Skip to main content
Log in

Limitations of posterior spinal fusion to L5 for flaccid neuromuscular scoliosis focusing on pelvic obliquity

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study design

Retrospective comparison based on the degree of pelvic obliquity (PO).

Purpose

To assess the controversial indications for and limitations of ending the instrumentation for posterior spinal fusion (PSF) at L5 in patients with flaccid neuromuscular scoliosis (fNMS).

Methods

We reviewed the cases of 45 patients with progressive spinal deformity as a result of fNMS treated by PSF to L5 and followed for an average of 4 years postoperatively with adequate clinical and radiological data. Anterior–posterior and lateral whole spine radiographs were evaluated. We divided patients into two groups based on the degree of pelvic obliquity (PO) at the final follow-up. Radiographic data from the two groups were analyzed to identify the indications and limitations of this surgical method focusing on PO.

Results

Preoperatively, there were significant differences between the two groups in Cobb angle, PO, thoracolumbar kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis (LL) while sitting; Cobb angle and LL while supine (Supine Cobb, and Supine LL); and major curve flexibility. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified Supine Cobb and Supine LL as independent risk factors for residual PO at the final follow-up (Supine Cobb: odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval 1.0–1.2, Supine LL: odds ratio, 0.9; 95% confidence interval 0.8–1.0).

Conclusion

Patients with larger preoperative Cobb angle and smaller LL while supine may not achieve adequate spine and pelvic correction and this may lead to deterioration in the PO over time, even after spinal fusion ending at L5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hsu JD (1983) The natural history of spine curvature progression in the nonambulatory Duchenne muscular dystrophy patient. Spine 8:771–775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith AD, Koreska J, Moseley CF (1989) Progression of scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Bone Jt Surg Am 71:1066–1074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bridwell KH, Baldus C, Iffrig TM, Lenke LG, Blanke K (1999) Process measures and patient/parent evaluation of surgical management of spinal deformities in patients with progressive flaccid neuromuscular scoliosis (Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy). Spine 24:1300–1309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Takaso M, Nakazawa T, Imura T, Okada T, Ueno M, Saito W, Takahashi K, Yamazaki M, Ohtori S (2010) Surgical correction of spinal deformity in patients with congenital muscular dystrophy. J Orthop Sci 15:493–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-010-1486-9(Epub 19 Aug 2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rideau Y, Glorion B, Delaubier A, Tarlé O, Bach J (1984) The treatment of scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve 7:281–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Holt JB, Dolan LA, Weinstein SL (2017) Outcomes of primary posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis in spinal muscular atrophy: clinical, radiographic, and pulmonary outcomes and complications. J Pediatr Orthop 37:e505–e511. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alman BA, Kim HK (1999) Pelvic obliquity after fusion of the spine in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Bone Jt Surg Br 81:821–824

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McCall RE, Hayes B (2005) Long-term outcome in neuromuscular scoliosis fused only to lumbar 5. Spine 30:2056–2060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramo BA, Roberts DW, Tuason D, McClung A, Paraison LE, Moore HG 4th, Sucato DJ (2014) Surgical site infections after posterior spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis: a thirty-year experience at a single institution. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96:2038–2048. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel J, Walker JL, Talwalkar VR, Iwinski HJ, Milbrandt TA (2011) Correlation of spine deformity, lung function, and seat pressure in spina bifida. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1302–1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1687-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Whitaker C, Burton DC, Asher M (2000) Treatment of selected neuromuscular patients with posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis ending with lumbar pedicle screw anchorage. Spine 25:2312–2318. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200009150-00008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Modi HN, Suh SW, Song HR, Yang JH, Jajodia N (2008) Evaluation of pelvic fixation in neuromuscular scoliosis: a retrospective study in 55 patients. Int Orthop 34:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0703-z(Epub 4 Dec 2008)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Anari JB, Spiegel DA, Baldwin KD (2015) Neuromuscular scoliosis and pelvic fixation in 2015: where do we stand? World J Orthop 6:564–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Takaso M, Nakazawa T, Imura T, Okada T, Toyama M, Ueno M, Fukushima K, Saito W, Minatani A, Miyajima G, Fukuda M, Takahira N, Takahashi K, Yamazaki M, Ohtori S, Okamoto H, Okutomi T, Okamoto M, Masaki T (2010) Two-year results for scoliosis secondary to Duchenne muscular dystrophy fused to lumbar 5 with segmental pedicle screw instrumentation. J Orthop Sci 15:171–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1437-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takaso M, Nakazawa T, Imura T, Ueno M, Saito W, Shintani R, Takahashi K, Yamazaki M, Ohtori S, Okamoto M, Masaki T, Okamoto H, Okutomi T, Ishii K, Ueda Y (2010) Can the caudal extent of fusion in the surgical treatment of scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy be stopped at lumbar 5? Eur Spine J 19:787–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1347-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Osebold WR, Mayfield JK, Winter RB, Moe JH (1982) Surgical treatment of paralytic scoliosis associated with myelomeningocele. J Bone Jt Surg Am 64:841–856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Modi HN, Suh SW, Hong JY, Cho JW, Park JH, Yang JH (2009) Treatment and complications in flaccid neuromuscular scoliosis (Duchenne muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy) with posterior-only pedicle screw instrumentation. Eur Spine J 19:384–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1198-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mehta SS, Modi HN, Srinivasalu S, Suh SW, Yi JW, Cho JW, Song HR (2009) Pedicle screw-only constructs with lumbar or pelvic fixation for spinal stabilization in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:428–433. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181872d74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arun R, Srinivas S, Mehdian SM (2010) Scoliosis in Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy: a changing trend in surgical management: a historical surgical outcome study comparing sublaminar, hybrid and pedicle screw instrumentation systems. Eur Spine J 19:376–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1163-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hahn F, Hauser D, Espinosa N, Blumenthal S, Min K (2008) Scoliosis correction with pedicle screws in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Eur Spine J 17:255–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cervellati S, Bettini N, Moscato M, Gusella A, Dema E, Maresi R (2004) Surgical treatment of spinal deformities in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a long term follow-up study. Eur Spine J 13:441–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sussman MD (1984) Advantage of early spinal stabilization and fusion in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Pediatr Orthop 4:532–537

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mubarak SJ, Morin WD, Leach J (1993) Spinal fusion in Duchenne muscular dystrophy—fixation and fusion to the sacropelvis? J Pediatr Orthop 13:752–757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sengupta DK, Mehdian SH, McConnell JR, Eisenstein SM, Webb JK (2002) Pelvic or lumbar fixation for the surgical management of scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Spine 27:2072–2079

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by an Intramural Research Grant (29-3) for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders from the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry and a Kitasato University Research Grant for Young Researchers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Design of the work: WS, GI, MT. Acquisition of the data: EI, TI, TN, AK, KU, TA. Interpretation of the data: WS, GI, TK, MT. Drafting the work: all authors. Final approval of the version to be published: all authors. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gen Inoue.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related directly or indirectly to this manuscript. No relevant financial activities outside the submitted work. The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s).

Ethical approval

The present study was conducted under a protocol approved by the institutional review board of Kitasato University School of Medicine.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saito, W., Inoue, G., Shirasawa, E. et al. Limitations of posterior spinal fusion to L5 for flaccid neuromuscular scoliosis focusing on pelvic obliquity. Spine Deform 9, 559–565 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00214-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00214-1

Keywords

Navigation