Abstract
An overview is given of the most important uncertainty sources that affect analytical UV-Vis spectrophotometric measurements. Altogether, eight uncertainty sources are discussed that are expected to have influence in chemical analysis. It is demonstrated that the well-known intrinsic (or “physical”) sources of uncertainty that originate from the instrument itself (repeatability of spectrophotometer reading, spectrophotometer drift, stray light, etc.) often have significantly lower contributions to the combined uncertainty of the result than the “chemical” sources of uncertainty that originate from the object under study (interference from the constituents of the matrix, decomposition of the photometric complex, etc.). Although selectivity of a photometric procedure is often considered more a validation topic than an uncertainty topic, it is very often important to include it also in the uncertainty budget.
Usually the most difficult part of uncertainty estimation of a chemical measurement result is to evaluate the magnitude of the actual uncertainty components, especially the chemical ones. For most of the uncertainty sources discussed in this paper, approaches for their evaluation are given. A generic uncertainty budget for absorbance is presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ellison S, Wegscheider W, Williams A (1997) Anal Chem 69:A607
Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (1993) ISO, Geneva, Switzerland
Eurachem/Citac guide (2000) Quantifying the uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2nd edn.
ISO 6777 (1984) Water quality. Determination of nitrite. Molecular absorption spectrometric method. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland
ISO 6491 (2000) Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of phosphorus content. Spectrometric method. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland
ISO 7150/1-1984 Water quality. Determination of ammonium – Part 1: Manual spectrometric method. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland
Meehan EJ (1981) In: Elving PJ, Meehan EJ, Kolthoff IM (eds) Treatise on analytical chemistry. Part I, vol 7. Optical methods of analysis. Wiley, New York, pp 53–157
Skoog DA, Holler FJ, Nieman TA (1998) Principles of instrumental analysis, 5th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia
Barwick VJ, Chrom JA (1999) Analyst 849:13
Ramachandran R, Rashmi (1999) Analyst 124:1099
Drolc A, Roš M (2002) Acta Chim Slov 49:409
Traks J, Sooväli L, Leito I (2005) Accred Qual Assur 10:197
The Eurachem Measurement Uncertainty Web site: http://www.measurementuncertainty. org/
ISO GUM Uncertainty examples Web site hosted by Testing Centre of University of Tartu http://www.ut.ee/katsekoda/GUM_ examples/
Inczédy J, Lengyel T, Ure AM (1997) Compendium of analytical nomenclature. Definitive Rules, 3rd edn. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry
Clare JF (2005) Accred Qual Assur 10:283
Kostkowski HJ (1997) Reliable spectroradiometry. Spectroradiometry Consulting
ISO (2004) International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology (VIM) 3rd edn, Draft, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland
Burke RW, Mavrodineanu R (1983) Accuracy in analytical spectrophotometry. NBS Special Publication 260-81. NBS, Washington, DC
Thompson M, Ellison SLR (2005) Accred Qual Assur 10:82
Massart DL, Kaufman L, Michotte Y, Deming SN, Vandeginste BG (1998) Chemometrics: A textbook, Elsevier, New York
Van der Veen AMH, Pauwels J (2000) Accred Qual Assur 5:464
The “GUM Workbench” package, available from Metrodata GmbH, http://www.metrodata.de/
The discussion over different weighed regression methods is outside the scope of this paper. The dominating regression method in spectrophotometric analysis is the conventional linear regression.
Charlot G (1961) Les Méthodes de la Chimie Analytique, quatriême édition, Masson et Cie (in French)
Pelikan P, Čeppan M, Liška M (1994) Applications of numerical methods in molecular spectroscopy. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA
See the example of determination of phosphorus content in feed (according to ISO 6491:2000) at the ISO GUM Uncertainty examples website hosted by Testing Centre of University of Tartu http://www.ut.ee/katsekoda/GUM_ examples/
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grant 5800 from the Estonian Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sooväli, L., Rõõm, EI., Kütt, A. et al. Uncertainty sources in UV-Vis spectrophotometric measurement. Accred Qual Assur 11, 246–255 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-006-0124-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-006-0124-x