Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • Review
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) remains to be established as a safe and effective alternative to open liver resection (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Aims

The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare laparoscopic versus open resection for HCC with regard to perioperative and oncologic outcomes.

Methods

A literature search was performed to identify comparative studies reporting outcomes for both laparoscopic and open resection for HCC. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using either the fixed effects model or random effects model.

Results

Ten nonrandomized controlled studies matched the selection criteria and reported on 494 subjects, of whom 213 underwent LLR and 281 underwent OLR for HCC. Compared with the perioperative results of open surgery, reports on laparoscopic resection indicate potentially favourable outcomes in terms of operative blood loss (WMD: −160.57, 95% CI: −246.49 to −74.66), blood transfusion requirement (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.86), postoperative morbidity (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.78), and length of hospital stay (WMD: −5.53, 95% CI: −7.89 to −3.16). Concerning the oncologic outcomes, there was no difference between groups in surgical margin, overall survival and disease-free survival.

Conclusions

LLR for HCC is superior to the OLR in terms of its perioperative results and does not compromise the oncological outcomes. Therefore, LLR may be an alternative choice for treatment of HCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2, 804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009,250:831–841. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c4df.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Vandeweyer H, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection of hepatic neoplasms: comparative analysis of short-term results. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2208–2213. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0023-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2003;362:1907–1917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou Y, Sui C, Li B, et al. Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a local experience and a systematic review. World J Surg Oncol. 2010;8:55. doi:10.1186/1471-230X-10-78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoon YS, Han HS, Cho JY, Ahn KS. Total laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma located in all segments of the liver. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1630–1637. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0823-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vibert E, Perniceni T, Levard H, Denet C, Shahri NK, Gayet B. Laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg. 2006;93:67–72. doi:10.1002/bjs.5150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Belli G, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:2004–2011. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9503-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dagher I, Proske JM, Carloni A, Richa H, Tranchart H, Franco D. Laparoscopic liver resection: results for 70 patients. Surg Endos. 2007;21:619–624. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9487-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Buell JF, Thomas MT, Rudich S, et al. Experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures. Ann Surg. 2008;248:475–486. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318185e647.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Simillis C, Constantinides VA, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resections for benign and malignant neoplasms–a meta-analysis. Surgery. 2007;141:203–211. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2006.06.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Laurent A, Cherqui D, Lesurtel M, Brunetti F, Tayar C, Fagniez PL. Laparoscopic liver resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma complicating chronic liver disease. Arch Surg. 2003;138:763–769.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaneko H, Takagi S, Otsuka Y, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2005;189:190–194. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.09.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Belli G, Limongelli P, Fantini C, et al. Laparoscopic and open treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Br J Surg. 2009;96:1041–1048. doi:10.1002/bjs.6680.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Endo Y, Ohta M, Sasaki A, et al. A comparative study of the long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted and open left lateral hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19:e171–e174. doi:10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181bc4091.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lai EC, Tang CN, Ha JP, Li MK. Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: ten-year experience in a single center. Arch Surg. 2009;144:143–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarpel U, Hefti MM, Wisnievsky JP, Roayaie S, Schwartz ME, Labow DM. Outcome for patients treated with laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: case-matched analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1572–1577. doi:10.1245/s10434-009-0414-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Aldrighetti L, Guzzetti E, Pulitanò C, et al. Case-matched analysis of totally laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC: short and middle term results. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:82–86. doi:10.1002/jso.21541.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tranchart H, Di Giuro G, Lainas P, et al. Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1170–1176. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0745-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A, Steel JJ, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg. 2010; [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.248.

  20. Shimada M, Hashizume M, Maehara S, et al. Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:541–544. doi:10.1007/s004640080099.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rau HG, Buttler E, Meyer G, Schardey HM, Schildberg FW. Laparoscopic liver resection compared with conventional partial hepatectomy–a prospective analysis. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45:2333–2338.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morino M, Morra I, Rosso E, Miglietta C, Garrone C. Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1914–1918. doi:10.1007/s00464-003-9070-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lesurtel M, Cherqui D, Laurent A, Tayar C, Fagniez PL. Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic lobectomy: a case-control study. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:236–242. doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01622-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Abu Hilal M, McPhail MJ, Zeidan B, et al. Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy: a comparative study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:1285–1288. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2008.01.018.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Aldrighetti L, Pulitanò C, Catena M, et al. A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:457–462. doi:10.1007/s11605-007-0244-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cai XJ, Yang J, Yu H, et al. Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2350–2356. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-9789-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Polignano FM, Quyn AJ, de Figueiredo RS, Henderson NA, Kulli C, Tait IS. Laparoscopic versus open liver segmentectomy: prospective, case-matched, intention-to-treat analysis of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2564–2570. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0110-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dagher I, Di Giuro G, Dubrez J, Lainas P, Smadja C, Franco D. Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy: a comparative study. Am J Surg. 2009;198:173–177. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.09.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tsinberg M, Tellioglu G, Simpfendorfer CH, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open liver tumor resection: a case-controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:847–853. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0262-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:413–424. doi:10.1245/ASO.2006.05.045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mathurin P, Raynard B, Dharancy S, et al. Meta-analysis: evaluation of adjuvant therapy after curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17:1247–1261. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01580.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dagher I, Lainas P, Carloni A, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:372–378. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9487-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Poon RT, Fan ST, Ng IO, Wong J. Significance of resection margin in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical reappraisal. Ann Surg. 2000;231:544–551.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. MacLehose RR, Reeves BC, Harvey IM, Sheldon TA, Russell IT, Black AM. A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4:1–154.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Abraham NS, Byrne CJ, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:238–245. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.04.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Abulkhir A, Limongelli P, Healey AJ, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization for major liver resection: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2008;247:49–57. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815f6e5b.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–634.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank U. Sarpel and colleagues for kindly providing more details about their reported cases.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Li.

Additional information

Yan-Ming Zhou and Wen-Yu Shao contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, YM., Shao, WY., Zhao, YF. et al. Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci 56, 1937–1943 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1572-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1572-7

Keywords

Navigation