Skip to main content
Log in

Antenna phase center calibration for precise positioning of LEO satellites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phase center variations of the receiver and transmitter antenna constitute a remaining uncertainty in the high precision orbit determination (POD) of low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites using GPS measurements. Triggered by the adoption of absolute phase patterns in the IGS processing standards, a calibration of the Sensor Systems S67-1575-14 antenna with GFZ choke ring has been conducted that serves as POD antenna on various geodetic satellites such as CHAMP, GRACE and TerraSAR-X. Nominal phase patterns have been obtained with a robotic measurement system in a field campaign and the results were used to assess the impact of receiver antenna phase patterns on the achievable positioning accuracy. Along with this, phase center distortions in the actual spacecraft environment were characterized based on POD carrier phase residuals for the GRACE and TerraSAR-X missions. It is shown that the combined ground and in-flight calibration can improve the carrier phase modeling accuracy to a level of 4 mm which is close to the pure receiver noise. A 3.5 cm (3D rms) consistency of kinematic and reduced dynamic orbit determination solutions is achieved for TerraSAR-X, which presumably reflects the limitations of presently available GPS ephemeris products. The reduced dynamic solutions themselves match the observations of high grade satellite laser ranging stations to 1.5 cm but are potentially affected by cross-track biases at the cm-level. With respect to the GPS based relative navigation of TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X formation, the in-flight calibration of the antenna phase patterns is considered essential for an accurate modeling of differential carrier phase measurements and a mm level baseline reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bar-Sever Y, Bertiger W, Byun S, Desai S, Haines B, Hajj G (2006) Calibrating the GPS satellites transmit antenna. In: IGS Workshop 2006, Darmstadt, pp 8–11

  • Bettadpur S (2004) Gravity recovery and climate experiment product specification document. GRACE 327-720 (CSR-GR-03-02), Rev 4.2, August 2, 2004, Center for Space Research, The University of Texas at Austin

  • Dach R, Hugentobler U, Fridez P, Meindl M (2007) Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0, University of Bern

  • Dilssner F, Seeber G, Schmitz M, Wübbena G, Tosos G, Maeusli D (2006) Characterisation of GOCE SSTI Antennas. Zeitschrift für Geodäsie. Geoinformation Landmanagement 131:61–71 (Zfv)

    Google Scholar 

  • Görres B, Campbell J, Siemes M, Becker M (2004) New anechoic chamber results and comparison with field and robot techniques. In: Presented at the IGS Workshop 2004, Bern, Switzerland

  • Jäggi A, Hugentobler U, Bock H, Beutler G (2007) Precise orbit determination for GRACE using undifferenced or doubly differenced GPS data. Adv Space Res 39:1612–1619. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2007.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouba J (2008) A simplified yaw-attitude model for eclipsing GPS satellites. GPS Solut. doi:10.1007/s10291-008-0092-1

  • Luthke SB, Zelensky NP, Rowlands DD, Lemoine FG, Williams TA (2003) The 1-centimeter orbit: Jason-1 precision orbit determination using GPS, SLR, DORIS, and Altimeter data. Mar Geod 26:399–421. doi:10.1080/714044529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines B, Bar-Sever Y, Bertiger W, Desai S, Willis P (2004) One-centimeter orbit determination for Jason-1: new GPS based strategies. Mar Geod 27(1–2):299–318. doi:10.1080/01490410490465300

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugentobler U, Meindl M, Beutler G, Bock H, Dach R, Jäggi A et al (2006) CODE IGS analysis center technical report 2003/04. In: Gowey k (ed) IGS technical reports 2003/04. IGS Central Bureau, JPL, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang z, Tapley B, Bettadpur S, Ries J, Nagel P, Pastor R (2006) Precise orbit determination for the GRACE mission using only GPS data. J Geod 80:322–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck O, Kroes R (2003) In-flight performance analysis of the CHAMP BlackJack receiver. GPS Solut 7:74–86. doi:10.1007/s10291-003-0055-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck O, van Helleputte T, Kroes R, Gill E (2005) Reduced dynamic orbit determination using GPS code and carrier measurements. Aerosp Sci Technol 9(3):261–271. doi:101016/jast200501003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck O, Garcia-Fernandez M, Williams J (2006) Performance comparison of semi-codeless GPS receivers for LEO satellites. GPS Solut 10:249–261. doi:101007/s10291-006-0025-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearlman MR, Degnan JJ, Bosworth JM (2002) The international laser ranging service. Adv Space Res 30(2):135–143. doi:10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00277-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothacher M, Schmid R (2006) ANTEX: The Antenna Exchange Format Version 1.3, 20 September 2006

  • Schmid R, Rothacher M, Thaller D, Steigenberger P (2005) Absolute phase center corrections of satellite and receiver antennas—impact on global GPS solutions and estimation of azimuthal phase center variations of the satellite antenna. GPS Solut 9(4):283–293. doi:10.1007/s10291-005-0134-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid R, Steigenberger P, Gendt G, Ge M, Rothacher M (2007) generation of a consistent absolute phase center correction model for GPS receiver and satellite antennas. J Geod 81(12):781–798. doi:10.1007/s00190-007-0148-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sensor Systems (2003) Outline drawing L1/L2 GPS antenna passive 1575/1227 MHz (S67-1575-14); Doc. No. 0575141A #4 SA 10-31-03; Sensor Systems Inc

  • Wübbena G, Schmitz M, Menge F, Böder V, Seeber G (2000) Automated absolute field calibration of GPS antennas in real-time. In: Proc ION GPS-2000, pp 2514–2522

Download references

Acknowledgments

The IGOR receiver, choke rings and SLR reflector of TerraSAR-X have been contributed by the GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ), Potsdam, to enable a high precision orbit determination of this spacecraft. Precise GPS ephemerides for use within this study have been obtained from the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe at the Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern (AIUB). Satellite laser ranging measurements of the GRACE and TerraSAR-X were provided by the International Laser Ranging Service (ILRS). The support of the above institutions is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Montenbruck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montenbruck, O., Garcia-Fernandez, M., Yoon, Y. et al. Antenna phase center calibration for precise positioning of LEO satellites. GPS Solut 13, 23–34 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-008-0094-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-008-0094-z

Keywords

Navigation