Abstract
The analysis of genetic structure is an important tool for the management of harvested and threatened species. Individual clustering methods and tests of Isolation by Distance (IBD) are currently used in this context. They have been applied to the red coral Corallium rubrum but some questions remained due to contrasted results among studies and limits in their interpretations. In this study, we used simulated and empirical data for a better understanding of the genetic structure in this species. We tested the impact of IBD between demes, sampling scheme and of clustering methods (BAPS, STRUCTURE or DAPC) on the inferred structure. By matching simulated scenarios to the empirical data, we first confirm that the genetic structure of the red coral is characterized by a combination between IBD and weak genetic breaks. Then, we demonstrate how the sampling scheme influences the results of the clustering methods. We also reveal the contrasted efficiencies of these methods to recover real demes or groups of demes in a context of IBD. Overall, our study underline the interest of comparing the results of different clustering methods and of using simulated data for interpreting empirical genetical data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aurelle D, Ledoux J-B, Rocher C, Borsa P, Chenuil A, Féral J-P (2011) Phylogeography of the red coral (Corallium rubrum): inferences on the evolutionary history of a temperate gorgonian. Genetica 139:855–869
Barnosky AD, Hadly EA, Bascompte J et al (2012) Approaching a state shift in earth’s biosphere. Nature 486:52–58
Beaumont MA, Balding DJ (2004) Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans. Mol Ecol 13:969–980
Blair C, Weigel DE, Balazik M, Keeley ATH, Walker FM, Landguth E, Cushman S, Murphy M, Waits L, Balkenhol N (2012) A simulation-based evaluation of methods for inferring linear barriers to gene flow. Mol Ecol Res 12:822–833
Bruckner AW (2009) Rate and extent of decline in Corallium (pink and red coral) populations: existing data meet the requirements for a CITES Appendix II listing. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 397:319–332
Castric V, Bernatchez L (2003) The rise and fall of isolation by distance in the anadromous brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill). Genetics 163(3):983–996
Chen C, Durand E, Forbes F (2007) Bayesian clustering algorithms ascertaining spatial population structure: a new computer program and a comparison study. Mol Ecol Notes 7:747–756
Corander J, Marttinen P (2006) Bayesian identification of admixture events using multilocus molecular markers. Mol Ecol 15:2833–2843
Corander J, Waldmann P, Sillanpää MJ (2003) Bayesian analysis of genetic differentiation between populations. Genetics 163(1):367–374
Corander J, Marttinen P, Siren J, Tang J (2008a) Enhanced Bayesian modelling in BAPS software for learning genetic structures of populations. BMC Bioinform 9(1):539
Corander J, Sirén J, Arjas E (2008b) Bayesian spatial modelling of genetic population structure. Comput Stat 23:111–129
Costantini F, Fauvelot C, Abbiati M (2007a) Fine-scale genetic structuring in Corallium rubrum: evidence of inbreeding and limited effective larval dispersal. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 340:109–119
Costantini F, Fauvelot C, Abbiati M (2007b) Genetic structuring of the temperate gorgonian coral (Corallium rubrum) across the western Mediterranean sea revealed by microsatellites and nuclear sequences. Mol Ecol 16:5168–5182
Costantini F, Taviani M, Remia A, Pintus E, Schembri PJ, Abbiati M (2010) Deep-water Corallium rubrum (L., 1758) from the Mediterranean Sea: preliminary genetic characterisation. Mar Ecol 31:261–269
Dawson KJ, Belkhir K (2001) A Bayesian approach to the identification of panmictic populations and the assignment of individuals. Genet Res Camb 78:59–77
Dawson KJ, Belkhir K (2009) An agglomerative hierarchical approach to visualization in Bayesian clustering problems. Heredity 103:32–45
Dellicour S, Frantz A, Colyn M, Bertouille S, Chaumont F, Flamand M-C (2011) Population structure and genetic diversity of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in forest fragments in north-western France. Cons Gen 12:1287–1297
Durand E, Jay F, Gaggiotti OE, François O (2009) Spatial inference of admixture proportions and secondary contact zones. Mol Biol Evol 26(9):1963–1973
Earl D, vonHoldt B (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Cons Gen Res 4(2):359–361
Epperson BK, McRae BH, Scribner K, Cushman SA, Rosenberg MS, Fortin M-J, James PMA et al (2010) Utility of computer simulations in landscape genetics. Mol Ecol 19(17):3549–3564
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14(8):2611–2620
Excoffier, Laval LG, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47–50
Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491
Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164(4):1567–1587
François O, Durand E (2010) Spatially explicit Bayesian clustering models in population genetics. Mol Ecol Res 10:773–784
Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2010) Introduction to conservation genetics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York
Frantz AC, Cellina S, Krier A, Schley L, Burke T (2009) Using spatial Bayesian methods to determine the genetic structure of a continuously distributed population: clusters or isolation by distance? J Appl Ecol 46:493–505
Garrabou J, Coma R, Bensoussan N et al (2009) Mass mortality in northwestern Mediterranean rocky benthic communities: effects of the 2003 heat wave. Glob Change Biol 15(5):1090–1103
Gauffre B, Estoup A, Bretagnolle V, Cosson JF (2008) Spatial genetic structure of a small rodent in a heterogeneous landscape. Mol Ecol 17:4619–4629
Giraudel JL, Aurelle D, Lek S, Berrebi P (2000) Application of the self-organizing mapping and fuzzy clustering to microsatellite data: how to detect genetic structure in brown trout (Salmo trutta) populations. In: Lek S, Guégan JF (eds) Artificial neuronal networks. Springer, Berlin, pp 187–202
Guillot G, Estoup A, Mortier F, Cosson JF (2005) A spatial statistical model for landscape genetics. Genetics 170(3):1261–1280
Guillot G, Leblois R, Coulon A, Frantz AC (2009) Statistical methods in spatial genetics. Mol Ecol 18:4734–4756
Heller R, Siegismund HR (2009) Relationship between three measures of genetic differentiation G ST, D EST and G’ ST : how wrong have we been? Mol Ecol 18:2080–2083
Hoban S, Bertorelle G, Gaggiotti OE (2012) Computer simulations: tools for population and evolutionary genetics. Nat Rev Gen 13:110–122
Jombart T (2008) Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403–1405
Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F (2010) Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet 11(1):94
Kalinowski ST (2011) The computer program STRUCTURE does not reliably identify the main genetic clusters within species: simulations and implications for human population structure. Heredity 106(4):625–632
Kimura M, Weiss GH (1964) Stepping stone model of population structure and the decrease of genetic correlation with distance. Genetics 49:561–576
Latch EK, Dharmarajan G, Glaubitz JC, Rhodes OEJ (2006) Relative performance of Bayesian clustering software for inferring population substructure and individual assignment at low levels of population differentiation. Cons Gen 7:295–302
Laval G, Excoffier L (2004) SIMCOAL 2.0: a program to simulate genomic diversity over large recombining regions in a subdivided population with a complex history. Bioinformatics 20(15):2485–2487
Leblois R, Estoup A, Rousset F (2003) Influence of mutational and sampling factors on the estimation of demographic parameters in a ‘‘Continuous’’ population under isolation by distance. Mol Biol Evol 20(4):491–502
Leblois R, Estoup A, Rousset F (2009) IBD Sim: a computer program to simulate genotypic data under Isolation by Distance. Mol Ecol Res 9:107–109
Ledoux J-B, Garrabou J, Bianchimani O, Drap P, Féral J-P, Aurelle D (2010a) Fine-scale genetic structure and inferences on population biology in the threatened Mediterranean red coral, Corallium rubrum. Mol Ecol 19(19):4204–4216
Ledoux J-B, Mokhtar-Jamaï K, Roby C, Féral J-P, Garrabou J, Aurelle D (2010b) Genetic survey of shallow populations of the Mediterranean red coral [Corallium rubrum (Linnaeus, 1758)]: new insights into evolutionary processes shaping nuclear diversity and implications for conservation. Mol Ecol 19(4):675–690
Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 18(4):189–197
Orozco-Ter Wengel P, Corander J, Schlötterer C (2011) Genealogical lineage sorting leads to significant but incorrect Bayesian multilocus inference of population structure. Mol Ecol 20:1108–1121
Palsbøll PJ, Bérubé M, Allendorf FW (2006) Identification of management units using population genetic data. Trends Ecol Evol 22(1):11–16
Palumbi SR (2003) Population genetics, demographic connectivity, and the design of marine reserves. Ecol Appl 13(sp1):146–158
Perrier C, Guyomard R, Baglinière J-L, Evanno G (2011) Determinants of hierarchical genetic structure in Atlantic salmon populations: environmental factors vs. anthropogenic influences. Mol Ecol 20(20):4231–4245
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155(2):945–959
Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49:1283–1286
Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145(4):1219–1228
Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Res 8:103–106
Rousset F, Leblois R (2012) Likelihood-based inferences under isolation by distance: two-dimensional habitats and confidence intervals. Mol Biol Evol 29(3):957–973
Safner T, Miller MP, McRae BH, Fortin M-J, Manel S (2011) Comparison of Bayesian clustering and edge detection methods for inferring boundaries in landscape genetics. Int J Mol Sci 12:865–889
Schwartz MK, McKelvey KS (2009) Why sampling scheme matters: the effect of sampling scheme on landscape genetic results. Cons Genet 10(2):441–452
Viard F, Franck P, Dubois M-P, Estoup A, Jarne P (1998) Variation of microsatellite size homoplasy across electromorphs, loci, and populations in three invertebrate species. J Mol Evol 47:42–51
Waples RS, Gaggiotti O (2006) What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Mol Ecol 15:1419–1439
Weir B, Cockerham C (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370
Zellmer AJ, Hanes MM, Hird SM, Carstens BC (2012) Deep phylogeographic structure and environmental differentiation in the carnivorous plant Sarracenia alata. Syst Biol 61(5):763–777
Acknowledgments
We thank Anne Chenuil-Maurel and Gwilherm Penant for helpful discussion on this topic. Two anonymous reviewers greatly helped improving a first version of this manuscript. J-B. Ledoux is supported by a post-doctoral grant SFRH/BPD/74400/2010 from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aurelle, D., Ledoux, JB. Interplay between isolation by distance and genetic clusters in the red coral Corallium rubrum: insights from simulated and empirical data. Conserv Genet 14, 705–716 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-013-0464-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-013-0464-0