Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Infection Control Rate of Irrigation and Débridement for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

  • Symposium: Papers Presented at the 2010 Meeting of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Irrigation and débridement with retention of prosthesis is commonly performed for periprosthetic joint infection. Infection control is reportedly dependent on timing of irrigation and débridement relative to the index procedure.

Questions/purposes

We therefore (1) compared the ability of irrigation and débridement to control acute postoperative, acute delayed, and chronic infections and (2) determined whether any patient-related factors influenced infection control.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 136 patients (138 joints) from two institutional databases treated with irrigation and débridement between 1996 and 2007. Mean age at time of treatment was 64 years (range, 18–89 years); 77 (56%) joints were in women. Three subgroups were extracted: acute postoperative infections, occurring within 4 weeks (52 joints), acute delayed infections occurring after 4 weeks with acute onset of symptoms (50 joints), and chronic infections (36 joints). Minimum followup was 12 months (average, 54 months; range, 12–115 months). Failure to control infection was reported as the need for any subsequent surgical intervention and/or use of long-term suppressive antibiotics.

Results

Infection control was not achieved in 90 joints (65%; 82 requiring return to surgery and eight remaining on long-term suppressive antibiotics). Failure rates were 69% (36 of 52), 56% (28 of 50), and 72% (26 of 36) for acute postoperative, acute delayed, and chronic infections, respectively. Of the 10 variables considered as potential risk factors, only Staphylococcal organisms predicted failure.

Conclusions

Irrigation and débridement is unlikely to control periprosthetic joint infection, including acute infections. Our data suggest surgeons should be cautious using this procedure as a routine means to address periprosthetic joint infection. For most patients, we recommend irrigation and débridement be reserved for an immunologically optimized host infected acutely with a non-Staphylococcal organism.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azzam KA, Seeley M, Ghanem E, Austin MS, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Irrigation and debridement in the management of prosthetic joint infection: traditional indications revisited. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:1022–1027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bengtson S, Blomgren G, Knutson K, Wigren A, Lidgren L. Hematogenous infection after knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;58:529–534.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bozic KJ, Ries MD. The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1746–1751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradbury T, Fehring TK, Taunton M, Hanssen A, Azzam K, Parvizi J, Odum SM. The fate of acute methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus periprosthetic knee infections treated by open debridement and retention of components. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:101–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brandt CM, Duffy MC, Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Osmon DR. Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection treated with prosthesis removal and delayed reimplantation arthroplasty. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999;74:553–558.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brandt CM, Sistrunk WW, Duffy MC, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Ilstrup DM, Osmon DR. Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection treated with debridement and prosthesis retention. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:914–919.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burger RR, Basch T, Hopson CN. Implant salvage in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:105–112.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiu FY, Chen CM. Surgical debridement and parenteral antibiotics in infected revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;461:130–135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cook JL, Scott RD, Long WJ. Late hematogenous infections after total knee arthroplasty: experience with 3013 consecutive total knees. J Knee Surg. 2007;20:27–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Crockarell JR, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Morrey BF. Treatment of infection with debridement and retention of the components following hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1306–1313.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cuckler JM, Star AM, Alavi A, Noto RB. Diagnosis and management of the infected total joint arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991;22:523–530.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Deirmengian C, Greenbaum J, Lotke PA, Booth RE Jr, Lonner JH. Limited success with open debridement and retention of components in the treatment of acute Staphylococcus aureus infections after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:22–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grogan TJ, Dorey F, Rollins J, Amstutz HC. Deep sepsis following total knee arthroplasty: ten-year experience at the University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:226–234.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hartman MB, Fehring TK, Jordan L, Norton HJ. Periprosthetic knee sepsis: the role of irrigation and debridement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:113–118.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirakawa K, Stulberg BN, Wilde AH, Bauer TW, Secic M. Results of 2-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:22–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hope PG, Kristinsson KG, Norman P, Elson RA. Deep infection of cemented total hip arthroplasties caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71:851–855.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Harmsen SW, Mandrekar JN, Osmon DR. Outcome of prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and retention of components. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:471–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marmor L, Berkus D. Hematogenous infection of total knee implants. Surgery. 1978;83:291–292.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McDonald DJ, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Ilstrup DM. Two-stage reconstruction of a total hip arthroplasty because of infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:828–834.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mont MA, Waldman B, Banerjee C, Pacheco IH, Hungerford DS. Multiple irrigation, debridement, and retention of components in infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:426–433.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morrey BF, Westholm F, Schoifet S, Rand JA, Bryan RS. Long-term results of various treatment options for infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:120–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Menashe S, Barrack RL, Bauer TW. Periprosthetic infection: what are the diagnostic challenges? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 4):138–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rasul AT Jr, Tsukayama D, Gustilo RB. Effect of time of onset and depth of infection on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:98–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Segawa H, Tsukayama DT, Kyle RF, Becker DA, Gustilo RB. Infection after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study of the treatment of eighty-one infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1434–1445.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Silva M, Tharani R, Schmalzried TP. Results of direct exchange or debridement of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:125–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, O’Connell JX, Duncan CP. Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:672–683.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomas BJ, Moreland JR, Amstutz HC. Infection after total joint arthroplasty from distal extremity sepsis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;181:121–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tsukayama DT, Estrada R, Gustilo RB. Infection after total hip arthroplasty: a study of the treatment of one hundred and six infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:512–523.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wigren A, Karlstrom G, Kaufer H. Hematogenous infection of total joint implants: a report of multiple joint infections in three patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;152:288–291.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Catherine J. Fedorka, MD, and Nicholas Brown, BS, for assistance in collecting data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javad Parvizi MD, FRCS.

Additional information

Javad Parvizi is a consultant for Stryker Orthopaedics (Mahwah, NJ) and has intellectual properties on SmarTech (Philadelphia, PA); Craig J. Della Valle is a consultant to Smith and Nephew Inc (Memphis, TN), Biomet Inc (Warsaw, IN), and Kinamed Inc (Camarillo, CA). Loukas Koyonos and Benjamin Zmistowski certify that they have no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. The authors’ institution did not receive any funding in support of this research project.

Each author certifies that his/her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

This work was performed at The Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics and the Rush University Medical Center.

About this article

Cite this article

Koyonos, L., Zmistowski, B., Della Valle, C.J. et al. Infection Control Rate of Irrigation and Débridement for Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469, 3043–3048 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1910-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1910-2

Keywords

Navigation