Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Colorado longitudinal twin study of reading disability

  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary objectives of the present study are to introduce the Colorado Longitudinal Twin Study of Reading Disability, the first longitudinal twin study in which subjects have been specifically selected for having a history of reading difficulties, and to present some initial assessments of the stability of reading performance and cognitive abilities in this sample. Preliminary examination of the test scores of 124 twins with a history of reading difficulties and 154 twins with no history of reading difficulties indicates that over the 5- to 6-year interval between assessments, cognitive and reading performance are highly stable. As a group, those subjects with a history of reading difficulties had substantial deficits relative to control subjects on all measures at initial assessment, and significant deficits remained at follow-up. The stability noted for all cognitive and achievement measures was highest for a composite measure of reading, whose average stability correlation across groups was 0.80. Results of preliminary behavior genetic analyses for this measure indicated that shared genetic influences accounted for 86% and 49% of the phenotypic correlations between the two assessments for twin pairs with and without reading difficulties, respectively. In addition, genetic correlations reached unity for both groups, suggesting that the same genetic influences are manifested at both time points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achenbach, T. A., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA School-age Forms and Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

  • Astrom, R. L., Wadsworth, S. J., & DeFries, J. C. (2007). Etiology of the stability of reading difficulties: The longitudinal Twin Study of Reading Disabilities. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10, 434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badian, N. A. (1999). Reading disability defined as a discrepancy between listening and reading comprehension: A longitudinal study of stability, gender differences, and prevalence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 138–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C. E., Manis, F. R., Pedersen, W. C., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Variation among developmental dyslexics: Evidence from a printed-word-learning task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 125–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, R. A., & Murphy, K. (1998). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A clinical workbook (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bast, J., & Reitsma, P. (1998). Analyzing the development of individual differences in terms of Matthew effects in reading: Results from a Dutch longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1373–1399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betjemann, R. S., Willcutt, E. G., Olson, R. K., Keenan, J. M., DeFries, J. C., & Wadsworth, S. J. (2007). Etiology of the stability of reading comprehension and its relation with word reading. Reading and Writing: An International Journal (in press).

  • Byrne, B., Samuelsson, S., Wadsworth, S., Hulslander, J., Corley, R., DeFries, J. C., et al. (2007). Longitudinal twin study of early literacy development: Preschool through Grade 1. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 77–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, G. (2005). Cholesky problems. Behavior Genetics, 35, 653–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C. (1985). Colorado reading project. In D. B. Gray, & J. F. Kavanagh (Eds.) Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia (pp. 107–122). Parkton, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C., Filipek, P. A., Fulker, D. W., Olson, R. K., Pennington, B. F., Smith, S. D., et al. (1997). Colorado learning disabilities research center. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C., & Fulker, D. W. (1985). Multiple regression analysis of twin data. Behavior Genetics, 15, 467–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C., & Fulker, D. W. (1988). Multiple regression analysis of twin data: Etiology of deviant scores versus individual differences. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae, 37, 205–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C., Plomin, R., Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1981). Parent-offspring resemblance for cognitive abilities in the Colorado Adoption Project: Biological adoptive, and control parents and one-year-old children. Intelligence, 5, 245–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C., Singer, S. M., Foch, T. T., & Lewitter, F. I. (1978). Familial nature of reading disability. British Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 361–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Markwardt, F. C. (1970). Examiner’s manual: Peabody individual achievement test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. E., & DeFries, J. C. (2002). Developmental dyslexia: Genetic dissection of a complex cognitive trait. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 767–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, J. W., Ekstrom, R. G., & Price, L. A. (1963). Manual for a kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayán, J., Willcutt, E. G., Fisher, S. E., Francks, C., Cardon, L. R., Olson, R. K., et al. (2005). Bivariate linkage scan for reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder localizes pleiotropic loci. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 1045–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, Y. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2002). Predictors of exception word and nonword reading in dyslexic children: The severity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlaar, N., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2007). From learning to read to reading to learn: Substantial and stable genetic influence. Child Development, 78, 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlaar, N., Spinath, F. M., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2005). Genetic influences on early word recognition abilities and disabilities: a study of 7-year-old twins. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulslander, J., Olson, R., & Wadsworth, S. (submitted for review). Longitudinal stability of reading skill profiles.

  • Kovacs, M. (1988). The children’s depression inventory manual. New York: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, H., Ahonen, T., Eklund, K., Guttorm, T. K., Laakso, M.-L., Leinonen, S., et al. (2001). Developmental pathways of children with and without familial risk for dyslexia during the first years of life. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20(2), 539–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markwardt Jr., F. C. (1989). Peabody individual achievement test–revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maughan, B., Hagell, A., Rutter, M., & Yule, W. (1994). Poor readers in secondary school. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 125–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R., Prior, M., Williams, S., Smart, D., & Sanson, A. (2002). The long-term significance of teacher-rated hyperactivity and reading ability in childhood: Findings from two longitudinal studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 1004–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, J. D. (1994). Methodological issues in longitudinal research in learning disabilities. In S. Vaugh, & C. Bos (Eds.) Research issues in learning disabilities: Theory, methodology, assessment, and ethics (pp. 202–230). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, H., Smith, S. D., Hager, K., Held, M., Liu, J., Olson, R. K., et al. (2005). DCDC2 is associated with reading disability and modulates neuronal development in the brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 17053–17058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E. (2002). Teen-aged mothers in contemporary Britain. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 727–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2007). M-plus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2003). Mx: Statistical modeling. VCU Box 900126, Richmond, VA 23298: Department of Psychiatry. 6th ed.

  • Nichols, R. C., & Bilbro, W. C. (1966). The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genetica, 16, 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K., Datta, H., Gayán, J., & DeFries, J. C. (1999). A behavioral-genetic analysis of reading disabilities and component processes. In R. Klein, & P. McMullen (Eds.) Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia (pp. 133–151). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K., Forsberg, H., & Wise, B. (1994). Genes, environment, and the development of orthographic skills. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.) The varieties of orthographic knowledge I: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 27–72). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.) Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 243–277). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrill, S. A., Deater-Deckard, K., Thompson, L. A., Schatschneider, C., Dethorne, L. S., & Vandenbergh, D. J. (2007). Longitudinal genetic analysis of early reading: The Western Reserve Reading Project. Reading and Writing, 20, 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., & Kovas, Y. (2005). Generalist genes and learning disabilities. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 592–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskind, M. H., Gerber, P. J., Goldberg, R. J., Higgins, E. L., & Herman, K. L. (1998). Longitudinal research in learning disabilities: Report on an international symposium. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 266–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskind, M. H., Higgins, E. L., Goldberg, R. J., & Herman, K. L. (1999). Patterns of change and predictors of success in individuals with learning disabilities: Results from a twenty-year longitudinal study. Thalamus, 16, 40–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, W., Welner, Z., & Herjanic, B. (1997). Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents—IV. North Towanda Falls, NY: Multi-Health System, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (1985). Revised children’s manifest anxiety scale manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Caspi, A., Fergusson, D., Horwood, L. J., Goodman, R., Maughan, B., et al. (2004). Sex differences in developmental reading disability: New findings from 4 epidemiological studies. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 2007–2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satz, P., Buka, S. L., Lipsitt, L. P., & Seidman, L. (1998). The long-term prognosis of learning disabled children: A review of studies (1954–1993). In B. K. Shapiro, P. J. Accardo, & A. J. Capute (Eds.) Reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 223–250). Timonium, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. S., & Parker, J. D. (2003). Children's learning and teachers’ expectations: Matthew effects in children with learning disabilities: Development of reading, IQ, and psychosocial problems from grade 2 to grade 8. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, S., Cherny, S. S., & Fulker, D. W. (1998). Increase in power through multivariate analyses. Behavior Genetics, 28, 357–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, J., Hoffmann, P., Schmael, C., Schulte-Körne, G., & Nöthen, M. M. (2007). Genetics of dyslexia: The evolving landscape. Journal of Medical Genetics, 44, 289–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Shaywitz, S. E. (1995). Defining and classifying learning disabilities and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child Neurology, 10, S50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, S. E., Escobar, M. D., Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Makuch, R. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading disability. New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 144–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, S. E., Fletcher, J. M., Holahan, J. M., Shneider, A. E., Marchione, K. E., Stuebing, K. K., et al. (1999). Persistence of dyslexia: The Connecticut Longitudinal Study at adolescence. Pediatrics, 104, 1351–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Fulbright, R. K., Skudlarski, P., Mencl, W. E., Constable, T., et al. (2003). Neural systems for compensation and persistence: Young adult outcome of childhood reading disability. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speece, D. L., & Ritchey, K. D. (2005). A longitudinal study of the development of oral reading fluency in young children at risk for reading failure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 387–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spira, E. G., Bracken, S. S., & Fischel, J. E. (2005). Predicting improvement after first-grade reading difficulties: The effects of oral language, emergent literacy, and behavior skills. Developmental Psychology, 41, 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, J., Langley, K., Pay, H., Payton, A., Worthington, J., Ollier, W., et al. (2005). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with reading disabilities: Preliminary genetic findings on the involvement of the ADRA2A gene. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 1081–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J., Wagner, R., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). A Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trzesniewski, K. H., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Taylor, A., & Maughan, B. (2006). Revisiting the association between reading achievement and antisocial behavior: New evidence of an environmental explanation from a twin study. Child Development, 77, 72–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S. A. (1990). Gender differences in intelligence, language, visual-motor abilities, and academic achievement in students with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vukovic, R. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). The double-deficit hypothesis: A comprehensive analysis of the evidence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, S. J., Corley, R. P., Plomin, R., Hewitt, J. K., & DeFries, J. C. (2006). Genetic and environmental influences on continuity and change in reading achievement in the Colorado Adoption Project. In A. Huston, & M. Ripke (Eds.) Developmental contexts of middle childhood: Bridges to adolescence and adulthood (pp. 87–106). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, S. J., & DeFries, J. C. (2005). Genetic etiology of reading difficulties in boys and girls. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8, 594–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1974). Examiners’ manual: Wechsler intelligence scale for children-revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1981). Examiners’ manual: Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1991). Examiners’ manual: The Wechsler intelligence scale for children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1997). Examiners’ manual: The Wechsler adult intelligence scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2002). Examiners’ manual: The Wechsler individual achievement test (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). Examiner’s manual: Wide range achievement test–3. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates-Wide Range Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willcutt, E. G., DeFries, J. C., Pennington, B. F., Smith, S. D., Cardon, L. R., & Olson, R. K. (2003). Genetic etiology of comorbid reading difficulties. In R. Plomin, J. C. DeFries, I. W. Craig, & P. McGuffin (Eds.) Behavioral genetics in the postgenomic era (pp. 227–246). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Willcutt, E. G., & Pennington, B. F. (2000). Psychiatric comorbidity in children and adolescents with reading disability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 1039–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willcutt, E. G., Pennington, B. F., Smith, S. D., Cardon, L. R., Gayán, J., Knopik, V. S., et al. (2002). Quantitative trait locus for reading disability on chromosome 6p is pleiotropic for ADHD. American Journal of Medical Genetics (Neuropsychiatric Genetics), 114, 260–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., & O’Donovan, M. C. (2006). The genetics of developmental dyslexia. European Journal of Human Genetics, 14, 681–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Colorado Learning Disabilities Research Center is supported by grant HD-27802 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). The Longitudinal Twin Study of Reading Disability is supported by grant DC-05190 from the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD). The continued cooperation of the many families participating in the CLCRC and LTSRD and the work of the staff members of these projects is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sally J. Wadsworth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wadsworth, S.J., DeFries, J.C., Olson, R.K. et al. Colorado longitudinal twin study of reading disability. Ann. of Dyslexia 57, 139–160 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-007-0009-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-007-0009-7

Keywords

Navigation