Skip to main content
Log in

Improving LEO precise orbit determination with BDS PCV calibration

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the new members of the Chinese Fengyun-3 meteorological satellites series, the Fengyun-3C (FY-3C) and Fengyun-3D (FY-3D) satellites were launched in 2013 and 2017, respectively. For the first time, both FY-3C and FY-3D satellites carry a high-precision BDS and GPS dual-system space-borne receiver to fulfill their stringent requirement of precise orbit determination (POD). The fusion of BDS and GPS onboard observations can significantly improve the spatial geometry, robustness and reliability of low earth orbit (LEO) POD. In order to achieve high-quality orbit recovery from the onboard GNSS observations, the in-flight calibration of phase center variation (PCV) is a prerequisite. In this contribution, we calibrate the BDS PCV for improving the orbit precision of both FY-3C and FY-3D satellites for the first time. The results show that with the GPS PCV corrections, the residuals of GPS carrier phase observations present a reduction of about 17.6% and 21.9% for FY-3C and FY-3D satellites, respectively, and overlap differences of the GPS-only orbit are reduced on average by 3 and 5 mm. After correcting for BDS PCV, the GPS and BDS combined (GC) POD achieves a better orbit precision for both FY-3C and FY-3D satellites. The application of BDS PCV corrections can contribute to a reduction of up to 12% in BDS phase residuals and a decrease of up to 3 mm in orbit overlap differences in 1-dimension. It indicates that the introduction of the BDS PCV model can significantly improve the orbit precision. Similar orbit precision can be achieved when using the GPS PCV model to replace the BDS PCV model in the GC POD. It demonstrates that for onboard receivers, the GPS PCV model can be used to correct PCV errors of BDS signals, which is commonly used in precise point positioning of ground stations when the BDS PCV is not available. Furthermore, we find that it is feasible to generate an integrated PCV model from both onboard BDS and GPS observations. After application of the integrated PCV model, the FY-3C and FY-3D orbits of GC POD present a better precision than the solution using the single-system PCV model and the largest precision improvement of about 1 mm can be recognized in the radial component. With such a high-quality orbit, FY-3C and FY-3D satellites can be expected to make more contributions to meteorological studies and applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai W, Sun Y, Du Q, Yang G, Yang Z, Zhang P, Bi Y, Wang X, Cheng C, Han Y (2014) An introduction to the FY3 GNOS instrument and mountain-top tests. Atmos Meas Tech 7(6):1817–1823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi Y, Yang Z, Zhang P, Sun Y, Bai W, Du Q, Yang G, Chen J, Liao M (2012) An introduction to China FY3 radio occultation mission and its measurement simulation. Adv Space Res 49(7):1191–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock H, Jäggi A, Meyer U, Dach R, Beutler G (2011) Impact of GPS antenna phase center variations on precise orbits of the GOCE satellite. Adv Space Res 47(11):1885–1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai Y et al (2017) In-orbit performance of GNOS on-board FY3-C and the enhancements for FY3-D satellite. Adv Space Res 60(12):2812–2821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Görres B, Campbell J, Becker M, Siemes M (2006) Absolute calibration of GPS antennas: laboratory results and comparison with field and robot techniques. GPS Solut 10(2):136–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo F, Li X, Zhang X, Wang J (2016) Assessment of precise orbit and clock products for Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS from IGS Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX). GPS Solut 21(1):279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Zhao Q, Guo X, Liu X, Liu J, Zhou Q (2015) Quality assessment of onboard GPS receiver and its combination with DORIS and SLR for Haiyang 2A precise orbit determination. Sci China Earth Sci 58(1):138–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines B, Bar-Sever Y, Bertiger W, Desai S, Willis P (2004) One-centimeter orbit determination for Jason-1: new GPS based strategies. Mar Geod 27(1–2):299–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines B, Bar-Sever Y, Bertiger W, Shailen D, Desai S, Harvey N, Sibois A, Weiss J (2015) Realizing a terrestrial reference frame using the global positioning system. J Geophys Res 120(8):5911–5939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäggi A, Dach R, Montenbruck O, Hugentobler U, Bock H, Beutler G (2009) Phase center modeling for LEO GPS receiver antennas and its impact on precise orbit determination. J Geod 83:1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-009-0333-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Li W, Shi C, Jiang K, Guo X, Dai X, Meng X, Yang Z, Yang G, Liao M (2017) Precise orbit determination of the Fengyun-3C satellite using onboard GPS and BDS observations. J Geod 91(11):1313–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Li X, Yuan Y, Zhang K, Zhang X, Wickert J (2018a) Multi-GNSS phase delay estimation and PPP ambiguity resolution: GPS, BDS, GLONASS. Galileo. J Geod 92(6):579–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Zhang K, Zhang Q, Zhang W, Yuan Y, Li X (2018b) Integrated orbit determination of FY-3C, BDS and GPS satellites. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 123(9):8143–8160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthcke SB, Zelensky NP, Rowlands DD, Lemoine FG, Williams TA (2003) The 1-centimeter orbit: Jason-1 precision orbit determination using GPS, SLR, DORIS, and altimeter data. Mar Geod 26:399–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/714044529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao X, Visser PNAM, van den Ijssel J (2017) Impact of GPS antenna phase center and code residual variation maps on orbit and baseline determination of GRACE. Adv Space Res 59(12):2987–3002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck O, Garcia-Fernandez M, Yoon Y, Schön S, Jäggi A (2009) Antenna phase center calibration for precise positioning of LEO satellites. GPS Solut 13(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck O et al (2017) The Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service (IGS)—achievement, prospects and challenges. Adv Space Res 59(7):1671–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid R, Steigenberger P, Gendt G, Ge M, Rothacher M (2007) Generation of a consistent absolute phase-center correction model for GPS receiver and satellite antennas. J Geod 81(12):781–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Guo J, Zhao Q, Liu J (2018) Empirically derived model of solar radiation pressure for BeiDou GEO satellites. J Geod. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1199-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanninger L, Beer S (2014) BeiDou satellite-induced code pseudorange variations: diagnosis and therapy. GPS Solut 19(4):639–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong C, Lu C, Zhu J, Ding H (2017) Orbit determination using real tracking data from FY3C-GNOS. Adv Space Res 60(3):543–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Guo X, Qu L, Zhao Q (2018a) Precise orbit determination of FY-3C with calibration of orbit biases in BeiDou GEO Satellite. Remote Sens 10(3):382. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10030382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Zhang Q, Zhang W, Li X, Ma F (2018b) Precise orbit determination for FY-3C satellite using the onboard BDS GPS observations during 2013~2017. Geophysical Research Abstracts, vol 20, sRef-ID: EGU2018-704-1, European Geosciences Union General Assembly

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the International GNSS Service (IGS) for providing the precise orbit and clock products of GPS and BDS at the IGS Web site (ftp://cddis.gsfc.nasa.gov). Thanks also go to the EPOS-RT/PANDA software from Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ), Germany. The onboard BDS and GPS tracking data are available from ftp://59.172.178.17. The numerical calculations have been done on the supercomputing system in the Supercomputing Center of Wuhan University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cuixian Lu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, C., Zhang, Q., Zhang, K. et al. Improving LEO precise orbit determination with BDS PCV calibration. GPS Solut 23, 109 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-019-0899-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-019-0899-y

Keywords

Navigation