Skip to main content
Log in

Plant-associated bacteria degrade defense chemicals and reduce their adverse effects on an insect defoliator

  • Plant-microbe-animal interactions - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phytophagous insects must contend with numerous secondary defense compounds that can adversely affect their growth and development. The gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) is a polyphagous herbivore that encounters an extensive range of hosts and chemicals. We used this folivore and a primary component of aspen chemical defenses, namely, phenolic glycosides, to investigate if bacteria detoxify phytochemicals and benefit larvae. We conducted insect bioassays using bacteria enriched from environmental samples, analyses of the microbial community in the midguts of bioassay larvae, and in vitro phenolic glycoside metabolism assays. Inoculation with bacteria enhanced larval growth in the presence, but not absence, of phenolic glycosides in the artificial diet. This effect of bacteria on growth was observed only in larvae administered bacteria from aspen foliage. The resulting midgut community composition varied among the bacterial treatments. When phenolic glycosides were included in diet, the composition of midguts in larvae fed aspen bacteria was significantly altered. Phenolic glycosides increased population responses by bacteria that we found able to metabolize these compounds in liquid growth cultures. Several aspects of these results suggest that vectoring or pairwise symbiosis models are inadequate for understanding microbial mediation of plant–herbivore interactions in some systems. First, bacteria that most benefitted larvae were initially foliar residents, suggesting that toxin-degrading abilities of phyllosphere inhabitants indirectly benefit herbivores upon ingestion. Second, assays with single bacteria did not confer the benefits to larvae obtained with consortia, suggesting multi- and inter-microbial interactions are also involved. Our results show that bacteria mediate insect interactions with plant defenses but that these interactions are community specific and highly complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abreu IN, Ahnlund M, Moritz T, Albrectsen BR (2011) UHPLC-ESI/TOFMS determination of salicylate-like phenolic gycosides in Populus tremula leaves. J Chem Ecol 37:857–870

  • Adams AS, Boone CK, Bohlmann J, Raffa KF (2011) Responses of bark beetle-associated bacteria to host monoterpenes and their relationship to insect life histories. J Chem Ecol 37:808–817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adams AS, Aylward FO, Adams SM et al (2013) Mountain pine beetles colonizing historical and naive host trees are associated with a bacterial community highly enriched in genes contributing to terpene metabolism. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:3468–3475

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aylward FO, Burnum-Johnson KE, Tringe SG et al (2013) Leucoagaricus gongylophorus produces diverse enzymes for the degradation of recalcitrant plant polymers in leaf-cutter ant fungus gardens. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:3770–3778

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boeckler GA, Gershenzon J, Unsicker SB (2011) Phenolic glycosides of the Salicaceae and their role as anti-herbivore defenses. Phytochemistry 72:1497–1509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boone CK, Six DL, Zheng Y, Raffa KF (2008) Parasitoids and dipteran predators exploit volatiles from microbial symbionts to locate bark beetles. Environ Entomol 37:150–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boone CK, Keefover-Ring K, Mapes AC et al (2013) Bacteria associated with a tree-killing insect reduce concentrations of plant defense compounds. J Chem Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10886-013-0313-0

  • Brenner K, You L, Arnold FH (2008) Engineering microbial consortia: a new frontier in synthetic biology. Trends Biotechnol 26:483–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broderick NA, Raffa KF, Goodman RM, Handelsman J (2004) Census of the bacterial community of the gypsy moth larval midgut using culturing and culture-independent methods. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:293–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoza YJ, Klepzig KD, Raffa KF (2006) Bacteria in oral secretions of an endophytic insect inhibit antagonistic fungi. Ecol Entomol 31:636–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carriere Y, Deland J-P, Roff DA, Vincent C (1994) Life-history costs associated with the evolution of insecticide resistance. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 258:35–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chu C-C, Spencer JL, Curzi MJ et al (2013) Gut bacteria facilitate adaptation to crop rotation in the western corn rootworm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:11917–11922

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chung SH, Rosa C, Scully ED et al (2013) Herbivore exploits orally secreted bacteria to suppress plant defenses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:15728–15733

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clay K (1988) Fungal endophytes of grasses: a defensive mutualism between plants and fungi. Ecology 69:10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Fine Licht HH, Schiøtt M, Rogowska-Wrzesinska A et al (2013) Laccase detoxification mediates the nutritional alliance between leaf-cutting ants and fungus-garden symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:583–587

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Denny TP, Hayward A (2001) Gram-negative bacteria: Ralstonia. In: Schaad NW, Jones JB, Chun W (eds) Laboratory guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria, 3rd edn. APS Press, St. Paul, pp 151–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson JR, Stevens MT, Barnhill HR, Lindroth RL (2006) Age-related shifts in leaf chemistry of clonal aspen (Populus tremuloides). J Chem Ecol 32:1415–1429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas AE (1996) Reproductive failure and the free amino acid pools in pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) lacking symbiotic bacteria. Science 42:247–255

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ettwig KF, Butler MK, Le Paslier D et al (2010) Nitrite-driven anaerobic methane oxidation by oxygenic bacteria. Nature 464:543–548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feyereisen R (1999) Insect P450 enzymes. Annu Rev Entomol 44:507–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field J, Stams AM, Kato M, Schraa G (1995) Enhanced biodegradation of aromatic pollutants in cocultures of anaerobic and aerobic bacterial consortia. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 67:747–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govenor H, Schultz JC, Appel HM (1997) Impact of dietary allelochemicals on gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) caterpillars: importance of midgut alkalinity. J Insect Physiol 43:1169–1175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerbacher A, Schmidt A, Wadke N et al (2013) A common fungal associate of the spruce bark beetle metabolizes the stilbene defenses of Norway spruce. Plant Physiol 162:1324–1336

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanshew AS, Mason CJ, Raffa KF, Currie CR (2013) Minimization of chloroplast contamination in 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing of insect herbivore bacterial communities. J Microbiol Methods 95:149–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hemming JDC, Lindroth RL (1995) Intraspecific variation in aspen phytochemistry: effects on performance of gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars. Oecologia 103:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemming JDC, Lindroth RL (2000) Effects of phenolic glycosdies and protein on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) and forest tent caterpillar (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) performance and detoxication activities. Environ Entomol 29:1108–1115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang SY, Lindhoth RL, Montgomery ME et al (1995) Aspen leaf quality effects gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) susceptibility to Bacillus thuringiensis. J Econ Entomol 88:278–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Imlay JA (2011) Cellular defenses against superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. Annu Rev Biochem 77:755–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janković-Hladni M, Ivanović J, Spasić MB et al (1997) Effect of the host plant on the antioxidative defense in the midugt of Lymantria dispar L. caterpillars of different population origins. J Insect Physiol 43:101–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser W, Huguet E, Casas J et al (2010) Plant green-island phenotype induced by leaf-miners is mediated by bacterial symbionts. Proc Biol Sci 277:2311–2319

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner RLL (2002) Molecular identification of an endosymbiotic bacterium associated with pederin biosynthesis in Paederus sabaeus (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 32:389–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2002) Plant responses to insect herbivory: the emerging molecular analysis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:299–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi Y, Hosokawa T, Fukatsu T (2011) An ancient but promiscuous host-symbiont association between Burkholderia gut symbionts and their heteropteran hosts. ISME J 5:446–460

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi Y, Hayatsu M, Hosokawa T et al (2012) Symbiont-mediated insecticide resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:8619–8622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch H, Schmid-Hempel P (2012) Gut microbiota instead of host genotype drive the specificity in the interaction of a natural host-parasite system. Ecol Lett 15:1095–1103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohl KD, Dearing MD (2012) Experience matters: prior exposure to plant toxins enhances diversity of gut microbes in herbivores. Ecol Lett 15:1008–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Schuler MA, Berenbaum MR (2007) Molecular mechanisms of metabolic resistance to synthetic and natural xenobiotics. Annu Rev Entomol 52:231–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth RL (1989) Biochemical detoxication: mechanism of differential tiger swallowtail tolerance to phenolic glycosides. Oecologia 81:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth RL, Hemming JDC (1990) Responses of the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) to tremulacin, an aspen phenolic glycoside. Environ Entomol 19:842–847

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth RL, Weisbrod AV (1991) Genetic variation in response of the gypsy moth to aspen phenolic glycosides. Biochem Syst Ecol 19:97–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth RL, Scriber JM, Hsia MT (1986) Differential responses of tiger swallowtail subspecies to secondary metabolites from tulip tree and quaking aspen. Oecologia 70:13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason CJ, Raffa KF (2014) Acquisition and structuring of midgut bacterial communites in gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) larvae. Environ Entomol (in press)

  • Oliver KM, Russell JA, Moran NA, Hunter MS (2003) Facultative bacterial symbionts in aphids confer resistance to parasitic wasps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1803–1807

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pineda A, Zheng S-J, van Loon JJ et al (2010) Helping plants to deal with insects: the role of beneficial soil-borne microbes. Trends Plant Sci 15:507–514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruuhola T, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Vainiotalo P (2003) In vitro degradation of willow salicylates. J Chem Ecol 29:1083–1097

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T et al (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Senderovich Y, Halpern M (2013) The protective role of endogenous bacterial communities in chironomid egg masses and larvae. ISME J 11:2147–2158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonowal R, Nandimath K, Kulkarni SS et al (2013) Hydrolysis of aromatic β-glucosides by non-pathogenic bacteria confers a chemical weapon against predators. Proc Biol Sci 280:20130721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank R. Lindroth, K. Keefover–Ring, and K. Rubert–Nason for assistance with the phenolic glycoside degradation assays and UHPLC-MS analysis, and for providing phenolic glycoside standards. This manuscript was greatly improved by discussions with K. Keefover-Ring (UW Dept. of Entomology) and M. Thomas (UW Dept. of Bacteriology). We thank R. Lindroth (UW Dept. of Entomology), A. Hanshew (UW Dept. of Surgery), and two anonymous reviewers for critical reviews of previous versions of this manuscript. We would like to thank C. Currie and P. Townsend for the use of laboratory space. This work was funded by NSF grant DEB 0841609 to R. Lindroth, USDA Hatch #WIS01598 awarded to K. Raffa, USDA NIFA AFRI Fellowship Grant 2012-67012-19900 awarded to J. Couture, NSF grant DEB 0841609 awarded to R. Lindroth, and the University of Wisconsin–Madison College of Agricultural and Life Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles J. Mason.

Additional information

Communicated by Corné Pieterse.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (EPS 114 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (EPS 131 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mason, C.J., Couture, J.J. & Raffa, K.F. Plant-associated bacteria degrade defense chemicals and reduce their adverse effects on an insect defoliator. Oecologia 175, 901–910 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-2950-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-2950-6

Keywords

Navigation