Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical study of SOEs' market orientation in transitional China

  • Regular Papers
  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using institutional theory, this paper investigates the antecedents and outcomes of market orientation in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in transitional China. A survey of 274 SOEs demonstrates a strong positive relationship between market orientation and various measures of organizational performance. Additionally, market competitive pressure, formalized corporate governance, and less government control are found to promote market orientation of SOEs in the transitional period. These results support the views that market orientation leads to better performance and that institutional factors should be considered in studies of strategy in Chinese firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D. 1989. “Managing assets and skills: The key to sustainable competitive advantage.” California Management Review, 31(2), 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. 1994. “Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation.” Academy of Management Review, 19, 645–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. 1997. “Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys.” Journal of Marketing Research, 14(August), 396–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avlonitis G. J., & Gounaris, S. P. 1999. “Marketing orientation and its determinants: an empirical analysis.” European Journal of Marketing, 33(11/12), 1003–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluedorn, A. C. 1993. “Pilgrim's progress: Trends and convergence in research on organizational size and environments.” Journal of Management, 19, 163–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1996. “From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining china's emerging economic order.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 600–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B. K., Dess, G. G., & Rasheed, A. M. 1993. “Divergence between archival and perceptual measures of the environment: Causes and consequences.” Academy of Management Review, 18, 204–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., & Ahlstrom, D. 2003. “An institutional view of china's venture capital industry explaining the differences between china and the west.” Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Lau, C. M. Lu, Y., & Rubanik, Y. 2004. “The impact of institutional differences: Strategic orientation differences between two emerging markets.” Paper presented at the Fourth Asia Academy of Management Conference, Shanghai, China.

  • Cao, Y., Qian, Y., & Weingast, B. R. 1999. “From federalism to privatisation: Chinese style.” Economics of Transition, 7(1), 103–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. J. 2004. “Corporation of china's state-owned enterprises and corporate governance.” Corporate Ownership & Control, 1(2), (Winter), 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. J., & Wills, D. 2002. “Agency theory and corporate governance — the chinese state-owned enterprises.” The Proceedings of 1st International Conference of Corporate Governance, the Business School, University of Birmingham, UK, July 9.

  • Chen, X., Hui, C., & Sego D. J. 1998. “The role of organizational citizenship behavior in turnover: Conceptualization and preliminary tests of key hypotheses.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 922–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., & Tsai, D. 2005. “The dynamic between firms' environmental strategies and institutional constraints in emerging economies: Evidence from China and Taiwan.”Journal of Management Studies, 42, 95–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow K. W., & Fung K. Y. 1996. “Firm dynamics and industrialization in the chinese economy in transition: Implications for small business policy.” Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 489–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, C. C., & Beamish, P. W. 2005. “The impact of institutional reforms on characteristics and survival of foreign subsidiaries in emerging economies.” Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 35–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles J. W., Victoria B., & McWilliams, N. S. 2001. “An examination of the relationship of governance mechanisms to performance.” Journal of Management, 27, 23–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo, A. 2002. “Corporate governance mechanisms: A plea for less code of good governance and more market control.” Corporate Governance: An International Review, 10(2), 84–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Aunno, T., Succi, M., & Alexander, J. A. 2000. “The role of institutional and market forces in divergent organizational change.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 679–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S. 1994. “The capabilities of market-driven organizations.” Journal of Marketing, 58 (October), 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng S., & Dart J. 1999. “The market orientation of chinese enterprises during a time of transition.” European Journal of Marketing, 33(5/6), 631–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, R., & Farley J. U. 1998. “Measuring market orientation: A generalization and synthesis.” Journal of Market Focused Management, 2(3), 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, R., & Webster, F. E. 1989. “Organizational culture and marketing: Defining the research.” Journal of Marketing, 53(1), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, R., Farley J. U., & Webster F. E. 1993. “Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in japanese firms: A quadrad analysis.” Journal of Marketing, 57 (January), 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despande, R., & Zaltman, G. 1982. “Factors affecting the use of market research information: A path analysis.” Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (February), 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G., & Robinson, R. 1984. “Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firms and conglomerate business unit.” Strategic Management Journal, 5, 265–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos A., & Hart S. 1993. “Linking market orientation and company performance: Preliminary evidence on kohli and jaworski's framework.” Journal of Management Studies, 27, 485–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Agency theory: An assessment and review.” Academy of Management Review, 14, 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. 1980. “Agency problem and the theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenley, G. E. 1995. “Market orientation and company performance: Empirical evidence from U. K. companies.” British Journal of Management, 6(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie D. 1998. “The declining significance of guanxi in china's economic transition.” China Quarterly, 154(June), 254–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham R. L., & Black W. C. 1995. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. 4th edn, Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Snow, C. C. 1977. “Contextual model of strategic decision Making.” Academy of Management Proceedings, 109–112.

  • Harris, L. C. 1998. “Cultural domination: The key to a market orientated culture.” European Journal of Marketing, 32(3/4), 354–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. C. 2000. “The organizational barriers to developing market orientation.” European Journal of Marketing, 34(5/6), 598–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassard, J., Sheehan, J., & Morris, J. 1999. “Enterprise reform in post-deng china.” International Studies of Management & Organization, 29(3), 54–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, D. J., & McMillan, C. J. 1981. Organization and nation: The Aston Programme IV., Westead, England: Gower.

  • Hitt, M. A., Tyler, B. B., Hardee, C., & Park, D. 1995. “Understanding strategic intent in the global marketplace.” The Academy of Management Executive, 9(2), 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooley, G., Cox, T., Fahy, J., Shipley, D., Beracs, J., Fonfara, K., & Snoj, B. 2000. “Market orientation in the transition economies of central europe: Tests of the narver and slater market orientation scales.” Journal of Business Research, 50, 273–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wight M. 2000. “Strategy in emerging economies.”Academy of Management Journal,43(3), 249–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Hill, C. W., & Kim, H. 1993. “The multidivisional structure: Organizational fossil or source of value?” Journal of Management, 19, 269–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli A. K. 1996. “Market orientation: Review, refinement, and roadmap.” Journal of Market-Focused Management, 1(2), 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. 1993. “Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences.”Journal of Marketing, 57, 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. H., & Singh, I. (ed.), 1999.Enterprise Reform in China, Oxford University Press.

  • Keats, B. W., &Hitt, M. A. 1988. “A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro-organizational characteristics, and performance.”Academy of Management Journal,31, 570–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. K., &Jaworski, B. J. 1990. “Market orientation: The construct, research propositions and managerial implications.”Journal of Marketing,54(April), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. 1992.Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences, Marketing Science Institute,Report No. 92–104, Cambridge, MA.

  • Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. 1996. “Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change.”American Sociological Review, 61, 812–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K., Subramanian, R., & Yauger, C. 1998. “Examining the market orientation-performance relationship: A context-specific study.”Journal of Management,24(2), 201–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, C. M. 1998. “Strategic orientations of chief executives in state-owned enterprises in transition.” In Hitt M. A., Ricart Costa J. E., &Nixon R. D. (Eds.),Managing Strategically in an Interconnected World,101–117, Chichester, England; Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. 1997. “The impact of economic reform on the performance of chinese state enterprises, 1980-1989.”Journal of Political Economy,105(5), 1080–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthal, J. B., &Wilson, P. T. 1992. “Becoming market oriented.”Journal of Business Research,24(3), 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. F., & Zhu, T. 2001. “Ownership restructuring in chinese state industry: An analysis of evidence on initial organizational changes.”China Quarterly,16(6), 305–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. 1995. “Market orientation and firm size: An empirical examination in uk firms.”European Journal of Marketing, 29(1), 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M. 2000. “Capitalist firms, public enterprises: Ownership reform and privatisation of chinese state-owned enterprises.” In Cook, S., Yao, S., &Zhuang, J. (Ed.),The Chinese Economy under Transition,Macmillan: Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., & Eddie, I. A. 1995. “Developments in accounting regulation.” In J. Blake, & S. Gao (Eds.),Perspectives on Accounting and Finance in China(pp. 139–158). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R., & Laczniak, G. 1987. “The evolving marketing concept, competitive intensity and organizational performance.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, E., & Kohli, A. K. 1996. “Market intelligence dissemination across functional boundaries.”Journal of Marketing Research,33 (February), 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, R. B., Robert, P. O., Morgan, E., & Kutwaroo, G. 2001. Market Orientation and Firm Value.Journal of Marketing Management, 2001,17:521–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C. 1995. “Organizational market information processes: Cultural antecedents and new product outcomes.”Journal of Marketing Research,32 (August), 318–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, N. A., & Piercy, N. F. 1991. “Barriers to marketing implementation in the professional service firms,”journal of professional services marketing,8(1), pp. 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. E., & Strong, C. A. 1998. “Market orientation and dimensions of strategic orientation.”European Journal of Marketing,32(11/12), 1051–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. 1990. “The effect of a market orientation on business profitability.”Journal of Marketing, 54, 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. 1998. “Additional thoughts on the measurement of market orientation: A comment on deshpande and farley.”Journal of Market-Focused Management,2(3), 233–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nee, V. 1992. “Organizational dynamics of market transition: Hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in china.”Administrative Science Quarterly,37, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, C. H., Sinha R. K., & Kumar A. 2002. “Market orientation and alternative strategic orientations: A longitudinal assessment of performance implications.”Journal of Marketing,66 (October), 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. 1990.Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance.,Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, N. G. Chow, C. W., & Wu, A. 2004. “The adoption of ‘western’ management accounting/controls in china's state-owned enterprises during economic transition.”Accounting, Organizations &Society,29(3/4), 349–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. 1997. “Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views.”Strategic Management Journal,18, 679–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. A., Robbins, D. K., & Robinson, R. B. 1987. “The impact of grand strategy and planning formality on financial performance.”Strategic Management Journal, 8, 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, A. M., & Wilson, D. T. 1996. “A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy, and market orientation culture on dimension of small-firm performance.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. 2000. Business Strategies in Transition Economies.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. 2002. “Towards an institution-based view of business strategy.”Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. 1996. “The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice.” Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 492–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. 2000. “Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link.” Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 486–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. E. 1978. The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. 1986. “Self-Reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects.”Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruekert, R. W. 1992. “Developing a market orientation: An organizational strategy perspective.”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9, 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzberger, T., Sinkovics, R., & Schlegelmilch, B. 1999. “Data equivalence in cross cultural research: A comparison of classical test theory and latent trait theory based approaches.”Australian Marketing Journal, 7(2), 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selnes, E., Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. 1996. “Market orientation in united states and scandinavian companies: A cross-cultural view.”Scandinavian Journal of Management, 12(2), 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, B. P. 1988. “What the hell is market oriented?” Harvard Business Review, 66, 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, W. 1994. “Politicians and firms.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 995–1025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, W. 1997. “A survey of corporate governance.”Journal of Finance, 52, 737–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkula, J. M. 1994. “Market information processing and organizational learning.”Journal of Marketing, 58 (January), 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. 1993. “Product market strategy and performance: An analysis of the miles and snow strategy types.”European Journal of Marketing, 27(10), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. 1994. “Does competitive environment moderate the effect of market orientation—performance relationship?”journal of marketing, 58(1), 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. 1995. “Market orientation and the learning organization.”Journal of Marketing, 59 (July), 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. 2000. “The positive effect of a market orientation on business profitability: A balanced replication.”Journal of Business Research, 48(1), 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. G., Guthrie, T. R., & Chen, M. 1989. “Strategy, size and performance.”Organization Studies, 10, pp. 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J., & Baumgartner, H. 1998. “Assessing measurement invariance in cross national consumer research.”Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (June), 78–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steensma, H., Marino, L., Weaver, K., & Dickson, P. 2000. “The influence of national culture on the formation of technology alliances by entrepreneurial firms.”Academy of Management Journal, 43, 851–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, R., & Gopalakrishna, P. 2001. “The market orientation-performance relationship in the context of a developing economy: An empirical analysis.”Journal of Business Research, 53, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, O. K. 1995. “Corporate governance in china's listed companies.” Corporate Governance: An International Review, 1, 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. 2003. “Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy.”Strategic Management Journal,, 24: 1249–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. E., Jr. 1988, “Rediscovering the marketing concept”Business Horizons, 31 (may-june), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, V., Saunders, J., & Doyle, P. 1989. “The barriers to achieving stronger market orientation in british companies: An exploratory study.” Proceedings of the 22nd MEG Conference, 35–64

  • Wood, V. R., & Bhuian, S. 1993. “Market orientation and nonprofit organizations: Performance associations and research propositions.”Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 1(1), 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, V. R., Bhuian, S., & Kiecker, P. 2000. “Market orientation and organizational performance in not-for-profit hospitals.”Journal of Business Research, 48: 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K. Z., Gao,G. Y., Yang Z., & Zhou, N. 2005. “Developing strategicorientation in China: Antecedents and consequences of market and innovation orientations.”Journal of Business Research, 58, 1049–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan Li.

Additional information

This paper was supported by NSFC (70472039, 70272023).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Y., Sun, Y. & Liu, Y. An empirical study of SOEs' market orientation in transitional China. Asia Pacific J Manage 23, 93–113 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-6117-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-6117-9

Keywords

Navigation