Skip to main content
Log in

Tomato Chemical Defenses Intensify Corn Earworm (Helicoverpa zea) Mortality from Opportunistic Bacterial Pathogens

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Insect herbivores face multiple challenges to their ability to grow and reproduce. Plants can produce a series of defenses that disrupt and damage the herbivore digestive system, which are heightened upon injury by insect feeding. Additionally, insects face threats from virulent microorganisms that can incur their own set of potential costs to hosts. Microorganisms that invade through the digestive system may function in concert with defenses generated by plants, creating combined assailments on host insects. In our study, we evaluated how tomato defenses interact with an enteric bacterial isolate, Serratia marcescens, in the corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea). We performed bioassays using different tomato cultivars that were induced by methyl jasmonate and larvae orally inoculated with a S. marcescens isolate. Untreated corn earworm larval mortality was low on constitutive tomato, while larvae inoculated with S. marcescens exhibited > 50% mortality within 5 days. Induction treatments elevated both control mortality (~ 45%) and in combination with S. marcescens (> 95%). Larvae also died faster when encountering induced defenses and Serratia. Using a tomato mutant, foliar polyphenol oxidase activity likely had stronger impacts on S. marcescens-mediated larval mortality. Induction treatments also elevated the number of bacterial colony-forming units in the hemolymph of larvae inoculated with Serratia. Larval mortality by S. marcescens was low (< 10%) on artificial diets. Our results demonstrate that plant chemical defenses enhance larval mortality from an opportunistic gut microbe. We propose that the combined damage from both the plant and microbial agent overwhelm the herbivore to increase mortality rates and expedite host death.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Raw data and R files have been made available at the USDA NAL Ag Data Commons: https://doi.org/10.15482/USDA.ADC/1528506

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the USDA ARS Tomato Genetics Resource Center for providing mutant tomato seed. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. This research was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Funding

Funding was provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture NIFA Postdoctoral Fellowship 2018–67012-27979 awarded to C.J.M., U.S. Department of Agriculture AFRI Grant 2017–67013-26596 awarded to G.W.F., and Hatch Project Grant PEN04576.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CJM, KH, & GWF determined the overall objectives; CJM designed the experiments; CJM & MP performed the experiments and collected the data; CJM analyzed the results; CJM wrote the first manuscript draft; KH, MP, & GWF provided editorial input.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles J. Mason.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mason, C.J., Peiffer, M., Hoover, K. et al. Tomato Chemical Defenses Intensify Corn Earworm (Helicoverpa zea) Mortality from Opportunistic Bacterial Pathogens. J Chem Ecol 49, 313–324 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-023-01420-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-023-01420-7

Keywords

Navigation