflebarger HL, Cammisa FP. Spinal fusions to the pelvis augmented by Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for neuromuscular scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1992;12(4):465–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Arlet V, Marchesi D, Papin P, Aebi M. The ‘MW’ sacropelvic construct: an enhanced fixation of the lumbosacral junction in neuromuscular pelvic obliquity. Eur Spine J. 1999;8(3):229–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Carroll EA, Shilt JS, Jacks L. MW construct in fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(3):373–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Arlet V. Comments on the article: MW construct in fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis (Eben A. Carroll, Jeffrey Scott Shilt, Laura Jacks). Eur Spine J. 2007;16(3):379–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Sponseller PD. The S2 portal to the Ilium. Roundtables in Spine Surgery. 2007;2(2):83–7.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Chang TL, Sponseller PD, Kebaish KM, Fishman EK. Low profile pelvic fixation: anatomic parameters for sacral alar-iliac fixation versus traditional iliac fixation. Spine. 2009;34(5):436–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. O’Brien JR, Yu WD, Bhatnagar R, et al. An anatomic study of the S2 iliac technique for lumbopelvic screw placement. Spine. 2009;34(12):E439–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Sponseller PD, Zimmerman RM, Ko PS, et al. Low profile pelvic fixation with the sacral alar iliac technique in the pediatric population improves results at two-year minimum follow-up. Spine. 2010;35(20):1887–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. McCarthy RE, Dunn H, McCullough FL. Luque fixation to the sacral ala using the Dunn-McCarthy modification. Spine. 1989;14(3):281–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. McCarthy RE, Bruffett WL, McCullough FL. S rod fixation to the sacrum in patients with neuromuscular spinal deformities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;364:26–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Warner Jr WC, Fackler CD. Comparison of two instrumentation techniques in treatment of lumbar kyphosis in myelodysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993;13(6):704–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Walick KS, King JT, Johnston CE, Rathjen KE. Neuropathic lower extremity pain following Dunn-McCarthy instrumentation. Spine. 2008;33(23):E877–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Jackson RP, McManus AC. The iliac buttress. A computed tomographic study of sacral anatomy. Spine. 1993;18(10):1318–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Glazer PA, Colliou O, Lotz JC, Bradford DS. Biomechanical analysis of lumbosacral fixation. Spine. 1996;21(10):1211–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Mazda K, Khairouni A, Penneçot GF, Bloch J. The ideal position of sacral transpedicular endplate screws in Jackson’s intrasacral fixation. An anatomic study of 50 sacral specimens. Spine. 1998;23(19):2123–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Mazda K, Penneçot GF, Decrette E, Bensahel H. The intrasacral fixation in pediatric practice: problems and prospectives [abstract]. Proceeding of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. J Ped Orthop. 1995;15:847.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Ilharreborde B, Hoffmann E, Tavakoli S. Intrasacral rod fixation for pediatric long spinal fusion: results of a prospective study with a minimum 5-year follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29(6):594–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Harrington PR. Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1962;44-A:591–610.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Widmann RF, Hresko MT, Hall JE. Lumbosacral fusion in children and adolescents using the modified sacral bar technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;364:85–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. King AG, Thomas KA, Zembo MM, et al. Analysis of the STIF technique for spino-pelvic fixation. Orthop Trans. 1996;20:128–9.

    Google Scholar 

  101. King AG, Thomas KA, Eiserloh 3rd HL, et al. Analysis of the STIF technique for spino-pelvic fixation: clinical results in 19 patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20(5):667–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Bulman WA, Dormans JP, Ecker ML, Drummond DS. Posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis in patients with cerebral palsy: a comparison of Luque rod and Unit Rod instrumentation. J Pediatr Orthop. 1996;16(3):314–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Peelle MW, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Sides B. Comparison of pelvic fixation techniques in neuromuscular spinal deformity correction: Galveston rod versus iliac and lumbosacral screws. Spine. 2006;31(20):2392–8. discussion 2399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Sponseller PD, Shah SA, Abel MF, et al. Scoliosis surgery in cerebral palsy: differences between unit rod and custom rods. Spine. 2009;34(8):840–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Jevsevar DS, Karlin LI. The relationship between preoperative nutritional status and complications after an operation for scoliosis in patients who have cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(6):880–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Guylaine Bedard from Shriners Hospital for the illustrations and Dr. Juan Sebastian Rendon for editorial assistance.

Disclosure

No conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Saran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dayer, R., Ouellet, J.A. & Saran, N. Pelvic fixation for neuromuscular scoliosis deformity correction. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 5, 91–101 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-012-9122-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-012-9122-2

Keywords

Navigation