Skip to main content
Log in

Conversion of Electrical and Synaptic Actions into Impulse Discharge Patterns in Purkinje Neurons with Active Dendrites: A Simulation Study

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

We studied relations between the cell output spiking patterns (neuronal codes) and the intensity of input signals on a model of cerebellar Purkinje neuron with reconstructed dendritic arborization and nonlinear membrane properties. The input influences were either a depolarizing current, I s, applied at the soma or tonic synaptic excitation resulting in a synaptic conductivity, G s homogeneously distributed over the dendrites. The spiking patterns were distinguished based on periodical or nonperiodical (stochastic) sequences of spikes and/or their groups (bursts). The role of dendrites in pattern forming was revealed from time-varying spatial distributions of the dendritic membrane potential and the corresponding voltages in the soma and distal axon. As integrative indicators, interspike intervals, ISIs, and mean firing rates, f, characterized the output spiking, while mean voltage differences, ΔĒ, between the remotest equidistant sites in all pairs of the sister dendrite branches characterized the electrical heterogeneity of the arborization. To explore a wide range of conditions, I st and G s were varied, respectively, from 0.55 to 1.4 nA and from 50 μS/cm2 to 7 mS/cm2 On average, the output firing rate f increased with increased intensities of either input signal. The f-I st and f-G s relations, however, differed from each other. The former was an approximately logarithmic function with small deviations at mid-range currents, while the latter was a nonmonotonically increasing function with remarkable slope breaks within an intermediate Gs range. Within the intensity ranges, the electrical heterogeneity of the arborization ΔĒ increased with greater I st, but it first increased and then decreased with increasing G s. The leading pattern-forming factor of dendritic origin consists of transitions of the dendritic domains between states of spatially homogeneous near-resting depolarization (down-state) and spatially heterogeneous high depolarization (up-state) manifested as the appearance of slow plateau-like depolarization potentials. The latter were generated with phase shifts between dendritic subtrees in response to the applied current I st > 1.5 nA (about threefold greater than the threshold current) or in response to synaptic activation of low (G s ≤ 66 μS/cm2) and high (G s > 75 μS/cm2), but not intermediate intensities. Under these conditions, the output patterns were either continuous firing with nearly constant ISIs or simple periodical sequences of identical bursts accompanied by moderate elevations of ΔĒ. At intermediate synaptic intensities, the synchronous transitions were periodically perturbed by nonsynchronous ones, leading to generation of several dissimilar bursts or “single spike-burst” complexes. These events were associated with the largest ΔĒ elevations indicating the greatest electrical heterogeneity of the arborization. Such desynchronized transitions are explained by the existence of an asymmetry-induced difference in the transfer properties of the dendrite subtrees, leading to increased differences in the electrical states. We conclude that the dendritic arborization of Purkinje neurons behaves like a complex of high-threshold low-frequency spatial electrical oscillators, while the axo-somatic trigger zone has a low threshold and is capable of providing a high firing frequency. These properties determine the conversion of the input signal intensity into output firing patterns depending on which of these coupled oscillators is at present the predominant receiver of the input signal and also on the input intensity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. C. Magee, “Voltage-gated channels in dendrites,” in: Dendrites, G. Stuart, N. Spruston, and M. Hausser (eds.), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (1999), pp. 139-160.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Z. F. Mainen and T. J. Sejnowski, “Influence of dendritic structure on firing pattern in model neocortical neurons,” Nature, 382, 363-366 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. F. Fohlmeister and R. F. Miller, “Mechanisms by which cell geometry controls repetitive impulse firing in retinal ganglion cells,” J. Neurophysiol., 78, No. 4, 1948-1964 (1997).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. L. Krichmar, S. J. Nasuto, R. Scorcioni, et al., “Effects of dendritic morphology on CA3 pyramidal cell electrophysiology: a simulation study,” Brain Res., 941, Nos. 1/2, 11-28 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. M. Korogod and S. Tyc-Dumont, Electrical Dynamics of the Dendritic Space, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, et al. (2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. I. B. Kulagina, V. I. Kukushka, and S. M. Korogod, “Structure-dependent electrical and concentration processes in the dendrites of pyramidal neurons of the superficial neocortical layers: model study,” Neurophysiology, 43, No. 2, 95-108 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. I. B. Kulagina, “Patterns of impulsation generated by abducens motoneurons with active reconstructed dendrites: a simulation study,” Neurophysiology, 43, No. 5, 389-398 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. B. Kulagina, “Features of active electrical states of asymmetrical dendrites of brainstem motoneurons during generation of stochastic impulse patterns: a simulation study,” Neurophysiology, 44, No. 1, 1-6 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. I. B. Kulagina and S. M. Korogod, “Biophysical mechanisms of structure dependence of Purkinje neuron output discharge. A simulation study,” Sci. Not. Tavrida V. I. Vernadsky Nat. Univ., Ser. Biology, Chemistry, 24(63), No. 4, 138-150 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. M. Bekkers and M. Häusser, “Targeted dendrotomy reveals active and passive contributions of the dendritic tree to synaptic integration and neuronal output,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, No. 27, 11447-11452 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. M. Korogod, I. B. Kulagina, and V. I. Kukoushka, “Impulse coding of electrical and synaptic input actions by nucl. abducens motoneurons with active dendrites: a simulation study,” Neurophysiology, 44, No. 2, 89-97 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. L. Hines and N. T. Carnevale, “Neuron – a tool for neuroscientists,” Neuroscientist, 7, 123-135 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. I. B. Kulagina, S. M. Korogod, G. Horcholle-Bossavit, et al., “The electrodynamics of the dendritic space in Purkinje cells of the cerebellum,” Arch. Ital. Biol., 145, 211-233 (2007).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. E. De Schutter and J. Bower, “An active membrane model of the cerebellar Purkinje cell 1. Simulation of current-clamps in slice,” J. Neurophysiol., 71, 375–400 (1994).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. T. Miyasho, H. Takagi, H. Suzuki, et al., “Low-threshold potassium channels and a low-threshold calcium channel regulate Ca2+ spike firing in the dendrites of cerebellar Purkinje neurons: a modeling study,” Brain Res., 891, 106–115 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. M. Korogod and A. V. Kaspirzhny, “Parameter sensitivity of distributed transfer properties of neuronal dendrites: a passive cable approximation,” Biol. Cybern., 98, No. 2, 87-100 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. S. M. Korogod and A. V. Kaspirzhny, “Spatial heterogeneity of passive electrical transfer properties of neuronal dendrites due to their metrical asymmetry,” Biol. Cybern., 105, Nos. 5/6, 305-317 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. L. F. Abbott, “Realistic synaptic inputs for model neural networks,” Network, 2, 245-258 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. M. Korogod, I. Kulagina, G. Horcholle-Bossavit, et al., “Activity-dependent reconfiguration of the effective dendritic field of motoneurons,” J. Comp. Neurol., 442, 18-34 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. L. Shin, F. E. Hoebeek, M. Schonewille, et al., “Regular patterns in cerebellar Purkinje cell simple spike trains,” PLoS One, 2, No. 5, e485 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. E. De Schutter and V. Steuber, “Patterns and pauses in Purkinje cell simple spike trains: experiments, modeling and theory,” Neuroscience, 162, No. 3, 816-826 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. М. Коrogod.

Additional information

The names of V. I. Kukoushka mentioned in Neurophysiology, 44, No. 2, and V. I. Kukushka in this paper are transliterated versions of the name of the same person.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Кulagina, I.B., Launey, T., Кukushka, V.I. et al. Conversion of Electrical and Synaptic Actions into Impulse Discharge Patterns in Purkinje Neurons with Active Dendrites: A Simulation Study. Neurophysiology 44, 187–200 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-012-9286-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-012-9286-9

Keywords

Navigation