Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a comparative study

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Although the feasibility of minor laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) has been demonstrated, data comparing the open vs the laparoscopic approach to liver resection are lacking. Methods: We compared 30 LLR with 30 open liver resections (OLR) in a pair-matched analysis. The indications for resection were malignant disease in 47% of the LLR and 83% of the OLR. The average size of the lesions was 42 mm for LLR and 41 mm for OLR. Five wedge resections, 12 segmentectomies, and 13 bisegmentectomies were performed in each group. Results: The conversion rate for LLR was nil. The mean operative time was 148 min for LLR and 142 min for OLR. Mean blood loss was minimal in the LLR group (320 vs 479 ml; p < 0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in 6.6% of the patients in each group; there were no deaths. The mean postoperative hospital stay was shorter for LLR patients (6.4 vs 8.7 days; p < 0.05). In tumors, the resection margin was <1 cm in 43% of the LLR patients and 40% of the OLR patients (p = NS). Conclusions: Minor LLR of the anterior segments has the same rates of mortality and morbidity as OLR. However, the laparoscopic approach reduces blood loss and postoperative hospital stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MY Abdel-Atty O Farges P Jagot J Belghiti (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy extends the indications for liver resection in patients with cirrhosis. Brit Surg 86 1397–1400 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FltFWrsA%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. U Berggren T Gordh D Grama U Haglund J Rastad D Arvidsson (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave analgesia and trauma responses. Br J Surg 81 1362–1365 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD2c7itFQ%3D Occurrence Handle7953415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. L Biertho A Waage M Gagner (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic hepatectomy. Ann Chir 127 164–170 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383gtFajsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11933628

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. H Bismuth (1982) ArticleTitleSurgical anatomy and anatomical surgery of the liver. World J Surg 6 3–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi2B38rotF0%3D Occurrence Handle7090393

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. D Cherqui E Husson R Hammoud B Malassagne F Stéphan S Bensaid N Rotman PL Fagniez (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 232 753–762 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FltVyntQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11088070

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. C Couinaud (1980) ArticleTitlePrincipes directeurs des hépatectomies réglées: L’anatomie et les définitions. Chirurgie 106 103–108 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi6C3sjjtlI%3D Occurrence Handle7471968

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. B Descottes F Lachachi M Sodji D Valleix S Durand-Fontanier B Pech De Laclause D Grousseau (2000) ArticleTitleEarly experience with laparoscopic approach for solid liver tumors: initial 16 cases. Ann Surg 232 641–645 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crhtF2ruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11066134

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. RE Falcone SR Wanamaker F Barnes CG Baxter SA Santarello (1993) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic vs. open wedge biposy of the liver. J Laparoendosc Surg 3 525–329 Occurrence Handle8111101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. G Ferzli A David T Kiel (1995) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic resection of a large hepatic tumor. Surg Endosc 9 733–735 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD2srotlw%3D Occurrence Handle7482177

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. M Gagner M Rheault J Dubuc (1992) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor. Surg Endosc 6 99

    Google Scholar 

  11. J-F Gigot D Glineur JS Azagra M Goergen M Ceuterick M Morino J Etienne J Marescaux D Mutter L van Krunckelsven B Descottes D Valleix F Lachachi L Bertrand B Mansvelt G Hubens JP Saey R Schockmel InstitutionalAuthorNameHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Section of the Royal Belgian Society of Surgery and the Belgian Group for Endoscopic Surgery (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors: preliminary results of a multicenter European study. Ann Surg 236 90–97 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200207000-00014 Occurrence Handle12131090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. TG John JD Greig JL Crosbie WF Miles OJ Garden (1994) ArticleTitleSuperior staging of liver tumors with laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound. Ann Surg 220 711–719 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD2sjkslQ%3D Occurrence Handle7986136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. N Katkhouda M Hurwitz J Gugenheim E Mavor R Mason D Waldrep RT Rivera M Chandra GM Campos S Offerman A Trussler P Fabiani J Mouiel et al. (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic management of benign solid and cystic lesions of the liver. Ann Surg 229 460–466 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3hslOhtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10203077

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. AM Lacy JC Garcia-Valdecasas S Delgado A Castells P Taura JM Pique et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359 2224–2229 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09290-5 Occurrence Handle12103285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. M Morino M De Giuli V Festa C Garrone (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic management of symptomatic nonparasitic cysts of the liver. Ann Surg 219 157–164 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC2srmtlI%3D Occurrence Handle8129486

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. HG Rau E Buttler G Meyer H Schardey FW Schildberg (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic liver resection compared with conventional partial hepatectomy: a prospective analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 45 2333–2338 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7jsFeruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9951918

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. G Samama L Chiche JL Bréfort Y Le Roux (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic anatomical hepatic resection: report of four left lobectomies for solid tumors. Surg Endosc 12 76–78 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fos1ygsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9419311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. S Schimdbauer KK Hallfeldt G Sitzmann T Kantelhardt A Trupka (2002) ArticleTitleExperience with ultrasound scissors and blades (UltraCision) in open and laparoscopic liver resection. Ann Surg 235 27–30 Occurrence Handle11753039

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. TC Schmandra S Mierdl H Bauer C Gutt E Hanisch (2002) ArticleTitleTransesophageal echocardiography shows high risk of gas embolism during laparoscopic hepatic resection under carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Br J Surg 89 870–876 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38zjvFCmtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12081736

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. O Zmora EG Weiss (2001) ArticleTitleTrocar site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: myth or real concern? Surg Oncol Clin North Am 10 625–638

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Raraty, MD, of the Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, England, UK, for revising the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Morino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morino, M., Morra, I., Rosso, E. et al. Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a comparative study . Surg Endosc 17, 1914–1918 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9070-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9070-4

Keywords

Navigation