Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in diagnosis of osteoporosis: Basic principles, indications, and scan interpretation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comprehensive Therapy

Abstract

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry is currently the most commonly used modality for the diagnosis of osteoprosis, allowing fast, accurate, and noninvasive measurements of bone mineral density. In this review we discuss the principles, applications, advantages, and limitations of this diagnostic technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mazess R: Advances in bone densitometry. Ital J Miner Electrol Metab. 1997:11:73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobson B. X-ray spectrophotometry in vivo. Am J Roentgenol. 1964;91:202–210.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gustafsson L, Jacobson B, Kusoffsky L. X-ray spectrophotometry for bone mineral determinations. Med Biol Eng. 1974;12:113–119.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson C, Collier B, Carrera G, Jacobson D. Acronym for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Radiology. 1990;176:875–876.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Genant H, Gluer C, Faulkner K, etal. Acronyms in bone densitometry. Radiology. 1992;184:878.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Brown ML, Morin RL, Riggs BL. Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine. Mayo Clin Proc. 1988;63:1075–1084.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kelly TL, Slovick DM, Schoenfield DA, Neer RM. Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;67:839–844.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gluer CC, Steiger P, Selvidge R, Elliesen-Kliefoth K, Hayashi C, Genant HK. Comparative assessment of dual photon absorptiometry and dual energy radiography. Radiology. 1990;174:223–228.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lees B, Stevenson J. An evaluation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and comparison with dual photon absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int. 1992:2:146–152.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sartoris D, Resnick D. Dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry for bone densitometry: current status and perspective. Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152:241–246.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson J, Dawson-Hughes B. Precision and stability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements. Calcif Tissue Int. 1991;49:171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cullun I, Ell P, Ryder J. X-ray dual-photon absorptiometry: A new method for the measurement of bone density. Br J Radiol. 1989;62:587–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Blake GM, McKeekey DB, Chhaya SC, Ryan PJ, Fogelman I. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. The effects of beam hardening on bone density measurements. Med Phys. 1992; 19:459–465.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sorenson J, Duke P, Smith S. Simulation studies of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Med Phys. 1989;16:75–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kerr R, Resnick D, Sartoris D, et al. Computerized tomogrophy of proximal femoral trabecular patterns. J Orthop Res. 1986;4:45–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tothill P, Pye D. Errors due to non-uniform distribution of fat in dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. Er J Radiol. 1992;65:807–813.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shipp CC, Berger PS, Deehr MS, Dawson-Hughes B. Precision of dual-photon absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int. 1988;42:287–292.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mazess R, Collick B, Trempe J, Barden H, Hanson J. Performance evaluation of a dual-energy X-ray bone densitometer. Calcif Tissue Int. 1989;44:228–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hansen MA, Hassager C, Overgaard K, Marslew U, Riis BJ, Christiansen C. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: A precise method of measuring bone mineral density in the lumbar spine. J Nucl Med. 1990;31:1156–1162.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lilley J, Walters BG, Heath DA, Drolc Z. In vivo and in vitro precision for bone density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorption. Osteoporos Int. 1991;1:141–146.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sievanen H, Oja P, Vuori I. Precision of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in determining bone mineral density and content of various skeletal sites. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1137–1142.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Svendsen O, Marslew U, Hassager C, Christiansen C. Measurement of bone mineral density of the proximal femur by two commercially available dual energy X-ray absorptiometric systems. Eur J Nucl Med. 1992;19:41–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Peel NF, Johnson A, Barrington NA, Smith TW, Eastell R. Impact of anomalous vertebral segmentation on measurements of bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res. 1993;8:719–723.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stewart CA, Hung GL, Garland DE, Rosen CD, Adkins R. Heterotopic ossification. Effect on dual photon absorptiometry of the hip. Clin Nucl Med. 1990;15:697–700.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson CR, Fogelman I, Blake GM, Rodin A. The effect of positioning on dual energy X-ray bone densitometry of the proximal femur. J Bone Miner Res. 1991;13:69–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Harper K, Wilkinson W, Lobaugh B, et al. Supine lateral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine provides improved diagnostic sensitivity [Abstract]. J Bone Miner Res. 1992;7(Suppl 1):S139.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lang P, Schmitz S, Steiger P, Genant H. Lateral dual X-ray absorptiometry of the spine. Comparison with anteroposterior dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative CT. Radiology. 1990;177:128.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rupich RC, Griffin MG, Pacifici R, Avioli LV, Susman N. Lateral dual energy radiography: Artifact error from rib and pelvic bone. J Bone Miner Res. 1992;7:97–101.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Guglielmi G, Grimston S, Fischer K, Pacifici R. Osteoporosis: Diagnosis with lateral and posteroanterior dual X-ray absorptiometry compared with quantitative CT. Radiology. 1994;192:845–850.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Formica C, Loro M, Gilsanz V, Seeman E. Inhomogeneity in body fat distribution may result in inaccuracy in the measurement of vertebral bone mass. J Bone Miner Res. 1995;10:1504–1511.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Larnach TA, Boyd SJ, Smart RC, Butler SP, Rohl PG, Diamond TH. Reproducibility of lateral spine scans using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int. 1992;51:255–258.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Blake G, Fogelman I. Technical principles of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Semin Nucl Med 1997;27:210–228.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mazess R. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for the management of bone disease. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 1995;6:507–537.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hanson J, Ergun D, Gauntt D, et al. The EXPERT imaging bone densitometer. In: Ring E, Elvins D, Bhalla A, eds, Current Research in Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Measurement II. Bath, UK:British Institute of Radiology; 1994:56.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Spector E, LeBlanc A, Shackelford L. Hologic QDR 2000 whole-body scans: a comparison of three combinations of scan modes and analysis software. Osteoporos Int. 1995;5: 440–445.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Pocock N, Noakes K, Majerovic Y, Griffiths M. Magnification error of femoral geometry using fan beam densitometers. Calcif Tissue Int. 1997;60:8–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lewis M, Blake G, Fogelman I. Patient dose in dual X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int. 1994;4:11–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. International Commission on Radiological Protection: 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. In: ICRP Publication 60, Ann ICRP. 1991;21:1–3.

  39. Faulkner K, Gluer C, Genant H. Radiation doses from bone densitometry: comparisons using the effective dose equivalent (Abstract 152). In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Osteoporosis. 1991, Kobe, Japan.

  40. Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnich RD. Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:919–923.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Rea J, Blake G, Fogelman I. Which scan mode is optimal for MXA studies on the Hologic QDR 4500A[Abstract]? J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11(Suppl 1):S237.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Slosman DO, Casez JP, Pichard C, et al. Assessment of whole-body composition with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Radiology. 1992;185:593–598.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Haarbo J, Gotfredsen A, Hassager C, Christiansen C. Validation of body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Clin Physiol. 1991;11:331–341.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Feyerabend A, Lear J. Regional variations in bone density as assessed with dual energy photon absorptiometry and dual X-ray absorptiometry. Radiology. 1993;186:467–469.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Nuti R, Martini G. Effects of age and menopause on bone density of entire skeleton in healthy and osteoporotic women. Osteoporos Int. 1993;3:59–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Nuti R, Martini G, Gennari C. Total body, spine and femurdual X-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 1993;53:388–393.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Going S, Massett M, Hall M, et al. Detection of small changes in body composition by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Am J Clin Nutr. 1993;57:845–850.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Ley C, Lees B, Stevenson J. Sex- and menopause-associated changes in body-fat distribution. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;52:950–954.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Weinstein R, New K, Sappington L. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry versus single-photon absorptiometry of the radius. Calcif Tissue Int. 1991;49:313–316.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Leboff MS, Fuleiham GE, Angell JE, Chung S, Curtis K. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: Reproducibility and correlation with single-photon absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res. 1992;7:841–846.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Nelson D, Feingold M, Mascha E, Kleerekoper M. Comparison of single-photon and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the radius. Bone Miner. 1992;18:77–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Nieves JW, Cosman F, Mars C, Lindsay R. Comparative assessment of bone mineral density of the forearm using single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int. 1992;51:352–355.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Ilich J, Hsieh L, Tzagournis M, etal. A comparison of single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm in children and adults. Bone. 1994;15:187–191.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Szucs J, Jonson R, Granhed H, et al. Accuracy, precision, and homogenity effects in the determination of the bone mineral content with dual photon absorptiometry in the heel bone. Bone. 1992;13:179–183.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Kotzki P, Buyck D, Leroux J, Hansson T. Measurement of the bone mineral density of the os calcis an an indication of vertebral fracture in women with lumbar osteoarthritis. Br J Radiol. 1993;66:55–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Florescu A, Podenphant J, Thamsborg G, Hansen M, Leffers AM, Andersen V. Distal metacarpal bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. Methodological investigation and application in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1993;11:635–638.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Peel NF, Spittlehouse AJ, Bax DE, Eastell R. Bone mineral density of the hand in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37:983–991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Garland S, Lees B, Stevenson J. DXA longitudinal quality control: a comparison of inbuilt quality assurance, visual inspection, multi-rule Shewhart charts and Cusum analysis. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7:231–237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Mazess RB, Trempe JA, Bisek JP, Hanson JA, Hans D. Calibration of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for bone density. J Bone Miner Res. 1991;6:799–806.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Miller P, Bonnick S, Rosen C. Clinical utility of bone mass measurements in adults: consensus of an international panel. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1996;25:361–372.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Miller P, Bonnick S, Rosen C. Consensus of an international panel on the clinical utility of bone mass measurement in the detection of low bone mass in the adult population. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996;58:207–214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Theodorou DJ, Theodorou SJ. Dual-energy xray absorptiometry in clinical practice. Application and interpretation of scans beyond the numbers. Clin Imaging. 2002;26:43–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kelly T, Slovik D, Neer R. Calibration and standardization of bone mineral densitometers. J Bone Miner Res. 1989;4:663–669.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Reid D, Lanham S, McDonald A, et al. Speed and comparability of 3 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer (DXA) models. In: Christiansen C, Overgaard K, eds. Osteoporosis 1990. Copenhagen: Osteopress APS; 1990;575–577.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Pocock NA, Sambrook PN, Nguyen T, Kelly P, Freund J, Eisman JA. Assessment of spinal and femoral bone density by dual X-ray absorptiometry: comparison of Lunar and Hologic instruments. J Bone Miner Res. 1992;7:1081–1084.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Faulkner KG, Gluer CC, Estilo M, Genant HK. Cross calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000. Calcif Tissue Int. 1993;52:79–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Fischer M, Kempers B. Phantom studies in osteoporosis. Eur J Nucl Med. 1993;20:434–439.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Morita R, Orimo H, Yamamoto I, et al. Some problems of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in the clinical use. Osteoporos Int. 1993;3(Suppl 1):87–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Genant HK, Grampp S, Gluer CC, et al. Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: Patient and phantom cross calibration results. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9:1503–1514.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Genant H. Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: Patient and phantom cross-calibration results [Letter]. J Bone Miner Res. 1995;10:997–998.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Steiger P. Standardization of measurements for assessing BMD by DXA [Letter]. Calcif Tissue Int. 1995;57:469.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Bonjour J, Theintz G, Buchs B, Slosman D, Rizzoli R. Critical years and stages of puberty for spinal and femoral bone mass accumulation during adolescence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;73:555–563.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, CA

    Daphne J. Theodorou MD (Radiologist), Stavroula J. Theodorou MD (Radiologist) & David J. Sartoris MD (Professor of Radiology)

  2. Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego Thornton Hospital, San Diego, CA

    Daphne J. Theodorou MD (Radiologist), Stavroula J. Theodorou MD (Radiologist) & David J. Sartoris MD (Professor of Radiology)

Authors
  1. Daphne J. Theodorou MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stavroula J. Theodorou MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David J. Sartoris MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The authors have stated that they do not have a significant financial interest or other relationship with any product manufacturer or provider of services discussed in this article.

About this article

Cite this article

Theodorou, D.J., Theodorou, S.J. & Sartoris, D.J. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in diagnosis of osteoporosis: Basic principles, indications, and scan interpretation. Compr Ther 28, 190–200 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12019-002-0028-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12019-002-0028-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation