Skip to main content
Log in

Examination of Changes in Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Epistemological Beliefs in Science and Exploration of Factors Meditating That Change

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Epistemological beliefs refer to an individual’s thinking and beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing. The present study examined two research questions: (1) how do prospective elementary teachers’ epistemological beliefs in science change as a result of instruction specifically designed to improve their epistemological beliefs and (2) what role does the conceptual ecology for epistemological beliefs play in their development? The study was correlational with a sample of 161 prospective elementary teachers (148 female, 13 male). Self-report questionnaires tapping four dimensions of epistemological beliefs (certainty-simplicity, justification, source, attainability of truth) were given to prospective elementary teachers at two time points during an introductory science course. Results indicated that prospective elementary teachers became more sophisticated in their beliefs across all four dimensions of epistemological beliefs. It was found that one component of conceptual ecology for epistemological beliefs, thinking dispositions, was related to the development of epistemological beliefs. Prospective teachers with high thinking dispositions developed more sophisticated beliefs in comparison to prospective teachers with low thinking dispositions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick F (2001) Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses: abandoning scientism, but…. J Sci Teacher Educ 12(3):215–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick F (2002) Rutherford’s enlarged: a content-embedded activity to teach about NOS. Phys Educ 37(1):64–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick F, Akerson VL (2004) Learning as conceptual change: factors that mediate the development of preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science. Sci Educ 88(5):785–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson VL, Abd-El-Khalick FS, Lederman NG (2000) Influence of a reflective activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 37(4):295–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson VL, Morrison JA, McDuffie AR (2006) One course is not enough: preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 43(2):194–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1993) Benchmarks for science literacy: a project 2061 report. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderman EM, Young AJ (1994) Motivation and strategy use in science: individual differences and classroom effects. J Res Sci Teach 31:811–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin JA, Ebert-May D, Burns D (1999) The development of a college biology self-efficacy instrument for nonmajors. Sci Educ 83:397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse NW (1989) The teaching of the philosophy of science in secondary classrooms: case studies of teachers’ personal theories. Int J Sci Educ 11(4):437–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr M, Barker M, Bell B, Biddulph F, Jones A, Kirkwood V, Pearson J, Symington D (1994) The constructivist paradigm and some implications for science content and pedagogy. In: Fensham PJ, Gunstone RF, White RT (eds) The content of science: a constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. Taylor & Francis, Bristol, pp 147–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers AF (1982) What is this thing called science?, 3rd edn. University of Queensland Press, Queensland (Chapters 1 and 2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough MP (2006) Learners’ response to the demands of conceptual change: considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Sci Educ 15:463–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobern WW, Loving CC (1998) The card exchange: introducing the philosophy of science. In: McComas W (ed) The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies. Kluwer, Dordercht, pp 73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot AJ, McGregor HA, Gable S (1999) Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: a mediational analysis. J Educ Psychol 91(3):549–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haydel AM, Roeser WR (2002) On motivation, ability, and perceived situation in science test performance: a person-centered approach with high school students. Educ Assess 8(2):163–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewson PW, Beeth ME, Thorley R (1998) Teaching for conceptual change. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin KG (eds) International handbook of science education, part 1. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 199–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer BK (1997) The development of personal epistemology: dimensions, disciplinary differences, and instructional practices. Doctoral dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  • Hofer BK (2002) Personal epistemology as a psychological and educational construct: an introduction. In: Hofer BK, Pintrich PR (eds) Personal epistemology: the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman NG, Abd-El-Khalick F (1998) Avoiding de-natured science: activities that promote understanding of the nature of science. In: McComas W (ed) The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies. Kluwer, Dordercht, pp 83–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman NG, Abd-El-Khalick F, Bell RL, Schwartz RS (2002) View of Nature of Science Questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 39:497–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin RM (2000) Scientific thinking. Broadview Press, Ontario, pp 216–222

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas W (1996) Ten myths of science: reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. Sch Sci Math 9(1):10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan JH, Forsyth DR (1991) What theories of motivation say about why learners learn. In: Menges R, Svinicki M (eds) College teaching: from theory to practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Meece JL, Blumenfeld PC, Hoyle RH (1988) Students’ goal orientation and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. J Educ Psychol 80:514–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley C, Kaplan A, Middleton M, Maehr M, Urdan T, Anderman LH, Anderman E, Roeser R (1998) The development and validation of scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemp Educ Psychol 23:113–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academic Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolen SB (1988) Reasons for studying: motivational orientations and study strategies. Cogn Instr 5:269–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich PR, Marx RW, Boyle RA (1993) Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Rev Educ Res 63(2):167–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Sá WC, West RF, Stanovich KE (1999) The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. J Educ Psychol 91:497–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagan C (1996) The most precious thing. In the demon-haunted world. Random House, New York, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw G, Dennison RS (1994) Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemp Educ Psychol 19:460–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz RS, Lederman NG (2002) “It’s the nature of the beast”: the influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 39(3):205–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra GM, Kardash CA (2004) Teacher candidates’ epistemologcial beliefs, dispositions, and views on teaching as persuasion. Contemp Educ Psychol 29(4):483–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CL, Wenk L (2006) Relations among three aspects of first-year college students’ epistemologies of science. J Res Sci Teach 43(8):747–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich KE, West RF (1997) Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. J Educ Psychol 89(2):342–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich KE, West RF (2007) Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Think Reason 13(3):225–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai C (2002) Nested epistemologies: science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning, and science. Int J Sci Educ 24(8):771–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai C (2007) Teachers’ scientific epistemological views: the coherence with instruction and students’ views. Sci Educ 91:222–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watercourse & Council for Environmental Education (1995) Project wet: curriculum & activity guide

  • White RT (1998) Decisions and problems in research on metacognition. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin KG (eds) International handbook of science education. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1207–1213

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters CA (2004) Advancing achievement goal theory: using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. J Educ Psychol 96(2):236–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yerrick RK, Pedersen JE, Arnason J (1998) “We’re just spectators”: a case study of science teaching, epistemology, and classroom management. Sci Educ 82:619–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Dr. Janelle Bailey and anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback in improving this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasan Deniz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deniz, H. Examination of Changes in Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Epistemological Beliefs in Science and Exploration of Factors Meditating That Change. J Sci Educ Technol 20, 750–760 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9268-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9268-x

Keywords

Navigation