Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the Double-Staple Technique for Esophagoenteric Anastomosis in Gastric Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Introduction

Reports on outcomes after double-staple technique (DST) for total and proximal gastrectomy are limited, originating mostly from Asian centers. Our objective was to examine anastomotic leak and stricture with DST for esophagoenteric anastomosis in gastric cancer patients.

Methods

A single institution review was performed for patients who underwent total/proximal gastrectomy with DST between 2006 and 2015. DST was performed using transoral anvil delivery (OrVil™) with end-to-end anastomosis. Clinical characteristics and outcomes, including anastomotic leak and stricture, were recorded.

Results

Overall, DST was performed in 60 patients [total gastrectomy (81.7 %, n = 49/60), proximal gastrectomy (10.0 %, n = 6/60), and completion gastrectomy (8.3 %, n = 5/60)]. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 21 patients (35.0 %), and 6 patients (10.0 %) received external beam radiation therapy prior to completion gastrectomy. Operative approach was open (51.7 %, n = 31/60), laparoscopic (43.3 %, n = 26/60), or robotic (5.0 %, n = 3/60). Anastomotic leak occurred in 6.7 % (n = 4/60), while stricture independent of leak was identified in 19.0 % (n = 11/58) of patients. Complications occurred in 38.3 % (n = 23/60) of patients, of which 52 % were classified as Clavien-Dindo grades III–V complications.

Conclusion

In the largest Western series of DST for esophagoenteric anastomoses in gastric cancer surgery, our experience demonstrates that DST is safe and effective with low rates of leak and stricture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Inaba K., S.S., Ishida Y., Taniguchi K., Isogaki J., Kanaya S., Overlap method: novel intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg, 2010. 211: p. e25-9.

  2. Shim, J.H., et al., Various types of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer, 2013. 16(3): p. 420–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Uyama, I., et al., Laparoscopic side-to-side esophagogastrostomy using a linear stapler after proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer, 2001. 4(2): p. 98–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kunisaki, C., et al., Application of the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc, 2011. 25(4): p. 1300–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liao, G.Q., et al., Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with trans-orally inserted anvil (OrVil): a single institution experience. World J Gastroenterol, 2013. 19(5): p. 755–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Xie, J.W., et al., A safe anastomotic technique of using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) in Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for proximal malignant tumors of the stomach. World J Surg Oncol, 2013. 11: p. 256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zuiki, T., et al., Stenosis after use of the double-stapling technique for reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc, 2013. 27(10): p. 3683–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamner JB, K.J., Laparoscopic Distal/Subtotal Gastrectomy, in Surgery for Cancers of the Gastrointestinal Tract: a Step-by-Step Approach, G.-A.J. Kim J, Editor. 2014, Springer: New York.

  9. Clavien, P.A., et al., The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg, 2009. 250(2): p. 187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeong, O. and Y.K. Park, Intracorporeal circular stapling esophagojejunostomy using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc, 2009. 23(11): p. 2624–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kachikwu, E.L., et al., Minimally invasive total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a pilot series. J Gastrointest Surg, 2011. 15(1): p. 81–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. LaFemina, J., et al., Esophagojejunal reconstruction after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer using a transorally inserted anvil delivery system. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013. 20(9): p. 2975–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marangoni, G., et al., OrVil-assisted anastomosis in laparoscopic upper gastrointestinal surgery: friend of the laparoscopic surgeon. Surg Endosc, 2012. 26(3): p. 811–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sakuramoto, S., et al., Technique of esophagojejunostomy using transoral placement of the pretilted anvil head after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surgery, 2010. 147(5): p. 742–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding Support

Dr. Chao’s efforts were supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number NIH 5K12CA001727-20. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. There was no additional funding provided by any source.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Byrne Lee or Joseph Kim.

Additional information

Byrne Lee and Joseph Kim are co-senior authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, A.H., Arrington, A., Falor, A. et al. Assessment of the Double-Staple Technique for Esophagoenteric Anastomosis in Gastric Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 20, 688–692 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3087-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3087-1

Keywords

Navigation