Skip to main content
Log in

Resolution of α-cyclohexyl-mandelic acid enantiomers by two-phase (O/W) recognition chiral extraction

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Science in China Series B: Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a new chiral separation technology: two-phase (O/W) recognition chiral extraction. Distribution behavior of α-cyclohexyl-mandelic acid enantiomers was studied in the extraction system with D(L)-isobutyl tartrate in 1,2-dichloroethane organic phase and β-CD derivatives in aqueous phase, and the influence of the kind and concentration of extractant and pH on extraction performance was investigated. The experimental results indicate that two-phase (O/W) recognition chiral extraction is of strong chiral separation ability. HP-β-CD, HE-β-CD and Me-β-CD have higher recognition ability for S-CHMA than that for R-CHMA, among which HP-β-CD has the strongest ability; whereas, D-isobutyl tartrate has reversed recognition ability for them. In the extraction system containing HP-β-CD and D-isobutyl tartrate, e.e.% of S-CHMA in aqueous phase reached 27.6% by one stage extraction, and the distribution ratio for R-CHMA(k R ) and for S-CHMA(k s ) and separation factor (α) are 2.44, 0.89 and 2.49, respectively. Meanwhile, pH and concentration of extractant have great effects on chiral separation ability. Two-phase (O/W) recognition chiral extraction has great significance for preparative separation of racemic compounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Michael J. Single enantiomer drugs: New strategies and directions. Chemistry & Industry, 1996, 5(20): D374–D378

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jung S S, Dongmok W, Hyoyoung L, Sung I J, Jinho O, Young J J, Kimoon K. A homochiral metal-organic porous material for enantioselective separation and catalysis. Nature, 2000, 404: D982–D986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosa H H, Pilar C F. Chromatographic separation of chlothalidone enantiomers using β-cyclodextrins as chiral additives. J Chromatogr B, 2000, 740: D169–D177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abolfazl S M, Robert T F. Pharmacokinetics of metoprolol enantiomers following single and multiple administration of racemate in rat. Internal J Pharm, 2002, 2: D97–D102

    Google Scholar 

  5. James E R. Chiral separations. AIChE J, 2001, 47: D2–D5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cen Z Z, Cai S H. Solvent extraction of ephedrine epimerides with chiral agents. J Chem Ind Engin (in Chinese), 2000, 51(3): D418–D420

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vladimir P, Mice K, Martin E. Lipophilic tartaric acid esters as enantioselective ionophores. Angew Chem, 1989, 28(9): D1147–D1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jérôme L, Catherine G G, Sonya T H, Jonathan J J. Efficient enantioselective extraction tris (diimine) ruthenium (II) compexes by chiral, lipophilic TRISPHAT anions. Angew Chem, 2000, 39(20): D3695–D3697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang K W, Chen G Bin, Yi J M. Enantioselective separation of ofloxacin enantiomers by chiral ligand exchange. Acta Chim Sin (in Chinese), 2004, 62(17): D1621–D1625

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tang K W, Zhou C S, Jang X Y. Racemic of loxacin separation by supported-liquid membrane extraction with two organic phases. Sci China Ser B-Chem (in Chinese), 2002, 32(6): D491–D496

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feitsm K G, Drenth B F H, de Zeeuw R A. Comparison of two β-cyclodextrin bonded stationary phases for high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr, 1987, 387: D447–D452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heldin E, Lindner K J, Pettersson C, Lindner W, Rao R. Tartaric acid derivatives as chiral selectors in liquid chromatography. Chromatographia, 1991, 32(9–10): D407–D416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu S S, Wu Y Z, Shi M R. Resolution of α-cyclohexyl-mandelic acid into enantiomers by HPLC with β-cyclodextrin as additive in mobile phase. Fine Chemicals (in Chinese), 2004, 21(10): D730–D732

    Google Scholar 

  14. Keurentjes J T F, Nabuurs L J W M, Vegter E A. Liquid membrane technology for the separation of racemic mixtures. J Membrane Sci, 1996, 113: D354–D360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ding H B, Carr P W, Cussler E L. Racemic leucine separation by hollow-fiber extraction. AIChE J, 1992, 38(10): D1493–D1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huang KeLong.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 20776038)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, K., Zhang, G., Huang, K. et al. Resolution of α-cyclohexyl-mandelic acid enantiomers by two-phase (O/W) recognition chiral extraction. Sci. China Ser. B-Chem. 50, 764–769 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-007-0053-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-007-0053-5

Keywords

Navigation