Abstract
Based on the most recently published data, we definitively estimated that the annual global production of sewage sludge may rise from ~ 53 million tons dry solids currently to ~ 160 million tons if global wastewater were to be treated to a similar level as in the 27 European Union countries/UK. It is widely accepted that the agricultural application is a beneficial way to recycle the abundant organic matter and plant nutrients in sewage sludge. However, land application may need to be limited due to the presence of metals. This work presents a meticulous and systematic review of the sources, concentrations, partitioning, and speciation of metals in sewage sludge in order to determine the impacts of sludge application on metal behavior in soils. It identifies that industrial wastewater, domestic wastewater and urban runoff are main sources of metals in sludge. It shows conventional treatment processes generally result in the partitioning of over 70% of metals from wastewater into primary and secondary sludge. Typically, the order of metal concentrations in sewage sludge is Zn > Cu > Cr ≈ Pb ≈ Ni > Cd. The proportion of these metals that are easily mobilised is highest for Zn and Ni, followed by Cd and Cu, then Pb and Cr. Sludge application to land will lead to elevated metal concentrations, and potentially to short-term changes to the dominant metal species in soils. However, the speciation of sludge-associated metals will change over time due to interactions with plant roots and soil minerals and as organic matter is mineralised by rhizo-microbiome.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Sewage sludge (SS) is the by-product of industrial and/or municipal wastewater treatment, and can be generally divided into primary sludge (PS) and secondary sludge (SES) depending on its production process (Kumar et al. 2017; Woo et al. 2022; Zoghlami et al. 2020). The sludge is generally composed of water, organic matter (OM) and inorganic components that are often referred to as biosolids (Fijalkowski et al. 2017; Usman et al. 2012; Yuan and Dai 2016). The total amount of SS produced in the world is increasing year-on-year due to population growth, increased urbanization (which tends to increase the proportion of wastewater treated centrally), and continuous improvements in the level of wastewater treatment (Nahar and Hossen 2021; Turek et al. 2019).
Currently, there is no agreement in the literature on the total global production of SS, therefore this must be estimated from the most recently published statistics. As shown in Fig. 1, the total annual production of SS (reported as dry solids; Mt: million tons) is 4.96 Mt in the US, 0.11 Mt in Mexico, 0.15 Mt in Colombia, 2.5 Mt in Brazil, 4.36 Mt in India, 0.41 Mt in Australia, 2.2 Mt in Japan, 11.2 Mt in China, and 1.25 Mt in the UK. The annual cumulative production of dry SS in the 27 European Union Countries (EU-27) is 9.25 Mt. In addition, the amount of SS produced per capita (kg/year, dry solids) can be calculated based on current populations: EU-27 (19 kg/year), UK (17 kg/year), Japan (16 kg/year), Australia (15 kg/year), US (14 kg/year), Brazil (11 kg/year), China (7 kg/year), India (3 kg/year), Colombia (3 kg/year) and Mexico (0.8 kg/year). By assuming that neighbouring regions have the same production rates, and using the United Nations (2022) world population statistics, we estimate that ~ 53 Mt/year of SS dry solids is currently produced globally (assumptions: Canada = US; central America = Mexico; South America = the average of Colombia and Brazil; non-EU European countries = UK, other Asian countries = the average of China and India; sludge production in Africa is ignored). If the wastewater produced around the globe were, in future, to be treated to a similar level as in EU-27/UK (i.e. assuming an average per capita production rate of 18 kg/year for the current world population) then ~ 160 Mt/year SS dry solids would be generated globally. Furthermore, SS usually contains 0.4–7% dry solids suspended in water and typical combined PS and SES contains about 3% solids by weight (National Research Council 1996; Turovskiy and Mathai 2006; US Army 1987); so the current production has a volume of ~ 1.6 billion m3, and this could potentially increase to ~ 4.8 billion m3. Thus, globally, safe and effective disposal of SS is a major problem, which will become particularly problematic in Asian countries due to their large and growing populations, and potential improvements in wastewater treatment standards (Iticescu et al. 2018; Seyedi et al. 2021; Teoh and Li 2020).
Numerous studies have shown that SS typically contains over 50% OM by dry weight (Carabassa et al. 2018; DelİBacak et al. 2020; Kominko et al. 2017; Zuo et al. 2019); it also contains macronutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, etc.) and micronutrients (Zn, Mn, Cu, Fe, etc.) that are important for plant growth (Eid et al. 2017; Kolodziej et al. 2023; Latare et al. 2014; Zoghlami et al. 2018). Thus, where local regulations permit, SS is frequently applied to the agricultural soil as an organic fertiliser (Hechmi et al. 2021; Lamastra et al. 2018; Nogueira et al. 2013). One advantage of agricultural use is the avoidance of the cost of fully dewatering SS, as treated SS is typically applied either as a liquid suspension at 3–6% dry solids by injection or as dewatered cake at 15–35% dry solids on the surface (Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs 2018; Environmental Protection Agency 2000; Saxlund 2022; US Army 1987).
Unfortunately, SS, particularly that from primary settlement, also contains organic contaminants, pathogens, and contaminant metals such as Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn (Barraoui et al. 2021; Camargo et al. 2016; Centofanti et al. 2016; Nahar and Hossen 2021; Neumann et al. 2016). Therefore, regulators often require further treatment of SS such as anaerobic digestion, composting, and thermal treatment (see Fig. 2) to improve sludge properties, degrade organic pollutants, and eliminate some pathogens before it is applied to agriculture (Buta et al. 2021; Camargo et al. 2016; Romdhana et al. 2009; Wluka et al. 2021). However, it should be noted that these treatment processes are designed to decrease the amount of organic substances and eliminate pathogenic microorganism, and have minimal effect on the metals removal (Milik et al. 2017). Hence, SS will still contain the contaminant metals after treatment (Cantinho et al. 2015). As those metals are not biodegradable, SS application to agriculture can lead to a gradual accumulation of metals within the soil (Charlton et al. 2016; Hasnine et al. 2017). Potentially, these metals can be incorporated into the food chain or be washed into aquifers, which would cause serious environmental and health risks (Liang et al. 2011).
Over the past decades, the potential for secondary contamination of agricultural soil by metals in sludge has attracted global attention (Buta et al. 2021; Meng et al. 2016; Saha et al. 2017; Suanon et al. 2016; Tytła and Widziewicz-Rzońca 2021). In order to ensure crop quality and safety, soil ecological health, groundwater safety and reduce the potential for metals toxicity, maximum levels of metals in agricultural soil have been set in some countries (Ahmad et al. 2021; Hasnine et al. 2017; Ministry of the Environment 2007). For example, in the UK, maximum permissible metal concentrations in soil are regulated based on their toxicity (Table 1); for some elements (Cu, Ni and Zn), the maximum concentrations are also pH dependant. Thus, it is necessary to monitor the metal concentrations in soils that receive SS to ensure that they remain below prescribed limits after sludge application.
However, at a time when there is a pressing need to increase the sustainability of agriculture by reducing its dependence on mineral fertilisers and preventing the depletion of soil OM, these regulations will also eventually restrict the application of SS as fertiliser for agriculture. Moreover, prescribing regulatory limits on metals in agricultural soil is simplistic, as it does not recognise that the potential risks posed by metals to crops and wider environment are both controlled by metal speciation (Jakubus 2020; Yan et al. 2020). Therefore, there is a need for more comprehensive information on the chemical forms of various metals in SS and how that speciation evolves upon SS introduction to the soil. This knowledge is crucial in establishing appropriate safe thresholds for metal concentrations in SS that will be applied to agricultural soil, as well as refining the safe limits for the accumulation of metals in the soil.
This review will, therefore, provide a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge of contaminant metals in SS and the impacts of its application on metals behaviour in soil. It will also provide new insights and perspectives arising from this synthesis of global data and published research. Specifically, (1) the current global amount of SS and the potential for future change in that quantity are definitively estimated; (2) the sources of metals and their partitioning from wastewater, to PS and SES are presented by using a synthesis of published data; (3) the concentration and speciation of metals in PS and SES are reported; (4) the impacts of sludge application on the concentrations and chemical forms of metals in soil are discussed by collating and comparing the data for the operationally defined speciation of metals in agricultural soil, SS and in sludge-treated soil; (5) future research priorities for better application of SS in agriculture are recommended.
2 Sources of metals and their pathways to SS
2.1 Sources
The main sources of metals in SS are domestic wastewater, industrial wastewater, and urban runoff (see Fig. 3).
2.1.1 Domestic wastewater
Domestic wastewater always contains metals, which contributes to metals content of SS (Drozdova et al. 2019; Razak et al. 2016). These metals come from various sources such as food, tap water, faeces, detergents and cosmetics (Kalinowska et al. 2020). Specifically, copper plumbing is a major source of Cu in domestic wastewater and older plumbing is a source of Pb, cleaning of stainless steel cookware is a source of Ni and Cr, human faeces are a source Zn, Cd and Ni, and household agents (such as medicated shampoos, washing powders) accounted for most of the Zn and a substantial proportion of Cd, Cr, and Pb (Aonghusa and Gray 2002; Comber and Gunn 1996; Drozdova et al. 2019; Kamerud et al. 2013). In domestic wastewater, a high proportion of metals are in a freely dissolved, bioavailable form. For example, Isozaki et al. (2006) found that the fraction of Zn, Cu, and Ni in domestic wastewater that was dissolved ranged from 12–47%, 24–61%, and 16–60%, respectively.
It has been reported that UK domestic wastewater contains 42 mg Cu, 24 mg Zn, 1 mg Pb, 0.7 mg Ni, 0.5 mg Cr and 0.1 mg Cd per person per day (Comber and Gunn 1996). These figures are comparable with more recent data (14 mg Cu, 13 mg Zn, 0.7 mg Ni, 0.05 mg Cr, 0.03 mg Pb, 0.02 mg Cd per person per day) from Sweden (Sorme and Lagerkvist 2002). A 2009 meta-study of European data (~ 50% from Germany and ~ 33% from Sweden) also observed that Cu and Zn were the major metals in domestic wastewater (34 mg Zn, 7 mg Cu, 3 mg Pb, 2 mg Ni, 2 mg Cr and 0.1 mg Cd per person per day), but Zn load exceeded Cu load (Meinzinger and Oldenburg 2009); this pattern is also shown by data from Japan (Chino et al. 1991). The figures above indicate that domestic inputs of Zn and Cu are major contributors to the overall levels of metals reaching wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). This is attributed to the extensive use of household agents (laundry detergents, shampoos, and skin care products, etc.), pigments and fungicides, which contain high levels of Zn and/or Cu. Particularly, it should be stressed that these household products are still widely used in daily life, so it will be very difficult to reduce these metals derived from this source in the short-term.
2.1.2 Industrial wastewater
Industry can discharge large volumes of wastewater to sewer; it can lead to high levels of metals being sent to WWTPs if the treatment prior to discharge is not mandated. Industrial activities such as metal plating, battery manufacture and recycling, mining, and leather tanning, are all noted for high metal content of untreated discharges (Barakat 2011; Iloms et al. 2020; Qasem et al. 2021). In Lithuania (where presumably there is relatively consistent regulation of industrial discharges to sewer), the level of metals in SS increases with increased industrial development in the catchment area of the WWTP (Praspaliauskas and Pedišius 2017). In industrial effluent, large amounts of metals are also soluble. For example, high concentrations of soluble Zn and Ni can be generated from the plating industry (Mokhter et al. 2018; Water Technology 2018). Soluble metals are highly bioavailable and are thus more likely to cause harm. Therefore, industrial wastewaters discharged to sewer are often an important source of metals in SS (Chen 2019; Qasem et al. 2021).
The metals content of industrial wastewater produced by different industrial activities varies greatly, leading to a large variation in the total concentration of various metals in SS (Islam et al. 2017). For example, the sludge produced by tanneries usually contains high concentration of Cr because chromium sulphate is an important component of tanning powder (Genawi et al. 2020; Islam et al. 2017). High levels of Cr, Cu, Zn, and Ni can be detected in SS produced by metal-plating wastewater because these metals are frequently used as electroplated coating (Świnder and Lejwoda 2021). Venkateswaran et al. (2007) reported that 3566 mg/kg Cr, 5996 mg/kg Cu, 966 mg/kg Ni and 6865 mg/kg Zn are detected in SS produced from electroplating industries located in Chennai, India.
Fortunately, many countries have recognised the issues associated with industrial effluents, and have successively regulated to minimise discharge to sewer and prevent environmental release (Sylwan and Thorin 2021). Industry is also adopting a range of clean technologies to treat the wastewater prior to discharge to WWTPs; as a result, the levels of metals emitted to sewer by industry is declining (Cantinho et al. 2015). Sorme and Lagerkvist (2002) observed that from 1973 to 1999 there has been a significant reduction in the concentrations of Cu and Pb in SS produced at three WWTPs in Stockholm, Sweden, which predominantly attributed to a drastic decrease in industrial discharges and various pre-treatments of wastewater.
2.1.3 Urban runoff
The contribution of urban runoff to metals in SS has received far less attention in the literature than domestic and industrial wastewater. However, metals originating from vehicles, construction activities, residential activities and atmospheric deposition can accumulate on impervious surfaces during dry periods (Shajib et al. 2019). These metals can be washed off by rainfall and conveyed to sewer, contributing to metals content in SS (Wijeyawardana et al. 2022). Comber and Gunn (1994) reported that runoff sources account for an important proportion of metals in Bracknell sewage, UK (Cd, 28%; Cr, 13%; Cu, 2%; Ni, 5%; Pb, 44%; Zn, 9%). Of those contributors to metals in urban runoff, vehicular emissions are widely considered to be the largest contributor (Muller et al. 2020). Traffic-related exhausts emissions are reported to account for 35% of metals in road dust in Beijing, China (Men et al. 2018). However, unlike industrial and domestic wastewater, where metals are in soluble and colloidal forms, those in urban runoff are largely associated with particulates (Adedeji and Olayinka 2013). In Beijing, 65–93% of metals in runoff from trafficked areas were associated with particulates and ~ 50% of metals from roof runoff are in the form of particulates (Shajib et al. 2019). Moreover, continuous urban expansion is increasing the area where metal-rich dusts accumulate. Combined with climate change induced intensification of precipitation patterns (i.e. more frequent long dry periods followed by high rainfall events), it is predictable that an increase in the impacts of urban runoff to wastewater would occur in future (Adedeji and Olayinka 2013).
2.2 Wastewater treatment and metals partitioning from wastewater to SS
2.2.1 Wastewater treatment
After preliminary treatment to remove large objects and grit, wastewater undergoes primary treatment in settling tanks to separate the majority (typically 50–70%) of the suspended solids from the liquid phase (Jasim and Aziz 2020; Nemerow 2006; Pachpute 2022; Pescod 1992). Both heavy solids that settle to the bottom and lighter solids that float to the surface are removed (generating PS); and the remaining liquid is either discharged (where only primary treatment is undertaken) or passed to the secondary treatment (Britannica 2022; Das and Basu 2010; Department of Environmental Protection 2018; Environmental Protection Agency 1998; National Research Council 1996; Zaharia 2017). Secondary treatment aims to digest and remove the soluble OM, nutrients and organic pollutants from aqueous phases using either a suspended (e.g. activated sludge; most common method) or attached (e.g. trickling filters) growth processes (Roman et al. 2022; Wang 2021). The resulting biological flocs or biofilms are then settled (generating SES), leaving the liquid substantially free of solids and with greatly reduced pollutant concentrations (Guo et al. 2017; Mannina and Viviani 2009; Perez et al. 2006; Zita and Hermansson 1994). Sometimes the liquid from secondary treatment requires further “polishing” (tertiary treatment) to remove any remaining suspended solids and biochemical oxygen demand from the effluent, or to remove nutrients to meet discharge consents (American Water Chemicals 2022; Blair et al. 2019). However, the sludge volume produced by tertiary treatment is small in comparison to the volume of PS and SES (Safe Drinking Water Foundation 2022).
2.2.2 Partitioning of metals from sewage to SS
The proportion of metals in wastewater that are transferred to SS during wastewater treatment depends on several factors, such as whether metals are dissolved, or associated with colloidal organics, organics solids, or particulates, and on the number of stages of wastewater treatment undertaken (Azizi et al. 2016; Benettayeb et al. 2023; Oliveira Ada et al. 2007; Rodrigo Sanz et al. 2021). Generally, more than 70% of metals in wastewater can be transferred to sludges during conventional wastewater treatment (Aganga et al. 2005; Lake et al. 1984; Thornton et al. 2001). However, as early as the late 1970’s, removal of 89–96% of metals in the influent wastewater (89% for Cd; 92% for Pb; 94% for Zn; 96% for Cu) was being achieved by primary sedimentation and activated sludge treatment at a then newly constructed WWTP in Oxford, UK (Lester et al. 1979; Stoveland et al. 1979). Additionally, in comparison with typical European domestic wastewater (assuming 200 L/person/day water usage and the typical metal loads of domestic wastewater), metal concentrations in the effluents from three WWTPs (primarily receiving domestic wastewaters) in the Canary Islands, Spain would indicate more than 95% metal removal (Comber and Gunn 1996; Meinzinger and Oldenburg 2009; Rodrigo Sanz et al. 2021). Therefore, it is possible that a far higher proportion of metals in wastewater can be transferred to SS when there is effective treatment than is generally reported.
The transfer of metals from raw sewage to PS is a physical process that mainly depends on the presence of metals in insoluble, settleable (associated with particulate matter) or possibly settleable forms (Collivignarelli et al. 2022; Poblete et al. 2022; Pöykiö et al. 2019). Therefore, the metal species and the efficiency of suspended solids removal are the dominant factors controlling metals partitioning at this stage (Kempton et al. 1987; Ziolko et al. 2011). The characteristics of each metal (such as valence and chemical affinity) also play an important role in this process, leading to the variation of metal behaviour. For example, it is reported that 24% of Ni in raw sewage, 40% of Cd and Cr are transferred, and > 50% of Zn and Pb are transferred to PS (Thornton et al. 2001; Zheng and Zhang 2011).
Metal transfer from primary effluent to SES is controlled by biological processes (Benettayeb et al. 2022b; Iyare et al. 2020; Pöykiö et al. 2018). Although both activated sludge and trickling filter methods are used for SES, the mechanisms of metals transfer to sludge are similar (Gardner et al. 2013). During secondary treatment, most metals are either adsorbed to, or absorbed by the new biomass and eventually are collected in the biologically settled sludge (Chipasa 2003). Metals can sorb to biomass by several mechanisms (Benettayeb et al. 2022a; Geng et al. 2020; Sylwan and Thorin 2021). These include entrapment of insoluble particles with the biomass, adsorption to bacterial walls and extracellular polymers (by ion exchange, complexation, and inorganic micro-precipitation reactions), and uptake by bacteria (metabolic pathways that have evolved for other substrates can transport contaminant metals into bacteria where they bio-accumulate). Obviously, metals partitioning to SES will be highly dependent upon the uptake of metals by the biomass and the separation of the biomass (Thornton et al. 2001).
3 Concentrations and speciation of metals in SS
3.1 Metal concentrations in SS
The metal concentrations in SS vary from country to country, which may be attributed to the wastewater source, the chosen treatment technologies and the relevant national regulations on wastewater management (An-nori et al. 2022; Davis et al. 2009; Duan and Feng 2022; Yakamercan and Aygün 2021). However, the average concentrations of metals in SS from each region generally decrease in the order Zn > Cu > Cr ≈ Pb ≈ Ni > Cd (see Table 2), a pattern that has been reported in many other sources (Schiptsova et al. 2020; Tytla et al. 2016; Xu et al. 2012; Zorpas et al. 2008). Metal concentrations in European and Japanese sludges are generally lower than those in sludges from other countries. However, despite regional differences, all the values reported in Table 2 are within the EU-27 and US guidelines for metals in SS to be applied to land. It may appear that the guideline values are high, but the sludge is typically applied to soil at low rates (about 0.5–2%, SS/soil by dry weight), ensuring the sludge application will not cause a dramatic increase of metals in soils (Environmental Protection Agency 2022b; Farmers Weekly 2022; Hudcová et al. 2019; Petersen 2003).
Data from seven WWTPs (5 in Europe, 2 in China) show that individual contaminant metals have a similar concentration in PS and SES (see Table 3; in all cases the activated sludge method was used for secondary treatment). While these data necessarily come from a small sample of WWTPs, which potentially increases the influence of specific local features, the relative concentrations of metals generally follow the same pattern as that in Table 2. Interestingly, this equal partitioning of metals between PS and SES was found with wastewater from a wide range of sources. However, other workers have reported a different partitioning of metals between PS and SES. For example, Pöykiö et al. (2018) report that metal concentrations in SES are all much higher than in PS. While Ribeiro et al. (2010) report that the metal concentrations in SES are all lower than in PS. These different results strongly suggest that the partitioning of metals between PS and SES is controlled by how PS is effectively separated from the treated wastewater after primary treatment (the sludge settling conditions), and thus the amount of metals associated with the suspended solids that are transferred with the aqueous phase for secondary treatment (Chipasa 2003; Ziolko et al. 2011).
While the dataset report in Table 3 is small, it indicates that co-treatment of industrial wastewater at a WWTP results in the higher concentrations of some contaminant metals in SS, than treating domestic wastewater alone or in combination with urban runoff. Enhancement of the metal concentrations is not uniform at a particular WWTP, presumably because it will depend on the industries in the catchment area, but it should be noted that the mostly highly contaminated sludges in Table 3 came from a WWTP in the most industrialized region of Poland (Tytla 2019). In this dataset, the difference between metal concentrations in SS from WWTPs that co-treat domestic wastewater with urban runoff and those that treat predominantly domestic wastewater, is small. This may indicate that the increase in SS metal concentration from urban run-off is small or may reflect under-reporting of urban run-off in some studies.
Sometimes the primary/secondary/combined sludge(s) undergoes further treatment before agricultural use. One of the most common methods is anaerobic digestion (Dauknys et al. 2016; Hanum et al. 2019). Generally, the anaerobic digestion of sludge can increase metal concentrations in the final digested sludge. For example, Chipasa (2003) reported that the average concentration of metals (Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn) in digested sludges were 1.7-2.0 times those of undigested sludges. Although this seems to be the worse-case range, as linear regression analysis of Chipasa’s data (see Fig. 4) suggests the contaminant metal concentrations in anaerobically digested sludge are typically 1.4 times higher than in the undigested sludge. The increase in metal concentrations is principally attributable to the decrease in the mass of volatile solids during digestion (Karvelas et al. 2003; Tytla 2019). Typically, there are 70–75% volatile solids in the feed sludge and 40–60% of them are digested, corresponding to 1.4–1.7 times increase in metal concentrations (Wisconsin 1992). Additionally, soluble metal complexes can be transferred to the digester in the water phase of the thickened sludge. These can then be reductively precipitated in the digester as metal sulphides, contributing further to the increase of metals content in the digested sludge.
3.2 Metal speciation in SS
The European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) sequential extraction is widely used to determine the operationally defined speciation of metals (Alan and Kara 2019; Li et al. 2010; Sungur et al. 2014b). This extraction procedure was originally developed for soils and sediments (Nemati et al. 2009), but it has subsequently been adopted for a variety of matrices, including SS, due to the simplicity of its operational procedures and the repeatability of the metal species results (Jasińska 2018; Tong et al. 2020). It initially divides metal speciation into three fractions: exchangeable/acid-extractable, i.e. weakly adsorbed to mineral surfaces or bound to carbonates; reducible, i.e. bound to Fe–Mn oxides; oxidizable, i.e. bound to OM and/or sulphides (Tokalioğlu et al. 2006; Tong et al. 2020). The residual fraction was added into the revised BCR scheme in 1999 (Rauret et al. 1999). There are potential drawbacks with BCR extraction such as the incomplete selectivity of reagents, incomplete dissolution of target phases, re-adsorption and re-precipitation of metals (Jasińska 2018). However, this straight-forward chemical extraction can provide useful information about the associations of metals with particular geochemical phases, and thus provide insight into processes that may mobilise metals from a material, and the conditions under which a material may present an environmental risk (Dąbrowska 2016; Nevidomskaya et al. 2021).
Studies that have used BCR scheme on SS suggest that the proportion of most metals in each operationally defined fraction is generally similar in PS and SES (see Fig. 5). Similar findings are also reported by Oake et al. (1984) and Mehrotra et al. (2008). However, the speciation pattern of each metal in sludges is different. In both PS and SES, Cu is principally in the oxidizable fraction, which is usually attributed to the affinity of OM for Cu and high stability of Cu–OM complexes (Gu et al. 2019; Lasheen and Ammar 2009). Zn and Ni are distributed between exchangeable, reducible, oxidizable, and residual fractions. The presence of a proportion of these metals in the exchangeable fraction suggests that a proportion of them may be readily solubilised, implying their higher mobility in SS (Katana et al. 2013; Sowunmi et al. 2020). Cr and Pb in both PS and SES are predominantly distributed in between oxidizable and residual fractions, showing their strong ability to form complexes with OM or become incorporated into residual phases thereby reducing their mobility (Narwal et al. 2008). In general, Pb and Cr are less of a concern because of their lower mobility and lower concentrations in SS. Cd is primarily distributed in between reducible, oxidizable, and residual fractions, although a small proportion of Cd is often found in the exchangeable fraction. Despite a small amount of exchangeable Cd in SS, this may still be a concern due to its hazards to environment and human health even at lower concentrations (Burke et al. 2016; Genchi et al. 2020; Hocaoglu-Ozyigit and Genc 2020).
4 Impacts of SS application on metal content and speciation in soil
4.1 Impacts of SS application on metal content in soil
The metal concentrations in SS are generally greater than the natural background, so its agricultural application inevitably increases the metal levels in soil (Gibbs et al. 2006; Liu and Sun 2013; Mcgrath and Cegarra 1992). Historically, there have been cases where long-term sludge application has resulted in metal accumulation in the soil becoming problematic (Alloway and Jackson 1991). For example, Chumbley and Unwin (1982) measured metal concentrations in UK agricultural soils with a history of sludge application during a period when metals disposal to sewer was less regulated, and showed that Cd and Pb concentrations in that soil (26.2 and 496 mg/kg, respectively) were much higher than the current regulatory limits in the UK. Also, the concentration ranges of Cd, Ni, and Cr in soils from Northeast Spain have increased by approximately 15–20% due to 10 years of sludge application (Jordán-Vidal et al. 2020). Despite these reservations, metal concentrations in agricultural soils generally remain below statutory limits even after repeated sludge applications (Jordán-Vidal et al. 2020; Obbard 2001; Topcuoğlu 2014), although this situation cannot continue indefinitely without a mechanism for removing metals from the soil (Antonkiewicz et al. 2022; Natal-da-Luz et al. 2012). Therefore, careful monitoring of metals content of the agricultural soil is a necessity if SS is to be applied without causing permanent damage to the land.
Most metals introduced by SS tend to be retained in surface soils (around 0–20 cm), especially in the short-term (Campos et al. 2019). However, high-mobility metals have the potential to be transported deeper into the soil after long-term SS application. For example, Legret et al. (1988) applied very heavily contaminated sludge to soil over an eight-year period and found that metals that persisted in the readily exchangeable fraction of the soil migrated to a depth of 60–80 cm, whereas metals associated primarily with the oxidizable fraction migrated to a depth of 40–60 cm. Thus, the speciation of metals when they are introduced with SS, and any transformations in speciation that may occur ovr time in the soil will determine whether metal mobility is a potential long-term issue.
4.2 Impacts of SS application on metal speciation in soil
Studies have shown that SS application to soils can cause the redistribution of sludge-borne and soil-borne metals in the sludge-soil mixtures to different operationally defined phases (Fadiran et al. 2014; Rosazlin et al. 2007; Shrivastava and Banerjee 2004). This redistribution process of metals is controlled by many factors, such as the chemical forms of each metal in sludges and soils, the dosage of sludge application/the amount of metals introduced to soil via sludge (Garcia-Delgado et al. 2002). It has been widely reported that the operationally defined speciation of contaminant metals (determined by sequential extraction) is different in untreated soil and SS, and that metal speciation in SS-soil mixtures is intermediate between that of the two components (Fadiran et al. 2014; Rosazlin et al. 2007). However, according to the currently published literature, it is still unclear whether the resulting metal distribution between the operationally defined phases is simply the result of mixing, or whether there are changes in metal speciation upon mixing. Furthermore, there is very little information available on whether the operationally defined speciation of metals in SS- amended soil evolves over time due to plant growth and rhizo-microbiome respiration.
Logically, changes in the operationally defined speciation of Zn and Cu are easiest to discern in SS-amended soil, because these contaminant metals have the highest concentration in SS. Therefore, studies where operational speciation of Zn and Cu has been determined using the sequential extraction scheme have been collated (see Fig. 6). In untreated agricultural soil, more than 50% of Cu and Zn are in the residual fraction, suggesting that the majority of these metals in soils are not bioavailable for crops uptake (Kotoky et al. 2015). However, Cu in SS is predominantly associated with the oxidizable fraction, and Zn in SS is distributed in between exchangeable, reducible, and oxidizable fractions (note: data from soil treated with different types of SS, including PS, SES, and anaerobically digested SS, have been averaged in Fig. 6). Where soil is treated with an amount SS of typical agricultural use, the speciation pattern of Cu and Zn in the treated soil is similar to that in untreated soil, with most present in the residual fraction (soils were analysed 1 month, 2 months, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment). This is not surprising, as the amount of the metals added with a typical agricultural application of SS is relatively small compared with the background values in the agricultural soil (only minor increases in total concentrations of Cu and Zn were reported in these studies). In two heavily treated soils (where the Cu and Zn introduced by the addition of 20% SS accounted for ~ 70% of the metals in the final mixtures) the Zn and Cu speciation patterns were intermediate between the untreated soil and the SS after 50 days, but more similar to that in SS (Brazauskiene et al. 2008). However, this study is insufficient to determine whether the final speciation patterns can be explained solely by mixing. Similarly, Garcia-Delgado et al. (2002) applied SS at about 10–20 times the typical agricultural rates, which produced a final Cu content that was 2–3 times greater than that in the untreated soil, and again found that the Cu speciation in the mixture was more similar to that in the SS than the untreated soil for up to a year after treatment. So, as would be anticipated, current studies clearly show that the SS application can increase the amount of bioavailable metals in a soil (at least in the short-term), and long-term application can lead to the accumulation of metals in soils. Therefore, it is essential to regularly monitor the bioavailable metals content when repeatedly applying sludge to agricultural soil to control those risks. However, current studies are insufficient to show the changes of metal speciation over time due to crop growth and microbial respiration in the rhizosphere (which will mineralise OM), and thus this topic needs further research (Shrivastava and Banerjee 2004; Zaragüeta et al. 2021).
5 Problems and outlook on metal bioavailability in sludge-soil system
Most studies to date have determined the contaminant metal speciation in a relatively short period after SS application, typically from a few days to a few months (Malinowska 2017; Parvin et al. 2022; Wu et al. 2006). In essence, they address the question “what is the immediate change in contaminant metal availability in soils due to the application of SS”, but shed little light on metal availability in the longer term. However, it is now becoming apparent that the chemical forms of metals in the environment is not constant, but instead evolves over time before achieving a new equilibrium (Garcia-Delgado et al. 2007; Prica et al. 2010; Scheckel et al. 2010; Wang and Li 2012).
Soil composition, pH value, redox potential, and OM content will be the principal factors that determine the equilibrium of metal speciation that will be achieved in the long-term (Khadhar et al. 2020; Orhue and Frank 2011; Zhang 2015; Zhang et al. 2017). Applying SS to agricultural land will potentially change the pH value, redox potential, and OM content of soil and create disequilibria in the speciation of the contaminant metals originally associated with the soil and of those introduced by the SS, and these may take time to reach a new equilibrium. Out of them, soil pH is widely recognised as the major factor governing metal speciation in soil (Gabler 1997; Kicińska et al. 2021; Oburger et al. 2020; Orhue and Frank 2011; Xu et al. 2020). Generally, the proportion of metals in the readily mobile fractions tends to increase at lower pH and reduce at higher pH values (Aigberua 2018; Kicińska et al. 2021; Olaniran et al. 2013; Sherene 2010). For example, Ullrich et al. (1999) observed that the average proportion of exchangeable metals (Cd, Pb and Zn) continuously reduced with the increasing soil pH. In addition, the OM in soil is relatively labile and is likely to be mineralised on longer timescales, potentially releasing any OM associated metals (Caracciolo and Terenzi 2021; De Conti et al. 2018; Natal-da-Luz et al. 2012). Local climate, weather, farming practices and irrigation conditions are further vector for longer geochemical change (Kelderman and Osman 2007; Parvin et al. 2022; Rieuwerts et al. 2015; Škarpa et al. 2011), as will be crop growth as plants can exude organic chemicals that can complex metals (Caracciolo and Terenzi 2021; De Conti et al. 2018; Gan et al. 2020).
Therefore, over time geochemical and microbiological processes in the soil may transform the metal speciation from that observed in short-term studies. At this stage, it is unclear whether these changes will increase the bioavailability of contaminant metals or sequestered them in unreactive minerals. Typical SS application rates are likely to have a small and transient impact on the soil geochemistry and cause only a small increase in contaminant metal concentrations, so there are no land-use changes. The speciation of contaminant metals within the soil before SS application may be a guide to the long-term “equilibrium” speciation. If so, it may mean that the risks posed by metals introduced by SS application are overestimated by short-term studies and could result in overly conservative restrictions on SS use in agriculture. Therefore, to better apply SS to agriculture and efficiently control the associated risks, some research priorities in future studies are urgently required (see Table 4).
6 Conclusions
This paper provides a synthesis of global data on current SS production rates, estimates future sewage sludge production rates, and comprehensively reviews the literature on contaminant metals in sewage sludge and the impacts of sewage sludge application on metals behaviour in soil. As a result, this review provides the following relevant new insights and perspectives beyond those available in previously published reviews.
-
It is definitively estimated that currently ~ 53 Mt/year dry sewage sludge is produced globally by wastewater treatment plants. This would increase to ~ 160 Mt/year if the wastewater produced around the globe were treated to a similar level as in EU-27/UK.
-
The three sources of metals in sewage sludge are domestic wastewater, industrial wastewater, and urban runoff. Typically, co-treatment of industrial wastewater results in higher contaminant metal concentrations in sewage sludge, than treating predominantly domestic wastewater with or without urban runoff. A large proportion of the metals in domestic and industrial wastewater are present in the soluble forms while metals in urban runoff are largely associated with particulates.
-
Generally, over 70% of metals in wastewater are transferred to primary and secondary sludges. The partitioning of metals from wastewater to primary sludge is a physical process that is highly dependent on the metals being in forms, or associated with inorganic or organic particles that are settleable. While the partitioning of metals from primary effluent to secondary sludge is a biological process which strongly depends on the uptake of metals by the biomass and the separation of the biomass.
-
Typically, the contaminant metal concentrations in sewage sludge decrease in the order of Zn > Cu > Cr ≈ Pb ≈ Ni > Cd. Anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge results in higher metal concentrations in the final sludge due to the loss of volatile solids and the reductive precipitation of soluble metal complexes transferred to the digester in water in the thickened sludge as metal sulphides.
-
Zn and Ni are distributed in exchangeable, reducible, oxidizable, and residual fractions of sewage sludge, and are therefore relatively mobile. Cu is predominantly distributed in the oxidizable fraction and Cd is principally distributed in between reducible, oxidizable, and residual fractions. Their mobility is moderate. The mobility of Pb and Cr is generally low because they are predominantly distributed between the oxidizable and residual fractions of sewage sludge.
-
The higher the metal content introduced via sludge, the more the pattern of metal speciation in the sludge-soil mixtures tends to be the pattern of metal speciation in the adopted sludge. Additionally, the metals speciation in the sludge-soil system will evolve with time due to the changes in soil properties and/or environmental conditions.
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
References
Adedeji OH, Olayinka OO (2013) Heavy metal concentrations in urban stormwater runoff and receiving stream. J Environ Earth Sci 3(7):141–151
Aganga AA et al (2005) Minerals in soils and forages irrigated with secondary treated sewage water in Sebele, Botswana. J Appl Sci 5(1):155–161. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2005.155.161
Ahmad W et al (2021) Toxic and heavy metals contamination assessment in soil and water to evaluate human health risk. Sci Rep 11(1):17006. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94616-4
Aigberua A (2018) Effects of spatial, temporal and pH changes on fractionated heavy metals in sediments of the Middleton River, Bayelsa State, Nigeria. MOJ Toxicol 4(6):424–430. https://doi.org/10.15406/mojt.2018.04.00140
Alan M, Kara D (2019) Comparison of a new sequential extraction method and the BCR sequential extraction method for mobility assessment of elements around boron mines in Turkey. Talanta 194(2019):189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.10.030
Alloway BJ, Jackson AP (1991) The behaviour of heavy metals in sewage sludge-amended soils. Sci Total Environ 100:151–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(91)90377-Q
Alvarez EA et al (2002) Heavy metal extractable forms in sludge from waste water treatment plants. Chemosphere 47:765–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00021-8
American Water Chemicals (2022) Tertiary filtration: perfecting the science of membrane treatment. https://www.membranechemicals.com/water-treatment/tertiary-filtration/
An-nori A et al (2022) Solar drying as an eco-friendly technology for sewage sludge stabilization: assessment of micropollutant behavior, pathogen removal, and agronomic value. Front Environ Sci 10:814590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.814590
Antonkiewicz J et al (2022) Phytoextraction of heavy metals after application of bottom ash and municipal sewage sludge considering the risk of environmental pollution. J Environ Manag 306:114517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114517
Aonghusa CN, Gray NF (2002) Laundry detergents as a source of heavy metals in Irish domestic wastewater. J Environ Sci Health 37(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1081/ese-100108477
Australian Water Association (2020) What are biosolids? What is in biosolids? Australian Water Association. reftrieved from,https://www.biosolids.com.au/info/what-are-biosolids/
Azizi S, Kamika I, Tekere M (2016) Evaluation of heavy metal removal from wastewater in a modified packed bed biofilm reactor. PLoS one 11(5):e0155462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155462
Barakat MA (2011) New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab J Chem 4:361–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.07.019
Barraoui D, Blais JF, Labrecque M (2021) Cleanup of sewage sludge spiked with cd, Cu, and Zn: sludge quality and distribution of metals in the soil-plant-water system. Chemosphere 267:129223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129223
Benettayeb A et al (2022) Some well-known alginate and chitosan modifications used in adsorption: a review. Water 14(9):1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091353
Benettayeb A et al (2022) A critical review with emphasis on recent pieces of evidence of Moringa oleifera biosorption in water and wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 29(32):48185–48209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19938-w
Benettayeb A et al (2023) Chitosan nanoparticles as potential nano-sorbent for removal of toxic environmental pollutants. Nanomaterials 13(3):447. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13030447
Blair RM, Waldron S, Gauchotte-Lindsay C (2019) Average daily flow of microplastics through a tertiary wastewater treatment plant over a ten-month period. Water Res 163:114909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.114909
Brazauskiene DM, Paulauskas V, Sabiene N (2008) Speciation of Zn, Cu, and Pb in the soil depending on soil texture and fertilization with sewage sludge compost. J Soils Sediments 8(3):184–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-008-0004-6
Britannica (2022) Wastewater treatment and disposal. https://www.britannica.com/technology/wastewater-treatment/Flow-rates
Burke F et al (2016) Impact of Cadmium polluted groundwater on human health. SAGE Open 6(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016634409
Buta M et al (2021) Sewage sludge in agriculture - the effects of selected chemical pollutants and emerging genetic resistance determinants on the quality of soil and crops-a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 214:112070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112070
Camargo FP et al (2016) Removal of toxic metals from sewage sludge through chemical, physical, and biological treatments-a review. Water Air Soil Pollut 227(12):433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-3141-3
Campos T et al (2019) Leaching of heavy metals in soils conditioned with biosolids from sewage sludge. Floresta E Ambiente 26(spe1):e20180399. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.039918
Cantinho P et al (2015) Behaviour and fate of metals in urban wastewater treatment plants: a review. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13(1):359–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0887-x
Carabassa V, Ortiz O, Alcañiz JM (2018) Sewage sludge as an organic amendment for quarry restoration: effects on soil and vegetation. Land Degrad Dev 29(8):2568–2574. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3071
Caracciolo AB, Terenzi V (2021) Rhizosphere microbial communities and heavy metals. Microorganisms 9(7):1462. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071462
Castellanos-Rozo J et al (2020) Assessment of two sludge stabilization methods in a wastewater treatment plant in Sotaquirá. Colombia Univ Sci 25(1):17–36. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.SC25-1.aots
Centofanti T et al (2016) Assessment of trace element accumulation by earthworms in an orchard soil remediation study using soil amendments. Water Air Soil Pollut 227(9):350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-3055-0
Charlton A et al (2016) Long-term impact of sewage sludge application on soil microbial biomass: an evaluation using meta-analysis. Environ Pollut 219:1021–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.050
Chen SY (2019) Occurrence characteristics and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in sewage sludge. IOP Conf Series Earth Environ Sci 295(5):052041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/295/5/052041
Chen M et al (2008) Total concentrations and speciation of heavy metals in municipal sludge from Changsha, Zhuzhou and Xiangtan in middle-south region of China. J Hazard Mater 160(2–3):324–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.036
Chen M et al (2021) Survey of elemental composition in dewatered sludge in Japan. Sci Total Environ 752:141857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141857
Cheng X et al (2022) Nationwide review of heavy metals in municipal sludge wastewater treatment plants in China: sources, composition, accumulation and risk assessment. J Hazard Mater 437:129267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129267
Chino M et al (1991) The amount of heavy metals derived from domestic sources in Japan. Water Air Soil Pollut 57–58:829–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282946
Chipasa KB (2003) Accumulation and fate of selected heavy metals in a biological wastewater treatment system. Waste Manag 23(2):135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0956-053x(02)00065-x
Chirila E, Draghici C, Puhacel A (2014) Total and dissolved metals occurrence in municipal wastewater treatment plant effluents. Environ Eng Manage J 13(9):2211–2218. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2014.246
Chumbley CG, Unwin RJ (1982) Cadmium and lead content of vegetable crops grown on land with a history of sewage sludge application. Environ Pollut Ser B 4:231–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-148X(82)90055-6
Collivignarelli MC et al (2022) Review of rheological behaviour of sewage sludge and its importance in the management of wastewater treatment plants. Water Pract Technol 17(1):483–491. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2021.098
Comber SDW, Gunn AM (1994) Diffuse sources of heavy metals to sewers. Final Report to the Department of the Environment. April 1992 to March 1994. https://www.dwi.gov.uk/research/completed-research/sewerage-surface-coastal-water-management/diffuse-sources-of-heavy-metals-to-sewers-final-report-to-the-department-of-the-environment-april-1992-to-march-1994/
Comber SDW, Gunn AM (1996) Heavy metals entering sewage-treatment works from domestic sources. Water Environ J 10:137–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.1996.tb00023.x
Dąbrowska L (2012) Speciation of heavy metals in sewage sludge after mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Chem Pap 66(6):598–606. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11696-011-0128-9
Dąbrowska L (2016) Fractionation of heavy metals in bottom sediments and sewage sludges using sequential extraction. Ecol Chem Eng A 23(1):63–75. https://doi.org/10.2428/ecea.2016.23(1)5
Das A, Basu K (2010) S. Chand’s ICSE economic application book I for class IX (2021 edition). S. Chand Publishing, New Delhi
Dauknys R et al (2016) Disintegration impact on sludge digestion process. Environ Technol 37(21):2768–2772. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1164250
Davis HT et al (2009) Identifying natural and anthropogenic sources of metals in urban and rural soils using GIS-based data, PCA, and spatial interpolation. Environ Pollut 157(8–9):2378–2385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.03.021
De Conti L et al (2018) Growth and chemical changes in the rhizosphere of black oat (Avena strigosa) grown in soils contaminated with copper. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 163:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.07.045
DelİBacak S, VoronİNa L, Morachevskaya E (2020) Use of sewage sludge in agricultural soils: useful or harmful. Eurasian J Soil Sci 9(2):126–139. https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.687052
Department of Environmental Protection (2018) The clean water book: choices for watershed protection Chap. 8: managing septic systems. https://www.nj.gov/dep/watershedrestoration/waterbook_chp8.html
Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (2018) Sewage sludge in agriculture: code of practice for England, Wales and Northern Ireland: Sect. 6.3, PTE limits in soil used for arable farming. Environ Agency. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sewage-sludge-in-agriculture-code-of-practice/sewage-sludge-in-agriculture-code-of-practice-for-england-wales-and-northern-ireland
Doelsch E, Deroche B, de van Kerchove V (2006) Impact of sewage sludge spreading on heavy metal speciation in tropical soils (Reunion. Indian Ocean). Chemosphere 65(2):286–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.02.046
Drozdova J et al (2019) Heavy metals in domestic wastewater with respect to urban population in Ostrava, Czech Republic. Water Environ J 33(1):77–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12371
Duan B, Feng Q (2022) Risk assessment and potential analysis of the agricultural use of sewage sludge in Central Shanxi Province. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(7):4236. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074236
Eid EM et al (2017) The effects of different sewage sludge amendment rates on the heavy metal bioaccumulation, growth and biomass of cucumbers (Cucumis sativus L). Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(19):16371–16382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9289-6
Elqassas AE, Hashem MH, Mousa IE (2022) Risk assessment classification of mixed sludge produced from different sites of Menofyia governorate. Egypt. Egypt J Chem 65(SI: 13):1417–1424. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2022.157040.6810
Environmental Protection Agency (2022a) Basic information about biosolids: biosolids uses. Environmental Protection Agency, US. https://www.epa.gov/biosolids/basic-information-about-biosolids
Environmental Protection Agency (2022b) Regulatory determination and pollutant limits for land applied sewage sludge. https://www.epa.gov/biosolids/regulatory-determinations-pollutants-biosolids#regulatory
Environmental Protection Agency (1998) How wastewater treatment works… the basics. EPA 833-F-98-002. Office of Water (4204), US.
Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Biosolids technology fact sheet land application of biosolids. EPA 832-F-00-064. Office of Water Washington, D.C, US
European Commision (2018) Final implementation report for directive 86/278/EEC on sewage sludge: 2013–2015
Eurostat (2022) Sewage sludge production and disposal from urban wastewater (in dry substance (d.s)). Data Browser. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/TEN00030/default/table?lang=en&category=env.env_wat.env_nwat
Fadiran AO, Tiruneh AT, Mtshali JS (2014) Assessment of mobility and bioavailability of heavy metals in sewage sludge from Swaziland through speciation analysis. Am J Environ Prot 3(4):198–208. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20140304.14
Farmers Weekly (2022) Why more growers are applying sewage sludge to land. https://www.fwi.co.uk/arable/securing-yields-tomorrow-sewage-sludge
Fijalkowski K et al (2017) The presence of contaminations in sewage sludge - the current situation. J Environ Manag 203(3):1126–1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.068
Fuentes A et al (2004) Simple and sequential extractions of heavy metals from different sewage sludges. Chemosphere 54(8):1039–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.10.029
Gabler HE (1997) Mobility of heavy metals as a function of pH of samples from an overbank sediment profile contaminated by mining activities. J Geochem Explor 58:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-6742(96)00061-1
Gan HY et al (2020) Soil organic matter mineralization as driven by nutrient stoichiometry in soils under differently managed forest stands. Front for Glob Change 3:99. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00099
Garcia-Delgado M et al (2002) Distribution of heavy metals in sewage sludges and sludge-amended soils as determined by sequential extractions. Waste Manage Environ 56:399–408. https://doi.org/10.2495/WM020411
Garcia-Delgado M et al (2007) Seasonal and time variability of heavy metal content and of its chemical forms in sewage sludges from different wastewater treatment plants. Sci Total Environ 382(1):82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.04.009
Gardner M et al (2013) Performance of UK wastewater treatment works with respect to trace contaminants. Sci Total Environ 456–457:359–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.088
Genawi NM et al (2020) Chromium removal from tannery wastewater by electrocoagulation: optimization and sludge characterization. Water 12(5):1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051374
Genchi G et al (2020) The effects of cadmium toxicity. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(11):3782. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113782
Geng H et al (2020) An overview of removing heavy metals from sewage sludge: achievements and perspectives. Environ Pollut 266(Pt 2):115375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115375
Gianico A et al (2013) Partitioning of nutrients and micropollutants along the sludge treatment line: a case study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(9):6256–6265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1686-x
Gibbs PA et al (2006) Initial results from a long-term, multi-site field study of the effects on soil fertility and microbial activity of sludge cakes containing heavy metals. Soil Use Manag 22(1):11–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2006.00003.x
Gu WH et al (2019) Heavy metals speciation and its bioavailability in sewage sludge pyrolysis residue. SN Appl Sci 1(9):1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1132-x
Guo Y, Qi PS, Liu YZ (2017) A review on advanced treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 63:012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/63/1/012025
Hanum F et al (2019) Treatment of sewage sludge using anaerobic digestion in Malaysia: current state and challenges. Front Energy Res 7:19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00019
Hasnine MT et al (2017) Heavy metal contamination in agricultural soil at DEPZA, Bangladesh. Environ Ecol Res 5(7):510–516. https://doi.org/10.13189/eer.2017.050707
Hechmi S et al (2021) Cumulative effect of sewage sludge application on soil adsorption complex and nutrient balance: a field study in semi-arid region (oued Souhil, Tunisia). Arab J Geosci 15(1):54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09369-1
Hocaoglu-Ozyigit A, Genc BN (2020) Cadmium in plants, humans and the environment. Front Life Sci RT 1:12–21
Horváth M et al (2010) Study of application of BCR sequential extraction procedure for fractionation of heavy metal content of soils, sediments, and gravitation dusts. Toxicol Environ Chem 92(3):429–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772240903036147
Hudcová H, Vymazal J, Rozkošný M (2019) Present restrictions of sewage sludge application in agriculture within the European Union. Soil Water Res 14(2):104–120. https://doi.org/10.17221/36/2018-SWR
Hundal LS et al (2014) Improvements in biosolids quality resulting from the clean water act. Water Environ Res 86(2):134–140. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143013x13807328849099
Illeraa V et al (2000) Short-term effects of biosolid and municipal solid waste applications on heavy metals distribution in a degraded soil under a semi-arid environment. Sci Total Environ 255:29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00444-7
Iloms E et al (2020) Investigating industrial effluent impact on municipal wastewater treatment plant in Vaal, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(3):1096. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031096
Islam MS et al (2017) Heavy metals in the industrial sludge and their ecological risk: a case study for a developing country. J Geochem Explor 172:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.09.006
Isozaki Y, Nakajima F, Furumai H (2006) Speciation of zinc, copper and nickel in domestic wastewater treatment process and in receiving river water. J Environ Sci 19:445–452. https://doi.org/10.11353/sesj1988.19.445
Iticescu C et al (2018) The characteristics of sewage sludge used on agricultural lands. Recent Adv Environ Chem Eng Mater AIP Conf Proc. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5060681
Iyare PU, Ouki SK, Bond T (2020) Microplastics removal in wastewater treatment plants: a critical review. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 6(10):2664–2675. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ew00397b
Jakubus M (2020) Changes in lead and chromium contents in sewage sludge evaluated using both single extractants and sequential method. Environ Pollut Bioavailab 32(1):87–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395940.2020.1778541
Jasim NA, Aziz HA (2020) The design for wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) with GPS X modelling. Cogent Eng 7(1):1723782. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1723782
Jasińska A (2018) The importance of heavy metal speciation from the standpoint of the use of sewage sludge in nature. Eng Prot Environ 21(3):239–250. https://doi.org/10.17512/ios.2018.3.3
Jin C et al (2017) Plant growth and heavy metal bioavailability changes in a loess subsoil amended with municipal sludge compost. J Soils Sediments 17(12):2797–2809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1698-0
Jordán-Vidal MM et al (2020) Metal contamination of agricultural soils amended with biosolids (sewage sludge) at a ceramic production area in NE Spain: a 10-year resampling period. Soil Use Manage 37(2):307–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12686
Kalinowska A et al (2020) Heavy metals in a high arctic fiord and their introduction with the wastewater: a case study of adventfjorden-longyearbyen system Svalbard. Water 12(3):794. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030794
Kamerud KL, Hobbie KA, Anderson KA (2013) Stainless steel leaches nickel and chromium into foods during cooking. J Agri Food Chem 61(39):9495–9501. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf402400v
Karvelas M, Katsoyiannis A, Samara C (2003) Occurrence and fate of heavy metals in the wastewater treatment process. Chemosphere 53(10):1201–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-6535(03)00591-5
Katana C, Jane M, Harun M (2013) Speciation of chromium and nickel in open-air automobile mechanic workshop soils in Ngara, Nairobi, Kenya. World Environ 3(5):143–154. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.env.20130305.01
Kelderman P, Osman AA (2007) Effect of redox potential on heavy metal binding forms in polluted canal sediments in Delft (the Netherlands). Water Res 41(18):4251–4261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.058
Kempton S, Sterritt RM, Lester JN (1987) Heavy metal removal in primary sedimentation i. the influence of metal solubility. Sci Total Environ 63:231–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(87)90048-9
Kesari KK et al (2021) Wastewater treatment and reuse: a review of its applications and health implications. Water Air Soil Pollut 232(5):208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05154-8
Khadhar S et al (2020) Integration of sequential extraction, chemical analysis and statistical tools for the availability risk assessment of heavy metals in sludge amended soils. Environ Pollut 263:114543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114543
Kicińska A, Pomykała R, Izquierdo-Diaz M (2021) Changes in soil pH and mobility of heavy metals in contaminated soils. Eur J Soil Sci 73(1):e13203. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13203
Kolodziej B et al (2023) Recovery of microelements from municipal sewage sludge by reed canary grass and giant miscanthus. Int J Phytoremediation 25(4):441–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2022.2090495
Kominko H, Gorazda K, Wzorek Z (2017) The possibility of organo-mineral fertilizer production from sewage sludge. Waste Biomass Valor 8(5):1781–1791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9805-9
Kotoky P et al (2015) Chemical fractionation of heavy metals in soils around oil installations, Assam. Chem Speciat Bioavailab 15(4):115–126. https://doi.org/10.3184/095422903782775181
Kumar V, Chopra AK, Kumar V (2017) A review on sewage sludge (biosolids) a resource for sustainable agriculture. Arch Agri Environ Sci 2(4):340–347. https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2017.020417
Lake DL, Kirk PWW, Leste JN (1984) Fractionation characterization and speciation of heavy metals in sewage sludge and sludge-amended soils: a review. J Environ Qual 13:175–183. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1984.00472425001300020001x
Lamastra L, Suciu NA, Trevisan M (2018) Sewage sludge for sustainable agriculture: contaminants’ contents and potential use as fertilizer. Chem Biol Technol Agric 5(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-018-0122-3
Lasheen MR, Ammar NS (2009) Assessment of metals speciation in sewage sludge and stabilized sludge from different wastewater treatment plants, Greater Cairo, Egypt. J Hazard Mater 164(2–3):740–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.068
Latare AM et al (2014) Direct and residual effect of sewage sludge on yield, heavy metals content and soil fertility under rice–wheat system. Ecol Eng 69:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.066
Legret M, Divet L, Juste C (1988) Movement and speciation of heavy metals in a soil amended with sewage sludge containing large amount of cd and ni. Water Res 22:953–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(88)90141-8
Leichman AK (2017) Brazil looks to Israeli tech to solve a stinky problem: one technology, three uses. ISRAEL21c. https://www.israel21c.org/brazil-looks-to-israeli-tech-to-solve-a-stinky-problem/
Lester JN, Harrison RM, Perry R (1979) The balance of heavy metals through a sewage treatment works i. lead, cadmium and copper. Sci Total Environ 12:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(79)90003-2
Li J et al (2010) Use of the BCR sequential extraction procedure for the study of metal availability to plants. J Environ Monit 12(2):466–471. https://doi.org/10.1039/b916389a
Li Z, Wu XH, Zhang J Transformation of heavy metals from sewage sludge during bioleaching. 2nd International Conference on, Machinery (2015) Materials Engineering, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology (MMECEB 2015), pp 117–124. https://doi.org/10.2991/mmeceb-15.2016.25
Liang Z, Peng X, Luan Z (2011) Immobilization of cd, zn and pb in sewage sludge using red mud. Environ Earth Sci 66(5):1321–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1341-0
Liu JY, Sun SY (2013) Total concentrations and different fractions of heavy metals in sewage sludge from Guangzhou, China. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 23(8):2397–2407. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1003-6326(13)62747-8
Liu J et al (2022) Concentrations and species of mercury in municipal sludge of selected Chinese cities and potential mercury emissions from sludge treatment and disposal. Front Environ Sci 10:895075. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.895075
Malinowska E (2017) The effect of liming and sewage sludge application on heavy metal speciation in soil. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 98(1):105–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-016-1984-3
Mannina G, Viviani G (2009) Hybrid moving bed biofilm reactors: an effective solution for upgrading a large wastewater treatment plant. Water Sci Technol 60(5):1103–1116. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.416
Marchioretto MM (2003) Heavy metals removal from anaerobically digested sludge. Doctoral thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands, p 142
Mcgrath SP, Cegarra J (1992) Chemical extractability of heavy metals during and after long-term applications of sewage sludge to soil. J Soil Sci 43:313–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1992.tb00139.x
Mehrotra A, Mehrotra I, Tandon SN (2008) Speciation of copper and zinc in sewage sludge. Environ Technol Lett 10(2):195–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593338909384732
Meinzinger F, Oldenburg M (2009) Characteristics of source-separated household wastewater flows: a statistical assessment. Water Sci Technol 59(9):1785–1791. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.185
Men C et al (2018) Pollution characteristics, risk assessment, and source apportionment of heavy metals in road dust in Beijing, China. Sci Total Environ 612:138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.123
Meng WQ et al (2016) Heavy metals in soil and plants after long-term sewage irrigation at Tianjin China: a case study assessment. Agric Water Manag 171:153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.03.013
Milik J et al (2017) The concentration of trace elements in sewage sludge from wastewater treatment plant in Gniewino. J Ecol Eng 18(5):118–124. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/74628
Ministry of the Environment (2007) Government decree on the assessment of soil contamination and remediation needs. Ministry of the Environment Finland 214/2007. https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2007/en20070214.pdf
Mokhter M et al (2018) Use of modified colloids and membranes to remove metal ions from contaminated solutions. Colloids Interfaces 2(2):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids2020019
Morera MT, Echeverría JC, Garrido JJ (2001) Mobility of heavy metals in soils amended with sewage sludge. Can J Soil Sci 81(4):405–414. https://doi.org/10.4141/S00-043
Muller A et al (2020) The pollution conveyed by urban runoff: a review of sources. Sci Total Environ 709:136125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136125
Nahar N, Hossen MS (2021) Influence of sewage sludge application on soil properties, carrot growth and heavy metal uptake. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 52(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2020.1836201
Narwal RP, Singh BR, Salbu B (2008) Association of cadmium, zinc, copper, and nickel with components in naturally heavy metal-rich soils studied by parallel and sequential extractions. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 30(7–8):1209–1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629909370279
Natal-da-Luz T et al (2012) Short-term changes of metal availability in soil. Part I: comparing sludge-amended with metal-spiked soils. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 63(2):199–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-012-9763-6
National Research Council (1996) Use of reclaimed water and sludge in food crop production. In: Committee on the use of treated municipal Wastewater effluents and sludge in the production of crops for human consumption water science and technology board commission on geosciences, environment, and resources. National Academy Press, Washington
Nemati K et al (2009) A modification of the BCR sequential extraction procedure to investigate the potential mobility of copper and zinc in shrimp aquaculture sludge. Microchem J 92(2):165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2009.03.002
Nemerow NL (2006) Industrial waste treatment: contemporary practice and vision for the future, 1st edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, New York
Neumann P et al (2016) Developments in pre-treatment methods to improve anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 15(2):173–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-016-9396-8
Nevidomskaya DG et al (2021) Speciation of Zn and Cu in Technosol and evaluation of a sequential extraction procedure using XAS, XRD and SEM-EDX analyses. Environ Geochem Health 43(6):2301–2315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-020-00693-1
Nogueira TA et al (2013) Short-term usage of sewage sludge as organic fertilizer to sugarcane in a tropical soil bears little threat of heavy metal contamination. J Environ Manage 114:168–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.012
Oake RJ, Booker CS, Davis RD (1984) Fractionation of heavy metals in sewage sludges. Water Sci Technol 17:587–598. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1985.0162
Obbard JP (2001) Ecotoxicological assessment of heavy metals in sewage sludge amended soils. Appl Geochem 16:1405–1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00042-7
Oburger E et al (2020) Response of tungsten (W) solubility and chemical fractionation to changes in soil pH and soil aging. Sci Total Environ 731:139224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139224
Olaniran AO, Balgobind A, Pillay B (2013) Bioavailability of heavy metals in soil: impact on microbial biodegradation of organic compounds and possible improvement strategies. Int J Mol Sci 14(5):10197–10228. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140510197
Oliveira Ada S et al (2007) Heavy metals in untreated/treated urban effluent and sludge from a biological wastewater treatment plant. Environ Sci Pollut Res 14(7):483–489. https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2006.10.355
Orhue ER, Frank UO (2011) Fate of some heavy metals in soils: a review. J Appl Nat Sci 3:131–138. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v3i1.171
Pachpute SN (2022) Understanding sewage flow treatment: how do waste water treatment plants function? Primary treatment. https://cfdflowengineering.com/understanding-sewage-flow-treatment/
Parvin A et al (2022) Chemical speciation and potential mobility of heavy metals in organic matter amended soil. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2022:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2028860
Perez YG, Leite SGF, Coelho MAZ (2006) Activated sludge morphology characterization through an image analysis procedure. Braz J Chem Eng 23(3):319–330. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322006000300005
Pescod MB (1992) Wastewater treatment and use in agriculture-FAO irrigation and drainage paper 47. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Petersen J (2003) Nitrogen fertilizer replacement value of sewage sludge, composted household waste and farmyard manure. J Agric Sci 140(2):169–182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859603003010
Poblete IBS, Araujo OQF, de Medeiros JL (2022) Sewage-water treatment and sewage-sludge management with power production as bioenergy with carbon capture system: a review. Processes 10(4):788. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10040788
Pöykiö R, Watkinsc G, Dahl O (2018) Characterization of primary and secondary wastewater treatment sludge from a pulp and board mill complex to evaluate the feasibility of utilization as a soil amendment agent and a fertilizer product. J Bioresour Bioprod 3(3):88–95. https://doi.org/10.21967/jbb.v3i3.174
Pöykiö R, Watkins G, Dahl O (2019) Characterisation of municipal sewage sludge as a soil improver and a fertilizer product. Ecol Chem Eng S 26(3):547–557. https://doi.org/10.1515/eces-2019-0040
Praspaliauskas M, Pedišius N (2017) A review of sludge characteristics in Lithuania’s wastewater treatment plants and perspectives of its usage in thermal processes. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev 67:899–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.041
Prica M et al (2010) Changes in metal availability during sediment oxidation and the correlation with the immobilization potential. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 73(6):1370–1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.06.014
Qasem NAA, Mohammed RH, Lawal DU (2021) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: a comprehensive and critical review. NPJ Clean Water 4(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-021-00127-0
Rahman N, Schoenau J (2022) Bioavailability, speciation, and crop responses to copper, zinc, and boron fertilization in South-Central Saskatchewan soil. Agronomy 12(8):1837. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081837
Rauret G et al (1999) Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials. J Environ Monit 1:57–61. https://doi.org/10.1039/A807854H
Razak AR et al (2016) Physiochemicals and heavy metal removal from domestic wastewater via phycoremediation. MATEC Web of Conferences 47:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20164705003
Ribeiro P et al (2010) Recycling pulp mill sludge to improve soil fertility using GIS tools. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(12):1303–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.05.009
Rieuwerts JS et al (2015) Factors influencing metal bioavailability in soils: preliminary investigations for the development of a critical loads approach for metals. Chem Speciat Bioavailab 10(2):61–75. https://doi.org/10.3184/095422998782775835
Rodrigo Sanz M, Millan Gabet V, Gonzalez JL (2021) Inputs of total and labile dissolved metals from six facilities continuously discharging treated wastewaters to the marine environment of Gran Canaria Island (Canary Islands, Spain). Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(21):11582. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111582
Roman MD et al (2022) Biological activated sludge from wastewater treatment plant before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(18):11323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811323
Romdhana MH et al (2009) Monitoring of pathogenic microorganisms contamination during heat drying process of sewage sludge. Process Saf Environ Prot 87:377–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2009.08.003
Rosazlin A et al (2007) Domestic sewage sludge application to an acid tropical soil: part III: fractionation study of heavy metals in sewage sludge and soils applied with sewage sludge. Malaysian J Soil Sci 11:81–95
Safe Drinking Water Foundation (2022) Wastewater treatment: how do cities treat wastewater, to make it safe for discharge? https://www.safewater.org/fact-sheets-1/2017/1/23/wastewater-treatment
Saha S et al (2017) Agricultural use of sewage sludge in India: benefits and potential risk of heavy metals contamination and possible remediation options-a review. Int J Environ Technol Manage 20(3/4):183–199. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijetm.2017.10010695
Saha S et al (2018) Assessing the suitability of sewage-sludge produced in Kolkata, India for their agricultural use. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad 97:781–792. https://doi.org/10.16943/ptinsa/2018/49410
Sahito OM et al (2015) Evaluation of heavy metal bioavailability in soil amended with poultry manure using single and BCR sequential extractions. Int J Environ Anal Chem 95(11):1066–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2015.1078800
Saxlund (2022) Sludge cake storage, reclaiming and conveying: piece of cake. https://www.saxlundgroup.com/en/industries/waste-water/
Scheckel KG et al (2010) Synchrotron speciation of silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles aged in a kaolin suspension. Environ Sci Technol 44:1307–1312. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9032265
Schiptsova N et al (2020) Effect of sewage sludge application on heavy metals contamination in soil and carrot. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 604(1):012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/604/1/012034
Sekhar KC et al (2002) Speciation, accumulation of heavy metals in vegetation grown on sludge amended soils and their transfer to human food chain-a case study. Toxicol Environ Chem 82(1–2):33–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/716067220
Seyedi S, Venkiteshwaran K, Zitomer D (2021) Current status of biomethane production using aqueous liquid from pyrolysis and hydrothermal liquefaction of sewage sludge and similar biomass. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 20(1):237–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09560-y
Shajib MTI et al (2019) Metals in surface specific urban runoff in Beijing. Environ Pollut 248:584–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.039
Shamuyarira KK, Gumbo JR (2014) Assessment of heavy metals in municipal sewage sludge: a case study of Limpopo province, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11(3):2569–2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110302569
Sherene T (2010) Mobility and transport of heavy metals in polluted soil environment. In Biol Forum 2:112–121
Shiota K et al (2015) Emission of particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) from sewage sludge incinerators in Japan. Dry Technol 33:1286–1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2015.1026977
Shrivastava SK, Banerjee DK (2004) Speciation of metals in sewage sludge and sludge-amended soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 152:219–232. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WATE.0000015364.19974.36
Singh V, Phuleria HC, Chandel MK (2020) Estimation of energy recovery potential of sewage sludge in India: waste to watt approach. J Clean Prod 276:122538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122538
Škarpa P et al (2011) Effect of organic matter and pH on the mobility of some heavy metals in soils of permanent grasslands in the foothills of the Hruby Jesenik MTS. Ecol Chem Eng A 18:1347–1354
Solís GJ, Alonso E, Riesco P (2002) Distribution of metal extractable fractions during anaerobic sludge treatment in southern Spain WWTPs. Water Air Soil Pollut 140(1/4):139–156. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020128605211
Sorme L, Lagerkvist R (2002) Sources of heavy metals in urban wastewater in Stockholm. Sci Total Environ 298:131–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00197-3
Sowunmi K, Titilayo S, Sowunmi L (2020) Seasonal bioavailability of heavy metal contaminants from the University of Lagos Lagoon, Nigeria. Res Sq. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-46411/v1
Spinosa L (2007) Water21 market briefing series–wastewater sludge: a global overview of the current status and future prospects (2nd edn). IWA Publishing Ltd, UK. https://iwaponline.com/ebooks/book/445/Wastewater-sludge-a-global-overview-of-the-current?redirectedFrom=PDF
Stoveland S et al (1979) The balance of heavy metals through a sewage treatment works ii. Chromium, nickel and zinc. Sci Total Environ 12:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(79)90004-4
Suanon F et al (2016) Utilization of sewage sludge in agricultural soil as fertilizer in the Republic of Benin (West Africa): what are the risks of heavy metals contamination and spreading? Am J Environ Sci 12(1):8–15. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2016.8.15
Sungur A, Soylak M, Ozcan H (2014) Investigation of heavy metal mobility and availability by the BCR sequential extraction procedure: relationship between soil properties and heavy metals availability. Chem Speciat Bioavailab 26(4):219–230. https://doi.org/10.3184/095422914x14147781158674
Sungur A et al (2014) Determination of heavy metals in sediments of the Ergene River by BCR sequential extraction method. Environ Earth Sci 72(9):3293–3305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3233-6
Świnder H, Lejwoda P (2021) Obtaining nickel concentrates from sludge produced in the process of electrochemical metal surface treatment. Water Air Soil Pollut 232(12):505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05456-x
Sylwan I, Thorin E (2021) Removal of heavy metals during primary treatment of municipal wastewater and possibilities of enhanced removal: a review. Water 13(8):1121. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13081121
Tarpani RRZ et al (2020) Life cycle environmental impacts of sewage sludge treatment methods for resource recovery considering ecotoxicity of heavy metals and pharmaceutical and personal care products. J Environ Manage 260:109643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109643
Teoh SK, Li LY (2020) Feasibility of alternative sewage sludge treatment methods from a lifecycle assessment (LCA) perspective. J Clean Prod 247:119495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119495
Thornton I et al (2001) Pollutants in urban waste water and sewage sludge. Final Report for Directorate-General Environment. ICON, IC Consultants Ltd London, UK. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/waste/sludge/pdf/sludge_pollutants.pdf
Tokalioğlu Ş, Kartal Ş, Gültekın A (2006) Investigation of heavy-metal uptake by vegetables growing in contaminated soils using the modified BCR sequential extraction method. Int J Environ Anal Chem 86(6):417–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067310500352387
Tong L et al (2020) Evaluation of the BCR sequential extraction scheme for trace metal fractionation of alkaline municipal solid waste incineration fly ash. Chemosphere 249:126115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126115
Topcuoğlu B (2014) Speciation and bioavailability of heavy metals in long-term sewage sludge-amended soil. Int J Adv Agric Environ Eng 1(1):15–18. https://doi.org/10.15242/ijccie.C1113011
Turek A, Wieczorek K, Wolf WM (2019) Digestion procedure and determination of heavy metals in sewage sludge-an analytical problem. Sustainability 11(6):1753. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061753
Turovskiy IS, Mathai PK (2006) Wastewater sludge processing. Wiley, Hoboken
Tytla M (2019) Assessment of heavy metal pollution and potential ecological risk in sewage sludge from municipal wastewater treatment plant located in the most industrialized region in Poland-case study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(13):2430. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132430
Tytla M (2020) Identification of the chemical forms of heavy metals in municipal sewage sludge as a critical element of ecological risk assessment in terms of its agricultural or natural use. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(13):4640. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134640
Tytla M, Widziewicz K, Zielewicz E (2016) Heavy metals and its chemical speciation in sewage sludge at different stages of processing. Environ Technol 37(7):899–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2015.1090482
Tytła M, Widziewicz-Rzońca K (2021) Heavy metals in municipal sewage sludge – a brief characteristic of potential threats and methods used to assess the ecological risk. Environ Earth Ecol 5:18–25. https://doi.org/10.24051/eee/134276
Tytła M et al (2023) First comprehensive analysis of potential ecological risk and factors influencing heavy metals binding in sewage sludge from wwtps using the ultrasonic disintegration process. Water 15(4):666. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040666
Ullrich SM, Ramsey MH, Helios-Rybicka E (1999) Total and exchangeable concentrations of heavy metals in soils near Bytom, an area of Pb/Zn mining and smelting in Upper Silesia, Poland. Appl Geochem 14(2):187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-2927(98)00042-0
United Nations (2022) World population to reach 8 billion on 15 November 2022. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/desa/world-population-reach-8-billion-15-november-2022
US Army (1987) Evaluation criteria guide for water pollution prevention, control, and abatement programs. Tech Man TM 5-814-8. https://wbdg.org/ffc/army-coe/technical-manuals-tm/tm-5-814-8
Usman K et al (2012) Sewage sludge: an important biological resource for sustainable agriculture and its environmental implications. Am J Plant Sci 3(12):1708–1721. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2012.312209
Venkateswaran P, Vellaichamy S, Palanivelu K (2007) Speciation of heavy metals in electroplating industry sludge and wastewater residue using inductively coupled plasma. Int J Environ Sci Technol 4:497–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325986
Vollprecht D et al (2020) Sequential chemical extraction and mineralogical bonding of metals from styrian soils. Int J Environ Sci Technol 17(8):3663–3676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02694-0
Wang W (2021) Analysis and discussion on operation stability of urban sewage treatment plant. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 657(1):012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/657/1/012001
Wang XL, Li Y (2012) Distribution and fractionation of heavy metals in long-term and short-term contaminated sediments. Environ Eng Sci 29(7):617–622. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2011.0122
Wang C et al (2006) Distribution of extractable fractions of heavy metals in sludge during the wastewater treatment process. J Hazard Mater 137(3):1277–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.04.026
Water Technology (2018) Eliminating soluble heavy metal ions from industrial wastewater: a plating industry example illustrates wastewater treatment variables. https://www.watertechonline.com/wastewater/article/15550684/eliminating-soluble-heavy-metal-ions-from-industrial-wastewater
Wijeyawardana P et al (2022) Improvement of heavy metal removal from urban runoff using modified pervious concrete. Sci Total Environ 815:152936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.152936
Wisconsin DNR (1992) Advanced anaerobic digestion study guide, Subclass F- June 1992 Edition. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Bureau of Science Services Operation Certification Program https://dnr.wi.gov/regulations/opcert/documents/wwsganaerobdigadv.pdf
Wluka AK et al (2021) Structural diversity of organic contaminants in sewage sludge: a comparison of sewage fingerprints from Germany and China. Discover Water 1:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43832-021-00004-4
Woo DCY et al (2022) A technoeconomic analysis of sewage sludge valorization for carbon emission reduction. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02922-2
Wu SC et al (2006) Influence of bacteria on Pb and Zn speciation, mobility and bioavailability in soil: a laboratory study. Environ Pollut 144(3):765–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2006.02.022
Xu JQ et al (2012) Effects of municipal sewage sludge stabilized by fly ash on the growth of Manilagrass and transfer of heavy metals. J Hazard Mater 217–218:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.02.065
Xu T et al (2020) Effect of soil pH on the transport, fractionation, and oxidation of chromium(III). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 195:110459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110459
Yakamercan E, Aygün A (2021) Ecological risk assessment of domestic sewage sludge-a case study. Sigma J Eng Nat Sci 39(4):422–433. https://doi.org/10.14744/sigma.2021.00030
Yan A et al (2020) Phytoremediation: a promising approach for revegetation of heavy metal-polluted land. Front Plant Sci 11:359. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00359
Yang SL et al (2013) Distribution and speciation of metals (Cu, Zn, Cd, and pb) in agricultural and non-agricultural soils near a stream upriver from the Pearl River, China. Environ Pollut 177:64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.01.044
Yang J et al (2014) Current status and developing trends of the contents of heavy metals in sewage sludges in China. Front Environ Sci Eng 8(5):719–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0600-6
Yuan SJ, Dai XH (2016) Facile synthesis of sewage sludge-derived in-situ multi-doped nanoporous carbon material for electrocatalytic oxygen reduction. Sci Rep 6:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27570
Zaharia C (2017) Comparative overview of primary sedimentation-based mechanical stage in some Romanian wastewater treatment systems. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 227:012138. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/227/1/012138
Zaragüeta A et al (2021) Effect of the long-term application of sewage sludge to a calcareous soil on its total and bioavailable content in trace elements, and their transfer to the crop. Minerals 11(4):356. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11040356
Zdeb M, Pawłowska M, Pacan J (2020) The influence of anaerobic digestion on selected heavy metals fractionation in sewage sludge. J Ecol Eng 21(3):27–35. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/118302
Zhang H (2015) The bioavailability and evolution of trace metals in environment. JSM Environ Sci Ecol 3:1–4. https://doi.org/10.15377/2410-3624.2016.03.01.1
Zhang X, Wang XQ, Wang DF (2017) Immobilization of heavy metals in sewage sludge during land application process in China: a review. Sustainability 9(11):1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112020
Zheng SN, Zhang MK (2011) Effect of moisture regime on the redistribution of heavy metals in paddy soil. J Environ Sci 23(3):434–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1001-0742(10)60428-7
Ziolko D et al (2011) An evaluation of metal removal during wastewater treatment: the potential to achieve more stringent final effluent standards. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41:733–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380903140299
Zita A, Hermansson M (1994) Effects of ionic strength on bacterial adhesion and stability of flocs in a wastewater activated sludge system. Appl Environ Microbiol 60(9):3041–3048. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.60.9.3041-3048.1994
Zoghlami RI et al (2018) Seasonal toxicity variation in light-textured soil amended with urban sewage sludge: interaction effect on cadmium, nickel, and phytotoxicity. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25(4):3608–3615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0637-3
Zoghlami RI et al (2020) Monitoring the variation of soil quality with sewage sludge application rates in absence of rhizosphere effect. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 8(3):245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2020.07.007
Zorpas AA, Inglezakis VJ, Loizidou M (2008) Heavy metals fractionation before, during and after composting of sewage sludge with natural zeolite. Waste Manage 28(11):2054–2060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.006
Zuo W et al (2019) Sewage sludge amendment improved soil properties and sweet sorghum yield and quality in a newly reclaimed mudflat land. Sci Total Environ 654:541–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.127
Funding
This work was supported by China Scholarship Council - University of Leeds Joint Scholarship (202006710002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JF Investigation; Writing—Original Draft; ITB Supervision; Writing—Review and Editing.; XC Supervision; Writing—Review and Editing; DIS Supervision; Writing—Review and Editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, J., Burke, I.T., Chen, X. et al. Assessing metal contamination and speciation in sewage sludge: implications for soil application and environmental risk. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 22, 1037–1058 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-023-09675-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-023-09675-y