Abstract
Purpose
This study was designed to assess the long-term results of stapled hemorrhoidopexy in 291 patients with Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoids after a minimum follow-up of five years.
Methods
Records of patients submitted to stapled hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoids between January 1999 and December 2002 were retrospectively analyzed. Long-term outcome was evaluated with a standardized questionnaire and an office visit, including anorectal examination and rigid proctoscopy.
Results
A total of 291 patients with Grade III (57.4 percent) and Grade IV (42.6 percent) hemorrhoids were evaluated. Intraoperative (20.3 percent) and postoperative (4.8 percent) bleeding was the most frequent complication. The questionnaire was submitted to all patients at a median follow-up of 73 (range 60–93) months. There were no symptoms related to hemorrhoids in 65.3 percent of patients, moderate symptoms in 25.4 percent of patients, and severe symptoms in 9.3 percent of patients. Fifty-three (18.2 percent) patients had recurrence. Reoperation was necessary in 21 (7.2 percent) patients (4 in Grade III hemorrhoids and 17 in Grade IV hemorrhoids; P < 0.001), with no recurrent symptoms and/or prolapse. Patient satisfaction for operation was 89.7 percent.
Conclusions
Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a safe and effective treatment for Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoids. Recurrence requiring reoperation was higher in Grade IV hemorrhoids than in Grade III hemorrhoids.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Johansson JF, Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiologic study. Gastroenterology 1990;98:380–6.
MacRae HM, MacLeod RG. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:687–94.
Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapsed with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome, Italy, June 3–6, 1998.
Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Systemic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1–15.
Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M, et al. Randomized controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapsed. Am J Surg 2001;182:64–8.
Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355:782–5.
Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy – cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound assessment at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;46:1666–75.
Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S. Prospective randomized multi center trial comparing stapled with open hemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:669–74.
Palimento D, Picchio M, Attanasio U, Lombardi A, Bambini C, Renda A. Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results. World J Surg 2003;27:203–7.
Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW. Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 2006;93:226–30.
Finco C, Sarzo G, Savastano S, Degregori S, Merigliano S. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse: is it worthwhile. Colorectal Dis 2006;8:130–4.
Gençosmanolu R, Sad O, Koç D, Inceoglu R. Hemorrhoidectomy: open or closed technique? A prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:70–5.
Chen HH, Wang JY, Changchien CR, et al. Risk factors associated with posthemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1096–9.
Arroyo A, Perez-Vicente F, Miranda E, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two different circular staplers for mucosectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. World J Surg 2006;30:1305–10.
Zaheer S, Reilly WT, Pemberton JH, Ilstrup D. Urinary retention after operations for benign anorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:696–704.
Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, Fearn SJ, Brough WA. Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1437–44.
Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, Wang J, Zhang L. The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systemic review and meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21:172–8.
Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1824–36.
Molloy RG, Kingsmore D. Life-threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000;335:810.
Beattie GC, Lam JP, Loudon MA. A prospective evaluation of the introduction of circonferential stapled anoplasty in the management of haemorrhoids and mucosa prolapsed. Colorectal Dis 2000;2:137–42.
Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Roviaro G. Stapled transanal rectal resection versus stapled anopexy in the cure of hemorrhoids associated with rectal prolapse. A randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007;22:245–51.
Picchio M, Palimento D, Attanasio U, Renda A. Stapled vs open hemorrhoidectomy: long-term outcome of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21:668–9.
Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Lanteri R, Di Cataldo A, Licata A. Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004;19:239–44.
Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I. Day-case stapled (circular) vs diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:93–9.
Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P. Randomized trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002;89:1376–81.
Ganio E, Altomare DF, Milito G, Gabrielli F, Canuti S. Long-term out come of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2007;94:1033–7.
Guenin MO, Rosenthal R, Kern B, Peterli R, von Flüe M, Ackermann C. Long-term results and patient satisfaction after Ferguson’s hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1523–7.
Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA. Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids (Review). The Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews 2006, Issue 4.
Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, Hartley JE, White TJ, Monson JR. Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2003;361:1437–8.
Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P, De Migule M. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:809–15.
Papagrigoriadis S, Vardonikolaki A. Stapled anopexy with double stapling: a safe and effective treatment for fourth-degree haemorrhoids. Acta Chir Belg 2006;106:717–8.
Au-Yong I, Rowsell M, Hemingway DM. Randomized controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy vs. conventional haemorrhoidectomy: a three and a half year follow-up. Colorectal Dis 2004;6:37–8.
Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1837–45.
Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tsang C, Eu KW. Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:1449–55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Reprints are not available.
About this article
Cite this article
Ceci, F., Picchio, M., Palimento, D. et al. Long-term Outcome of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III and Grade IV Hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 1107–1112 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9333-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9333-1