Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term Outcome of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III and Grade IV Hemorrhoids

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to assess the long-term results of stapled hemorrhoidopexy in 291 patients with Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoids after a minimum follow-up of five years.

Methods

Records of patients submitted to stapled hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoids between January 1999 and December 2002 were retrospectively analyzed. Long-term outcome was evaluated with a standardized questionnaire and an office visit, including anorectal examination and rigid proctoscopy.

Results

A total of 291 patients with Grade III (57.4 percent) and Grade IV (42.6 percent) hemorrhoids were evaluated. Intraoperative (20.3 percent) and postoperative (4.8 percent) bleeding was the most frequent complication. The questionnaire was submitted to all patients at a median follow-up of 73 (range 60–93) months. There were no symptoms related to hemorrhoids in 65.3 percent of patients, moderate symptoms in 25.4 percent of patients, and severe symptoms in 9.3 percent of patients. Fifty-three (18.2 percent) patients had recurrence. Reoperation was necessary in 21 (7.2 percent) patients (4 in Grade III hemorrhoids and 17 in Grade IV hemorrhoids; P < 0.001), with no recurrent symptoms and/or prolapse. Patient satisfaction for operation was 89.7 percent.

Conclusions

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a safe and effective treatment for Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoids. Recurrence requiring reoperation was higher in Grade IV hemorrhoids than in Grade III hemorrhoids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johansson JF, Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiologic study. Gastroenterology 1990;98:380–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. MacRae HM, MacLeod RG. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:687–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapsed with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome, Italy, June 3–6, 1998.

  4. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Systemic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M, et al. Randomized controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapsed. Am J Surg 2001;182:64–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355:782–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy – cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound assessment at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;46:1666–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S. Prospective randomized multi center trial comparing stapled with open hemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:669–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Palimento D, Picchio M, Attanasio U, Lombardi A, Bambini C, Renda A. Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results. World J Surg 2003;27:203–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW. Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 2006;93:226–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Finco C, Sarzo G, Savastano S, Degregori S, Merigliano S. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse: is it worthwhile. Colorectal Dis 2006;8:130–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gençosmanolu R, Sad O, Koç D, Inceoglu R. Hemorrhoidectomy: open or closed technique? A prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:70–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen HH, Wang JY, Changchien CR, et al. Risk factors associated with posthemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1096–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Arroyo A, Perez-Vicente F, Miranda E, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two different circular staplers for mucosectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. World J Surg 2006;30:1305–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zaheer S, Reilly WT, Pemberton JH, Ilstrup D. Urinary retention after operations for benign anorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:696–704.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, Fearn SJ, Brough WA. Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1437–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, Wang J, Zhang L. The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systemic review and meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21:172–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1824–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D. Life-threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000;335:810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Beattie GC, Lam JP, Loudon MA. A prospective evaluation of the introduction of circonferential stapled anoplasty in the management of haemorrhoids and mucosa prolapsed. Colorectal Dis 2000;2:137–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Roviaro G. Stapled transanal rectal resection versus stapled anopexy in the cure of hemorrhoids associated with rectal prolapse. A randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007;22:245–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Picchio M, Palimento D, Attanasio U, Renda A. Stapled vs open hemorrhoidectomy: long-term outcome of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21:668–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Lanteri R, Di Cataldo A, Licata A. Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004;19:239–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I. Day-case stapled (circular) vs diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:93–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P. Randomized trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002;89:1376–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Milito G, Gabrielli F, Canuti S. Long-term out come of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2007;94:1033–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Guenin MO, Rosenthal R, Kern B, Peterli R, von Flüe M, Ackermann C. Long-term results and patient satisfaction after Ferguson’s hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1523–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA. Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids (Review). The Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews 2006, Issue 4.

  29. Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, Hartley JE, White TJ, Monson JR. Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2003;361:1437–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P, De Migule M. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:809–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Papagrigoriadis S, Vardonikolaki A. Stapled anopexy with double stapling: a safe and effective treatment for fourth-degree haemorrhoids. Acta Chir Belg 2006;106:717–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Au-Yong I, Rowsell M, Hemingway DM. Randomized controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy vs. conventional haemorrhoidectomy: a three and a half year follow-up. Colorectal Dis 2004;6:37–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1837–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tsang C, Eu KW. Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:1449–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello Picchio M.D..

Additional information

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

Ceci, F., Picchio, M., Palimento, D. et al. Long-term Outcome of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III and Grade IV Hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 1107–1112 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9333-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9333-1

KEY WORDS

Navigation