Skip to main content
Log in

The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Fate of Two-stage Reimplantation After Failed Irrigation and Débridement for Periprosthetic Knee Infection

  • Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Irrigation and débridement is an attractive low morbidity solution for acute periprosthetic knee infection. However, the failure rate in the literature is high, averaging 68% (range, 61%–82%). Patients who fail subsequently undergo two-stage reimplantation after a prolonged period of illness. This leads to higher surgical risk and further delays in rehabilitation and may contribute to failure of subsequent revision surgery.

Questions/purposes

We determined the rerevision rate due to infection after two-stage reimplantation performed for failed irrigation and débridement of infected TKA.

Methods

We performed a multicenter retrospective review of periprosthetic knee infections treated with a two-stage procedure from 1994 to 2008. Selection criteria for the study included initial treatment with irrigation and débridement and subsequent two-stage revision surgery. Failure of two-stage revision was defined as the need for any additional surgery due to infection.

Results

Of the 83 knees that had undergone previous irrigation and débridement, 28 (34%) failed subsequent two-stage revision and required reoperation for persistent infection.

Conclusions

The failure rate in this series of two-stage revisions for periprosthetic knee infection in patients treated with previous irrigation and débridement is considerably higher than previously reported failure rates of two-stage revision. Factors affecting the failure rate may include host quality, thoroughness of débridement, and organism virulence. Patients and surgeons must understand that irrigation and débridement, while initially attractive, may lead to high failure rates of subsequent two-stage reimplantation.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study. See the guidelines online for a complete description of level of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Booth RE, Lotke PA. The results of spacer block technique in revision of infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:57–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Borden LS, Gearen PF. Infected total knee arthroplasty: a protocol for management. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2:27–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bradbury T, Fehring TK, Taunton M, Hanssen A, Azzam K, Parvizi J, Odum S. The fate of acute methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus periprosthetic knee infections treated by open débridement and retention of components. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(Suppl 6):101–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brandt CM, Sistrunk WW, Duffy MC, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Ilstrup DM, Osmon DR. Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection treated with débridement and prosthesis retention. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:914–919.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burger RR, Basch T, Hopson CN. Implant salvage in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:105–112.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cuckler JM. The infected total knee. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(Suppl 2):33–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Deirmengian C, Greenbaum J, Stern J, Braffman M, Lotke PA, Booth RE Jr, Lonner JH. Open débridement of acute gram-positive infections after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:129–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Durbhakula SM, Czajka J, Fuchs MD, Uhl RL. Antibiotic-loaded articulating cement spacer in the 2-stage exchange of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:768–774.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fehring TK, Odum S, Calton TF, Mason JB. Articulating versus static spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis. The Ranawat Award. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;380:9–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goksan SB, Freeman MA. One-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:78–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldman RT, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:118–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Haleem AA, Berry DJ, Hanssen AD. Mid-term to long-term followup of two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:35–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hart WJ, Jones RS. Two-stage revision of infected total knee replacements using articulating cement spacers and short-term antibiotic therapy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1011–1015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hartman MB, Fehring TK, Jordan L, Norton JH. Periprosthetic knee sepsis: the role of irrigation and débridement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:113–118.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Herbert CK, Williams RE, Levy RS, Barrack RL. Cost of treating an infected total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:140–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirakawa K, Stulberg BN, Wilde AH, Bauer TW, Secic M. Results of 2-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:22–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hofmann AA, Goldberg T, Tanner AM, Kurtin SM. Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty using an articulating spacer: 2–12-year experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;430:125–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Insall JN, Thompson FM, Brause BD. Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:1087–1098.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ivey FM, Hicks CA, Calhoun JH, Mader JT. Treatment options for infected knee arthroplasties. Rev Inf Dis. 1990;12:468–478.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Schmier J, Ong K, Zhao K, Parvizi J. Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:984–991.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ, Berry D, Parvizi J. Prosthetic joint infection risk after TKA in the Medicare population. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:52–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J, Mowat F, Saleh K, Dybvik E, Kärrholm J, Garellick G, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Malchau H, Lau E. Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(Suppl 3):144–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Harmsen SW, Mandrekar JN, Osmon DR. Outcome of prosthetic joint infections treated with débridement and retention of components. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:471–478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Masri BA, Kendall RW, Duncan CP, Beauchamp CP, McGraw RW, Bora B. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty using a functional antibiotic-loaded spacer in the treatment of the infected knee replacement: The Vancouver experience. Semin Arthroplasty. 1994;5:122–136.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mont MA, Waldman B, Banerjee C, Pancheco, IH, Hungerford DS. Multiple irrigation, débridement, and retention of components in infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:426–433.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Morrey BF, Westholm F, Schoifet S, Rand JA, Bryan RS. Long-term results of various treatment options for infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:120–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rand JA. Alternatives to reimplantation for salvage of the total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:282–289.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rand JA, Bryan RS, Morrey BF, Westholm F. Management of infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;205:75–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rasul AT, Tsukayama D, Gustilo RB. Effect of time of onset and depth of infection on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:98–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rozner MA. The American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score and risk of perioperative infection. JAMA. 1996;275:234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schoifet SD, Morrey BF. Treatment of infection after total knee arthroplasty by débridement with retention of components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:1383–1390.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Segawa H, Tsukayama D, Kyle RF, Becker DA, Gustillo RB. Infection after total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective study of the treatment of 81 infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1434–1445.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Silva M, Tharani R, Schmalzried TP. Results of direct exchange or débridement of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:125–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Teeny SM, Dorr L, Murata G, Conaty P. Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1990,5:35–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wilde AH, Ruth JT. Two-stage reimplantation in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;236:23–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wilson MG, Kelley K, Thornhill TS. Infection as a complication of total knee-replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:878–883.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas K. Fehring MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained as necessary.

Data were collected at each institution. Data analysis was conducted at OrthoCarolina Research Institute.

The members of the Periprosthetic Infection Consortium include Kevin Bozic, MD; Craig Della Valle, MD; Terence Gioe, MD; Javad Parvizi, MD; Bryan D. Springer, MD; Thomas K. Fehring, MD; and Susan Odum, MEd.

About this article

Cite this article

Sherrell, J.C., Fehring, T.K., Odum, S. et al. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Fate of Two-stage Reimplantation After Failed Irrigation and Débridement for Periprosthetic Knee Infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469, 18–25 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1434-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1434-1

Keywords

Navigation