Skip to main content

Taking Epistemological Beliefs into Account in Students’ Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Interactions and Networking in Cyber Society

Abstract

The concept of beliefs has a long history and has been defined in a variety of ways. Beliefs are clustered as a set of interrelated beliefs in a broader, general belief structure or system; they can vary in strength. The more a belief is interrelated with others in this structure, the more difficult it is to alter the belief in question (Pajares F, Britner SL, Valiante G, Contemp Educ Psychol 25:406–422, 2000). Epistemology is the area of philosophy that deals with the nature and formation of human knowledge (Hofer B, Pintrich P, Rev Educ Res 67(1):88–140, 1997). Since the early 1960s, a line of research has drawn to study the relation between dimensions of epistemological beliefs and learning, the correlation between these dimensions, and academic motivational learning in this area. Schommer as one of the pioneers in this research line believed that the epistemological beliefs have different dimensions that are less and more independent. These dimensions include knowledge structure, knowledge finality, knowledge source, acquisition speed and ability to learn. The aim of the research is to study the view that learning ability can be improved and how it is related to sophisticated beliefs. For teachers, in particular, it is also critical to explicitly teach students that scientific knowledge is complex, constantly evolving, and is empirically developed (Lederman NG, J Res Sci Teach 36:916–929, 1999). Suggestions about what instructional techniques to employ are relatively sparse, mostly because researchers have little empirical evidence about how students acquire beliefs and how they change their beliefs (Hofer BK, J Educ Psychol Rev 13:353–383, 2001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms were governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 586–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender -related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2009). Personal epistemologies, work and learning. Educational Research Review, 4(3), 210–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braten, I., & Stromso, H. (2004). Epistemological belief and implicit theories of intelligence as predictors of achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 374–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braten, I., & Stromso, H. I. (2005). The relationship of epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning among Norwegian postsecondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 539–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction, perception of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model to approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (1999). Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 628–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghorban-Jahromi, R. (2007). The relationship of achievement goals and epistemological beliefs with computer anxiety. M.A. dissertation in educational psychology. Tehran: University of Tehran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13, 353–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B., & Pintrich, P. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science an classroom practice. Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo, S. P., Kassim, M., Kim, P. L., & Abdullah, A. C. (1997). Linking higher education to basic education: A Malaysian case study. Penang: School of Educational Studies. Universiti Sains Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. J. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., Britner, S. L., & Valiante, G. (2000). Relation between achievement goals and self-beliefs of middle school students in writing and science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 406–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, F. A. (2007). The conditional and interaction effects of epistemological beliefs on the self-regulated learning of college students: Cognitive and behavioral strategies. Research in Higher Education, 48(3), 353–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555. Psychology, 31, 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River: Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M., Calvert, C., & Gianna, G. (1997). The development of epistemological beliefs among secondary students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psyhcology, 89, 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sungur, S. (2007). Modeling the relationships among students’ motivational beliefs, metacognitive strategy use, and effort regulation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51, 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-val ue theory of achievem ent motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. R. Rushdan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hutagalung, F.D., Wong, S.L., Rushdan, A.R. (2017). Taking Epistemological Beliefs into Account in Students’ Performance. In: Gaol, F., Hutagalung, F. (eds) Social Interactions and Networking in Cyber Society. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4190-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4190-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4189-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4190-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics