Abstract
Previous research has documented the relationship among managerial ties, firm resources, and performance in emerging economies such as China. While managerial ties may be embedded in a particular location, some of these ties may be non-location-bound. Therefore, for firms located within one geographically concentrated cluster, how do managerial ties and firm resources affect performance? Using data from 163 firms in two Chinese clusters, we demonstrate that managerial ties and firm resources—independently and in combination—help firms improve market performance. Results support the view that both network-centered strategies (utilizing managerial ties) and market-centered strategies (leveraging firm resources) are critical determinants of firm performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barney, J. 1986. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32: 1231–1241.
Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–120.
Barney, J. 2001. Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26: 41–56.
Collis, D. 1991. A resource-based analysis of global competition: The case of the bearings industry. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 49–68.
Dei Ottati, G. 1994. Cooperation and competition in the industrial district as an organization model. European Planning Studies, 2: 463–483.
Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35: 1504–1511.
Enright, M. 1991. Geographic concentration and industrial organization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Guthrie, D. 1998. The declining significance of guanxi in China’s economic transition. China Quarterly, 154: 254–282.
Hall, R. 1993. A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 607–618.
Hoskisson, R., Eden, L., Lau, C., & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 249–267.
Le, N., Venkatesh, S., & Nguyen, T. 2006. Getting bank financing: A study of Vietnamese private firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 209–227.
Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. 2001. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 615–640.
Li, J. 2005. The formation of managerial networks of foreign firms in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 423–443.
Li, X. 2002. Managerial coordination and enterprise cluster: An analysis of the growth of cluster firms in Pearl River Delta. Nankai Business Review, 5(3): 49–55(Qi ye jia xie tiaoo yu qi ye ji qun-dui zhujiang san jiao zhou qi ye ji qun cheng zhang de fen xi. Nankai Guanli Pinglun, in Chinese).
Li, Y., Sun, Y., & Liu, Y. 2006. An empirical study of SOEs’ market orientation in transitional China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 93–113.
Luo, Y. 2003. Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: The case of China. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 1315–1327.
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. 2003. Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography, 3: 5–35.
McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. 1999. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 1133–1156.
McGrath, R., MacMillan, I., & Venkataraman, S. 1996. Defining and developing a competence: A strategic process paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 251–275.
Morris, S. A. 1997. Environmental pollution and competitive advantage: An exploratory study of U.S. industrial-goods manufacturers. The Academy of Management Proceedings, 97: 411–415.
Park, S., & Luo, Y. 1998. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 455–477.
Peng, M. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 275–286.
Peng, M., & Heath, P. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21: 492–528.
Peng, M., & Luo, Y. 2002. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 486–501.
Peng, M., & Zhou, J. 2005. How network strategies and institutional transitions evolve in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 321–336.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Porter, M. 1998. On competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Pouder, R., & John, C. 1996. Hot spots and blind spots: Geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21: 1192–1225.
Rabellotti, R. 1997. External economies and cooperation in industrial districts. London: Macmillan.
Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schoenecker, T., & Cooper, A. 1998. The role of firm resources and organizational attributes in determining entry timing: A cross-industry study. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 1127–1143.
Tang, F., & Xi, Y. 2006. Exploring dynamic multi-level linkages in inter-organizational networks. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 187–208.
Wu, W., & Leung, A. 2005. Does a micro–macro link exist between managerial value of reciprocity, social capital and firm performance? The case of SMEs in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 445–463.
Xin, K., & Pearce, J. 1996. Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1641–1658.
Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. 2005. Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 809–825.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (06JC630031), China National Philosophy and Social Science Foundation (07CJY008), National Natural Science Foundation of China (70472026, 70602018, 70732005), and a Grant of 985 projects (regional development and industrial organization) from Sun Yat-sen University. We thank Mike Peng (Editor-in-Chief) and two reviewers for editorial guidance. In developing this paper, we have benefited from helpful discussions with Jay Barney, Heli Wang, and Jilin Dai. The views expressed here are ours and do not necessarily represent those of the funding agencies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, S., Li, X. Managerial ties, firm resources, and performance of cluster firms. Asia Pac J Manage 25, 615–633 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9090-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9090-7