Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological Variability in Leaves and Molecular Characterization of Novel Table Grape Candidate Cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.)

  • Research
  • Published:
Molecular Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 07 May 2014

Abstract

The present work report the characterization of twenty-one table grapes candidate cultivars plus five registered ones included as reference, by means of 47 ampelographic traits, 23 ampelometric measurements and six microsatellite loci. The final goal of the research was to analyse the possibility of reducing the number of morphological and molecular tools required for a precise and effective description of a grape genotype or cultivar. This would be of great help for future biodiversity description on a larger sample of more than 300 table grapes accessions today grown at the ‘Consiglio per la Ricerca e la sperimentazione in Agricoltura (C.R.A.)—Unità di ricerca per l’uva da tavola e la vitivinicoltura in ambiente mediterraneo (Bari—Italy)’. OIV ampelographic traits showed a clear distinction among all twenty-six genotypes analysed, suggesting the relevant morphological variability investigated. Principal component analysis based on ampelometric traits revealed main veins ON3, ON4 and O3N4; ratios between main veins; angles between main veins and of petiolar sinus, to be the most effective records in differentiating cultivars, for a total variation of 69.9 % described by the first three components. Molecular analysis based on six microsatellite loci was performed on all genotypes, providing a detailed molecular profile and a dendrogram of genetic similarity, in which all genotypes were clearly distinguishable. Finally, with the goal of using the minimum possible number of markers to differentiate genotypes, microsatellites VVMD5 and VVMD27 were selected to be sufficient to distinguish among all the candidate cultivars included in the analysis, representing a possible ‘step by step’ approach when a molecular characterization has to be undertaken on a large number of genotypes, by first testing few markers and increasing their number only if necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Myles, S., Boyko, A. R., Owens, C. L., Brown, P. J., Grassi, F., Aradhya, M. K., et al. (2010). Genetic structure and domestication history of the grape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(9), 3457–3458.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pelengić, R., & Rusjan, D. (2010). Efficacy of ampelographic and phyllometric tools for the validation of grapevine Vitis vinifera L. biodiversity in Slovenia. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 4, 563–568.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Santiago, J. L., Gonzalez, I., Gago, P., Alonso-Villaverde, V., Boso, S., & Martinez, M. C. (2008). Identification of and relationships among a number of teinturier grapevines that expanded across Europe in the early tweentith century. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 14, 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sefc, K. M., Lefort, M. S., Grando, K., Scott, H., Steinkellner, & Thomas, M. R. (2001). Microsatellite markers for grapevine: A state of the art. In K. A. Roubelakis-Angelakis (Ed.), Molecular biology and biotechnology of grapevine (pp. 407–438). Amsterdam: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tomažič, I., & Korošec-Koruza, Z. (2003). Validity of phyllometric parameters used to differentiate local Vitis vinifera L. cultivars. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 50, 773–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Keller, M. (2010). The science of grapevines: Anatomy and physiology. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ortız, J. M., Martın, J. P., Borrego, J., Chavez, J., Rodrıguez, I., Munoz, G., et al. (2004). Molecular and morphological characterization of a Vitis gene bank for the establishment of a base collection. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 51, 403–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Santiago, J. L., Boso, S., Martin, J. P., Ortiz, J. M., & Martinez, M. C. (2005). Characterization and identification of grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) from Northwestern Spain using microsatellite marlers and ampelometric methods. Vitis, 44(2), 67–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. OIV (2009) 2nd edition of the OIV descriptor list for grape varieties and Vitis species. Organisation Internationale de la Vigne et du Vin, Paris, France—International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy (www.oiv.org).

  10. Galet, P. (1998). Grape varieties and rootstock varieties. Collection avenis oenologie. Chaintré: Oeno Plurimedia.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frankel, O. H., & Brown, A. H. D. (2001). Plant genetic resources today: a critical appraisal. In J. H. W. Holden & J. T. Williams (Eds.), In crop genetic resources: Conservation and evaluation (pp. 249–257). London: Georges Allen & Unwin Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Polignano, G. B., Uggenti, P., Alba, V., Bisignano, V., & Della Gatta, C. (2005). Morphoagronomic diversity in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Plant Genetic Resources, 3(1), 29–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Le Cunff, L., Fournier-Level, A., Laucou, V., Vezzulli, S., Lacombe, T., Adam-Blondon, A. F., et al. (2008). Construction of nested genetic core collections to optimize the exploitation of natural diversity in Vitis vinifera L. subsp. Sativa. BMC Plant Biology, 8, 31. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-8-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rohlf, F. J. (2001). NTSYS-PC: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.02i. In A. C. Godwin (Ed.), Department of ecology and evolution (pp. 407–438). New York: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Superampelos 2.0. Programma di ampelometria fogliare. Comunità Monastica S.S. Pietro e Paolo. Loc. Giardino della Risurrezione, 28887 Germagno (VB), Italy, http://www.pomologia.it/SuperAmpelo/Release.aspx.

  16. Thomas, M. R., & Scott, N. S. (1993). Microsatellite repeats in grapevine reveal DNA polymorphisms when analysed as sequence-tagged sites (STSs). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 86, 985–990.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bowers, J. E., Dangl, G. S., Vignani, R., & Meredith, C. P. (1996). Isolation and characterization of new polymorphic simple sequence repeat loci in grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Genome, 39, 628–633.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bowers, J. E., Dangl, G. S., & Meredith, C. P. (1999). Development and characterization of additional microsatellite DNA markers for grape. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 50(3), 243–246.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sefc, K. M., Regner, E., Turetschek, J., Glössl, H., & Steinkellner, (1999). Identification of microsatellite sequences in Vitis riparia and their applicability for genotyping of different Vitis species. Genome, 42, 367–373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yeh, F. C., Yang, R. C., & Boyle, T. (1999). POPGENE version 1.31: Microsoft Windows—based freeware for population genetic analysis. In M. J. Wingfield (Ed.), Department of renewable resources. Edmonton: University of Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dice, L. R. (1945). Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology, 26, 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alleweldt, G., & Dettweiler, E. (1989). A model to differentiate grapevine cultivars with the aid of morphological characteristics. Rivista di Viticoltura é Enologia, 42, 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Davies, T. J., & Savolainen, V. (2006). Neutral theory, phylogenies, and the relationship between phenotypic change and evolutionary rates. Evolution, 60(3), 476–483.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Costacurta, A., Calò, A., Carraro, R., Giust, M., Antoniazzi, M., & Lazzaro, G. (1996). Metodologie computerizzate per la caratterizzazione dei vitigni (1° contributo). Rivista di Viticoltura é Enologia, 49, 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Galet, P. (1988). Cépages et vignobles de frances (pp. 9–17). Montpellier: Dèhan.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bowers, J., Boursiquot, J. M., This, P., Chu, K., Johansson, H., & Meredith, C. (1999). Historical genetics: The Parentage of chardonnay, gamay, and other wine grapes of Northeastern France. Science, 285(5433), 1562–1565.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Meredith, C. P., Bowers, J. E., Riaz, S., Handley, V., Bandman, E. B., & Dangl, G. S. (1999). The identity and parentage of the variety known in California as Petite Sirah. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 50, 236–242.

    Google Scholar 

  28. This, P., Jung, A., Boccacci, P., Borrego, J., Botta, R., Costantini, L., et al. (2004). Development of a standard set of microsatellite reference alleles for identification of grape cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 109, 1448–1458.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fernandez-Gonzalez, M., Mena, A., Izquierdo, P., & Martinez, J. (2007). Genetic characterization of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars from Castilla La Mancha (Spain) using microsatellite markers. Vitis, 46(3), 126–130.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jakše, J. N., Štajner, L., Tomić, & Javornik, B. (2013). Application of microsatellite markers in grapevine and olives. In Barbara Sladonja (Ed.), The Mediterranean genetic code—grapevine and olive. Zagreb: InTech. doi:10.5772/53411. ISBN 978-953-51-1067-5.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stajner, N., Rusjan, D., Korosec-Koruza, Z., & Javornik, B. (2011). Genetic characterization of old slovenian grapevine varieties of Vitis vinifera L. by Microsatellite Genotyping. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 62(2), 250–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Santana, J. C., Heuertz, M., Arranz, C., Rubio, J. A., Martinez-Zapater, J. M., & Hidalgo, E. (2010). Genetic structure, origins, and relationships of grapevine cultivars from the Castilian Plateau of Spain. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 61(2), 214–224.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Laucou, V., Lacombe, T., Dechesne, F., Siret, R., Bruno, J. P., Dessup, M., et al. (2011). High throughput analysis of grape genetic diversity as a tool for germplasm collection management. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 122(6), 1233–1245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donato Antonacci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alba, V., Bergamini, C., Cardone, M.F. et al. Morphological Variability in Leaves and Molecular Characterization of Novel Table Grape Candidate Cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.). Mol Biotechnol 56, 557–570 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-013-9729-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-013-9729-6

Keywords

Navigation