Skip to main content
Log in

Community organizing: An ecological route to empowerment and power

  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

An important contribution to empowerment theory and community psychology practice can be made by examining how the concept of social power is developed and manifested in the context of community organizing. Theory and practice may be further informed through an ecological analysis of organizing processes and interventions. Lessons from a national community organizing network highlight the relationship between empowerment and power through a set of organizing principles and a cycle of organizing activity. Perhaps most important is the understanding that a reciprocal relationship exists between development of power for community organizations and individual empowerment for organization members. Implications for empowerment theory in the community organizing domain are provided in a matrix adapted from Zimmerman's description of empowerment processes and outcomes at multiple levels of analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alinsky, S. D. (1971).Rules for radicals. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power.American Political Science Review, 56, 947–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Neuhaus, R. J. (1977).To empower people: The role of mediating structures in public policy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavis, D. M., Speer, P. W., Resnick, I., & Zippay, A. (1993). Building community capacity to address alcohol and drug abuse: Getting to the heart of the problem. In R. C. Davis, A. J. Lurigio, & D. Rosenbaum (Eds.),Drugs and community (pp. 251–284). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clamp, C. (1987). Managing cooperation at Mondragon: Persistence and change. In E. M. Bennett (Ed.),Social intervention: Theory and practice (pp. 371–392). Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florin, P., & Wandersman, A. (1990). An introduction to citizen participation, voluntary organizations, and community development: Insights for empowerment through research.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970).Pedagogy for the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1983).The anatomy of power. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, J. (1980).Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, L. M. (1990). Working with women of color: An empowerment perspective.Social Work, 35, 149–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. (1989). Return to community.American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 1–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. G. (1987). An ecological paradigm: Defining mental Health Consultation as a preventive service.Prevention in Human Services, 6, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. G. (1992). On teaching the practice of prevention: Integrating the concept of prevention. In M. Chesler, S. E. Goldsten, & Joffe, J. M. (Eds.),The present and future of prevention (pp. 251–264). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, C. H. (1984). Citizen empowerment: A development perspective.Prevention in Human Services, 3, (2/3), 9–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D., & Wood, J. R. (1981).Organized for action. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. E. (1958). The local community as an ecology of games.American Journal of Sociology, 64, 251–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1974).Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondros, J. B., & Wildon, S. M. (1994).Organizing for power and empowerment. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbrough, J. R. (1992). Community psychology in the postmodern world.Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. E. (1936). Human ecology.American Journal of Sociology 17, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, G. F. A. (1984).Activism that makes sense: Congregations and community organization. Chicago, IL: ACTA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polsby, N. W. (1959). The sociology of community power: A reassessment.Social Forces, 37, 232–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, R. H. (1990). Whither participation and empowerment.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 163–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1984). Studies in empowerment: Introduction to the issue.Prevention in Human Services, 5, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemples of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology.American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 121–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reitzes, D. C., & Reitzes, D. C. (1987). The Alinsky legacy: Alive and kicking. In L. Kriesberg (Eds.),Social movements, conflicts and change. Greenwich, CT: Jai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riger, S. (1993). What's wrong the empowerment.American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, B., & Hanna, M. G. (1994). Lessons for academics grassroots community organizing: A case study—the Industrial Areas Foundation.Journal of Community Practice, 1, 63–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, P. W., Hughey, J., Gensheimer, L. K., & Adams-Leavitt, W. (1995). Organizing for power: A comparative case study.Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, C., & Levin, G. (1987). Empowerment: An emerging mental health technology.Journal of Primary Prevention, 8, 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, E. J. (1984). Toward a distinctive community psychology: An ecological metaphor for conduct of community research and the nature of training.American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, E. J. (1994). Human diversity and community psychology: Where ecology and empowerment meet.American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 583–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, T. A., & Trickett, E. J. (1983). Preventive interventions and the human context: Ecological approaches to environmental assessment and change. In R. D. Felner, L. J. Jason, J. N. Moritsugu, & S. S. Farber (Eds.),Preventive psychology: Theory, research and practice. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R., Fullilove, M. T., & Wallace, D. (1992). Family systems and deurbanization: Implications for substance abuse. In J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, & R. B. Millman, (Eds.),Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook. Philadelphia, PA: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, N., & Bernstein, E. (1994). Introduction to community empowerment, participatory education and health.Health Education Quartely, 21, 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (in press). Citizen participation. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.),Handbook of community psychology. New York: Plenum Press.

  • Wicker, A. W. (1990). Levels of analysis of an ecological issue in the relational psychologies. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. Jason (Eds.),Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and methods. (pp. 127–130). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F., & Whyte, K. K. (1991).Making Mondragon: The growth and dynamics of the worker cooperative complex. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A. (1990). Taking aim an empowerment research: On the distinction between individual and psychological conceptions.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 169–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman (1993 June).Empowerment theory: How do we know it when we see it? Paper presented at the fourth biennial Conference on Community Research and Action, Williamsburg, VA.

  • Zimmerman, M. A. (in press). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.),Handbook of community psychology, New York: Plenum Press.

  • Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control and psychological empowerment.American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 725–750.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A., & Zahniser, J. H. (1991). Refinements of sphere-specific measures of perceived control: Development of a sociopolitical control scale.Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Speer, P.W., Hughey, J. Community organizing: An ecological route to empowerment and power. Am J Commun Psychol 23, 729–748 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506989

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506989

Key Words

Navigation