Abstract
Epistemological beliefs refer to an individual’s thinking and beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing. The present study examined two research questions: (1) how do prospective elementary teachers’ epistemological beliefs in science change as a result of instruction specifically designed to improve their epistemological beliefs and (2) what role does the conceptual ecology for epistemological beliefs play in their development? The study was correlational with a sample of 161 prospective elementary teachers (148 female, 13 male). Self-report questionnaires tapping four dimensions of epistemological beliefs (certainty-simplicity, justification, source, attainability of truth) were given to prospective elementary teachers at two time points during an introductory science course. Results indicated that prospective elementary teachers became more sophisticated in their beliefs across all four dimensions of epistemological beliefs. It was found that one component of conceptual ecology for epistemological beliefs, thinking dispositions, was related to the development of epistemological beliefs. Prospective teachers with high thinking dispositions developed more sophisticated beliefs in comparison to prospective teachers with low thinking dispositions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd-El-Khalick F (2001) Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses: abandoning scientism, but…. J Sci Teacher Educ 12(3):215–233
Abd-El-Khalick F (2002) Rutherford’s enlarged: a content-embedded activity to teach about NOS. Phys Educ 37(1):64–68
Abd-El-Khalick F, Akerson VL (2004) Learning as conceptual change: factors that mediate the development of preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science. Sci Educ 88(5):785–810
Akerson VL, Abd-El-Khalick FS, Lederman NG (2000) Influence of a reflective activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 37(4):295–317
Akerson VL, Morrison JA, McDuffie AR (2006) One course is not enough: preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 43(2):194–213
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1993) Benchmarks for science literacy: a project 2061 report. Oxford University Press, New York
Anderman EM, Young AJ (1994) Motivation and strategy use in science: individual differences and classroom effects. J Res Sci Teach 31:811–831
Baldwin JA, Ebert-May D, Burns D (1999) The development of a college biology self-efficacy instrument for nonmajors. Sci Educ 83:397–408
Brickhouse NW (1989) The teaching of the philosophy of science in secondary classrooms: case studies of teachers’ personal theories. Int J Sci Educ 11(4):437–449
Carr M, Barker M, Bell B, Biddulph F, Jones A, Kirkwood V, Pearson J, Symington D (1994) The constructivist paradigm and some implications for science content and pedagogy. In: Fensham PJ, Gunstone RF, White RT (eds) The content of science: a constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. Taylor & Francis, Bristol, pp 147–160
Chalmers AF (1982) What is this thing called science?, 3rd edn. University of Queensland Press, Queensland (Chapters 1 and 2)
Clough MP (2006) Learners’ response to the demands of conceptual change: considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Sci Educ 15:463–494
Cobern WW, Loving CC (1998) The card exchange: introducing the philosophy of science. In: McComas W (ed) The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies. Kluwer, Dordercht, pp 73–82
Elliot AJ, McGregor HA, Gable S (1999) Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: a mediational analysis. J Educ Psychol 91(3):549–563
Haydel AM, Roeser WR (2002) On motivation, ability, and perceived situation in science test performance: a person-centered approach with high school students. Educ Assess 8(2):163–189
Hewson PW, Beeth ME, Thorley R (1998) Teaching for conceptual change. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin KG (eds) International handbook of science education, part 1. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 199–218
Hofer BK (1997) The development of personal epistemology: dimensions, disciplinary differences, and instructional practices. Doctoral dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Hofer BK (2002) Personal epistemology as a psychological and educational construct: an introduction. In: Hofer BK, Pintrich PR (eds) Personal epistemology: the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 3–14
Lederman NG, Abd-El-Khalick F (1998) Avoiding de-natured science: activities that promote understanding of the nature of science. In: McComas W (ed) The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies. Kluwer, Dordercht, pp 83–126
Lederman NG, Abd-El-Khalick F, Bell RL, Schwartz RS (2002) View of Nature of Science Questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 39:497–521
Martin RM (2000) Scientific thinking. Broadview Press, Ontario, pp 216–222
McComas W (1996) Ten myths of science: reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. Sch Sci Math 9(1):10–16
McMillan JH, Forsyth DR (1991) What theories of motivation say about why learners learn. In: Menges R, Svinicki M (eds) College teaching: from theory to practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Meece JL, Blumenfeld PC, Hoyle RH (1988) Students’ goal orientation and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. J Educ Psychol 80:514–523
Midgley C, Kaplan A, Middleton M, Maehr M, Urdan T, Anderman LH, Anderman E, Roeser R (1998) The development and validation of scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemp Educ Psychol 23:113–131
National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academic Press, Washington, DC
Nolen SB (1988) Reasons for studying: motivational orientations and study strategies. Cogn Instr 5:269–287
Pintrich PR, Marx RW, Boyle RA (1993) Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Rev Educ Res 63(2):167–199
Sá WC, West RF, Stanovich KE (1999) The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. J Educ Psychol 91:497–510
Sagan C (1996) The most precious thing. In the demon-haunted world. Random House, New York, pp 1–22
Schraw G, Dennison RS (1994) Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemp Educ Psychol 19:460–475
Schwartz RS, Lederman NG (2002) “It’s the nature of the beast”: the influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 39(3):205–236
Sinatra GM, Kardash CA (2004) Teacher candidates’ epistemologcial beliefs, dispositions, and views on teaching as persuasion. Contemp Educ Psychol 29(4):483–498
Smith CL, Wenk L (2006) Relations among three aspects of first-year college students’ epistemologies of science. J Res Sci Teach 43(8):747–785
Stanovich KE, West RF (1997) Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. J Educ Psychol 89(2):342–357
Stanovich KE, West RF (2007) Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Think Reason 13(3):225–247
Tsai C (2002) Nested epistemologies: science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning, and science. Int J Sci Educ 24(8):771–783
Tsai C (2007) Teachers’ scientific epistemological views: the coherence with instruction and students’ views. Sci Educ 91:222–243
Watercourse & Council for Environmental Education (1995) Project wet: curriculum & activity guide
White RT (1998) Decisions and problems in research on metacognition. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin KG (eds) International handbook of science education. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1207–1213
Wolters CA (2004) Advancing achievement goal theory: using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. J Educ Psychol 96(2):236–250
Yerrick RK, Pedersen JE, Arnason J (1998) “We’re just spectators”: a case study of science teaching, epistemology, and classroom management. Sci Educ 82:619–648
Acknowledgments
The author thanks Dr. Janelle Bailey and anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback in improving this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deniz, H. Examination of Changes in Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Epistemological Beliefs in Science and Exploration of Factors Meditating That Change. J Sci Educ Technol 20, 750–760 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9268-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9268-x