Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertainty sources in UV-Vis spectrophotometric measurement

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An overview is given of the most important uncertainty sources that affect analytical UV-Vis spectrophotometric measurements. Altogether, eight uncertainty sources are discussed that are expected to have influence in chemical analysis. It is demonstrated that the well-known intrinsic (or “physical”) sources of uncertainty that originate from the instrument itself (repeatability of spectrophotometer reading, spectrophotometer drift, stray light, etc.) often have significantly lower contributions to the combined uncertainty of the result than the “chemical” sources of uncertainty that originate from the object under study (interference from the constituents of the matrix, decomposition of the photometric complex, etc.). Although selectivity of a photometric procedure is often considered more a validation topic than an uncertainty topic, it is very often important to include it also in the uncertainty budget.

Usually the most difficult part of uncertainty estimation of a chemical measurement result is to evaluate the magnitude of the actual uncertainty components, especially the chemical ones. For most of the uncertainty sources discussed in this paper, approaches for their evaluation are given. A generic uncertainty budget for absorbance is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ellison S, Wegscheider W, Williams A (1997) Anal Chem 69:A607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (1993) ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  3. Eurachem/Citac guide (2000) Quantifying the uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2nd edn.

  4. ISO 6777 (1984) Water quality. Determination of nitrite. Molecular absorption spectrometric method. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  5. ISO 6491 (2000) Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of phosphorus content. Spectrometric method. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  6. ISO 7150/1-1984 Water quality. Determination of ammonium – Part 1: Manual spectrometric method. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  7. Meehan EJ (1981) In: Elving PJ, Meehan EJ, Kolthoff IM (eds) Treatise on analytical chemistry. Part I, vol 7. Optical methods of analysis. Wiley, New York, pp 53–157

  8. Skoog DA, Holler FJ, Nieman TA (1998) Principles of instrumental analysis, 5th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barwick VJ, Chrom JA (1999) Analyst 849:13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramachandran R, Rashmi (1999) Analyst 124:1099

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Drolc A, Roš M (2002) Acta Chim Slov 49:409

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Traks J, Sooväli L, Leito I (2005) Accred Qual Assur 10:197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. The Eurachem Measurement Uncertainty Web site: http://www.measurementuncertainty. org/

  14. ISO GUM Uncertainty examples Web site hosted by Testing Centre of University of Tartu http://www.ut.ee/katsekoda/GUM_ examples/

  15. Inczédy J, Lengyel T, Ure AM (1997) Compendium of analytical nomenclature. Definitive Rules, 3rd edn. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry

  16. Clare JF (2005) Accred Qual Assur 10:283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kostkowski HJ (1997) Reliable spectroradiometry. Spectroradiometry Consulting

  18. ISO (2004) International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology (VIM) 3rd edn, Draft, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  19. Burke RW, Mavrodineanu R (1983) Accuracy in analytical spectrophotometry. NBS Special Publication 260-81. NBS, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thompson M, Ellison SLR (2005) Accred Qual Assur 10:82

    Google Scholar 

  21. Massart DL, Kaufman L, Michotte Y, Deming SN, Vandeginste BG (1998) Chemometrics: A textbook, Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Van der Veen AMH, Pauwels J (2000) Accred Qual Assur 5:464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. The “GUM Workbench” package, available from Metrodata GmbH, http://www.metrodata.de/

  24. The discussion over different weighed regression methods is outside the scope of this paper. The dominating regression method in spectrophotometric analysis is the conventional linear regression.

  25. Charlot G (1961) Les Méthodes de la Chimie Analytique, quatriême édition, Masson et Cie (in French)

  26. Pelikan P, Čeppan M, Liška M (1994) Applications of numerical methods in molecular spectroscopy. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  27. See the example of determination of phosphorus content in feed (according to ISO 6491:2000) at the ISO GUM Uncertainty examples website hosted by Testing Centre of University of Tartu http://www.ut.ee/katsekoda/GUM_ examples/

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grant 5800 from the Estonian Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivo Leito.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sooväli, L., Rõõm, EI., Kütt, A. et al. Uncertainty sources in UV-Vis spectrophotometric measurement. Accred Qual Assur 11, 246–255 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-006-0124-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-006-0124-x

Keywords

Navigation