Abstract
Quantification of metal droplets ejected due to impinging gas jet on the surface of liquid metal is an important parameter for the understanding and for the modeling of the refining kinetics of reactions in slag-metal emulsion zone. In the present work, a numerical study has been carried out to critically examine the applicability of droplet generation rate correlation previously proposed by Subagyo et al. on the basis of dimensionless blowing number (N B). The blowing number was re-evaluated at the impingement point of jet with taking into account the temperature effect of change in density and velocity of the gas jet. The result obtained from the work shows that the modified blowing number N B,T at the furnace temperature of 1873 K (1600 °C) is approximately double in magnitude compared to N B calculated by Subagyo and co-workers. When N B,T has been employed to the Subagyo’s empirical correlation for droplet generation, a wide mismatch is observed between the experimental data obtained from cold model and hot model experiments. The reason for this large deviation has been investigated in the current study, and a theoretical approach to estimate the droplet generation rate has been proposed. The suitability of the proposed model has been tested by numerically calculating the amount of metals in slag. The study shows that the weight of metals in emulsion falls in the range of 0 to 21 wt pct of hot metal weight when droplet generation rate has been calculated at ambient furnace temperature of 1873 K (1600 °C).
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- C p :
-
Heat capacity of oxygen gas (J/K)
- d e :
-
Nozzle diameter at exit (m)
- d t :
-
Throat diameter of the nozzle (m)
- F G :
-
Volumetric gas flow rate at pressure 101325 Pa and 273 K (0 °C) (Nm3/s)
- F G,T :
-
Volumetric gas flow rate at steelmaking furnace temperature (Nm3/s)
- g :
-
Gravitational constant (m/s2)
- h :
-
Lance height (m)
- H o :
-
Enthalpy of the nozzle exit (J/kg)
- H a :
-
Enthalpy of the ambient furnace (J/kg)
- \( \,M_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }} \) :
-
Molecular weight of oxygen (kg/mol)
- N B :
-
Blowing number (-)
- N B,T :
-
Modified blowing number (-)
- P a :
-
Ambient pressure of the furnace (Pa)
- P NTP :
-
Pressure of the gas jet at NTP (=101325 Pa)
- P d,h :
-
Dynamic pressure of the gas jet at impingement point (Pa)
- P h :
-
Pressure of the gas jet at impingement point (Pa)
- P o :
-
Back pressure of the nozzle (Pa)
- Pr:
-
Prandtl number (-)
- R :
-
Gas constant (J/ (mol K))
- n :
-
amount of gas (mole)
- R B :
-
Droplet generation rate (kg/s)
- R B,T :
-
Modified droplet generation rate (kg/s)
- T h :
-
Temperature of the gas jet at distance h from the nozzle exit
- T NTP :
-
Temperature of the gas jet at NTP (=25 °C)
- u o :
-
Jet centerline velocity at nozzle exit (m/s)
- u j :
-
Jet centerline velocity at impingement point (m/s)
- u g :
-
Critical tangential jet velocity at impingement point (m/s)
- ρ g :
-
Density of gas at pressure 101325 Pa and 273 K (0 °C) (kg/m3)
- ρ l :
-
Density of liquid metal (kg/m3)
- ρ a :
-
Density of ambient gas (kg/m3)
- ρ e :
-
Density of gas at nozzle exit (kg/m3)
- ρ g,h :
-
Density of gas at a distance h from the nozzle exit (kg/m3)
- σ l :
-
Surface tension of molten metal (N/m)
- η :
-
Constant (-)
- α :
-
Constant (-)
- β :
-
Constant (-)
- a :
-
Constant (-)
- k :
-
Constant (-)
References
N. A. Molloy: J. Iron steel Inst., 1970, vol. 208, pp. 943-50.
A. Chatterjee and A. V Bradshaw: J. Iron steel Inst., 1972, vol. 210, pp. 179-87.
H. Qinglin: Fluid dynamics and droplet generation in the BOF steelmaking process, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wollongong, 1990.
E. T. Turkdogan: Chem. Eng. Sci.,1966, vol. 21, pp. 1133-44.
H. Y. Hwang and G. A. Irons: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2012, vol. 43B, pp. 302-15.
S. Sabah and G. Brooks: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2014, vol. 46B, pp. 863-44.
W.G. Davenport, A.V.B. Bradshaw, and D.H. Wakelin: in Heat and Mass Transfer in Process Metallurgy. A.W.D. Hills, ed., IMM, London, 1967, pp. 207–44.
H. Meyer, W. Porter, G. Smith, and J. Szekely: J Met., 1968, vol. 20., pp. 35-42.
P. Kozakevitch: J. Met., 1969, vol. 22, pp. 57–67.
J. Schoop, W. Resch, and G. Mahn: Ironmak. Steelmak., 1978, vol. 2(1), pp. 72-78.
D.J. Price: in Process Engineering of Pyrometallurgy Symposium. M.J. Jones, ed., The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, 1974, pp. 8–15.
Subagyo, G. Brooks, K. Coley, and G. Irons: ISIJ Int., 2003, vol. 43 (7), pp. 983-89.
N. Standish and Q. He: ISIJ Int., 1989, vol. 29 (6), pp. 455-61.
C. L. Molloseau and R. J. Fruehan: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2002, vol. 33B, pp. 335-44.
N. Dogan, G. A. Brooks, and M. A. Rhamdhani: ISIJ Int., 2011, vol. 51 (7), pp. 1086-92.
R. Sarkar, P. Gupta, S. Basu, and N. B. Ballal: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2015, vol. 46B, pp. 961-76.
I.H. Jung, P. Hudon, M.A. Van Ende, and W.Y. Kim: AISTech—Iron and Steel Technology Conference Proceedings, 2014, vol. 1, 1257–68.
R. Li and R. L. Harris: In Pyrometallurgy 95 Conference Proceedings, 1995, pp. 107–24.
B. Deo and R. Boom: Fundamentals of Steelmaking Metallurgy. Prentice-Hall, New York, 1993, pp. 169–78.
M. S. Millman, A. Kapilashrami, M. Bramming, and D. Malmberg: Imphos: improving phosphorus refining, European Union, Luxembourg, 2011.
K.D. Peaslee, D.K. Panda, and D.G.C. Robertson: 76 th Steelmaking Conference, 1993, pp. 637–44.
Q. L. He and N. Standish: ISIJ Int., 1990, vol. 30 (4), pp. 305-309.
Q. L. He and N. Standish: ISIJ Int., 1990, vol. 30 (5), pp. 356-61.
H.Y. Hwang and G.A. Irons: AISTech—Iron and Steel Technology Conference Proceedings, 2009, vol. I, pp. 769-79.
M. Alam, J. Naser and G. Brooks: Metall. Mater. Trans, 2010, vol. 41B, pp.636-645.
Q. Li, M. Li, B. S. Kuang and Z. Zou: Can. Metall. Q., 2014, vol. 53 (3), pp.340-351.
G. Brooks, Y. Pan, Subagyo and K. Coley: Metall. Mater. Trans, 2005, vol. 36B, pp.525-35.
I. Sumi, Y. Kishimoto, Y. Kikuchi, and H. Igarashi: ISIJ Int., 2006, vol. 46 (9), 1312-17.
S. Ito and I. Muchi: J Iron Steel Inst Japan–Tetsu-to-Hagane, 1969, vol. 55, pp. 1152–63.
M. Hirai, R. Tsujino, T. Mukai, T. Harada. and M. Omori: Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Japan, 1987, vol. 27 (10), pp. 805–13.
B. Allemand, P. Bruchet, C. Champinot, S. Melen, and F. Porzucek: Rev. Metallurgie, 2001, vol. 98, pp. 571-87.
C. Cicutti, M. Valdez, T. Pérez, J. Petroni, A. Gómez, R. Donayo, and L. Ferro: Sixth International Conference on Molten Slags, Fluxes and Salts, ISS, Warrandale, PA, 2000.
N. Dogan, G. A. Brooks, and M. A. Rhamdhani, ISIJ Int., 2011, vol. 51 (7), pp. 1093-1101.
R. C. Urquhart and W. G. Davenport: Can. Metall. Q., 1973, vol. 12 (4), pp. 507-16.
M. Millman, A. Overbosch, A. Kapilasharmi, D. Malmberg and M. Bramming: Ironmak. Steelmak., 2013, vol. 40 (6), pp. 460-69.
G. Turner and S. Jahanshahi: Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Japan, 1987, vol. 27 (9), pp. 734-39.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Tata Steel for providing financial support for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Manuscript submitted June 15, 2016.
Appendices
Appendix I: Algorithm for Calculation of Metal in Emulsion
Modeling of Metals in Emulsion
In the present work, residence time of the droplets was calculated based on the theory of bloated droplet given by Brooks et al.[27] The total blowing time was divided into small time steps, ∆t. At each time step, a set of droplet generated and their residence time were calculated from the residence time model. Thus, the amount of metals in the emulsion phase at a given time is calculated by adding all the metal droplets present in the emulsion. It is to be noted that the droplets present in the emulsion at a particular time are different in their size mass and density due to the bloating phenomena caused by decarburization reaction. Here, it is assumed that the number of droplet remains same in the emulsion. Computational methodology to calculate the metal in emulsion is shown in Figure A1.
A matrix W em is constructed to keep the track of the change in droplet mass due to decarburization reaction at a given time step and time of residence in emulsion phase.
where w m is the mass of the single droplet at the time of ejection and n k is the number of droplet generated at each calculation time. W em is a j × k matrix and j, k values are calculated as
The instantaneous value of total metal in emulsion at each time of blowing has been calculated from the matrix W em by summing up the diagonal elements (both off diagonal and main diagonal), which is shown below:
Appendix II: Sample Calculation for Droplet Generation for Steelmaking Conditions
The modified blowing number is calculated according to Eq. [13] and the density of the gas and velocity of the jet at the impingement have been corrected by applying Eq. [12]. At ambient temperature of the furnace of 1873 K (1600 °C), T h is estimated to be 1060 K (787 °C).
At lance height h = 1.8 m, ambient temperature T = 1873 K (1600 °C), Pa = 101325 Pa, P0 = 1180436.3 Pa, Q O2 = 10.33 Nm3/s, the density and jet velocity of the gas have been estimated to be
Substituting η = 0.4421, ρ l = 7000 Kg/m3, σ l = 1.7 N/m, the modified blowing number is
The modified droplet generation rate is calculated based on Eq. [16] by applying temperature effect on volumetric expansion of the gas. Assuming pressure of the gas jet remains constant, the volume expansion of the gas at furnace environment is calculated as
Substituting \( F_{\text{G,T}} \) and \( N_{\text{B,T}} \) values in Eq. [16], R B,T can be estimated to be ~1783 kg/s.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rout, B.K., Brooks, G., Subagyo et al. Modeling of Droplet Generation in a Top Blowing Steelmaking Process. Metall Mater Trans B 47, 3350–3361 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-016-0773-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-016-0773-z