Abstract
This paper examines public participation and the role of community psychology in an emerging environmental dispute relevant to global climate change (GCC)—whether nuclear power represents a “green” solution. From a dialectical position, we explore the nuclear debate as it is linked to GCC, and more specifically, how participation in related federally-mandated processes may be shaped by power. We present qualitative data from public meetings in two nuclear communities and analyze these data through a lens of social power and environmental justice, including an examination of nukespeak and telepolitical appeals to highlight the complexity of the issues, how the appearance of successful participation may be deceptive, and how consensus may be manipulated. We argue that CP should consider GCC to be one of the most significant social problems of our time and make every effort to be involved in the search for truly “green” solutions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
About 440 civilian nuclear power plants are in operation worldwide.
According to the Department of Energy, since its origin in the 1940s, the nuclear industry has remained unable to compete economically on its own. Federal subsidies for nuclear have dwarfed all other energy sources since then. From 1948 to the present, nuclear has received about 57% of all federal energy subsidies, as compared to fossil fuels (23%), renewables (11%) and efficiency programs (9%).
The economic, security, health and environmental problems associated with nuclear power are well-documented (e.g., see reports from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003 or the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, IEER 2006). Military and foreign policy implications are also clear, given that nuclear plants produce the radioactive components of nuclear weapons (e.g., plutonium).
Because of the public nature of these meetings and the respective data sources, our study was reviewed and approved under an “exempt” review category by the Georgia State University Institutional Review Board.
References
Aamodt motions to the nuclear regulatory commission for investigation in the matter of Metropolitan Edison company: Licensees’ reports of radioactive releases during the initial days of the TMI-2 accident and postponement of restart decision pending resolution of this investigation. Docket Filing 50–289. June 21, 1984.
Abel, T. D., & Stephan, M. (2000). The limits of civic environmentalism. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 613–627.
Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1998). Observational techniques. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Alldred, M., & Schrader-Frechette, K. (2009). Environmental injustice in siting nuclear plants. Environmental Justice, 2, 85–96.
Angelique, H. L., & Culley, M. R. (2007). History and theories of community psychology in the U.S.: Returning to political, critical and ecological roots. In S. Riemer, M. Riemer, I. Prilleltensky, & M. Montero (Eds.), International community psychology, History and theories. Berlin: Springer.
Angelique, H. L., & Cunningham, K. (2006). Media framing of dissent: The case of initial anti- nuclear protests following the Three Mile Island accident. The Australian Community Psychologist, 18, 42–57.
Aronoff, M., & Gunter, V. (1994). A pound of cure: Facilitating participatory process in technological hazard disputes. Society and Natural Resources, 7, 235–252.
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). The two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56, 947–952.
Bennett, C., Anderson, L., Cooper, S., Hassol, L., Klein, D., & Rosenblum, G. (1966). Community psychology: A report of the Boston conference on the education of psychologists for community mental health. Boston: Department of Psychology. Boston University Press.
Berg, B. L. (1998). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bullard, R. D. (1990). Dumping in dixie. Race, class and environmental quality. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Bullard, R. D. (1996). Environmental justice: It’s more than waste facility siting. Social Science Quarterly, 77, 493–499.
Bullard, R. D., & Johnson, G. S. (2000). Environmental justice: Grassroots activism and its impact on public policy decision-making. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 555–578.
Cable, S., Walsh, E. J., & Warland, R. H. (1988). Differential paths to political activism: Comparisons of four mobilization processes after the three mile island accident. Social Forces, 66, 951–969.
Carnes, S. A., Schweitzer, M., Peelle, E. B., Wolfe, A. K., & Munro, J. F. (1998). Measuring the success of public participation on environmental restoration and waste management activities in the U.S. department of energy. Technology in Society, 20, 385–406.
Churchill, W., & LaDuke, W. (1983). Native America: The political economy of radioactive colonialism. Insurgent Sociologist, 13, 51–63.
Civil Society Institute. (2006). American views of alternative energy choices: Wind, solar and nuclear energy. Accessed August 2, 2008 from: http://www.civilsocietyinstitute.org/reports/R_CSI%20Alternative%20Energy%20524.pdf.
Cleary, P. D., & Houts, P. S. (1984). The psychological impact of the three mile island incident. Journal of Human Stress and Coping, 10, 28–34.
Couch, S. R., Kroll-Smith, S., & Wilson, J. P. (1997). Toxic contamination and alienation: Community disorder and the individual. Research in Community Sociology, 7, 95–115.
Culley, M. R. (1998). Women’s perceived transformation relative to their long-term three mile island activism: Implications for toxic waste activism and scholarship. Unpublished master’s thesis. The Pennsylvania State University.
Culley, M. R. (2004). Power and “official” vehicles for public participation in a local hazardous waste setting: A community case study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. The University of Missouri-Kansas City.
Culley, M. R., & Angelique, H. L. (2003). Women’s gendered experiences as long-term three mile island activists. Gender & Society, 17, 445–461.
Culley, M. R., & Angelique, H. L. (2010). Nuclear power: Renaissance or relapse? Global climate change and long-term three mile island activists’ narratives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45, 231–246.
Culley, M. R., & Hughey, J. (2008). Power and public participation in a local hazardous waste dispute: A community case study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 99–114.
Culley, M. R., Ogley-Oliver, E., Carton, A., & Street, J. (2010). Media framing of proposed nuclear reactors: An analysis of print media. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, published online July 20, doi:10.1002/casp.1056.
Cvetkovich, G., & Earle, T. C. (1994). The construction of justice: A case study of public participation in land management. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 161–178.
Dahl, R. A. (1969). The concept of power. In R. Bell, D. M. Edwards, & R. H. Wagner (Eds.), Political power: A reader in theory and research. New York: NY: Free Press.
Gaventa, J. (1980). Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an appalacian valley. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gould, K. A. (1991). The sweet smell of money: Economic dependency and local environmental political mobilization. Society and Natural Resources, 4, 133–150.
Gould, K. A. (1992). Putting the (w)raps on public participation: Remedial action planning and working-class power in the great lakes. Sociological Practice Review, 3, 133–139.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
Heller, K. (1989). Return to community. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 1–15.
Hilgartner, S., Bell, R. C., & O’Connor, R. (1982). Nukespeak: Nuclear language, visions and mindset. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
Hogan, J. M. (1994). The nuclear freeze campaign: Rhetoric and foreign policy in the telepolitical age. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
IEER. (2006). Insurmountable risks: The dangers of using nuclear power to combat global climate change. Washington DC: Institute for Energy and Environmental Research.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007). Fourth assessment report: Climate change. World Meteorological Organization and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
Kelly, J. G. (1966). Ecological constraints of mental health services. American Psychologist, 21, 535–539.
Kelly, J. G. (1970). Toward an ecological conception of preventive interventions. In D. Adelson & B. Kalis (Eds.), Community psychology and mental health (pp. 126–145). Chandler: Scranton, PA.
Kieffer, C. H. (1984). Citizen empowerment: A developmental perspective. Prevention in Human Services, 3, 9–36.
Konisky, D. M., & Beirerle, T. C. (2001). Innovations in public participation and environmental decision making: Examples from the great lakes region. Society and Natural Resources, 14, 815–826.
Lowry, R. C. (1998). All hazardous waste politics is local: Grass-roots advocacy and public participation in siting and cleanup disputes. Policy Studies Journal, 26, 748–759.
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan Press, Ltd.
Makhijani, A. (2007). Carbon-free and nuclear-free: A roadmap for U.S. energy policy. Washington, DC: IEER Press and RDR Books.
Mazmanian, D. A., & Morell, D. (1992). Beyond superfailure: America’s toxic policy for the 1990s. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
MIT. (2003). The future of nuclear power: An interdisciplinary MIT study. Boston: MA, MIT Press.
Newbrough, J. R. (1995). Toward community: A third position. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 9–37.
NIRS. (2008). Nuclear information and resource service petition: u.s. organizations against nuclear power as a means to address climate crisis. Accessed August 3, 2008 from: http://www.nirs.org/petition2/ussigners.pdf.
Öko Institute. (1997). Comparing greenhouse-gas emissions and abatement costs of nuclear and alternative energy options from a life-cycle perspective. Accessed February 25, 2008 from: http://www.oeko.de/service/gemis/files/info/nuke_co2_en.pdf.
Pellow, D. N. (2004). The politics of illegal dumping: An environmental justice framework. Qualitative Sociology, 27, 511–525.
PEW Research Center. (2006). Survey report. Accessed August 3, 2008 from: http://people-press.org/report/269/iran-a-growing-danger-bush-gaining-on-spy-issue.
Price, R. (1989). Bearing witness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 151–167.
Prilleltensky, I. (1997). Values, assumptions, and practices: Assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist, 47, 517–535.
Prilleltensky, I. (2008). The role of power in wellness, oppression and liberation: The promise of psychopolitical validity. Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 113–136.
Prince-Embury, S., & Rooney, J. F. (1987). Psychological symptoms of residents in the aftermath of the three mile island nuclear accident and restart. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 779–790.
Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 1–25.
Rappaport, J. (1995). Empowerment meets narrative: Listening to stories and creating settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 795–807.
Rich, R. C., Edelstein, M., Hallman, W. K., & Wandersman, A. H. (1995). Citizen participation and empowerment: The case of local environmental hazards. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 657–676.
Riger, S. (1990). Ways of knowing and organizational approaches to community research. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. Jason (Eds.), Researching community psychology (pp. 42–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Shinn, M. (1987). Expanding community psychology’s domain. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 555–574.
Speer, P., & Hughey, J. (1995). Community organizing: An ecological route to empowerment and power. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 729–748.
Speer, P., Ontkush, M., Schmitt, B., Raman, P., Jackson, C., Rengert, K. M., et al. (2003). The intentional exercise of power: Community organizing in Camden, New Jersey. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13, 399–408.
Strauss, L. (1954). Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission’s Speech to the National Association of Science Writers. New York, NY.
Szasz, A., & Meuser, M. (1997). Public participation in the cleanup of contaminated military facilities: Democratization or anticipatory cooptation. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 34, 211–233.
Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York, NY: The Falmer Press.
Totten, S. (1984). Orwellian language in the nuclear age. Curriculum Review, 23, 43–46.
Vlek, C. (2000). Essential psychology for environmental policy making. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 153–167.
Walsh, E. J. (1988). Democracy in the shadows: Citizen mobilization in the wake of the accident at Three Mile Island. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (1990). Citizen participation, voluntary organizations and community development: Insights for empowerment and research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 41–177.
Webb, D. B. (1989). PBB: An environmental contamination in Michigan. Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 30–46.
Wing, S., Richardson, D., Armstrong, D., & Crawford-Brown, D. (1997). A re-evaluation of cancer incidence near the three mile island nuclear plant: The collision of evidence and assumption. Environmental Health Perspectives, 105, 52–57.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Culley, M.R., Angelique, H. Participation, Power, and the Role of Community Psychology in Environmental Disputes: A Tale of Two Nuclear Cities. Am J Community Psychol 47, 410–426 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9395-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9395-9