Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling of Droplet Generation in a Top Blowing Steelmaking Process

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantification of metal droplets ejected due to impinging gas jet on the surface of liquid metal is an important parameter for the understanding and for the modeling of the refining kinetics of reactions in slag-metal emulsion zone. In the present work, a numerical study has been carried out to critically examine the applicability of droplet generation rate correlation previously proposed by Subagyo et al. on the basis of dimensionless blowing number (N B). The blowing number was re-evaluated at the impingement point of jet with taking into account the temperature effect of change in density and velocity of the gas jet. The result obtained from the work shows that the modified blowing number N B,T at the furnace temperature of 1873 K (1600 °C) is approximately double in magnitude compared to N B calculated by Subagyo and co-workers. When N B,T has been employed to the Subagyo’s empirical correlation for droplet generation, a wide mismatch is observed between the experimental data obtained from cold model and hot model experiments. The reason for this large deviation has been investigated in the current study, and a theoretical approach to estimate the droplet generation rate has been proposed. The suitability of the proposed model has been tested by numerically calculating the amount of metals in slag. The study shows that the weight of metals in emulsion falls in the range of 0 to 21 wt pct of hot metal weight when droplet generation rate has been calculated at ambient furnace temperature of 1873 K (1600 °C).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

C p :

Heat capacity of oxygen gas (J/K)

d e :

Nozzle diameter at exit (m)

d t :

Throat diameter of the nozzle (m)

F G :

Volumetric gas flow rate at pressure 101325 Pa and 273 K (0 °C) (Nm3/s)

F G,T :

Volumetric gas flow rate at steelmaking furnace temperature (Nm3/s)

g :

Gravitational constant (m/s2)

h :

Lance height (m)

H o :

Enthalpy of the nozzle exit (J/kg)

H a :

Enthalpy of the ambient furnace (J/kg)

\( \,M_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }} \) :

Molecular weight of oxygen (kg/mol)

N B :

Blowing number (-)

N B,T :

Modified blowing number (-)

P a :

Ambient pressure of the furnace (Pa)

P NTP :

Pressure of the gas jet at NTP (=101325 Pa)

P d,h :

Dynamic pressure of the gas jet at impingement point (Pa)

P h :

Pressure of the gas jet at impingement point (Pa)

P o :

Back pressure of the nozzle (Pa)

Pr:

Prandtl number (-)

R :

Gas constant (J/ (mol K))

n :

amount of gas (mole)

R B :

Droplet generation rate (kg/s)

R B,T :

Modified droplet generation rate (kg/s)

T h :

Temperature of the gas jet at distance h from the nozzle exit

T NTP :

Temperature of the gas jet at NTP (=25 °C)

u o :

Jet centerline velocity at nozzle exit (m/s)

u j :

Jet centerline velocity at impingement point (m/s)

u g :

Critical tangential jet velocity at impingement point (m/s)

ρ g :

Density of gas at pressure 101325 Pa and 273 K (0 °C) (kg/m3)

ρ l :

Density of liquid metal (kg/m3)

ρ a :

Density of ambient gas (kg/m3)

ρ e :

Density of gas at nozzle exit (kg/m3)

ρ g,h :

Density of gas at a distance h from the nozzle exit (kg/m3)

σ l :

Surface tension of molten metal (N/m)

η :

Constant (-)

α :

Constant (-)

β :

Constant (-)

a :

Constant (-)

k :

Constant (-)

References

  1. N. A. Molloy: J. Iron steel Inst., 1970, vol. 208, pp. 943-50.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Chatterjee and A. V Bradshaw: J. Iron steel Inst., 1972, vol. 210, pp. 179-87.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Qinglin: Fluid dynamics and droplet generation in the BOF steelmaking process, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wollongong, 1990.

  4. E. T. Turkdogan: Chem. Eng. Sci.,1966, vol. 21, pp. 1133-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Y. Hwang and G. A. Irons: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2012, vol. 43B, pp. 302-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Sabah and G. Brooks: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2014, vol. 46B, pp. 863-44.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W.G. Davenport, A.V.B. Bradshaw, and D.H. Wakelin: in Heat and Mass Transfer in Process Metallurgy. A.W.D. Hills, ed., IMM, London, 1967, pp. 207–44.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Meyer, W. Porter, G. Smith, and J. Szekely: J Met., 1968, vol. 20., pp. 35-42.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Kozakevitch: J. Met., 1969, vol. 22, pp. 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Schoop, W. Resch, and G. Mahn: Ironmak. Steelmak., 1978, vol. 2(1), pp. 72-78.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D.J. Price: in Process Engineering of Pyrometallurgy Symposium. M.J. Jones, ed., The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, 1974, pp. 8–15.

  12. Subagyo, G. Brooks, K. Coley, and G. Irons: ISIJ Int., 2003, vol. 43 (7), pp. 983-89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. N. Standish and Q. He: ISIJ Int., 1989, vol. 29 (6), pp. 455-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C. L. Molloseau and R. J. Fruehan: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2002, vol. 33B, pp. 335-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. N. Dogan, G. A. Brooks, and M. A. Rhamdhani: ISIJ Int., 2011, vol. 51 (7), pp. 1086-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Sarkar, P. Gupta, S. Basu, and N. B. Ballal: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2015, vol. 46B, pp. 961-76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. I.H. Jung, P. Hudon, M.A. Van Ende, and W.Y. Kim: AISTech—Iron and Steel Technology Conference Proceedings, 2014, vol. 1, 1257–68.

  18. R. Li and R. L. Harris: In Pyrometallurgy 95 Conference Proceedings, 1995, pp. 107–24.

  19. B. Deo and R. Boom: Fundamentals of Steelmaking Metallurgy. Prentice-Hall, New York, 1993, pp. 169–78.

  20. M. S. Millman, A. Kapilashrami, M. Bramming, and D. Malmberg: Imphos: improving phosphorus refining, European Union, Luxembourg, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K.D. Peaslee, D.K. Panda, and D.G.C. Robertson: 76 th Steelmaking Conference, 1993, pp. 637–44.

  22. Q. L. He and N. Standish: ISIJ Int., 1990, vol. 30 (4), pp. 305-309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Q. L. He and N. Standish: ISIJ Int., 1990, vol. 30 (5), pp. 356-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H.Y. Hwang and G.A. Irons: AISTech—Iron and Steel Technology Conference Proceedings, 2009, vol. I, pp. 769-79.

  25. M. Alam, J. Naser and G. Brooks: Metall. Mater. Trans, 2010, vol. 41B, pp.636-645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Q. Li, M. Li, B. S. Kuang and Z. Zou: Can. Metall. Q., 2014, vol. 53 (3), pp.340-351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. G. Brooks, Y. Pan, Subagyo and K. Coley: Metall. Mater. Trans, 2005, vol. 36B, pp.525-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. I. Sumi, Y. Kishimoto, Y. Kikuchi, and H. Igarashi: ISIJ Int., 2006, vol. 46 (9), 1312-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. S. Ito and I. Muchi: J Iron Steel Inst Japan–Tetsu-to-Hagane, 1969, vol. 55, pp. 1152–63.

  30. M. Hirai, R. Tsujino, T. Mukai, T. Harada. and M. Omori: Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Japan, 1987, vol. 27 (10), pp. 805–13.

  31. B. Allemand, P. Bruchet, C. Champinot, S. Melen, and F. Porzucek: Rev. Metallurgie, 2001, vol. 98, pp. 571-87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. C. Cicutti, M. Valdez, T. Pérez, J. Petroni, A. Gómez, R. Donayo, and L. Ferro: Sixth International Conference on Molten Slags, Fluxes and Salts, ISS, Warrandale, PA, 2000.

  33. N. Dogan, G. A. Brooks, and M. A. Rhamdhani, ISIJ Int., 2011, vol. 51 (7), pp. 1093-1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. R. C. Urquhart and W. G. Davenport: Can. Metall. Q., 1973, vol. 12 (4), pp. 507-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. M. Millman, A. Overbosch, A. Kapilasharmi, D. Malmberg and M. Bramming: Ironmak. Steelmak., 2013, vol. 40 (6), pp. 460-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. G. Turner and S. Jahanshahi: Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Japan, 1987, vol. 27 (9), pp. 734-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Tata Steel for providing financial support for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bapin Kumar Rout.

Additional information

Manuscript submitted June 15, 2016.

Appendices

Appendix I: Algorithm for Calculation of Metal in Emulsion

Modeling of Metals in Emulsion

In the present work, residence time of the droplets was calculated based on the theory of bloated droplet given by Brooks et al.[27] The total blowing time was divided into small time steps, ∆t. At each time step, a set of droplet generated and their residence time were calculated from the residence time model. Thus, the amount of metals in the emulsion phase at a given time is calculated by adding all the metal droplets present in the emulsion. It is to be noted that the droplets present in the emulsion at a particular time are different in their size mass and density due to the bloating phenomena caused by decarburization reaction. Here, it is assumed that the number of droplet remains same in the emulsion. Computational methodology to calculate the metal in emulsion is shown in Figure A1.

Fig. A1
figure 10

Algorithm to calculate the amount of metal in emulsion

A matrix W em is constructed to keep the track of the change in droplet mass due to decarburization reaction at a given time step and time of residence in emulsion phase.

$$ W_{em} = \left( {\begin{array}{ccccc} {n_{1} w_{{m}_{1,1}} } & {n_{2} w_{{m}_{2,1}} } & \cdots & {n_{k} w_{{m}_{k,1}} } \\ {n_{1} w_{{m}_{1,2}} } & {n_{2} w_{{m}_{2,2}} } & \cdots & \vdots \\ \vdots & \vdots & \cdots & \vdots \\ {n_{1} w_{{m}_{1,j}} } & {n_{2} w_{{m}_{2,j}} } & \cdots & {n_{k} w_{{m}_{k,j}} } \\ \end{array} } \right), $$

where w m is the mass of the single droplet at the time of ejection and n k is the number of droplet generated at each calculation time. W em is a j × k matrix and j, k values are calculated as

$$ j = {\text{Residence time}} (k)/\Delta t,k = {\text{ Blowing time}}/\Delta t. $$

The instantaneous value of total metal in emulsion at each time of blowing has been calculated from the matrix W em by summing up the diagonal elements (both off diagonal and main diagonal), which is shown below:

Appendix II: Sample Calculation for Droplet Generation for Steelmaking Conditions

The modified blowing number is calculated according to Eq. [13] and the density of the gas and velocity of the jet at the impingement have been corrected by applying Eq. [12]. At ambient temperature of the furnace of 1873 K (1600 °C), T h is estimated to be 1060 K (787 °C).

At lance height h = 1.8 m, ambient temperature T = 1873 K (1600 °C), Pa = 101325 Pa, P0 = 1180436.3 Pa, Q O2 = 10.33 Nm3/s, the density and jet velocity of the gas have been estimated to be

$$ \rho_{\text{g,h}} = 0.36 \;{\text{kg}}/{\text{m}}^{3} \; {\text{and}} \; u_{j} = 373 {\text{m}}/{\text{s}}. $$

Substituting η = 0.4421, ρ l = 7000 Kg/m3, σ l = 1.7 N/m, the modified blowing number is

$$ N_{\text{B,T}} = 1 5 $$

The modified droplet generation rate is calculated based on Eq. [16] by applying temperature effect on volumetric expansion of the gas. Assuming pressure of the gas jet remains constant, the volume expansion of the gas at furnace environment is calculated as

$$ F_{\text{G,T}} = \frac{1060}{298} \times 10.33 = 36.75 \;{\text{m}}^{3} /{\text{s}}. $$

Substituting \( F_{\text{G,T}} \) and \( N_{\text{B,T}} \) values in Eq. [16], R B,T can be estimated to be ~1783 kg/s.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rout, B.K., Brooks, G., Subagyo et al. Modeling of Droplet Generation in a Top Blowing Steelmaking Process. Metall Mater Trans B 47, 3350–3361 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-016-0773-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-016-0773-z

Keywords

Navigation