Skip to main content
Log in

Patient dose in dual x-ray absorptiometry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provides a convenient, non-invasive method of assessing skeletal bone mineral which is widely used for clinical studies. This report describes a study to estimate the effective dose of radiation (ICRP-60(1990)) to a typical female patient from scans performed on three DXA scanners: the Hologic QDR-1000, QDR-1000/W and QDR-2000. The scans modes studied were: total body; anteroposterior (AP) lumbar spine; lateral lumbar spine; proximal femur; distal forearm. An ionization chamber and tissue-equivalent phantom were used to determine entrance surface dose and percentage depth-dose curves for each scan mode. Anatomical data from ICRP-23 (Reference Man) and a body section atlas were used to estimate the absorbed dose to each organ in the scan fields. Effective dose was estimated using the ICRP-60 tissue weighting factors and the fraction of each organ in the scan field. Results are summarized below. Figures for the effective dose are given both excluding and (in brackets) including the ovaries to cover the cases of postmenopausal and premenopausal women respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tothill P. Methods of bone mineral measurement. Phys Med Biol 1989;34:543–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Brown ML, Morin RL, Riggs BL. Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine. Mayo Clin Proc 1988;63:1075–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mazess R, Collick B, Trempe J, Barden H, Hanson J. Performance evaluation of a dual-energy x-ray bone densitometer. Calcif Tissue Int 1989;44:228–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cullim ID, Ell PJ, Ryder JP. X-ray dual-photon absorptiometry: a new method for the measurement of bone density. Br J Radiol 1989;62:587–92.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Broerse JJ, Carmichael JHE. Quantity criteria for diagnostic radiographic images. CEC working document. 2nd ed. 1990.

  6. Kalender WA. Effective dose values in bone mineral measurements by photon absorptiometry and computed tomography. Osteoporosis Int 1992;2:82–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. ICRP Publication 60. 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP 1991;21:no. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pye DW, Hannan WJ, Hesp R. Effective dose equivalent in dual X-ray absorptiometry. Br J Radiol 1990;63:149.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rawlings DJ, Faulkner K, Chappie CL. The influence of scan time on patient dose and precision in bone mineral densitometry. In: EFJ Ring, editor. Current reseach in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurement II. London: British Institute of Radiology, 1992:23–4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Laskey MA, Flaxman ME, Barber RW, Trafford S, Hayball MP, Lyttle KD, Crisp AJ, Compston JE. Comparative performance in vitro and in vivo of Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray absorptiometers. Br J Radiol 1991;64:1023–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Purdie D. Screening for osteoporosis: the Humberside experiment. In: EFJ Ring, editor. Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurement II. London: British Institute of Radiology, 1992:84–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reid DM. Screening for osteoporosis: which site and at what cost? In: EFJ Ring editor. Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurement II. London: British Institute of Radiology, 1992:85.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kanis JA, Geusens P, Christiansen C. Guidelines for clinical trials in osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 1991;1:182–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Steiger P, von Stetten E, Weiss H, Stein JA. Paired AP and lateral supine dual x-ray absorptiometry of the spine: initial results with a 32 detector system [abstract]. Osteoporosis Int 1991;1:190.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herd RJM, Blake GM, Parker JC, Ryan PJ, Fogelman I. Total body studies in normal British women using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Br J Radiol 1993;66:303–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. ICRP Publication 23. Report of the task group on reference man. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1975.

  17. Eycleshymer AC, Schoemaker DM. A cross-sectional anatomy. New York: Appleton and Century, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hughes JS, Shaw KB, O'Riordan MC. Radiation exposure of the UK population: 1988 review. National Radiation Protection Board Report NRPB-R227. London: HMSO, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shrimpton PC, Wall BF, Jones DG, Fisher ES, Hillier MC, Kendall GM, Harrison RM. A national survey of doses to patients undergoing a selection of routine x-ray examinations in English hospitals. National Radiological Protection Board NRPB-R200. London: HMSO, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Conway BJ, McCrohan JL, Antonsen RG, Reuter FG, Slayton RJ, Suleiman OH. Average radiation dose in standard CT examination of the head: results of the 1990 NEXT survey. Radiology 1992;184:135–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. ICRP Publication 26. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP 1977;1:no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, M.K., Blake, G.M. & Fogelman, I. Patient dose in dual x-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporosis Int 4, 11–15 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02352255

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02352255

Keywords

Navigation