Skip to main content
Log in

MW construct in fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A retrospective case control review was conducted to determine if the MW construct offers a superior means of correction of Cobb angles and pelvic obliquity in neuromuscular scoliosis. Posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis presents a surgical challenge. Particularly difficult is the correction of pelvic obliquity. Numerous instrumentation techniques have sought to address these difficulties. Most recently Arlet et al have introduced the MW construct. (in Eur Spine 8(3):229–231, 1999). They theorize that this construct may allow for superior spinopelvic fixation. Six patients with neuromuscular scoliosis who underwent PSF with the MW construct were compared with six subjects undergoing PSF utilizing the Galveston technique. Subjects were matched on the basis of preoperative Cobb angles and similar amounts of preoperative pelvic obliquity. Individuals who underwent PSF utilizing the MW construct obtained nearly 30% better correction of pelvic obliquity than did those who received a Galveston construct. A trend toward superior correction of Cobb angles with the MW construct was also observed. The MW construct may be a superior construct for curve correction in PSF for neuromuscular scoliosis, particularly those cases with excessive pelvic obliquity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig.3 
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL (1984) The Galveston technique of pelvic fixation with L-rod instrumentation of the spine. Spine 9:388–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dubousset J (1996) Pelvic obliquity correction. In: Margulies JY, Floman Y, Farcy JP, Neuwirth MG (eds) Lumbosacral and spinopelvic fixation. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asher MA (1996) Lumbopelvic fixation with the Isola system. In: Margulies JY, Floman Y, Farcy JP, Neuwirth MG (eds) Lumbosacral and spinopelvic fixation. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  4. McCord DH, Cunningham BW, Shono Y, Myers JJ, McAfee PC (1992) Biomechanical analysis of lumbosacral fixation. Spine 17:S235–S243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arlet V, Aebi M, Marchesi D, Papin P. (1999) The ‘MW’ sacropelvic construct: an enhanced fixation of the lumbosacral junction in neuromuscular pelvic obliquity. Eur Spine J.8(3):229–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Scott Shilt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carroll, E.A., Shilt, J.S. & Jacks, L. MW construct in fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis. Eur Spine J 16, 373–377 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0077-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0077-0

Keywords

Navigation