Skip to main content
Log in

Failure of Irrigation and Débridement for Early Postoperative Periprosthetic Infection

  • Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Irrigation and débridement (I&D) of periprosthetic infection (PPI) is associated with infection control ranging from 16% to 47%. Mitigating factors include organism type, host factors, and timing of intervention. While the influence of organism type and host factors has been clarified, the timing of intervention remains unclear.

Questions/Purposes

We addressed the following questions: What is the failure rate of I&Ds performed within 90 days of primary surgery? And what factors are associated with failure?

Methods

We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of I&D for PPI within 90 days of primary surgery. We included 86 patients (44 males, 42 females) with an average age of 61 years. Failure was defined as return to the operating room for an infection-related problem. We determined the failure rate of I&D within 90 days of primary surgery and whether the odds of rerevision for infection were associated with Charlson Comorbidity Index, age, sex, joint, organism type, and timing. The minimum followup was 24 months (average, 46 months; range, 24–106 months).

Results

54 of 86 patients (63%) failed. Eight of 10 (80%) failed within the first 10 days, 32 of 57 (56%) within 4 weeks, and 22 of 29 (76%) within 31 to 90 days postoperatively. No covariates were associated with subsequent revision surgery for infection.

Conclusions

I&D for PPI is frequently used in the early postoperative period to control infection. While it is assumed early intervention will lead to control of infection in most cases, our data contradict this assumption.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aboltins CA, Page MA, Buising KL, Jenney AM, Daffy JR, Choong PF, Stanley PA. Treatment of staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections with debridement, prosthesis retention and oral rifampicin and fusidic acid. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13:586–591.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Azzam KA, Seeley M, Ghanem E, Austin MS, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Irrigation and debridement in the management of prosthetic joint infection: traditional indications revisited. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:1022–1027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bester E, Kroukamp O, Wolfaardt GM, Boonzaaier L, Liss SN. Metabolic differentiation in biofilms as indicated by carbon dioxide production rates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:1189–1197.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradbury T, Fehring TK, Taunton M, Hanssen A, Azzam K, Parvizi J, Odum SM. The fate of acute methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus periprosthetic knee infections treated by open debridement and retention of components. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6 suppl):101–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brandt CM, Sistrunk WW, Duffy MC, Hanessn AD, Steckelberg JM, Ilstrup DM, Osmon DR. Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection treated with debridement and prosthesis retention. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:914–919.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Burger RR, Basch T, Hopson CN. Implant salvage in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:105–112.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi HR, von Knoch F, Zurakowski D, Nelson SB, Malchau H. Can implant retention be recommended for treatment of infected TKA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:961–969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Costerton JW. The etiology and persistence of cryptic bacterial infections: a hypothesis. Rev Infect Dis. 1984;6(suppl 3):S608–S616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 1999;284:1318–1322.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Crockarell JR, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Morrey BF. Treatment of infection with debridement and retention of the components following hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1306–1313.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Deirmengian C, Greenbaum J, Lotke PA, Booth RE Jr, Lonner JH. Limited success with open debridement and retention of components in the treatment of acute Staphylococcus aureus infections after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(7 suppl 1):22–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deirmengian C, Greenbaum J, Stern J, Braffman M, Lotke PA, Booth RE Jr, Lonner JH. Open debridement of acute gram-positive infections after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:129–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:167–193.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Estes CS, Beauchamp CP, Clarke HD, Spangehl MJ. A two-stage retention debridement protocol for acute periprosthetic joint infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2029–2038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Flemming HC, Neu TR, Wozniak DJ. The EPS matrix: the “house of biofilm cells.” J Bacteriol. 2007;189:7945–7947.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gardner J, Gioe TJ, Tatman P. Can this prosthesis be saved? Implant salvage attempts in infected primary TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:970–976.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hartman MB, Fehring TK, Jordan L, Norton HJ. Periprosthetic knee sepsis: the role of irrigation and debridement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:113–118.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ivey FM, Hicks CA, Calhoun JH, Mader JT. Treatment options for infected knee arthroplasties. Rev Infect Dis. 1990;12:468–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jahoda D, Sosna A, Landor I, Vavrik P, Pokorny D, Hudec T. [Two-stage reimplantation using spacers—the method of choice in treatment of hip joint prosthesis-related infections. Comparison with methods used from 1979 to 1998] [in Czech]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2003;70:17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Treatment based on the type of infected TKA improves infection control. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:977–984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim YH, Kim JS, Park JW, Joo JH. Cementless revision for infected total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:19–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klouche S, Lhotellier L, Mamoudy P. Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty Treated by an Irrigation-Debridement/Component Retention Protocol: A Prospective Study in a 12-Case Series With Minimum 2 Years’ Follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 March 7 [Epub ahead of print].

  23. Koenig K, Huddleston JI 3rd, Huddleston H, Maloney W, Goodman SB. Advanced Age and Comorbidity Increase the Risk for Adverse Events after Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Jan 16 [Epub ahead of print].

  24. Koyonos L, Zmistowski B, Della Valle CJ, Parvizi J. Infection control rate of irrigation and débridement for periprosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:3043–3048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Krasin E, Goldwirth M, Hemo Y, Gold A, Herling G, Otremski I. Could irrigation, debridement and antibiotic therapy cure an infection of a total hip arthroplasty? J Hosp Infect. 2001;47:235–238.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Harmsen SW, Mandrekar JN, Osmon DR. Outcome of prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and retention of components. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:471–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McKee MD, Wild LM, Schemitsch EH, Waddell JP. The use of an antibiotic-impregnated, osteoconductive, bioabsorbable bone substitute in the treatment of infected long bone defects: early results of a prospective trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:622–627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mont MA, Waldman B, Banerjee C, Pacheco IH, Hungerford DS. Multiple irrigation, debridement, and retention of components in infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:426–433.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Moussa FW, Gainor BJ, Anglen JO, Christensen G, Simpson WA. Disinfecting agents for removing adherent bacteria from orthopaedic hardware. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:255–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Odum SM, Fehring TK, Lombardi AV, Zmistowski BM, Brown NM, Luna JT, Fehring KA, Hansen EN. Irrigation and debridement for periprosthetic infections: does the organism matter? J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(1 suppl):114–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Phillips PL, Wolcott RD, Fletcher J, Schultz GS. Biofilms made easy. Wounds Int. 2010;1:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rand JA. Alternatives to reimplantation for salvage of the total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection. Instr Course Lect. 1993;42:341–347.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rasul AT Jr, Tsukayama D, Gustilo RB. Effect of time of onset and depth of infection on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:98–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schoifet SD, Morrey BF. Treatment of infection after total knee arthroplasty by debridement with retention of the components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:1383–1390.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Segawa H, Tsukayama DT, Kyle RF, Becker DA, Gustilo RB. Infection after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study of the treatment of eighty-one infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1434–1445.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sherrell JC, Fehring TK, Odum S, Hansen E, Zmistowski B, Dennos A, Kalore N; Periprosthetic Infection Consortium. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award. Fate of two-stage reimplantation after failed irrigation and débridement for periprosthetic knee infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:18–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Silva M, Tharani R, Schmalzried TP. Results of direct exchange or debridement of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:125–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sutherland I. Biofilm exopolysaccharides: a strong and sticky framework. Microbiology. 2001;147(pt 1):3–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sweet FA, Roh M, Sliva C. Intra-wound application of vancomycin for prophylaxis in instrumented thoracolumbar fusions: efficacy, drug levels, and patient outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:2084–2088.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Teeny SM, Dorr L, Murata G, Conaty P. Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty: irrigation and debridement versus two-stage reimplantation. J Arthroplasty. 1990;5:35–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tsukayama DT, Estrada R, Gustilo RB. Infection after total hip arthroplasty: a study of the treatment of one hundred and six infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:512–523.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Van Kleunen JP, Knox D, Garino JP, Lee GC. Irrigation and débridement and prosthesis retention for treating acute periprosthetic infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2024–2028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wasielewski RC, Barden RM, Rosenberg AG. Results of different surgical procedures on total knee arthroplasty infections. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:931–938.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the following individuals for their help with this project: Bahar Adeli (Rothman Institute), Vanessa Chiu (University of California, San Francisco), Robert Cope (OrthoCarolina), Keith Fehring, MD (Virginia Commonwealth University), Pat Knickerbocker (Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center), Michal Sneller (Joint Implant Surgeons), and Matthew Tetreault (Rush University Medical Center).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas K. Fehring MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

Data were collected at each institution. Data analysis was conducted at OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA.

About this article

Cite this article

Fehring, T.K., Odum, S.M., Berend, K.R. et al. Failure of Irrigation and Débridement for Early Postoperative Periprosthetic Infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 250–257 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2373-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2373-9

Keywords

Navigation