Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to explore the role of morphological awareness in reading comprehension in different language learning contexts (ESL and EFL). Korean ESL and Korean EFL learners (50 and 257 respectively) in grades five and six were administered measures of L2 (English) morphological, phonological, and orthographic awareness (MA, PA, and OA), as well as reading comprehension. The participants’ L1 (Korean) MA was also measured. The multiple-group path analysis showed that among both group participants’ L2 MA was the greatest predictor for their L2 reading comprehension, when the effect of PA and OA was controlled (within-linguistic perspective). Concerning cross-linguistic perspective, there was a statistically significant difference between the ESL and the EFL groups: the ESL participants’ L1 MA played a positive role in predicting their L2 reading comprehension, but not for their EFL counterparts. Educational implications and research recommendations are discussed in relation to MA’s contribution to reading comprehension.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The ability to process phonemes is typically called phonemic awareness, whereas phonological awareness is general term referring to the ability to manipulate several units of spoken languages, such as syllables or onsets and rimes in addition to phonemes.
The researcher-developed KMA was initially examined by one of the KLS school teachers to make sure the test items were appropriate for the fifth- and sixth-grade Korean ESL students. Eight students in the school were pilot tested, and no floor or ceiling effects were found.
References
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Nagy, W., & Carlisle, J. F. (2010). Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9130-6.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.
Carlo, M. S., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C., Dressler, C., Lippman, D., et al. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 188–215.
Carter, R., & Nunan, D. (Eds.). (2001). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cassar, M. T., & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginning of orthographic knowledge: Children’s knowledge of double letters in words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 631–644.
Cho, J.-R., Chiu, M. M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2011). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and literacy development in Korean and English: A 2-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 383–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.487143.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.
Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education & S. Amrita (Eds.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3–49). Los Angeles, LA: Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center California State University.
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001110.
Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Farran, L. K., Bingham, G. E., & Matthews, M. W. (2012). The relationship between language and reading in bilingual English–Arabic children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 2153–2181. https://doi.org/10.1007/211145-011-9352-5.
Goodwin, A. P., Huggins, A. C., Carlo, M. S., August, D., & Calderon, M. (2013). Minding morphology: How morphological awareness relates to reading for English language learners. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26, 1387–1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9412-5.
Gottardo, A., Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1996). The relationships between phonological sensitivity, syntactic processing and verbal working memory in the reading performance of third-grade children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 563–582.
Hu, C.-F. (2013). Predictors of reading in children with Chinese as a first language: A developmental and cross-linguistic perspective. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26, 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9360-0.
Jeon, E. H. (2011). Contribution of morphological awareness to second-language reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01179.x.
Jongejan, W., Verhoeven, L., & Siegel, L. (2007). Predictors of reading and spelling abilities in first- and second-language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 835–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.835.
Kachru, B. B. (1989). Teaching word Englishes. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15, 85–95.
Kieffer, M. J., & Box, C. D. (2013). Derivational morphological awareness, academic vocabulary, and reading comprehension in linguistically diverse sixth graders. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.017.
Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2008). The role of derivational morphology in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9092-8.
Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012a). Direct and indirect roles of morphological awareness in the English reading comprehension of native English, Spanish, Filipino, and Vietnamese speakers. Language Learning, 62, 1170–1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00722.x.
Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012b). Knowledge of words, knowledge about words: Dimensions of vocabulary in first and second language learners in sixth grade. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 347–373.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Koda, K. (2008). Impacts of prior literacy experience on second language learning to read. In K. Koda & A. Zehler (Eds.), Learning to read across languages (pp. 68–97). New York, NY: Routledge.
Kuo, L.-J., & Anderson, R. C. (2010). Beyond cross-language transfer: Reconceptualizing the impact of early bilingualism on phonological awareness. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888431003623470.
MacGinitie, W., MacGinitie, R., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie reading test (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.
Mahfoundhi, A., Elbeheri, G., Al-Rashidi, M., & Everatt, J. (2010). The role of morphological awareness in reading comprehension among typical and learning disabled native Arabic speakers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409355478.
McBride-Chang, C. (1996). Models of speech perception and phonological processing in reading. Child Development, 67, 1836–1856.
McBride-Chang, C., Cho, J.-R., Liu, H., Wagner, R. K., Shu, H., Zhou, A., et al. (2005a). Changing models across cultures: Associations of phonological awareness and morphological structure awareness with vocabulary and word recognition in second graders from Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, and the United States. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.03.009.
McBride-Chang, C., Tardif, T., Cho, J.-R., Shu, H., Fletcher, P., Stokes, S. F., et al. (2008). What’s in a word? Morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge in three languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640909020X.
McBride-Chang, C., Wagner, R. K., Muse, A., Chow, B. W., & Shu, H. (2005b). The role of morphological awareness in children’s vocabulary acquisition in English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640505023X.
Nagy, W. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In R. K. Wagner, A. E. Muse, & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 52–77). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Nagy, W., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.134.
Pasquarella, A., Chen, X., Lam, K., Luo, Y. C., & Ramirez, G. (2011). Cross-language transfer of morphological awareness in Chinese–English bilinguals. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01484.x.
Ramirez, G., Chen, X., Geva, E., & Kiefer, H. (2010). Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: Within and cross-language effects on word reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9.
Ramirez, G., Chen, X., & Pasquarella, A. (2013). Cross-linguistic transfer of morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners. Topics in Language Disorders, 33(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e318280f55a.
Rasinski, T., Padak, N., Newton, J., & Neton, E. (2011). The Latin-Greek connection: Building vocabulary through morphological study. The Reading Teacher, 65, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01015.
Sherry, A. (2006). Discriminant analysis in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 661–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287103.
Siegel, L. S., Share, D., & Geva, E. (1995). Evidence for superior orthographic skills in dyslexics. Psychological Science, 6, 250–254.
Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Wagner, A. E., Muse, A. E., & Tannenbaum, K. R. (2007). Promising avenues for better understanding implications of vocabulary development for reading comprehension. In R. K. Wagner, A. E. Muse, & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 276–291). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87.
Wang, M., Cheng, C., & Chen, S.-W. (2006). Contribution of morphological awareness to Chinese–English biliteracy acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 542–553. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.542.
Wang, M., Ko, I. Y., & Choi, J. (2009). The importance of morphological awareness in Korean-English biliteracy acquisition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.002.
Wang, M., Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2005). Chinese–English biliteracy acquisition: cross-language and writing system transfer. Cognition, 97, 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.001.
Zhang, D., & Koda, K. (2012). Contribution of morphological awareness and lexical inferencing ability to L2 vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension among advanced EFL learners: Testing direct and indirect effects. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1195–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9313-z.
Zhang, D., & Koda, K. (2013). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension in a foreign language: A study of young Chinese EFL learners. System, 41, 901–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.09.009.
Acknowledgement
We are very grateful to all teachers and parents in the Korean language schools in Southern Texas, the U.S., and the Korean elementary schools in Seoul, Korea, for their cooperation. Special thanks also go to the students for their willing participation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bae, H.S., Joshi, R.M. A multiple-group comparison on the role of morphological awareness in reading: within- and cross-linguistic evidence from Korean ESL and EFL learners. Read Writ 31, 1821–1841 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9795-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9795-4